Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Placental Thickness in Normal Singleton Pregnancies for Estimation of Gestation Age
International Journal of Medical Imaging
Volume 3, Issue 6, November 2015, Pages: 143-147
Received: Nov. 28, 2015;
Accepted: Dec. 6, 2015;
Published: Dec. 25, 2015
Views 5280 Downloads 200
Ridhi Adhikari, Department of Radiodiagnosis, College of Medical Sciences & Teaching Hospital, Bharatpur, Nepal
Pravin Kumar Deka, Department of Radiodiagnosis, College of Medical Sciences & Teaching Hospital, Bharatpur, Nepal
Ashok Tayal, Department of Radiodiagnosis, College of Medical Sciences & Teaching Hospital, Bharatpur, Nepal
Pramod Kumar Chettri, Department of Radiodiagnosis, College of Medical Sciences & Teaching Hospital, Bharatpur, Nepal
Follow on us
Background: Use of ultrasonography is the most effective method to estimate the gestational age. Placental thickness can be used as a new parameter to estimate the gestational age of the fetus and to assess the growth pattern of the placenta with advancing gestational age. Methods: This was a prospective cross sectional study consisting 150 normal antenatal women who were assessed clinically at the Department of Obstetrics and Gyaenocology and referred to the Department of Radiology, College of Medical Sciences, Bharatpur for ultrasonography. Antenatal women of all gestational ages from 11 weeks to 40 weeks of gestation with normal singleton pregnancies were included in the study. Placental thickness value, in mm, was calculated by averaging the three best measurements for each case. Relationship of placental thickness (in mm), measured at the level of insertion of umbilical cord with advancing gestational age in weeks was studied. Correlation of mean placental thickness with gestational age from 11 weeks to 40 weeks was calculated. Results: It was observed that the placental thickness gradually increased from approximately 11 mm at 11 weeks to 38.33 mm at 40 weeks of gestation. From 11 to 34 weeks of gestation, the placental thickness (in mm) almost matched the gestational age in weeks, thereafter from 35 to 40 weeks; the placental thickness was lower by 1 to 2 mm. Conclusion: The relationship between the placental thickness and gestational age was linear and direct. Placental thickness (in mm) measurement can be an important additional parameter for estimating gestational age along with other parameters especially from 11 to 34 weeks of gestation.
Gestational Age, Placenta, Ultrasonography, Umbilical Cord
To cite this article
Pravin Kumar Deka,
Pramod Kumar Chettri,
Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Placental Thickness in Normal Singleton Pregnancies for Estimation of Gestation Age, International Journal of Medical Imaging.
Vol. 3, No. 6,
2015, pp. 143-147.
Copyright © 2015 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Kobayashi M, Hellman LM, Fillisti L. Placental localization by ultrasound. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1970; 106: 279-85.
Gottesfield KR, Thompson HE, Holmes JH, Taylor ES. Ultrasonic placentography – a new method of placental localization. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1966; 96: 538-47.
Jauniaux E. Placental ultrasonographic measurements: What can we learn and is it worth doing routinely? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1992; 2: 241-2.
Mital P, Hooja N, Mehndiratta K. Placental thickness: a sonographic parameter for estimating gestational age of the fetus. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2002; 12: 553-4.
Jain A, Kumar G, Agarwal U, Kharakwal S. Placental thickness –a sonographic indicator of gestational age. J Obstet Gynaecol Ind. 2001; 51: 48-9.
Tanawattancharoen S, Manotaya S, Uerpairojkit B. Ultrasound measurement of placental thickness in normal singleton pregnancy. Thai J Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 10: 73-8.
Hadlock FP, Deter RL, Harrist RB, Park SK. Estimating foetal age: computer-assisted analysis of multiple foetal growth parameters. Radiology. 1984; 152: 497-501.
Nagwani M, Sharma PK, Singh U, Rani A, Mehrotra S. Ultrasonographic measurement of placental thickness and its correlation with gestational age – a cross-sectional ultrasonographic study. International Journal of Advanced Research. 2014; 2: 354-360.
Baghel P, Bahel V, Paramhans R, Sachdev P, Onkar S. Correlation of placental thickness estimated by ultrasonography with gestational age and fetal outcome. Indian Journal of Neonatal Medicine and Research. 2015; 3: 19-24.
Nyberg DA, Finberg HJ. The placenta, placental membranes and umbilical cord. In: Newburgh DA, Mahony BS, Pretorius DH, editors. Diagnostic ultrasound of foetal anomalies. St. Louis: Mosby year book publishers; 1990. p. 623-75.
Karthikeyan T, Subramaniam RK, Johnson W, Prabhu K. Placenatal thickness and its correlation to gestational age and foetal growth parameters- a cross sectional ultrasonographic study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2012; 6: 1732-5.
Benson CB, Doubilet PM. Foetal measurements: normal and abnormal foetal growth. In: Rumak CM, Wilson SR, Charboneau JW, Levine D, editors. Diagnostic ultrasound, 4th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2011. p. 1455-71.
Shepard MJ, Richards VA, Berkowitz RL, Warsof SL, Hobbins JC. An evaluation of two equations for predicting foetal weight by ultrasound. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982; 142: 47-54.
Wolf H, Oosting H, Treffers PE. A longitudinal study of relationship between placental and foetal growth as measured by ultrasonography. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989; 161: 1140-5.