| Peer-Reviewed

Investor’s Optimal Strategy with and Without Transaction Cost Under Ornstein-Uhlenbeck and Constant Elasticity of Variance (CEV) Models Via Exponential Utility Maximization

Received: 5 June 2020    Accepted: 20 June 2020    Published: 4 July 2020
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

In this work, we studied the optimal investment problem of an investor who had exponential utility preference and traded two assets; (1) a risky asset which price dynamics was governed by the Constant Elasticity of variance (CEV) model and (2) a risk-free asset which price system followed the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck model. We employed the maximum principle of dynamic programming to obtain the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman (H-J-B) equation on which the first principle and the elimination of variable dependency were applied to get the closed-form of the investor’s optimal strategies. Two scenarios where the Brownian motions correlated and where they did not correlate were investigated. Also considered were the cases of when transaction cost was involved and when transaction cost was not involved. This lead to six cases that among the results obtained was that the investor has an optimal investment strategy that requires more amount of money for investment when the Brownian motions do not correlate and there is transaction cost than when the Brownian motions correlate and there is no transaction.

Published in Pure and Applied Mathematics Journal (Volume 9, Issue 3)
DOI 10.11648/j.pamj.20200903.12
Page(s) 55-63
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Investor, Optimal Strategy, Transaction Cost, Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Model, Constant of Elasticity of Variance (CEV) Model, Exponential Utility Maximization

References
[1] Merton R. C. (1971). Optimum Consumption and Portfolio Rules in a Continuous-time model, Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 3, No. 4, 373-413.
[2] Gu A., Guo X., and Li Z. (2012). Optimal Control of excess-of-loss Reinsurance an Investment for Insurers under Constant Elasticity of variance (CEV) model, Insurance Mathematics and Economics, Vol. 51, No. 3, 674 – 684.
[3] Liu J., Bai L., and Yiu K. C. (2012). Optimal Investment with a value-at-risk constraint. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization [JIMO], 8 (3): 531-457
[4] Zhao H., Rong X. (2012): Portfolio selection problem with multiple risky assets under the constant elasticity of variance model. Elsevier, vol. 50 (1), pages 179-190.
[5] Chang H., Chang K. and Lu J. M. (2014): Portfolio selection with liability and affine interest rate in the HARA utility framework, Abstract and Applied Analysis. 2014, pp. 1-12
[6] Ihedioha S. A, Oruh B. I. & Osu B. O. (2017). Effects of Correlation of Brownian Motions on an Investor’s Optimal Investment and Consumption Decision under Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Model, Academic Journal of Applied Mathematical Sciences, Academic Research Publishing Group, Vol 3 (6), pages 52-61, 06-2017. Handle: RePEc: arp: ajoams: 2017: 52-61.
[7] Okonkwo, C. U., Osu B. O., Ihedioha S. A. and Chibuisi C. (2018). Optimal Investment Strategy for Defined Contribution Pension Scheme under the Heston Volatility Model, Journal of Mathematical Finance, 8, 613-622
[8] Osu B. O., Njoku K. N. C and Basimanebotlhe O. S. (2019). Fund Management Strategies for a Defined Contribution (DC) Pension Scheme under the Default Fund Phase IV, Communications in Mathematical Finance, vol. 8, no. 1, 2019, 169-185 ISSN: 2241-195X (print), 2241- 1968 (online) Scientific Press International Limited.
[9] Akpanibah E. E., Osu B. O., Njoku K. N. C and Eyo O. A (2017). Optimization of Wealth Investment Strategies for DCPension Fund with Stochastic Salary and Extra Contributions, International Journal of Partial Differential Equations and Applications, vol. 5. no. 1, 33-41.
[10] Njoku K. N. C., Osu B. O., Akpanibah E. E. and Ujumadu R. N. (2017). Effect of Extra Contribution on Stochastic Optimal Investment Strategies for DC Pension with Stochastic Salary under the Affine Interest Rate Model, Journal of Mathematical Finance, 7, 821-833.
[11] Wang L. and Chen, Z. (2018). Nash Equilibrium Strategy for a DC Pension Plan with State Dependent Risk Aversion: A Multiperiod Mean-Variance Framework. Hindawi Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society Article ID 7581231 https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7581231.
[12] Osu B. O., Akpanibah E. E. and Olunkwa C. (2018). Mean-Variance Optimization of portfolios with return of premium clauses in a DC pension plan with multiple contributors under constant elasticity of variance model, Int. J. Math. Comput. Sci., 12 (2018), 85–90. 1
[13] Osu B. O., Akpanibah E. E. and Oruh B. I. (2017). Optimal investment strategies for Defined Contribution (DC) pension fund with multiple contributors via Legendre transform and dual theory, Int. J. Pure Appl. Res., 2 97–105. 1
[14] Osu B. O., Njoku K. N. C. and Oruh B. I. (2019). On the Effect of Inflation and Impact of Hedging on Pension Wealth Generation Strategies under the Geometric Brownian motion Mode, Earthline Journal of Mathematical Sciences, Volume 1, Number 2, 2019, Pages 119-142. http://www.earthlinepublishers.com; https://doi.org/10.34198/ejms.1219.119142
[15] Njoku K. N. C. and Osu B. O. (2019). On the Modified Optimal Investment Strategy for Annuity Contracts under the Constant Elasticity of Variance (CEV) Model, Earthline Journal of Mathematical Sciences, Volume 1, Number 1, 63-90. http://www.earthlinepublishers.com, https://doi.org/10.34198/ejms.1119.6390
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Silas Abahia Ihedioha, Nanle Tanko Danat, Audu Buba. (2020). Investor’s Optimal Strategy with and Without Transaction Cost Under Ornstein-Uhlenbeck and Constant Elasticity of Variance (CEV) Models Via Exponential Utility Maximization. Pure and Applied Mathematics Journal, 9(3), 55-63. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pamj.20200903.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Silas Abahia Ihedioha; Nanle Tanko Danat; Audu Buba. Investor’s Optimal Strategy with and Without Transaction Cost Under Ornstein-Uhlenbeck and Constant Elasticity of Variance (CEV) Models Via Exponential Utility Maximization. Pure Appl. Math. J. 2020, 9(3), 55-63. doi: 10.11648/j.pamj.20200903.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Silas Abahia Ihedioha, Nanle Tanko Danat, Audu Buba. Investor’s Optimal Strategy with and Without Transaction Cost Under Ornstein-Uhlenbeck and Constant Elasticity of Variance (CEV) Models Via Exponential Utility Maximization. Pure Appl Math J. 2020;9(3):55-63. doi: 10.11648/j.pamj.20200903.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.pamj.20200903.12,
      author = {Silas Abahia Ihedioha and Nanle Tanko Danat and Audu Buba},
      title = {Investor’s Optimal Strategy with and Without Transaction Cost Under Ornstein-Uhlenbeck and Constant Elasticity of Variance (CEV) Models Via Exponential Utility Maximization},
      journal = {Pure and Applied Mathematics Journal},
      volume = {9},
      number = {3},
      pages = {55-63},
      doi = {10.11648/j.pamj.20200903.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pamj.20200903.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.pamj.20200903.12},
      abstract = {In this work, we studied the optimal investment problem of an investor who had exponential utility preference and traded two assets; (1) a risky asset which price dynamics was governed by the Constant Elasticity of variance (CEV) model and (2) a risk-free asset which price system followed the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck model. We employed the maximum principle of dynamic programming to obtain the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman (H-J-B) equation on which the first principle and the elimination of variable dependency were applied to get the closed-form of the investor’s optimal strategies. Two scenarios where the Brownian motions correlated and where they did not correlate were investigated. Also considered were the cases of when transaction cost was involved and when transaction cost was not involved. This lead to six cases that among the results obtained was that the investor has an optimal investment strategy that requires more amount of money for investment when the Brownian motions do not correlate and there is transaction cost than when the Brownian motions correlate and there is no transaction.},
     year = {2020}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Investor’s Optimal Strategy with and Without Transaction Cost Under Ornstein-Uhlenbeck and Constant Elasticity of Variance (CEV) Models Via Exponential Utility Maximization
    AU  - Silas Abahia Ihedioha
    AU  - Nanle Tanko Danat
    AU  - Audu Buba
    Y1  - 2020/07/04
    PY  - 2020
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pamj.20200903.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.pamj.20200903.12
    T2  - Pure and Applied Mathematics Journal
    JF  - Pure and Applied Mathematics Journal
    JO  - Pure and Applied Mathematics Journal
    SP  - 55
    EP  - 63
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2326-9812
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pamj.20200903.12
    AB  - In this work, we studied the optimal investment problem of an investor who had exponential utility preference and traded two assets; (1) a risky asset which price dynamics was governed by the Constant Elasticity of variance (CEV) model and (2) a risk-free asset which price system followed the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck model. We employed the maximum principle of dynamic programming to obtain the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman (H-J-B) equation on which the first principle and the elimination of variable dependency were applied to get the closed-form of the investor’s optimal strategies. Two scenarios where the Brownian motions correlated and where they did not correlate were investigated. Also considered were the cases of when transaction cost was involved and when transaction cost was not involved. This lead to six cases that among the results obtained was that the investor has an optimal investment strategy that requires more amount of money for investment when the Brownian motions do not correlate and there is transaction cost than when the Brownian motions correlate and there is no transaction.
    VL  - 9
    IS  - 3
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Mathematics, Plateau State University Bokkos, Jos, Plateau State, Nigeria

  • Department of Mathematics, Plateau State University Bokkos, Jos, Plateau State, Nigeria

  • Department of Actuarial Science, University of Jos, Jos, Plateau State, Nigeria

  • Sections