Skin Protective Activity of Consciousness Energy Healing Treatment Based Herbomineral Formulation
Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences
Volume 5, Issue 3, May 2017, Pages: 86-95
Received: Mar. 28, 2017; Accepted: Apr. 7, 2017; Published: May 9, 2017
Views 1982      Downloads 50
Dennille Mellesia Smith, Trivedi Global, Inc., Henderson, USA
Mahendra Kumar Trivedi, Trivedi Global, Inc., Henderson, USA
Alice Branton, Trivedi Global, Inc., Henderson, USA
Dahryn Trivedi, Trivedi Global, Inc., Henderson, USA
Gopal Nayak, Trivedi Global, Inc., Henderson, USA
Sambhu Charan Mondal, Trivedi Science Research Laboratory Pvt. Ltd., Bhopal, India
Snehasis Jana, Trivedi Science Research Laboratory Pvt. Ltd., Bhopal, India
Article Tools
Follow on us
The current study was attempted to evaluate the impact of the Consciousness Energy Healing (The Trivedi Effect®) Treatment based herbomineral test formulation and cell medium (DMEM) against skin health. The test formulation and DMEM were divided into two parts. One of each part was received the Consciousness Energy Healing Treatment by Dennille Mellesia Smith and was termed as the Biofield Energy Treated samples, while the other parts were denoted as the untreated test items. MTT showed >78% viable cells, indicating that the test formulation was safe and nontoxic in all the tested concentrations in three cell lines. The percent cell proliferation by BrdU assay was significantly increased by 238.30%, 192.06%, and 43.96% in the UT-DMEM + BT-Test formulation, BT-DMEM + UT-Test formulation, and BT-DMEM + BT-Test formulation groups, respectively at 17.5 µg/mL with respect to the UT-DMEM + UT-Test formulation group. The level of collagen was significantly increased by 55.55%, 32.65%, and 52.48% in the UT-DMEM + BT-Test formulation, BT-DMEM + UT-Test formulation and BT-DMEM + BT-Test formulation groups, respectively at 1.25 µg/mL compared to the untreated group. Elastin was significantly (p≤0.001) increased by 6.30%, 105.04%, and 29.41% in the UT-DMEM + BT-Test formulation, BT-DMEM + UT-Test formulation, and BT-DMEM + BT-Test formulation groups, respectively at 10 µg/mL compared to the untreated group. Hyaluronic acid was increased by 4.78%, 29.71%, and 58.29% in the UT-DMEM + BT-Test formulation, BT-DMEM + UT-Test formulation, and BT-DMEM + BT-Test formulation groups, respectively at 0.63 µg/mL compared to the UT-DMEM + UT-Test Formulation group. The level of melanin was reduced by 14.64% and 18.25% in the UT-DMEM + BT-Test formulation and BT-DMEM + UT-Test formulation, respectively at 0.13 µg/mL compared to the untreated group. Skin protection against UV-B data displayed that cell proliferation was increased by 17.88%, 20.14%, and 9.89% in the BT-DMEM + BT-Test formulation at 0.63, 1.25, and 2.5 µg/mL, respectively compared to the untreated group. Wound healing activity exhibited significant wound closure and cell migration in all the tested groups compared to the untreated group. Overall, result suggests that the Biofield Energy Treated DMEM and test formulation exhibited better responses compared to the untreated medium and test formulation. Therefore, the Biofield Energy Treated herbomineral formulation could be useful for the development of an effective cosmetic product for the prevention and treatment of several skin problems such as erythema, contact dermatitis, skin aging, wrinkles and/or change in the skin color, etc.
The Trivedi Effect®, Consciousness Energy Healing, Skin Protection, HFF-1, B16-F10, HaCaT, Scratch Assay, Extracellular Matrix
To cite this article
Dennille Mellesia Smith, Mahendra Kumar Trivedi, Alice Branton, Dahryn Trivedi, Gopal Nayak, Sambhu Charan Mondal, Snehasis Jana, Skin Protective Activity of Consciousness Energy Healing Treatment Based Herbomineral Formulation, Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences. Vol. 5, No. 3, 2017, pp. 86-95. doi: 10.11648/j.jfns.20170503.15
Copyright © 2017 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License ( which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Cross CE, van der Vliet A, Louie S, Thiele JJ, Halliwell B (1998) Oxidative stress and antioxidants at biosurfaces: Plants, skin, and respiratory tract surfaces. Environ Health Perspect 5: 1241-1251.
Schwartz JR, Marsh RG, Draelos ZD (2005) Zinc and skin health: Overview of physiology and pharmacology. Dermatol Surg 31: 837-847.
Park K (2015) Role of micronutrients in skin health and function. Biomol Ther (Seoul) 23: 207-217.
McDaniel S, Goldman GD (2002) Consequences of using escharotic agents as primary treatment for nonmelanoma skin cancer. Arch Dermatol 138: 1593-1596.
Nelson PS, Montgomery B (2003) Unconventional therapy for prostate cancer: Good, bad or questionable? Nat Rev Cancer 3: 845-858.
Clark LC, Graham GF, Crounse RG, Grimson R, Hulka B, Shy CM (1984) Plasma selenium and skin neoplasms: A case-control study. Nutr Cancer 6: 13-21.
Chan S, Gerson B, Subramaniam S (1998) The role of copper, molybdenum, selenium, and zinc in nutrition and health. Clin Lab Med 18: 673-685.
Kivirikko KI, Myllyla R (1985) Post-translational processing of procollagens. Ann NY Acad Sci 460: 187-201.
Traikovich SS (1999) Use of topical ascorbic acid and its effects on photodamaged skin topography. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 125: 1091-1098.
Sugiyama Y, Kawakishi S, Osawa T (1996) Involvement of the beta-diketone moiety in the antioxidative mechanism of tetrahydrocurcumin. Biochem Pharmacol 52: 519-525.
Huang MT, Ma W, Lu YP, Chang RL, Fisher C, Manchand PS, Newmark HL, Conney AH (1995) Effects of curcumin, demethoxycurcumin, bisdemethoxycurcumin and tetrahydrocurcumin on 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate-induced tumor promotion. Carcinogenesis 16: 2493-2497.
Bylka W, Znajdek-Awiżeń P, Studzińska-Sroka E, Brzezińska M (2013) Centella asiatica in cosmetology. Advances in Dermatology and Allergology/Postȩpy Dermatologii I Alergologii 30: 46-49.
Barnes PM, Powell-Griner E, McFann K, Nahin RL (2004) Complementary and alternative medicine use among adults: United States, 2002. Adv Data 343: 1-19.
Myers R (2003) The basics of chemistry. Greenwood Press, Westport, Connecticut.
Movaffaghi Z, Farsi M (2009) Biofield therapies: Biophysical basis and biological regulations. Complement Ther Clin Pract 15: 35-37.
Yount G, Patil S, Dave U, Alves-dos-Santos L, Gon K, Arauz R, and Rachlin K (2013) Evaluation of biofield treatment dose and distance in a model of cancer cell death. J Altern Complement Med 19: 124-127.
Garland SN, Valentine D, Desai K, Li S, Langer C, Evans T, Mao JJ (2013) Complementary and alternative medicine use and benefit finding among cancer patients. J Altern Complement Med 19: 876-881.
Trivedi MK, Tallapragada RM (2008) A transcendental to changing metal powder characteristics. Met Powder Rep 63: 22-28, 31.
Trivedi MK, Nayak G, Patil S, Tallapragada RM, Latiyal O (2015) Studies of the atomic and crystalline characteristics of ceramic oxide nano powders after bio field treatment. Ind Eng Manage 4: 161.
Dabhade VV, Tallapragada RR, Trivedi MK (2009) Effect of external energy on atomic, crystalline and powder characteristics of antimony and bismuth powders. Bull Mater Sci 32: 471-479.
Sances F, Flora E, Patil S, Spence A, Shinde V (2013) Impact of biofield treatment on ginseng and organic blueberry yield. Agrivita J Agric Sci 35: 22-29.
Lenssen AW (2013) Biofield and fungicide seed treatment influences on soybean productivity, seed quality and weed community. Agricultural Journal 83: 138-143.
Trivedi MK, Patil S, Shettigar H, Gangwar M, Jana S (2015) Antimicrobial sensitivity pattern of Pseudomonas fluorescens after biofield treatment. J Infect Dis Ther 3: 222.
Trivedi MK, Patil S, Shettigar H, Bairwa K, Jana S (2015) Phenotypic and biotypic characterization of Klebsiella oxytoca: An impact of biofield treatment. J Microb Biochem Technol 7: 203-206.
Trivedi MK, Patil S, Shettigar H, Gangwar M, Jana S (2015) An effect of biofield treatment on multidrug-resistant Burkholderia cepacia: A multihost pathogen. J Trop Dis 3: 167.
Patil SA, Nayak GB, Barve SS, Tembe RP, Khan RR (2012) Impact of biofield treatment on growth and anatomical characteristics of Pogostemon cablin (Benth.). Biotechnology 11: 154-162.
Nayak G, Altekar N (2015) Effect of biofield treatment on plant growth and adaptation. J Environ Health Sci 1: 1-9.
Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 5: Tests for in vitro cytotoxicity (ISO 10993-5: 2009), I. S. EN ISO, 10993-5: 2009.
Junquiera LC, Junqueira LC, Brentani RR (1979) A simple and sensitive method for the quantitative estimation of collagen. Anal Biochem 94: 96-99.
Hahn MS, Kobler JB, Starcher BC, Zeitels SM, Langer R (2006) Quantitative and comparative studies of the vocal fold extracellular matrix. I: Elastic fibers and hyaluronic acid. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 115: 156-164.
Zhang L, Yoshida T, Kuroiwa Y (1992) Stimulation of melanin synthesis of B16-F10 mouse melanoma cells by bufalin. Life Sci 51: 17-24.
Fronza M, Heinzmann B, Hamburger M, Laufer S, Merfort I (2009) Determination of the wound healing effect of Calendula extracts using the scratch assay with 3T3 fibroblasts. J Ethnopharmacol 126: 463-467.
Wen KC, Shih IC, Hu JC, Liao ST, Su TW, Chiang HM (2011) Inhibitory effects of Terminalia catappa on UV-B-induced photodamage in fibroblast cell line. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2011: 904532.
Rozario T, DeSimone DW (2010) The extracellular matrix in development and morphogenesis: A dynamic view. Dev Biol 341: 126-140.
Yadav K, Singhal N, Rishi V, Yadav H (2014) Cell proliferation assays. eLS. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester.
Albini A, Adelmann-Grill BC (1985) Collagenolytic cleavage products of collagen Type I as chemoattractants for human dermal fibroblasts. Eur. J Cell Biol 36: 104-107.
Jeffrey J (1995) Metalloproteinases and tissue turnover. Wounds 7: 13A-22A.
Almine JF, Wise SG, Weiss AS (2012) Elastin signaling in wound repair. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today 96: 248-257.
Yin L, Morita A, Tsuji T (2001) Skin aging induced by ultraviolet exposure and tobacco smoking: evidence from epidemiological and molecular studies. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 17: 178-183.
Castelo-Branco C, Figueras F, Martínez de Osaba MJ, Vanrell JA (1998) Facial wrinkling in postmenopausal women. Effects of smoking status and hormone replacement therapy. Maturitas 29: 75-86.
Youn CS, Kwon OS, Won CH, Hwang EJ, Park BJ, Eun HC, Chung JH (2003) Effect of pregnancy and menopause on facial wrinkling in women. Acta Derm Venereol 83: 419-424.
Contet-Audonneau JL, Jeanmaire C, Pauly G (1999) A histological study of human wrinkle structures: Comparison between sun-exposed areas of the face, with or without wrinkles, and sun-protected areas. Br J Dermatol 140: 1038-1047.
Brincat M, Moniz CJ, Studd JW, Darby A, Magos A, Emburey G, Versi E (1985) Long-term effects of the menopause and sex hormones on skin thickness. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 92: 256-259.
Frantz C, Stewart KM, Weaver VM (2010) The extracellular matrix at a glance. J Cell Sci 123: 4195-4200.
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
Tel: (001)347-983-5186