The Effect of Individual Care of Case Manager on Breast Cancer Patients
American Journal of Nursing Science
Volume 9, Issue 3, June 2020, Pages: 124-126
Received: Apr. 1, 2020; Accepted: Apr. 17, 2020; Published: Apr. 28, 2020
Views 247      Downloads 136
Lingling Wang, General Surgery Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
Yuhua Ma, General Surgery Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
Junnan Lin, Department of Ophthalmology and Stomatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
Article Tools
Follow on us
Objective: To assess influence of individual care of case manager on breast cancer patients. Methods: 99 participants who were diagnosed as breast cancer were invested to join our study, their diagnose time is from October 2018 to March 2019. We randomly assign the participants to the two different groups, that include control group (n = 51) and the intervention group (n = 48). In control group, the participants received traditional care services which were follow the standards required by the hospital. Additionally, the intervention group participants receive individual care. our researchers collected the information, that include anxiety information, depression information, patient satisfaction and patient informed. We collected data using the following questionnaires: Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), Self-rating depression scale (SDS) and some simple questionnaire. Result: In participants characteristics, most participants are early breast cancer in our research result [22 (45.8%) & 25 (49.0%)]. The number of secondary is metaphase of breast cancer group, it is just a few fewer people than early breast cancer group [18 (37.5%) & 20 (39.2%)]. In research of satisfaction and informed intervention group has higher score than that of control group in satisfaction assessment and informed assessment. In anxiety status and depression status, the intervention group has better performance than that of control group in SAS and SDS (53.5+10.44 vs 41.5+8.82 & 49.75+9.45 vs 40.25+5.11). Conclusion: The individual care of case manager has good improvement in breast cancer patient’s mental health. In particular, the intervention group participants who receive individual care of case manager have better performance in satisfaction research, anxiety research and depression research.
Individual Care, Breast Cancer, Nursing
To cite this article
Lingling Wang, Yuhua Ma, Junnan Lin, The Effect of Individual Care of Case Manager on Breast Cancer Patients, American Journal of Nursing Science. Vol. 9, No. 3, 2020, pp. 124-126. doi: 10.11648/j.ajns.20200903.18
Copyright © 2020 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License ( which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries, CA Cancer J. Clin. 2018; 68 (6): 394–424.
Berry DA, Cronin KA, Plevritis SK, et al. Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015; 353: 1784-92.
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018, CA Cancer J. Clin. 2018; 68 (1): 7–30.
Liu S, Wicha MS. Targeting breast cancer stem cells, J. Clin. Oncol. 2016; 28 (25): 4006–4012.
Cho N, Han W, Han BK, et al. Breast cancer screening with mammography plus ultrasonography or magnetic resonance imaging in women 50 years or younger at diagnosis and treated with breast conservation therapy. JAMA Oncol 2017; 3: 1495-502.
Monticciolo DL, Newell MS, Moy L, Niell B, Monsees B, Sickles EA. Breast cancer screening in women at higher-than-average risk: recommendations from the ACR. J Am Coll Radiol 2018; 15: 408-14.
Grunfeld E, Hodgson DC, Del Giudice ME, Moineddin R. Population-based longitudinal study of follow-up care for breast cancer survivors. J Oncol Pract. 2017; 6: 174-81.
lsen JC, Ogarek JL, Goldenberg EJ, Sulo S. Impact of a chronic painprotocol on emergency department utilization. Acad Emerg Med. 2016; 23 (4): 424-432.
Soril LJJ, Leggett LE, Lorenzetti DL, Noseworthy TW, Clement FM. Reducing frequent visits to the emergency department: a systematic re-view of interventions. PLOS ONE. 2015; 10 (4): e0123660.
Seaberg D, Elseroad S, Dumas M, et al. Patient navigation for patientsfrequently visiting the emergency department: a randomized, controlledtrial. Acad Emerg Med. 2017; 24 (11): 1327-1333.
Mercer T, Bae J, Kipnes J, et al. The highest utilizers of care: individual-ized care plans to coordinate care, improve healthcare service utilization, and reduce costs at an academic tertiary care center. J Hosp Med. 2015; 10 (7): 419-424.
Grover CA, Sughair J, Stoopes S, et al. Case management reduces lengthof stay, charges, and testing in emergency department frequent users. WestJ Emerg Med. 2018; 19 (2): 238-244.
White D, Leach C, Sims R, Atkinson M, Cottrell D. Validation of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale for use with adolescents. Br J Psychiatry 1999; 175: 452–454.
El-Rufaie O, Absood G. Validity study of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale among a group of Saudi patients. Br J Psychiatry 1987; 151: 687–688.
Orsaria P, Chiaravalloti A, Caredda E, Marchese PV, Titka B, Anemona L, Portarena I, Schillaci O, Petrella G, Palombi L, Buonomo OC. Evaluationof the usefulness of FDG-PET/CT for nodal staging of breast cancer. Anticancer Res. 2018; 38 (12): 6639–6652.
Youssef AI, Hassan AA, Mohammed SA, Ahmed HA. Distribution of thechemokine receptor-5 gene in Egyptian breast cancer patients. Benha Medical J. 2018; 35 (1): 49.
Sorlie, C. M. Perou, R. Tibshirani, T. Aas, S. Geisler, H. Johnsen, T. Hastie, M. B. Eisen, M. van de Rijn, S. S. Jeffrey, T. Thorsen, H. Quist, J. C. Matese PO. Brown D. Botstein, P. E. Lonning, A. L. Borresen-Dale, Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical im-plications, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2017; 98: 10869e10874.
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
Tel: (001)347-983-5186