| Peer-Reviewed

The Need for Good Radiation Protection in Diagnostic Imaging in Ghana

Received: 30 January 2015    Accepted: 30 January 2015    Published: 21 March 2015
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

The need to re-examine radiation protection and safety measures to protect the people in Ghana is therefore essential. This is because medical X-ray diagnosis in the country continues to increase. It is the responsibility of the radiation worker to protect patients, self, staff and the members of the public against unnecessary exposure to ionizing radiation. Medical radiation protection is an important aspect of quality care that X-ray departments are expected to provide for their patients. Following increasing concern about radiation hazards from medical diagnostic x-ray, radiation dose assessment of patients undergoing medical diagnostic x-ray examinations has been suggested. However, to implement them requires an effective infrastructure which includes adequate laws and regulations, efficient regulatory system, experts on radiation protection and operational provisions.

Published in Clinical Medicine Research (Volume 4, Issue 3-1)

This article belongs to the Special Issue Radiographic Practice Situation in a Developing Country

DOI 10.11648/j.cmr.s.2015040301.19
Page(s) 42-45
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Radiation Protection, Diagnostic Imaging, Regulation, Implementation

References
[1] Asmundsdottir E.E and Kaplan S. (2000) Icelandic Occupational Therapist’s Attitudes Toward Professionalism. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy (7): 67-75.
[2] Benke K.K. (1995) Biological effects of low-level radiation and diagnostic medical X-rays. Journal of he Australian College of Nutritional and Environmental Medicine 14 (1): 17-20
[3] Burns R. (2000) Introduction to research Methods. London: Sage publications.
[4] Chen B.L. (1991) “radiation standards and Hazards”. Institute of Electrical, Electronic, Engineers 34:261-265.
[5] Commission for European Communities (1990) Working Document on Quality Criteria for Diagnostic Images and Patient Exposure. CEC X11 1173190. Luxemburg.
[6] Cox R., Muirhead., Stather J.W. et al (2004) Risk of radiation-induced cancer at low dose and low dose rates for radiation protection purpose. Documents of the National radiological Protection Board volume 6, No 1.
[7] Cunningham R., IIari O., Ishiguro A et al (2004) Radiation protection today and tomorrow: an assessment of the present status and future perspective of radiation protection. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Paris. OECD Nuclear Energy Agency Publication.
[8] Dendy P.P., Goldstone K.E and Barber R.W (1998) Radiation protection. In-Sharp P.F., Gemmell H.G and Smith F.W (eds) Practical Nuclear Medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[9] Department of Health (2001) Guidance Notes for Dental Practitioners on the safe use of X-ray Equipment. London: National radiological Protection Board.
[10] Dixon B and Dendy P.P. (2003) The effects of radiation on cells. In-Martin C.J., Dendy P.P. and Corbett R.H (eds) Medical Imaging and Radiation Protection for Medical Students and Clinical Staff. Oxford: British Institute of Radiology.
[11] Dowd S.B and Tilson E.R. (1999) Practical radiation Protection and Radiobiology. Philadelphia: W.B Saunders
[12] European Commission (2000) Referral guidelines for imaging. Radiation Protection 118. Luxemburg: European Commission.
[13] French S. (1993) Practical Research. A Guide for Therapists. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann.
[14] Ghana Atomic Energy Act 204 (1963) Atomic Energy Commission. Accra.
[15] Ghana Atomic Energy Act 204 (1993) Amendment by the provisional national Defence Council Law 308. Accra.
[16] Hicks C.M (1990) Research and Statistics: A practical introduction for nurses. London: Prentice Hall.
[17] International commission on Radiological Protection (1991) 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 60. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
[18] Johnston D.A. and Brennan P.C (2000) Reference dose levels for patients undergoing common diagnostic X-ray examinations in Irish hospitals. British Journal of Radiology 73 (868): 396-402.
[19] Kovacs A. R. (1985) The Research Process: Essentials of Skill Development. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Company.
[20] May T. (2002) Social research: Issues, methods and process. Buckingham: Open University Press.
[21] National Radiological Protection Board (2004) Patient dose reduction in diagnostic radiology: Report by the Royal College of Radiologists and the National radiological
[22] protection Board. Documents of NRPB volume 1, No.3.
[23] Nicholes P (2002) Social survey methods: A Field guide for Development Workers.
[24] Development guidelines No. 6. Oxfam: Oxfam.
[25] Osei E.K., Amoh G.E.A and Schandorf C. (1997) Risk ranking by perception. Health Physics 72 (2): 195-203.
[26] Organizations of Economic Communities and Development (1994) Radiation Protection Overview: International aspects and perspective. Issue Brief No. 10 December 1994. Nuclear Energy Agency Publications.
[27] Parahoo A.K. (1997) Nursing Research: Process and issues. London: Palgrave.
[28] Polgar and Thomas. (1995) Introduction to Research in the Health Sciences. London: Churchill Livingstone.
[29] Picano E. (2004) Sustainability of medical imaging. British Medical Journal 328 (7439): 578-580).
[30] Royal College of Radiologist (2003) Making the best use of a department of clinical
[31] radiology: London: Royal College of Radiologist.
[32] Schandorf C. Osei E.K and Allotey F.K.A (1995) Introducing a national radiation protection and safety infrastructure in Ghana. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 62 (4): 233-237.
[33] Schandorf C., Osei E.K and Emi-Reynolds (1996) Studies and analysis of occupational dose distributions from personal monitoring service in Ghana (1900-1993). Radiation Protection Dosimetry 63 (1): 49-54.
[34] Schandorf C and Tetteh G.K (1998) Analyses of dose and dose distribution for patients undergoing selected X –ray diagnostic procedures in Ghana.
[35] Shiralkar S., Rennie A., Snow M et al (2003) Doctors’ knowledge of radiation exposure: questionnaire study. British Medical Journal 327 (7411): 371-372.
[36] Shrimpton P.C., Wall B.F., Jones D.G et al (1986) Doses to patients from routine X-ray examinations in England. British Journal of Radiology 59 (704): 749-58.
[37] Walker J.S (1989) The controversy over radiation safety – A historical Overview. Journal of The American Medical Association 262 (5): 664-608.
[38] Wootton R. (1993) The need for radiation protection of the patient. In-Wootton R. (ed) Radiation Protection of Patients. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Antwi W. K., Kyei K. A. (2015). The Need for Good Radiation Protection in Diagnostic Imaging in Ghana. Clinical Medicine Research, 4(3-1), 42-45. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cmr.s.2015040301.19

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Antwi W. K.; Kyei K. A. The Need for Good Radiation Protection in Diagnostic Imaging in Ghana. Clin. Med. Res. 2015, 4(3-1), 42-45. doi: 10.11648/j.cmr.s.2015040301.19

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Antwi W. K., Kyei K. A. The Need for Good Radiation Protection in Diagnostic Imaging in Ghana. Clin Med Res. 2015;4(3-1):42-45. doi: 10.11648/j.cmr.s.2015040301.19

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.cmr.s.2015040301.19,
      author = {Antwi W. K. and Kyei K. A.},
      title = {The Need for Good Radiation Protection in Diagnostic Imaging in Ghana},
      journal = {Clinical Medicine Research},
      volume = {4},
      number = {3-1},
      pages = {42-45},
      doi = {10.11648/j.cmr.s.2015040301.19},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cmr.s.2015040301.19},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.cmr.s.2015040301.19},
      abstract = {The need to re-examine radiation protection and safety measures to protect the people in Ghana is therefore essential. This is because medical X-ray diagnosis in the country continues to increase. It is the responsibility of the radiation worker to protect patients, self, staff and the members of the public against unnecessary exposure to ionizing radiation. Medical radiation protection is an important aspect of quality care that X-ray departments are expected to provide for their patients. Following increasing concern about radiation hazards from medical diagnostic x-ray, radiation dose assessment of patients undergoing medical diagnostic x-ray examinations has been suggested. However, to implement them requires an effective infrastructure which includes adequate laws and regulations, efficient regulatory system, experts on radiation protection and operational provisions.},
     year = {2015}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - The Need for Good Radiation Protection in Diagnostic Imaging in Ghana
    AU  - Antwi W. K.
    AU  - Kyei K. A.
    Y1  - 2015/03/21
    PY  - 2015
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cmr.s.2015040301.19
    DO  - 10.11648/j.cmr.s.2015040301.19
    T2  - Clinical Medicine Research
    JF  - Clinical Medicine Research
    JO  - Clinical Medicine Research
    SP  - 42
    EP  - 45
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2326-9057
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cmr.s.2015040301.19
    AB  - The need to re-examine radiation protection and safety measures to protect the people in Ghana is therefore essential. This is because medical X-ray diagnosis in the country continues to increase. It is the responsibility of the radiation worker to protect patients, self, staff and the members of the public against unnecessary exposure to ionizing radiation. Medical radiation protection is an important aspect of quality care that X-ray departments are expected to provide for their patients. Following increasing concern about radiation hazards from medical diagnostic x-ray, radiation dose assessment of patients undergoing medical diagnostic x-ray examinations has been suggested. However, to implement them requires an effective infrastructure which includes adequate laws and regulations, efficient regulatory system, experts on radiation protection and operational provisions.
    VL  - 4
    IS  - 3-1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Radiography, School of Biomedical and Allied Health Sciences, University of Ghana, Korle-Bu, Accra, Ghana

  • Department of Radiography, School of Biomedical and Allied Health Sciences, University of Ghana, Korle-Bu, Accra, Ghana

  • Sections