Assessment of Radiation Exposure of Head and Neck during Panoramic Radiography in Different Age Groups

Ehsan Moudi; Sina Haghanifar; Hoora Hadian; Ali Shabestani Monfared; Gholamreza Deilam; Nika Bahemmat

doi:doi:10.11648/j.sjcm.20140301.13

| Peer-Reviewed

Assessment of Radiation Exposure of Head and Neck during Panoramic Radiography in Different Age Groups

Ehsan Moudi, Sina Haghanifar, Hoora Hadian, Ali Shabestani Monfared, Gholamreza Deilam, Nika Bahemmat

Published in Science Journal of Clinical Medicine (Volume 3, Issue 1)

Received: 3 January 2014 Accepted: Published: 20 February 2014

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Background and aim: Panoramic imaging is one of the most commonly used imaging techniques in dentistry. Being able to accurately assess the radiation dose patients receive during procedures is a crucial step in the management of dose. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the head and neck skin absorbed dose during panoramic radiography in different age groups with panoramic machine of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology section of Babol school of dentistry. Materials and methods: 273 thermoluminescent dosemeters (TLDs) (100 LiF: Mg, Ti , harshaw, USA) were used.90 samples were selected from the patients who referred to the Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology section of Babol school of dentistry for panoramic radiography. .Samples divided in 3 age_ group: 4_ 10 years, 10_40 years and above 40 years . TLDs were calibrated in dosimetry laboratory, National Radiation Protection Department. Thermoluminescent signal was read out with a Harshaw 4500 (Harshaw, Bicron USA) reader. Mean and standard deviation was determined by SPSS10 software and ANOVA statistic analysis. Results: Mean ± SD of skin absorbed dose of head and neck for 90 patients was 0.47± 0.09mGy. Conclusions: Since Diagnostic Reference level (DRL) of panoramic imaging is unknown in Iran, there is no possibility to compare the current results with DRL. However, This study conclude that decrease of radiation dose seems to be achievable with lower exposure condition with the panoramic unit.

Published in	Science Journal of Clinical Medicine (Volume 3, Issue 1)
DOI	10.11648/j.sjcm.20140301.13
Page(s)	10-14
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Radiography, Panoramic, Thermoluminescent Dosimetry, Thyroid Gland, Parotid Gland

References

[1]	Ribeiro DA. Cytogenetic biomonitoring in oral mucosa cells following dental X-ray. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2012 Mar;41(3):181-4.
[2]	Batista WO, Navarro MV, Maia AF.Effective doses in panoramic images from conventional and CBCT equipment.Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2012;151(1):67-75. Epub 2011 Dec 14.
[3]	Williams JR, Montgomery A.Measurement of dose in panoramic dental radiology.Br J Radiol. 2000 Sep;73(873):1002-6.
[4]	Zhang Y, Li X, Segars WP, Samei E. Organ doses, effective doses, and risk indices in adult CT: comparison of four types of reference phantoms across different examination protocols. Med Phys. 2012 Jun;39(6):3404-23.
[5]	Ludlow JB. Comment on "Effective dose range for dental cone beam computed tomography scanners".Eur J Radiol. 2012 Dec;81(12):4219-20.
[6]	S.M.J. Mortazavi , M. Ghiassi-Nejad , M. Bakhshi , M. Jafari-Zadeh , A. Kavousi , J. Ahmadi , et al. Entrance Surface Dose Measurement on the thyroid gland in orthopantomography: The need for optimization. Iranian Journal of Radiation Research. 2004; 2 (1) :21-26.
[7]	[No authors listed]Radiological protection and safety in medicine. A report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.Ann ICRP. 1996;26(2):1-47.
[8]	[No authors listed]Diagnostic reference levels in medical imaging: review and additional advice. Ann ICRP. 2001;31(4):33-52
[9]	Asadinezhad M, Bahreyni Toossi MT. Doses to patients in some routine diagnostic X-ray examinations in Iran: proposed the first Iranian diagnostic reference levels. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2008;132(4):409-14. Doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncn308. Epub 2008 Dec 23.
[10]	Toosi MT, Asadinezhad M. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. Local diagnostic reference levels for some common diagnostic X-ray examinations in Tehran county of Iran.2007;124(2):137-44. Epub 2007 May 10.
[11]	Faghihi R, Mehdizadeh S, Sina S, Alizadeh FN, Zeinali B, Kamyab GR, Aghevlian S, Khorramdel H, Namazi I, Heirani M, Moshkriz M, MahaniH, SharifzadehM. Radiation dose to neonates undergoing X-ray imaging in special care baby units in Iran.Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2012 Jun;150(1):55-9. Doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncr373. Epub 2011 Nov 28.
[12]	White SC, Pharoah MJ. Oral radiology : principles and interpretation. 6th ed. New Delhi : Mosby, 2009 :31.87.
[13]	Gijbels F, Jacobs R, Bogaerts R, Debaveye D, Verlinden S, Sanderink G. Dosimetry of digital panoramic imaging. Part I: Patient exposure. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2005 May;34(3):145-9.
[14]	Doyle P, Martin CJ, Robertson J.Techniques for measurement of dose width product in panoramic dental radiography.Br J Radiol. 2006 Feb;79(938):142-7.
[15]	Garcia Silva MA, Wolf U, Heinicke F, Gründler K, Visser H, Hirsch E. Effective dosages for recording Veraviewepocs dental panoramic images: analog film, digital, and panoramic scout for CBCT. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008 Oct;106(4):571-7. Epub 2008 Jul 7.
[16]	Lorenzoni DC, Bolognese AM, Garib DG, Guedes FR, Sant'anna EF.Cone-beam computed tomography and radiographs in dentistry: aspects related to radiation dose. Int J Dent. 2012;2012:813768. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
[17]	Gavala S, Donta C, Tsiklakis K, Boziari A, Kamenopoulou V, Stamatakis HC.Radiation dose reduction in direct digital panoramic radiography. Eur J Radiol. 2009 Jul;71(1):42-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.03.018. Epub 2008 May 2.
[18]	[Article in Japanese]Matsuo A, Okano T, Gotoh K, Yokoi M, Hirukawa A, Okumura S, Koyama S. [Absorbed dose and the effective dose of panoramic temporo mandibular joint radiography]. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2011;67(10):1275-83.
[19]	Grünheid T, Kolbeck Schieck JR, Pliska BT, Ahmad M, Larson BE. Dosimetry of a cone-beam computed tomography machine compared with a digital x-ray machine in orthodontic imaging. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012 Apr;141(4):436-43.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Ehsan Moudi, Sina Haghanifar, Hoora Hadian, Ali Shabestani Monfared, Gholamreza Deilam, et al. (2014). Assessment of Radiation Exposure of Head and Neck during Panoramic Radiography in Different Age Groups. Science Journal of Clinical Medicine, 3(1), 10-14. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjcm.20140301.13

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Ehsan Moudi; Sina Haghanifar; Hoora Hadian; Ali Shabestani Monfared; Gholamreza Deilam, et al. Assessment of Radiation Exposure of Head and Neck during Panoramic Radiography in Different Age Groups. Sci. J. Clin. Med. 2014, 3(1), 10-14. doi: 10.11648/j.sjcm.20140301.13

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Ehsan Moudi, Sina Haghanifar, Hoora Hadian, Ali Shabestani Monfared, Gholamreza Deilam, et al. Assessment of Radiation Exposure of Head and Neck during Panoramic Radiography in Different Age Groups. Sci J Clin Med. 2014;3(1):10-14. doi: 10.11648/j.sjcm.20140301.13

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.sjcm.20140301.13,
  author = {Ehsan Moudi and Sina Haghanifar and Hoora Hadian and Ali Shabestani Monfared and Gholamreza Deilam and Nika Bahemmat},
  title = {Assessment of Radiation Exposure of Head and Neck during Panoramic Radiography in Different Age Groups},
  journal = {Science Journal of Clinical Medicine},
  volume = {3},
  number = {1},
  pages = {10-14},
  doi = {10.11648/j.sjcm.20140301.13},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjcm.20140301.13},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sjcm.20140301.13},
  abstract = {Background and aim: Panoramic imaging is one of the most commonly used imaging techniques in dentistry. Being able to accurately assess the radiation dose patients receive during procedures is a crucial step in the management of dose. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the head and neck skin absorbed dose during panoramic radiography in different age groups with panoramic machine of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology section of Babol school of dentistry. Materials and methods: 273 thermoluminescent dosemeters (TLDs) (100 LiF: Mg, Ti , harshaw, USA) were used.90 samples were selected from the patients who referred to the Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology section of Babol school of dentistry for panoramic radiography. .Samples divided in 3 age_ group: 4_ 10 years, 10_40 years and above 40 years . TLDs were calibrated in dosimetry laboratory, National Radiation Protection Department. Thermoluminescent signal was read out with a Harshaw 4500 (Harshaw, Bicron USA) reader. Mean and standard deviation was determined by SPSS10 software and ANOVA statistic analysis. Results: Mean ± SD of skin absorbed dose of head and neck for 90 patients was 0.47± 0.09mGy. Conclusions: Since Diagnostic Reference level (DRL) of panoramic imaging is unknown in Iran, there is no possibility to compare the current results with DRL. However, This study conclude that decrease of radiation dose seems to be achievable with lower exposure condition with the panoramic unit.},
 year = {2014}
}

Copy | Download

TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessment of Radiation Exposure of Head and Neck during Panoramic Radiography in Different Age Groups
AU - Ehsan Moudi
AU - Sina Haghanifar
AU - Hoora Hadian
AU - Ali Shabestani Monfared
AU - Gholamreza Deilam
AU - Nika Bahemmat
Y1 - 2014/02/20
PY - 2014
N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjcm.20140301.13
DO - 10.11648/j.sjcm.20140301.13
T2 - Science Journal of Clinical Medicine
JF - Science Journal of Clinical Medicine
JO - Science Journal of Clinical Medicine
SP - 10
EP - 14
PB - Science Publishing Group
SN - 2327-2732
UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjcm.20140301.13
AB - Background and aim: Panoramic imaging is one of the most commonly used imaging techniques in dentistry. Being able to accurately assess the radiation dose patients receive during procedures is a crucial step in the management of dose. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the head and neck skin absorbed dose during panoramic radiography in different age groups with panoramic machine of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology section of Babol school of dentistry. Materials and methods: 273 thermoluminescent dosemeters (TLDs) (100 LiF: Mg, Ti , harshaw, USA) were used.90 samples were selected from the patients who referred to the Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology section of Babol school of dentistry for panoramic radiography. .Samples divided in 3 age_ group: 4_ 10 years, 10_40 years and above 40 years . TLDs were calibrated in dosimetry laboratory, National Radiation Protection Department. Thermoluminescent signal was read out with a Harshaw 4500 (Harshaw, Bicron USA) reader. Mean and standard deviation was determined by SPSS10 software and ANOVA statistic analysis. Results: Mean ± SD of skin absorbed dose of head and neck for 90 patients was 0.47± 0.09mGy. Conclusions: Since Diagnostic Reference level (DRL) of panoramic imaging is unknown in Iran, there is no possibility to compare the current results with DRL. However, This study conclude that decrease of radiation dose seems to be achievable with lower exposure condition with the panoramic unit.
VL - 3
IS - 1
ER -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Ehsan Moudi

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran
Sina Haghanifar

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran
Hoora Hadian

Post Graduate Student of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Ali Shabestani Monfared

Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Babol University of Medical Science
Gholamreza Deilam

Private Dentist, Babol, Iran
Nika Bahemmat

Post Graduate Student of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Ehsan Moudi, Sina Haghanifar, Hoora Hadian, Ali Shabestani Monfared, Gholamreza Deilam, et al. (2014). Assessment of Radiation Exposure of Head and Neck during Panoramic Radiography in Different Age Groups. Science Journal of Clinical Medicine, 3(1), 10-14. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjcm.20140301.13

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Ehsan Moudi; Sina Haghanifar; Hoora Hadian; Ali Shabestani Monfared; Gholamreza Deilam, et al. Assessment of Radiation Exposure of Head and Neck during Panoramic Radiography in Different Age Groups. Sci. J. Clin. Med. 2014, 3(1), 10-14. doi: 10.11648/j.sjcm.20140301.13

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Ehsan Moudi, Sina Haghanifar, Hoora Hadian, Ali Shabestani Monfared, Gholamreza Deilam, et al. Assessment of Radiation Exposure of Head and Neck during Panoramic Radiography in Different Age Groups. Sci J Clin Med. 2014;3(1):10-14. doi: 10.11648/j.sjcm.20140301.13

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.sjcm.20140301.13,
  author = {Ehsan Moudi and Sina Haghanifar and Hoora Hadian and Ali Shabestani Monfared and Gholamreza Deilam and Nika Bahemmat},
  title = {Assessment of Radiation Exposure of Head and Neck during Panoramic Radiography in Different Age Groups},
  journal = {Science Journal of Clinical Medicine},
  volume = {3},
  number = {1},
  pages = {10-14},
  doi = {10.11648/j.sjcm.20140301.13},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjcm.20140301.13},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sjcm.20140301.13},
  abstract = {Background and aim: Panoramic imaging is one of the most commonly used imaging techniques in dentistry. Being able to accurately assess the radiation dose patients receive during procedures is a crucial step in the management of dose. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the head and neck skin absorbed dose during panoramic radiography in different age groups with panoramic machine of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology section of Babol school of dentistry. Materials and methods: 273 thermoluminescent dosemeters (TLDs) (100 LiF: Mg, Ti , harshaw, USA) were used.90 samples were selected from the patients who referred to the Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology section of Babol school of dentistry for panoramic radiography. .Samples divided in 3 age_ group: 4_ 10 years, 10_40 years and above 40 years . TLDs were calibrated in dosimetry laboratory, National Radiation Protection Department. Thermoluminescent signal was read out with a Harshaw 4500 (Harshaw, Bicron USA) reader. Mean and standard deviation was determined by SPSS10 software and ANOVA statistic analysis. Results: Mean ± SD of skin absorbed dose of head and neck for 90 patients was 0.47± 0.09mGy. Conclusions: Since Diagnostic Reference level (DRL) of panoramic imaging is unknown in Iran, there is no possibility to compare the current results with DRL. However, This study conclude that decrease of radiation dose seems to be achievable with lower exposure condition with the panoramic unit.},
 year = {2014}
}

Copy | Download