| Peer-Reviewed

Does Decision-Making during Gambling Involve Primary Roles for the Pre-Frontal Cortex and Anterior Cingulate Cortex

Received: 6 August 2014    Accepted: 22 August 2014    Published: 30 August 2014
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have implicated multiple brain regions as being involved in the complex process of decision-making, including gambling. While decision-making is a key aspect of everyday life, the consequences of poor decision-making can be greatly magnified during gambling. Thus, it is useful to review current evidence regarding the brain regions involved in gambling. To date, there have been three tasks that have been frequently used to examine the paradigm of decision-making during gambling: the Iowa Gambling Task, the Game of Dice Task, and the Wisconsin Card Sorting Task. There are four brain regions that are most consistently involved, the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC), orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC), and anterior cingulate cortex. Interestingly, we have recently found that disobedience to an authority figure in a gambling task also involves activation in the amygdala, ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (vlPFC) and anterior insula. Taken together, we propose that decision-making in the context of gambling is primarily determined in the pre-frontal cortex (PFC) and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC). While multiple other brain regions are likely involved, the primacy of the PFC and ACC in decision-making during gambling behaviours should be more fully recognized.

Published in International Journal of Medical Imaging (Volume 2, Issue 5)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijmi.20140205.11
Page(s) 96-104
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

fMRI, Gambling, Pre-Frontal Cortex, Anterior Cingulate Cortex

References
[1] Cavedini P, Riboldi G, Keller R, D’Annucci A, Bellodi L (2002) Frontal lobe dysfunction in pathological gambling patients. Biological Psychiatry 51: 334-341.
[2] Kertzman S, Lidogoster H, Aizer A, Kotler M, Dannon PN (2011) Risk-taking decisions in pathological gamblers is not a result of their impaired inhibition ability. Psychiatry Research 188: 71-77.
[3] Labudda K, Wolf OT, Markowitsch HJ, Brand M (2007) Decision-making and neuroendocrine responses in pathological gamblers. Psychiatry Research 153: 233-243.
[4] Forbush KT, Shaw M, Graeber MA, Hovick L, Meyer VJ, et al. (2008) Neuropsychological characterisitics and personality traits in pathological gambling. CNS Spectrums 13: 306-315.
[5] Petry N (2001) Substance abuse, pathological gambling, and impulsiveness. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 63: 29-38.
[6] Vitaro F, Arseneault L, Tremblay RE (1999) Impulsivity predicts problem gambling in low SES adolescent males. Addiction 94: 565-575.
[7] Bechara A, Damasio A, Damasio H, Anderson SW (1994) Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition 50: 7-15.
[8] Brand M, Fujiwara E, Borsutzky S, Kalbe E, Kessler J, et al. (2005) Decision-making deficits of korsakoff patients in a new gambling task with explicit rules: Associations with executive functions. Neuropsychology 19: 267-277.
[9] Grant DA, Berg EA (1948) A behavioral analysis of degree of reinforcement and ease of shifting to new responses in a Weigel-type card-sorting problem. Journal of Experimental Psychology 38: 404-411.
[10] Brevers D, Cleeremans A, Bechara A, Greisen M, Kornreich C, et al. (2013) Impaired Self-Awareness in Pathological Gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies 29: 119-129.
[11] Bechara A, Damasio H, Tranel D, Anderson SW (1998) Dissociation of working memory from decision making within the human prefrontal cortex. The journal of neuroscience 18: 428-437.
[12] Bechara A (2001) Neurobiology of decision-making: Risk and reward. Seminars in Clinical Neuropsychiatry 6: 205-216.
[13] Thiel A, Hilker R, Kessler J, Habedank B, Herholz K, et al. (2003) Activation of basal ganglia loops in idiopathic Parkinson’s disease: a PET study. Journal of Neural Transmission 110: 1289-1301.
[14] Stout JC, Rodawalt WC, Siemers ER (2001) Risky decision making in Huntington's disease. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 7: 92-101.
[15] Whitney KA, Fastenau PS, Evans JD, Lysaker PH (2004) Comparative neuropsychological function in obsessive-compulsive disorder and schizophrenia with and without obsessive-compulsive symptoms. Schizophrenia Research 69: 75-83.
[16] Cavedini P, Riboldi G, D'Annucci A, Belotti P, Cisima M, et al. (2002) Decision-making heterogenity in obsessive-compulsive disorder: Ventromedial prefrontal cortex function predicts different treatment outcomes. Neuropsychologia 40: 205-211.
[17] Cavedini P, Bassi T, Ubbiali A, Casolari A, Giordani S, et al. (2004) Neuropsychological investigation of decision-making in anorexia nervosa. Psychiatry Research 15: 259-266.
[18] Everitt BJ, Robbins TW (2005) Neural systems of reinforcement for drug addiction: from actions to habits to compulsion. Nature Neuroscience 8: 1481-1489.
[19] Brevers D, Bechara A, Cleeremans A, Noël X (2013) Iowa Gambling Task (IGT): Twenty years after - gambling disorder and IGT. Frontiers in Psychology 4: 665-679.
[20] Bechara A, Damasio H, Damasio AR (2003) Role of the Amygdala in Decision‐Making. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 985: 356-369.
[21] Bechara A, Damasio H, Damasio AR, Lee GP (1999) Different contributions of the human amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex to decision-making. The Journal of Neuroscience 19: 5473-5481.
[22] Petry NM, Bickel WK, Arnett M (1998) Shortened time horizons and insensitivity to future consequences in heroin addicts. Addiction 93: 729-738.
[23] Yechiam E, Busemeyer JR, Stout JC, Bechara A (2005) Using Cognitive Models to Map Relations Between Neuropsychological Disorders and Human Decision-Making Deficits. Psychological Science 16: 973-978.
[24] Linnet J, Møller A, Peterson E, Gjedde A, Doudet D (2011) Dopamine release in ventral striatum during Iowa Gambling Task performance is associated with increased excitement levels in pathological gambling. Addiction 106: 383-390.
[25] De Wilde B, Goudriaan AE, Sabbe B, Hulstijn W, Dom G (2013) Relapse in pathological gamblers: A pilot study on the predictive value of different impulsivity measures. Journal of Behavioral Addictions 2: 23-30.
[26] Peterson E, Møller A, Doudet DJ, Bailey CJ, Hansen KV, et al. (2010) Pathological gambling: Relation of skin conductance response to dopaminergic neurotransmission and sensation-seeking. European Neuropsychopharmacology 20: 766-775.
[27] Knutson B, Fong GW, Bennett SM, Adams CM, Hommer D (2003) A region of mesial prefrontal cortex tracks monetarily rewarding outcomes: characterization with rapid event-related fMRI. NeuroImage 18: 263-272.
[28] Miedl SF, Peters J, Büchel C (2012) ALtered neural reward representations in pathological gamblers revealed by delay and probability discounting. Archives of General Psychiatry 69: 177-186.
[29] Power Y, Goodyear B, Crockford D (2012) Neural Correlates of Pathological Gamblers Preference for Immediate Rewards During the Iowa Gambling Task: An fMRI Study. Journal of Gambling Studies 28: 623-636.
[30] Ernst M, Bolla K, Mouratidis M, Contoreggi C, Matochik JA, et al. (2002) Decision-making in a Risk-taking Task: A PET Study. Neuropsychopharmacology 26: 682-691.
[31] Fukui H, Murai T, Fukuyama H, Hayashi T, Hanakawa T (2005) Functional activity related to risk anticipation during performance of the Iowa gambling task. NeuroImage 24: 253-259.
[32] Li X, Lu Z-L, D'Argembeau A, Ng M, Bechara A (2010) The Iowa Gambling Task in fMRI images. Human Brain Mapping 31: 410-423.
[33] Svaldi J, Brand M, Tuschen-Caffer B (2010) Decision-making impairments in women with binge eating disorder. Appetite 54: 84-92.
[34] Brand M, Franke-Sievert C, Jacoby GE, Markowitsch HJ, Tuschen-Caffier B (2007) Neuropsychological correlates of decision making in patients with bulimia nervosa. Neuropsychology 21: 742-750.
[35] Brand M, Labudda K, Kalbe E, Hilker R, Emmans D, et al. (2004) Decision-making impairments in patients with Parkinson's disease. Behavioral Neurology 15: 77-85.
[36] Brand M, Recknor EC, Grabenhorst F, Bechara A (2007) Decisions under ambiguity and decisions under risk: Correlations with executive functions and comparisons of two different gambling tasks with implicit and explicit rules. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 29: 86-99.
[37] Hsu M, Bhatt M, Adolphs R, Tranel D, Camerer CF (2005) Neural systems responding to degress of uncertainty in human decision-making. Science 310: 1680-1683.
[38] Brand M, Kalbe E, Labudda K, Fujiwara E, Kessler J, et al. (2005) Decision-making impairments in patients with pathological gambling. Psychiatry Research 133: 91-99.
[39] Stuss DT, Levine B, Alexander MP, Hong J, Palumbo C, et al. (2000) Wisconsin Card Sorting Test performance in patients with focal frontal and posterior brain damage: effects of lesion location and test structure on separable cognitive processes. Neuropsychologia 38: 388-402.
[40] Nagahama Y, Okada T, Katsumi Y, Hayashi T, Yamauchi H, et al. (2001) Dissociable Mechanisms of Attentional Control within the Human Prefrontal Cortex. Cerebral Cortex 11: 85-92.
[41] Rogers R, Andrews TC, Grasby PM, Brooks DJ, Robbins TW (2000) Contrasting cortical and subcortical activations produced by attentional-set shifting and reversal learning in humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 12: 142-162.
[42] Gotham AM, Brown RG, Marsden CD (1988) ‘Frontal’ cognitive function in patients with Parkinson's disease ‘on’and ‘off’ levodopa. Brain 111: 299-321.
[43] Monchi O, Petrides M, Petre V, Worsley K, Dagher A (2001) Wisconsinc Card Sorting revisitied: Distinct neural circuits participating in different stages of the task identified by event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging. The Journal of Neuroscience 21: 7733-7741.
[44] Rugle L, Melamed L (1993) Neuropsychological Assessment of Attention Problems in Pathological Gamblers. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 181: 107-112.
[45] Marazziti D, Dell'Osso L, Conversano C, Consoli G, Vivarelli L, et al. (2008) Executive function abnormalities in pathological gamblers. Clinical Practive and Epidemiology in Mental Health 4: 7.
[46] van Holst RJ, van Holstein M, van den Brink W, Veltman DJ, Goudriaan AE (2012) Response Inhibition during Cue Reactivity in Problem Gamblers: An fMRI Study. PLoS ONE 7: e30909.
[47] Schultz W, Dayan P, Montague PR (1997) A Neural Substrate of Prediction and Reward. Science 275: 1593-1599.
[48] Knutson B, Cooper JC (2005) Functional magnetic resonance imaging of reward prediction. Current Opinion in Neurology 18: 411-417.
[49] Knutson B, Fong GW, Adams CM, Varner JL, Hommer D (2001) Dissociation of reward anticipation and outcome with event-related fMRI. NeuroReport 12: 3683-3687.
[50] O'Doherty JP, Deichmann R, Critchley HD, Dolan RJ (2002) Neural Responses during Anticipation of a Primary Taste Reward. Neuron 33: 815-826.
[51] Tanaka SC, Doya K, Okada G, Ueda K, Okamoto Y, et al. (2004) Prediction of immediate and future rewards differentially recruits cortico-basal ganglia loops. Nature Neuroscience 7: 887-893.
[52] O'Doherty J, Dayan P, Schultz J, Deichmann R, Friston K, et al. (2004) Dissociable Roles of Ventral and Dorsal Striatum in Instrumental Conditioning. Science 304: 452-454.
[53] Delgado MR, Miller MM, Inatia S, Phelps EA (2005) An fMRI study of reward-related probability learning. Neuroimage 24: 862-873.
[54] Berridge KC (2012) From prediction error to incentive salience: Mesolimbic computation of reward motivation. European Journal of Neuroscience 35: 1123-1143.
[55] Robinson TE, Berridge KC (1993) The neural basis of drug craving: An incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Research Reviews 18: 247-291.
[56] Berridge KC (2007) The debate over dopamine’s role in reward: the case for incentive salience. Psychopharmacology 191: 391-431.
[57] Berridge KC, Robinson TE (1998) What is the role of dopamine in reward: hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience? Brain Research Reviews 28: 309-369.
[58] Smith KS, Berridge KC, Aldridge JW (2011) Disentangling pleasure from incentive salience and learning signals in brain reward circuitry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108: E255–E264.
[59] Wise RA (1985) The anhedonia hypothesis: Mark III. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8: 178-186.
[60] Sienkiewicz-Jarosz H, Scinska A, Kuran W, Ryglewicz D, Rogowski A, et al. (2005) Taste responses in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry 76: 40-46.
[61] Krawczyk DC (2002) Contributions of the prefrontal cortex to the neural basis of human decision making. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 26: 631-664.
[62] Levy DJ, Glimcher PW (2012) The root of all value: a neural common currency for choice. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 22: 1027-1038.
[63] Grabenhorst F, Rolls ET (2011) Value, pleasure and choice in the ventral prefrontal cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 15: 56-67.
[64] Kable JW, Glimcher PW (2009) The Neurobiology of Decision: Consensus and Controversy. Neuron 63: 733-745.
[65] Padoa-Schioppa C (2011) Neurobiology of Economic Choice: A Good-Based Model. Annual Review of Neuroscience 34: 333-359.
[66] FitzGerald THB, Seymour B, Dolan RJ (2009) The Role of Human Orbitofrontal Cortex Value Comparison for Incommensurable Objects. Journal of Neuroscience 29: 8388-8395.
[67] Chib VS, Rangel A, Simojo S, O'Doherty J (2009) Evidence for a Common Representation of Decision Values for Dissimilar Goods in Human Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 29: 12315-12320.
[68] Levy DJ, Glimcher PW (2011) Comparing Apples and Oranges: Using Reward-Specific and Reward-General Subjective Value Representation in the Brain. Journal of Neuroscience 31: 14693-14707.
[69] Smith DV, Hayden BY, Truong TK, Song AW, Platt ML, et al. (2010) Distinct Value Signals in Anterior and Posterior Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 30: 2490-2495.
[70] Cavada C, Compañy T, Tejedor J, Cruz-Rizzolo RJ, Reinoso-Suárez F (2000) The Anatomical Connections of the Macaque Monkey Orbitofrontal Cortex. A Review. Cerebral Cortex 10: 220-242.
[71] Hikosaka K, Watanabe M (2000) Delay Activity of Orbital and Lateral Prefrontal Neurons of the Monkey Varying with Different Rewards. Cerebral Cortex 10: 263-271.
[72] Murray EA, Izquierdo A (2007) Orbitofrontal Cortex and Amygdala Contributions to Affect and Action in Primates. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1121: 273-296.
[73] Izquierdo A, Murray EA (2004) Combined unilateral lesions of the amygdala and orbital prefrontal cortex impair affective processing in rhesus monkeys. Journal of Neurophysiology 91: 2023-2039.
[74] Iverson SD, Mishkin M (1970) Perseverative interference in moneky following selective lesions of the inferior prefrontal convexity. Experimental Brain Research 11: 367-386.
[75] Drewe EA (1975) Go- no go learning after frontal lobe lesions in humans. Cortex 11: 8-16.
[76] Belger A, Puce A, Krystal JH, Gore JC, Goldman-Rakic P, et al. (1998) Dissociation of mnemonic and perceptual processes during spatial and nonspatial working memory using fMRI. Human Brain Mapping 6: 14-32.
[77] Shimamura A (2000) The role of the prefrontal cortex in dynamic filtering. Psychobiology 28: 207-218.
[78] Waltz JA, Knowlton BJ, Holyoak KJ, Boone KB, Mishkin FS, et al. (1999) A System for Relational Reasoning in Human Prefrontal Cortex. Psychological Science 10: 119-125.
[79] Prabhakaran V, Smith JAL, Desmond JE, Glover GH, Gabrieli JDE (1997) Neural Substrates of Fluid Reasoning: An fMRI Study of Neocortical Activation during Performance of the Raven's Progressive Matrices Test. Cognitive Psychology 33: 43-63.
[80] Baker S, Dolan R, Frith C (1996) The functional anatomy of logic: a PET study of inferential reasoning. Neuroimage 3: S218.
[81] Goldberg E, Harner R, Lovell M, Podell K, Riggio S (1994) Cognitive Bias, Functional Cortical Geometry, and the Frontal Lobes: Laterality, Sex, and Handedness. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 6: 276-296.
[82] Podell K, Lovell M, Zimmerman M, Goldberg E (1995) The cognitive bias task and lateralized frontal lobe functions in males. The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience 7: 491-501.
[83] Goel V, Dolan RJ (2000) Anatomical Segregation of Component Processes in an Inductive Inference Task. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 12: 110-119.
[84] Goel V, Grafman J (2000) Role of the right prefrontal cortex in ill-structured planning. Cognitive Neuropsychology 17: 415-436.
[85] Potenza MN, Steinberg MA, Skudlarski P, Fulbright RK, Lacadie CM, et al. (2003) Gambling urgers in pathological gambling: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Archives of General Psychiatry 60: 828-836.
[86] Crockford DN, Goodyear B, Edwards J, Quickfall J, el-Guebaly N (2005) Cue-Induced Brain Activity in Pathological Gamblers. Biological Psychiatry 58: 787-795.
[87] Carter CS, Braver TS, Barch DM, Botvinick MM, Noll D, et al. (1998) Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. Science 280: 747-749.
[88] Botvinick M, Nystrom LE, Fissell K, Carter CS, Cohen JD (1999) Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex. Nature 402: 179-181.
[89] Botvinick MM, Braver TS, Barch DM, Carter CS, Cohen JD (2001) Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review 108: 624-652.
[90] Critchley HD, Mathias CJ, Dolan RJ (2001) Neural Activity in the Human Brain Relating to Uncertainty and Arousal during Anticipation. Neuron 29: 537-545.
[91] Potenza MN (2013) Neurobiology of gambling behaviors. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 23: 660-667.
[92] Suen VYM, Brown MRG, Morck RK, Silverstone PH (2014) Regional Brain Changes Occurring during Disobedience to “Experts” in Financial Decision-Making. PLoS ONE 9: e87321.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Victoria Y. M. Suen, Peter H. Silverstone. (2014). Does Decision-Making during Gambling Involve Primary Roles for the Pre-Frontal Cortex and Anterior Cingulate Cortex. International Journal of Medical Imaging, 2(5), 96-104. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmi.20140205.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Victoria Y. M. Suen; Peter H. Silverstone. Does Decision-Making during Gambling Involve Primary Roles for the Pre-Frontal Cortex and Anterior Cingulate Cortex. Int. J. Med. Imaging 2014, 2(5), 96-104. doi: 10.11648/j.ijmi.20140205.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Victoria Y. M. Suen, Peter H. Silverstone. Does Decision-Making during Gambling Involve Primary Roles for the Pre-Frontal Cortex and Anterior Cingulate Cortex. Int J Med Imaging. 2014;2(5):96-104. doi: 10.11648/j.ijmi.20140205.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijmi.20140205.11,
      author = {Victoria Y. M. Suen and Peter H. Silverstone},
      title = {Does Decision-Making during Gambling Involve Primary Roles for the Pre-Frontal Cortex and Anterior Cingulate Cortex},
      journal = {International Journal of Medical Imaging},
      volume = {2},
      number = {5},
      pages = {96-104},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijmi.20140205.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmi.20140205.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijmi.20140205.11},
      abstract = {Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have implicated multiple brain regions as being involved in the complex process of decision-making, including gambling. While decision-making is a key aspect of everyday life, the consequences of poor decision-making can be greatly magnified during gambling. Thus, it is useful to review current evidence regarding the brain regions involved in gambling. To date, there have been three tasks that have been frequently used to examine the paradigm of decision-making during gambling: the Iowa Gambling Task, the Game of Dice Task, and the Wisconsin Card Sorting Task. There are four brain regions that are most consistently involved, the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC), orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC), and anterior cingulate cortex. Interestingly, we have recently found that disobedience to an authority figure in a gambling task also involves activation in the amygdala, ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (vlPFC) and anterior insula. Taken together, we propose that decision-making in the context of gambling is primarily determined in the pre-frontal cortex (PFC) and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC). While multiple other brain regions are likely involved, the primacy of the PFC and ACC in decision-making during gambling behaviours should be more fully recognized.},
     year = {2014}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Does Decision-Making during Gambling Involve Primary Roles for the Pre-Frontal Cortex and Anterior Cingulate Cortex
    AU  - Victoria Y. M. Suen
    AU  - Peter H. Silverstone
    Y1  - 2014/08/30
    PY  - 2014
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmi.20140205.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijmi.20140205.11
    T2  - International Journal of Medical Imaging
    JF  - International Journal of Medical Imaging
    JO  - International Journal of Medical Imaging
    SP  - 96
    EP  - 104
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-832X
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmi.20140205.11
    AB  - Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have implicated multiple brain regions as being involved in the complex process of decision-making, including gambling. While decision-making is a key aspect of everyday life, the consequences of poor decision-making can be greatly magnified during gambling. Thus, it is useful to review current evidence regarding the brain regions involved in gambling. To date, there have been three tasks that have been frequently used to examine the paradigm of decision-making during gambling: the Iowa Gambling Task, the Game of Dice Task, and the Wisconsin Card Sorting Task. There are four brain regions that are most consistently involved, the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC), orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC), and anterior cingulate cortex. Interestingly, we have recently found that disobedience to an authority figure in a gambling task also involves activation in the amygdala, ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (vlPFC) and anterior insula. Taken together, we propose that decision-making in the context of gambling is primarily determined in the pre-frontal cortex (PFC) and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC). While multiple other brain regions are likely involved, the primacy of the PFC and ACC in decision-making during gambling behaviours should be more fully recognized.
    VL  - 2
    IS  - 5
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Psychiatry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada

  • Department of Psychiatry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada

  • Sections