Environmental, Social and Governance Disclosures: A Call for Integrated Reporting in Nigeria
Journal of Finance and Accounting
Volume 3, Issue 6, November 2015, Pages: 227-233
Received: Nov. 27, 2015; Accepted: Dec. 8, 2015; Published: Dec. 25, 2015
Views 4083      Downloads 171
Authors
Adebimpe Otu Umoren, Department of Accounting, Faculty of Business Administration, University of Uyo, Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria
Ekubiat John Udo, Department of Accountancy, Akwa Ibom State Polytechnic, Ikot Osurua, Ikot Ekpene, Nigeria
Bokime Sunday George, Department of Accounting, Faculty of Business Administration, University of Uyo, Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria
Article Tools
Follow on us
Abstract
Annual reports of most companies quoted on the Nigerian Stock Exchange (NSE) have been found to be deficient, because they lack vital financial and non-financial information that would enable stakeholders make informed decisions. The aim of this study was to investigate the environmental, social and governance (ESG) practices of Nigerian quoted companies and discuss the need for integrated reporting (IR). A checklist was developed to capture the ESG disclosures from the annual reports of 40 companies listed on the Nigerian Stock Exchange over a two-year period from 2013 to 2014. The ESG determinants were proxied by company size, profitability and auditor type. Company size was measured by total assets, profitability was measured by return on equity (ROE), and auditor type was measured by a dummy variable, ‘1‘ for Big 4 and ’0‘ for otherwise. The data obtained were analysed using descriptive statistics, correlation and regression. The findings revealed that, the level of ESG disclosure was 53%, this was made up environmental scores (7%), social scores (66%) and governance scores (81%). This showed that governance information was the most disclosed while environmental information was the least disclosed. Findings also revealed that ESG disclosure practice was influenced by auditor type; but not by company size and profitability. The current trend of integrated reporting worldwide calls for Nigerian companies to be proactive. There is a need to improve on ESG practices by integrating the financial and ESG elements to generate a single integrated report, which allows both the company and its stakeholders to make better-informed decisions.
Keywords
Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Disclosures, Annual Reports, ESG Determinants, Integrated Reporting
To cite this article
Adebimpe Otu Umoren, Ekubiat John Udo, Bokime Sunday George, Environmental, Social and Governance Disclosures: A Call for Integrated Reporting in Nigeria, Journal of Finance and Accounting. Vol. 3, No. 6, 2015, pp. 227-233. doi: 10.11648/j.jfa.20150306.19
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
References
[1]
G. Terry, “Why corporate leaders need to embrace sustainability to ensure future profitability”. The South African Institute of Chartered Accountants: Kengray, South Africa. 2008.
[2]
R. Eccles and M. Krzus, One report: integrated reporting for a sustainable strategy. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. “Ethics” (2010). vol. 49, pp. 143–165.
[3]
M. Oladipupo, G. Mathias and A. Mohammed,. Integrated reporting: another crisis of external dependence or a model for sustainable capital allocation? European Journal of Globalization and Development Research, 2013, vol. 8 (1), pp. 492–506.
[4]
PwC Integrated reporting: the future of corporate reporting. Retrieved September 08, 2015 from http://pwc.de/integrated-reporting.html. 2012.
[5]
KPMG International survey of corporate responsibility reporting. KPMG International Cooperative, 2011.
[6]
L. Ho, and M. E. Taylor, “An empirical analysis of triple bottom line reporting and its determinants: Evidence from the United States and Japan. Journal of International Management and Accounting, 2007, vol. 18(2).
[7]
E. Eltaib, “Environmental accounting disclosures of Australian oil and gas companies”. Research Online University of Wollongong Thesis Collections; 2012, pp. 1-281.
[8]
W. Albassam, “Corporate governance, voluntary disclosure and financial performance: ban empirical analysis of Saudi listed firms using a mixed-methods research design”, PhD thesis. http://theses.gla.ac.uk/5280/2014.
[9]
C. K. Lindblom, “The implications of organizational legitimacy for corporate social performance and disclosure”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting Conference, New York, 1994.
[10]
M. C. Suchman, M. C, “Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches”. Academy of Management Journal, 1995, vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 571-610.
[11]
C. Deegan, M. Rankin, and P. Voght, Firms’ disclosure reactions to major social incidents: Australian evidence, Accounting Forum, 2000, vol. 24 (1), pp. 101-130.
[12]
R. Gray, R. Kouhy, and S. Lavers, “Corporate social and environmental reporting: a review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 1995, vol. 8 (2), pp. 47–77.
[13]
S. Williams, “Voluntary environmental and social accounting disclosure practice in the Asia-Pacific Region: an international empirical test of political economy theory”, The International Journal of Accounting, 1999, vol. 34, pp. 209-238.
[14]
C. Huang, and F. Kung, “Drivers of environmental disclosure and stakeholder expectation: evidence from Taiwan”, Journal of Business Ethics, 2010, vol. 96, pp. 435-451.
[15]
K. M, Hearit, “Mistakes were made’: organizations, apologia, and crises of social legitimacy”, Communication Studies, 1995, vol.46 (1-2), pp. 1-17. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/32/18/31557724.pdf.
[16]
V. Dorweiler, and M. Yakhou, “Environmental accounting: An essential component of business strategy”. Business Strategy and the Environment; 2004, vol.13, pp. 65-77.
[17]
Gray, R. H. (2000). The social accounting project and accounting, organisations and society: Privileging engagement, imaginings, new accountings and pragmatism over critique? Accounting, Organisations and Society, 27, 687-708.
[18]
OECD Principles of Corporate Governance, 2004, p. 11,
[19]
Lemke & Lin, Regulation of Investment Advisers, Thomson West, 2014, vol. 2, p. 158.
[20]
J. Echave and S. Bhati, “Determinants of social and environmental disclosures by Spanish Companies”. GSMI Third Annual International Business Conference, Michigan, USA: Global Strategic Management., 2010, pp. 55-68.
[21]
J. Prado-Lorenzo, M. I. Gallego-Alvarez, M. I. and M. Garcia-Sanchez, “Stakeholder engagement and corporate social responsibility reporting: the ownership structure effect”. Corporate Social-Responsibility and Environmental Management, 2009, vol. 16(2), p. 94.
[22]
N. Osazuwa, O. Francis, and F. Izedonmi, “Corporate attributes and environmental disclosures of Nigerian quoted firms: an empirical analysis”. Research Journal of Social Science & Management, 2013, vol. 3, (6), pp. 150-158.
[23]
E. Stammy, and K. Ely, “Corporate environmental disclosures about the effects of climate change”. Corporate Social-Responsibility and Environmental Management, 2008, vol. 15(6), pp. 338-352.
[24]
R. W. Roberts, “Determinant of corporate social responsibility disclosure: an application of stakeholder theory”. Accounting Organisations and Society, 1992, vol.17 (6), pp. 595-612.
[25]
A. Ali, C. Durtschi, B. Lev, and M. Trombley, M. “Changes in institutional ownership and subsequent earnings announcement abnormal returns”. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 2004, vol. 19, pp. 221–48.
[26]
S. Stanwick, and P. Stanwick,. Corporate social responsiveness: An empirical examination using the environment. International Journal of Commerce & Management, ABI/INFORM Global, 1998.
[27]
D. Hackston, and M. Milne, Some determinants of social and environmental disclosures in New Zealand companies. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 1996, vol. 9 (1), pp. 77–108.
[28]
H. Davey, “Measuring corporate environmental performance: The trade-offs of sustainability ratings”. Business Strategy and the Environment, 1982, vol. 19, pp. 245-260.
[29]
A. Ng, “Corporate social disclosure: a note on a test of agency theory”. British Accounting Review, 1985, vol. 23 (3), pp. 211–218.
[30]
E. Fama, and M. Jensen, “Separation of ownership and control”. Journal of Law and Economics, 1983, vol. 25, 301-325.
[31]
P. Gupta, and N. Nayar, “Information content of control deficiency disclosures under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act: An empirical investigation”. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 2007, Vol. 4(1), 3-24.
[32]
E. Ortas, I. Álvarez, and A. Garayar, “The environmental, social, governance, and financial performance effects on companies that adopt the United Nations global compact”. Journal Sustainability, 2015, vol. 7, pp. 1932-1956; doi: 10.3390/su7021932.
[33]
IIRC, Discussion paper on towards integrated reporting – communicating value in the 21st century, 2013, Retrieved September 08, 2015 from http://www.the iirc.org.html.
[34]
A. Peiró-Signes, M. Segarra-Oña, J. Mondéjar-Jiménez, and Vargas-Vargas, M. Influence of the environmental, social and corporate governance ratings on the economic performance of companies: an overview. International Journal of Environmental Research, 2013, vol. 7(1) pp. 105-112.
[35]
P. Crifo, V. Forget, and S. Teyssier, The price of environmental, social and governance practice disclosure: an experiment with professional private equity investors. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2015, 30, pp. 168–194.
ADDRESS
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
U.S.A.
Tel: (001)347-983-5186