International Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Analysis

| Peer-Reviewed |

Marine Biofouling Potential on Reverse Osmosis Desalination Membrane and Other Substrata Corresponding to in situ Microbial and Physicochemical Characterization of Seawater

Received: 18 September 2015    Accepted: 20 September 2015    Published: 30 November 2015
Views:       Downloads:

Share This Article

Abstract

In situ investigation was designed for following up the biofouling community formed on the different substrata representative of the desalination unit components including Teflon, Glass, Stainless steel and Reverse Osmosis desalination membrane (RO desalination membrane), submerged in the seawater of the Eastern Harbor, Alexandria, Egypt. The area of study was physico-chemically and microbially characterized along 84 days, the time of the experiment. Some physico-chemical parameters such as Temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen, salinity, and nutrients (ammonia, nitrite, nitrate, phosphate, and silicate) were estimated. For in situ microbial characterization of seawater, the total heterotrophic bacteria and total marine fungi, in addition to several bacterial groups were counted. Data indicated that the total count of heterotrophic bacteria increased linearly with time until it reached the peak after 42 days of submerging coupons (4x106 CFU/ml), then it decreased with the time until the end of submerging trail. The count of common pathogenic bacteria Staphylococcus sp., Vibrio sp. And Aeromonas sp. was in same trend but the counts of Staphylococcus sp. were more than of the others. On the other side, Salmonella/Shigella group was not detected in samples at all. The fecal indicator bacteria exhibited moderate counts, while the count of total marine fungi in the seawater samples showed low counts along the period of submerging coupons. Regarding the marine fouling, a total of 36 coupons were examined along 84 days of submerging in the seawater. Throughout the study 21 species of marine macro-fouling were recorded in addition to the very thin layer of blue-green algae. These belonged to different groups as follows: Macroalgae (2 species), Hydriods (1 species), Polychaets (5 species; 3 sedentarian and 2 errantias), Cirripeds (4 species), amphipods (4 species), Taniads (1 species), bryozoan (2 species), and tunicates (2 species). There are clear dominances by two sessile species. These are the polychaete (tube worm); Hydroideselegans and the barnacle; Balanusamphitrite. In average, they constituted about 50% and 29% of total fouling abundance, respectively. Across the different substrates, the average total abundance and biomass of the developing fouling community was comparable during different intervals of immersion except for the glass which showed the lowest values. Responsible factors for these variations are discussed.

DOI 10.11648/j.ijema.s.2015030501.16
Published in International Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Analysis (Volume 3, Issue 5-1, October 2015)

This article belongs to the Special Issue New Horizons in Environmental Science

Page(s) 38-50
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Marine Biofouling, Reverse Osmosis Membrane, in situ Characterization

References
[1] P.K. Abdul Azis, I. Al-Tisan and N. Sasikumar, “Biofouling potential and environmental factors of seawater at a desalination plant intake”. Desalination, (2001), 135 (1–3): 69–82.
[2] M. Wilf and C. Bartels, “Optimization of seawater RO systems design”. Desalination, (2005), 173:1–12.
[3] S.T. Hsu, K.T. Cheng and Chiou, J.S. “Seawater desalination by direct contact membrane distillation”. Desalination, (2002), 143, 3: 279–287.
[4] H.C. Flemming, and G. Schaule, “Biofouling on membranes–a microbiological approach”. Desalination, (1988), 70:95–119.
[5] H.C. Flemming, G. Schaule, T. Griebe, J. Schmitt and A. Tamachkiarowa, “Biofouling–the Achilles heel of membrane processes”. Desalination, (1997), 113:215–225.
[6] M. Zhang, S. Jiang, D. Tanuwidjaja, N. Voutchkov, E.M. V. Hoek, and B. Cai,“Composition and variability of biofouling organisms in seawater reverse osmosis desalination plants”. Applied and Environmental Microbiology Journal, (2011), 77(13): 4390–4398.
[7] H.C. Flemming, A. Tamachkiarowa, J. Klahre and J. Schmitt, “Monitoring of fouling and biofouling in technical systems”. Water Science Technology, (1998), 38:291–298.
[8] X. Jin, A. Jawor, S. Kim and E.M Hoek, “Effects of feed water temperature on separation performance and organic fouling of brackish water RO membranes”. Desalination, (2009), 239:346–359.
[9] J.S. Vrouwenvelder, J.C. Kruithof and M.C.M. Van Loosdrecht, “Integrated approach for biofouling control”. Water Science Technology, (2010), 62:2477–2490.
[10] S., Wang, G. Guillen and E.M.V. Hoek, “Direct observation of microbial adhesion to membranes”. Environmental Science Technology, (2005), 39:6461–6469.
[11] X. Jin, X.F. Huang and E.M.V Hoek, “Role of specific ion interactions in seawater RO membrane fouling by alginic acid”. Environmental Science Technology, (2009), 43:3580–3587.
[12] L.A. Bereschenko, G.H. Heilig, M.M. Nederlof, M.C. van Loosdrecht, A.J. Stams and G.J. Euverink, “Molecular characterization of the bacterial communities in the different compartments of a full-scale reverse-osmosis water purification plant”. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, (2008), 74:5297–5304.
[13] L.A., Bereschenko, A.J.M. Stams, G.J.W. Euverink and M.C.M. van Loosdrecht, “Biofilm formation on reverse osmosis membranes is initiated and dominated by Sphingomonasspp”. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, (2010), 76:2623–2632.
[14] D. Kim, S. Jung, J. Sohn, H. Kim and S. Lee, “Biocide application for controlling biofouling of SWRO membranes–an overview”. Desalination, (2009), 238:43–52.
[15] C.M. Pang and W.T. Liu, “Community structure analysis of reverse osmosis membrane biofilms and the significance of Rhizobiales bacteria in biofouling”. Environmental Science Technology, (2007), 41:4728–4734.
[16] V.T.C. Penna, S.A.M. Martins and P.G. Mazzola, “Identification of bacteria in drinking and purified water during the monitoring of a typical water purification system. BMC Public Health, (2002), 2:13-15.
[17] H.F. Ridgway, A., Kelly, C. Justice and B.H. Olson, “Microbial fouling of reverse osmosis membranes used in advanced wastewater-treatment technology: chemical, bacteriological, and ultrastructural analyses”. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, (1983), 45:1066–1084.
[18] C.E. Zobell, “Marine Microbiology”. Waltham, MA: Chronica Botanica. (1946), 240 pp.
[19] G.M. Abo-Elela, and A.M. Farag, “Bacteriological quality and metal contents of Diplodusvulgarus and Siganusrivulotus in the Eastern Harbour water: a comparative study of freshly harvested and market fish”. Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Research, (2004), 30(A): 216-225.
[20] T. Kobayashi, S. Enomato, R. Sakazaki and S. Kuwahara, “A new selective medium for pathogenic Vibrios. TCBS agar (modified Nakanishi's agar)”. Japanese Journal of Bacteriology, (1963), 18: 387-391.
[21] International Organization for Standardization (ISO 9308/1). (1990). Water quality-detection and enumeration of coliform organisms, thermotolerant coliform organisms and presumptive Escherichia coli. Part 1: Membrane filtration method, 10 pages, Geneva, Switzerland.
[22] International Organization for Standardization (ISO 7899/2). (1984). Water quality-detection and enumeration of faecal Streptococci. Part 2: Method by membrane filtration, 4 pages, Geneva, Switzerland.
[23] R.M. Atlas, “Handbook of media for environmental microbiology”. (1997), (p. 265, 412). Boca Raton, FL: CR Press.
[24] K. Grasshoff, “Methods of Seawater Analysis”. Verlage Chemie. Weinheim, New York, (1976), 317p.
[25] B. Austin, “The marine environment”. In: Marine Microbiology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (1988), (pp.1-11).
[26] G.M. Abo-Elela, “Studies on the settlement of marine bacteria and its response to some coatings on artificial substrata in Alexandria Eastern Harbour”. M.Sc. Faculty of Science, Alexandria University. (1994), 156 pp.
[27] J.D. Strickland and T.R. Parsons, “A Practical handbook of sea water analysis”. Canada Ottawa: (1972), 311 p.
[28] F. Koroleff, “Determination of ammonia as indophenol blue”. International Council for the Exploration of the sea (ICES), 8. (1969).
[29] A.A. Aleem, “Marine algae of Alexandria”. (1993). 138 pp., 55 plates. Egypt.
[30] S. Ruffo, “The amphipoda of the Meditranean, part 3 {Gammarildeaaridea, (Melphidippidae to Talitridae), Ingolfiellidea Caprellidea}”, Momoires de L’ Institut O’ceanographique, Monaco, (1993), 13: 577-813.
[31] R. Riedl, “Fauna und flora der Adria”. Verlag Paul Parey, Hamburg und Berlin. (1970), 702 pp.
[32] A.C. Campbell, “The Hamlyn guide to the flora and fauna of the Mediterranean Sea”. Hamlyn Publishing Group Limited, London. (1982), 320 pp.
[33] D. Bellan-Santini, G. Karaman, G. Krapp-Schickel, M. Ledoyer, S. Ruffo, “The Amphipoda of the Mediterranean”. Part III. Memoires de LʼInstitut Oceanographique, Monaco. (1993), pp. 577-813.
[34] L.Y. Dudley, and N.S.J. Christopher, “Practical experiences of biofouling in reverse osmosis systems”, (1999), p. 101–159. In C. W. Keevil, A. Godfree, D. Holt, and C. Dow (ed.), Biofilms in aquatic environment. Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
[35] P. Hugenholtz, B.M. Goebel and N.R. Pace, “Impact of culture independent studies on the emerging phylogenetic view of bacterial diversity”. Journal of Bacteriology, (1998), 180: 4765–4774.
[36] C.M. Pang and W-T. Liu, “Community structure analysis of reverse osmosis membrane biofilms and the significance of Rhizobiales bacteria in biofouling”. Environmental Science Technology,(2007), 41:4728–4734.
[37] M. Herzberg and M. Elimelech, “Biofouling of reverse osmosis membranes: role of biofilm-enhanced osmotic pressure”. Journal of Membrane Science, (2007), 295: 11–20.
[38] M. Herzberg and M. Elimelech, “Physiology and genetic traits of reverse osmosis membrane biofilms: a case study with Pseudomonas aeruginosa”. ISME Journal, (2008), 2: 180–194.
[39] W.R. Hamza, “Phytoplankton production in lake Manzalah”, Egypt. M.Sc. Thesis Faculty of Science, Alexandria University Egypt. (1985).
[40] J.M.C.N. Sieburth, “Observations on Bacteria planktonic in Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island”. A resume proceeding of the U.S. Japan Seminar on Marine microbiology. Bullten of Misaki, Marine Biology Institute, Kyoto University,(1968), 12: 49-64.
[41] R.B., Nessim, A.B., Tadros, M.A., Mohamed, M.M.A. Akel and A.E.A. Abou Taleb, “Water chemistry of Alexandria Eastern Harbor”. Global Journal of Environ. Science Toxicology, (2014), 1(2): 49 - 67.
[42] A.M. Abdel-Halim, and H.M. Khairy, “Potential impact of some abiotic parameters on a phytoplankton community in a confined bay of the Eastern Mediterranean Sea: Eastern Harbour of Alexandria, Egypt”. Mediterranean Marine Science, (2007), 8(2): 49-64.
[43] D. Dyrssen and M. Wedborg, “Major and minor elements, chemical speciation in estuarine waters”. In: E. Olausson and I. Cato. Chemistry and biogeochemistry of estuaries, John Wiley and Sons. Chichester, (1980), pp. 71-119.
[44] G. Grasshoff, “The hydrochemistry of land locked basins”. Fjords Chemical Oceanography, (1975), 2: 568-574.
[45] T.A. Aboul-Kassim, “Cycles of Carbon, Nitrogen and phosphorus in the marine environment in Alexandria region”. M.Sc. Thesis, Faculty of Science, Alexandria University, (1987), 223 pp.
[46] R. Ahmad and Z. Abdullah, “Salinity induced changes in the growth and chemical composition of potato”. Pakistan Journal of Botany, (1979), 11: 103-112.
[47] H.M. Faragallah, H.R.Z. Tadros and M.A. Okbah, “Nutrient salts and chlorophyll-a during short term scale in the Eastern Harbour, Alexandria (Egypt)”. Egyptian Journal Aquatic Research, (2009), 35(3): 243-250.
[48] H.M. Faragallah, “Sediment-water interface chemistry in the Eastern Harbour, Alexandria, Egypt”. MSc. Thesis, Faculty of Science, Alexandria University, (1995), 277p.
[49] F. Madkour, M. Dorgham and M. Fahmy, “Short term scale observations on phytoplankton in the Eastern Harbour of Alexandria, Egypt”. Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Research, (2007), 33(1): 193-209.
[50] F.A. Zaghloul, “Plankton production and composition in the Nile water between Edfina and Rashid in relation to environmental conditions”. M.Sc. Thesis. Faculty of Science, Alexandria University, (1976), pp. 273.
[51] M. Meybeck, G. Cauwet, S. Dessery, M. Somville, D. Gouleau and G. Billen, “Nutrients (organic C, P, N, Si) in the eutrophic river Loire (France) and its Estuary”. Eastern Coastal Shelf Science, (1988), 27: 595-624.
[52] M.A. Fahmy, A.I. Beltagi and M.M. Abbas, “Nutrient salts and Chlorophyll-a in the Egyptian Mediterranean coastal waters”. MEDCAST 99- EMECS99 Joint conferences, Land-Ocean Interactions: Managing coastal Ecosystems, 9-13 November, Antalya, Turkey. (1999).
[53] G. Chiaudani and M. Vighi, “Metodologia standard disaggioalgare per 10 studio dellaacque marine quaderni dell Institute di Ricerca Sulleacque, (1978),pp. 39: 120.
[54] J.D. Zardus, B.T. Nedved, Y. Huang, C. Tran and M.G. Hadfield, “Microbial biofilms facilitate adhesion in biofouling invertebrates”. Biology Bullten, (2008), 214: 91-98.
[55] R.L. Fletcher and M.E. Callow, “The settlement, attachment and establishment of marine algal spores”. British Phycological Journal, (1992), 27: 303-329.
[56] T.M. Glasby, “Surface composition and orientation interact to affect subtidalepibiota”. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, (2000), 248: 177-190.
[57] M. Failmali, F. Garaventa, A. Terlizzi, M. Chiantore, and R. Cattaneo-Vietti, “The interplay of substratum nature and biofilm formation in regulating Balanus Amphitrite Darwin, 1854 larval settlement”. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, (2004), 306: 37-50.
[58] C.J. Brown, “Epifaunal colonization of the Loch Linnhe artificial reef”. Biofouling, (2005), 21: 73-85.
[59] A.F.A. Ghobashy, and M.M. El-Komi, “Fouling in the southern region of the Suez Canal”. Hydrobiological Bulletin, (1981), 14(3): 179-185.
[60] S.E. Ramadan, “Ecological and systematic studies on the marine fouling of the northern part of the Suez Canal”. Ph.D. thesis, Mansoura Univ., Egypt, (1986), 428 pp.
[61] M.M. El-Komi, “Incidence and Ecology of marine fouling organisms in the Eastern Harbour of Alexandria, Egypt”. Bulletin of National Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries (Egypt), (1991), 17 (1): 1-16.
[62] J.H. Connell, and R.O. Slatyer, “mechanisms of succession in natural communities and their role in community stability and organization”. The American Naturalist, (1977). 111(1982): 1119-1144.
[63] W.A. Haswell, “On some new Australian tubicolous annelids”. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales, (1883), 7: 633-638.
[64] H.A. ten Hove, “Notes on Hydroideselegans (Haswell, 1883) and Mercierella enigmatic Fauvel, 1923, alien serpulidpolychaetes introduced to the Netherlands”. Bullten Zoology Museum University Amsterdam, (1974), 4(6): 45-51.
[65] R.C. DeFelice, L.G. Eldredge and J.T. Carlton, “Nonindigenous marine invertebrates. Contribution No. 2001-005 to the Hawaii biological survey. Bishop Museum, Hawaii Biological Survey, Bishop Museum Technical Report No. 21. (2001).
[66] K. Simkiss and K.M., Wilbur, “Biomineralization: Cell Biology and Mineral Deposition”. Academic Press, San Diego. (1989).
[67] H.A. Lowenstam, “Minerals formed by organisms. Science, (1981), 211: 1126–1131.
[68] F.H. Wilt, C.E. Killian, B.T. Livingston, “Development of calcareous skeletal elements in invertebrates”. Differentiation, (2003), 71: 237-250.
[69] V.B.S. Chan, V. Thiyagarajan, X.W. Lu, T. Zhang, K. Shih, “Temperature dependent effects of elevated CO2 on shell composition and mechanical properties of Hydroideselegans: insights from a multiple stressor experiment”. PLoS ONE (2013), 8(11): e78945. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078945.
[70] M.J. Anderson and A.J. Underwood, “Effects of substratum on the recruitment and development of an intertidal estuarine fouling assemblage”. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, (1994), 184: 217-236.
[71] K.A. McGuinness and A.J. Underwood,. “Habitat structure and the nature of communities on intertidal boulders”. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology Ecology, (1986), 104: 97-123.
[72] K.A. McGuinness, “Effects of some natural and artificial substrata on and primary fouling films on Bryozoan settlement”. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology Ecology, (1989), 54(2): 167-179.
[73] B. Bendinger, H.H.M. Rijnaaris, K. Altendorf, A.J.B. Zehnder, “Physicochemical cell surface and adhesive properties of coryneform bacteria related to the presence and chain length of mycolic acids”. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, (1993), 59: 3973-3977.
[74] P.-Y. Qian, V. Thiyagarajan, S.C.K. Lau and S.C.K. Cheung, “Relationship between bacterial community profile in biofilm and attachment of the acorn barnacle Balanus Amphitrite”. Aquatic Microbial Ecology, (2003), 33:225–237.
Author Information
  • Marine Biota Taxonomy Laboratory, National Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries, Alexandria, Egypt

  • Marine Chemistry Laboratory, National Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries, Alexandria, Egypt

  • Microbiology Laboratory, National Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries, Alexandria, Egypt

  • Environmental Studies Devision, Institute of Graduate Studies and Research, Alexandria, Egypt

  • Environmental Studies Devision, Institute of Graduate Studies and Research, Alexandria, Egypt

Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Khaled Mahmoud Abdelsalam, Dalia El Sayed Abd El-Khalek, Hassan A. H. Ibrahim, Sahar Hassan Ibrahem, Ahmed Morsi Attia. (2015). Marine Biofouling Potential on Reverse Osmosis Desalination Membrane and Other Substrata Corresponding to in situ Microbial and Physicochemical Characterization of Seawater. International Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Analysis, 3(5-1), 38-50. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijema.s.2015030501.16

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Khaled Mahmoud Abdelsalam; Dalia El Sayed Abd El-Khalek; Hassan A. H. Ibrahim; Sahar Hassan Ibrahem; Ahmed Morsi Attia. Marine Biofouling Potential on Reverse Osmosis Desalination Membrane and Other Substrata Corresponding to in situ Microbial and Physicochemical Characterization of Seawater. Int. J. Environ. Monit. Anal. 2015, 3(5-1), 38-50. doi: 10.11648/j.ijema.s.2015030501.16

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Khaled Mahmoud Abdelsalam, Dalia El Sayed Abd El-Khalek, Hassan A. H. Ibrahim, Sahar Hassan Ibrahem, Ahmed Morsi Attia. Marine Biofouling Potential on Reverse Osmosis Desalination Membrane and Other Substrata Corresponding to in situ Microbial and Physicochemical Characterization of Seawater. Int J Environ Monit Anal. 2015;3(5-1):38-50. doi: 10.11648/j.ijema.s.2015030501.16

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijema.s.2015030501.16,
      author = {Khaled Mahmoud Abdelsalam and Dalia El Sayed Abd El-Khalek and Hassan A. H. Ibrahim and Sahar Hassan Ibrahem and Ahmed Morsi Attia},
      title = {Marine Biofouling Potential on Reverse Osmosis Desalination Membrane and Other Substrata Corresponding to in situ Microbial and Physicochemical Characterization of Seawater},
      journal = {International Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Analysis},
      volume = {3},
      number = {5-1},
      pages = {38-50},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijema.s.2015030501.16},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijema.s.2015030501.16},
      eprint = {https://download.sciencepg.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijema.s.2015030501.16},
      abstract = {In situ investigation was designed for following up the biofouling community formed on the different substrata representative of the desalination unit components including Teflon, Glass, Stainless steel and Reverse Osmosis desalination membrane (RO desalination membrane), submerged in the seawater of the Eastern Harbor, Alexandria, Egypt. The area of study was physico-chemically and microbially characterized along 84 days, the time of the experiment. Some physico-chemical parameters such as Temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen, salinity, and nutrients (ammonia, nitrite, nitrate, phosphate, and silicate) were estimated. For in situ microbial characterization of seawater, the total heterotrophic bacteria and total marine fungi, in addition to several bacterial groups were counted. Data indicated that the total count of heterotrophic bacteria increased linearly with time until it reached the peak after 42 days of submerging coupons (4x106 CFU/ml), then it decreased with the time until the end of submerging trail. The count of common pathogenic bacteria Staphylococcus sp., Vibrio sp. And Aeromonas sp. was in same trend but the counts of Staphylococcus sp. were more than of the others. On the other side, Salmonella/Shigella group was not detected in samples at all. The fecal indicator bacteria exhibited moderate counts, while the count of total marine fungi in the seawater samples showed low counts along the period of submerging coupons. Regarding the marine fouling, a total of 36 coupons were examined along 84 days of submerging in the seawater. Throughout the study 21 species of marine macro-fouling were recorded in addition to the very thin layer of blue-green algae. These belonged to different groups as follows: Macroalgae (2 species), Hydriods (1 species), Polychaets (5 species; 3 sedentarian and 2 errantias), Cirripeds (4 species), amphipods (4 species), Taniads (1 species), bryozoan (2 species), and tunicates (2 species). There are clear dominances by two sessile species. These are the polychaete (tube worm); Hydroideselegans and the barnacle; Balanusamphitrite. In average, they constituted about 50% and 29% of total fouling abundance, respectively. Across the different substrates, the average total abundance and biomass of the developing fouling community was comparable during different intervals of immersion except for the glass which showed the lowest values. Responsible factors for these variations are discussed.},
     year = {2015}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Marine Biofouling Potential on Reverse Osmosis Desalination Membrane and Other Substrata Corresponding to in situ Microbial and Physicochemical Characterization of Seawater
    AU  - Khaled Mahmoud Abdelsalam
    AU  - Dalia El Sayed Abd El-Khalek
    AU  - Hassan A. H. Ibrahim
    AU  - Sahar Hassan Ibrahem
    AU  - Ahmed Morsi Attia
    Y1  - 2015/11/30
    PY  - 2015
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijema.s.2015030501.16
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijema.s.2015030501.16
    T2  - International Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Analysis
    JF  - International Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Analysis
    JO  - International Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Analysis
    SP  - 38
    EP  - 50
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2328-7667
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijema.s.2015030501.16
    AB  - In situ investigation was designed for following up the biofouling community formed on the different substrata representative of the desalination unit components including Teflon, Glass, Stainless steel and Reverse Osmosis desalination membrane (RO desalination membrane), submerged in the seawater of the Eastern Harbor, Alexandria, Egypt. The area of study was physico-chemically and microbially characterized along 84 days, the time of the experiment. Some physico-chemical parameters such as Temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen, salinity, and nutrients (ammonia, nitrite, nitrate, phosphate, and silicate) were estimated. For in situ microbial characterization of seawater, the total heterotrophic bacteria and total marine fungi, in addition to several bacterial groups were counted. Data indicated that the total count of heterotrophic bacteria increased linearly with time until it reached the peak after 42 days of submerging coupons (4x106 CFU/ml), then it decreased with the time until the end of submerging trail. The count of common pathogenic bacteria Staphylococcus sp., Vibrio sp. And Aeromonas sp. was in same trend but the counts of Staphylococcus sp. were more than of the others. On the other side, Salmonella/Shigella group was not detected in samples at all. The fecal indicator bacteria exhibited moderate counts, while the count of total marine fungi in the seawater samples showed low counts along the period of submerging coupons. Regarding the marine fouling, a total of 36 coupons were examined along 84 days of submerging in the seawater. Throughout the study 21 species of marine macro-fouling were recorded in addition to the very thin layer of blue-green algae. These belonged to different groups as follows: Macroalgae (2 species), Hydriods (1 species), Polychaets (5 species; 3 sedentarian and 2 errantias), Cirripeds (4 species), amphipods (4 species), Taniads (1 species), bryozoan (2 species), and tunicates (2 species). There are clear dominances by two sessile species. These are the polychaete (tube worm); Hydroideselegans and the barnacle; Balanusamphitrite. In average, they constituted about 50% and 29% of total fouling abundance, respectively. Across the different substrates, the average total abundance and biomass of the developing fouling community was comparable during different intervals of immersion except for the glass which showed the lowest values. Responsible factors for these variations are discussed.
    VL  - 3
    IS  - 5-1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

  • Sections