| Peer-Reviewed

GIS and Logit Regression Model Applications in Land Use/Land Cover Change and Distribution in Usangu Catchment

Received: 13 March 2015    Accepted: 31 March 2015    Published: 9 April 2015
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

This study applied time series analysis to examine land use/land cover (LULC) change and distribution in Usangu watershed and multinomial logistic regression in the GIS environment to model the influence of the related driving factors. Historical land use/cover data of the watershed were extracted from the 2000, 2006 and 2013 Landsat images using GIS and remote sensing data processing and analysis techniques. Data was analyzed using ArcMap 10.1, ERDAS Imagine, SPSS and IDRISI Selva software. Eight factors likely to influence LULC change and LULC distribution were assessed. These include elevation, slope, distance from roads, distance from rivers networks, population density, Normalized Vegetation Index (NDVI), annual rainfall and soil types. Results show that LULC changes are mainly influenced by variations in annual rainfall, population density and distance from road networks. LULC distribution is determined mainly by terrain and edaphic factors namely elevation, slope and soil types. NDVI does not influence LULC change nor determine the LULC distribution, but can be used to show concentration of LULC types on a landscape. Combination of GIS, remote sensing and statistical analysis capabilities are powerful tools for assessing and model processes of land use change and their underlying causes in terms of time and space. It is concluded that ingeniously integration of remote sensing, GIS application combined with multi-source spatial data analysis give great possibility of quantifying and explaining the temporal and spatial LULC changes and distribution in a given watershed.

Published in American Journal of Remote Sensing (Volume 3, Issue 1)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajrs.20150301.12
Page(s) 6-16
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

LandUse/Cover, Change and Distribution, GIS, Remote Sensing, Multinomial Logit Regression, Usangu

References
[1] Koomen, E. and J. Stillwell, Modelling land-use change. 2007: Springer.
[2] Hyandye, C. and I. Katega, Natural Barriers to Eco-environmental Vulnerability in a Complex Ecosystem. Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering, 2010. 4(9): p. 32-39.
[3] Antrop, M., Landscape change and the urbanization process in Europe. Landscape and urban planning, 2004. 67(1): p. 9-26.
[4] Cihlar, J. and L.J. Jansen, From land cover to land use: a methodology for efficient land use mapping over large areas. The Professional Geographer, 2001. 53(2): p. 275-289.
[5] Peña, J., et al., Driving forces of land-use change in a cultural landscape of Spain, in Modelling land-use change. 2007, Springer. p. 97-116.
[6] Bürgi, M., A.M. Hersperger, and N. Schneeberger, Driving forces of landscape change—current and new directions. Landscape Ecology, 2004. 19(8): p. 857-868.
[7] Wood, R. and J. Handley, Landscape dynamics and the management of change. Landscape Research, 2001. 26(1): p. 45-54.
[8] Verburg, P.H., et al., Determinants of land-use change patterns in the Netherlands. Environment and Planning B, 2004. 31(1): p. 125-150.
[9] Giri, C., P. Defourny, and S. Shrestha, Land cover characterization and mapping of continental Southeast Asia using multi-resolution satellite sensor data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2003. 24(21): p. 4181-4196.
[10] Lambin, E.F., H.J. Geist, and E. Lepers, Dynamics of land-use and land-cover change in tropical regions. Annual review of environment and resources, 2003. 28(1): p. 205-241.
[11] Jansen, L., G. Carrai, and M. Petri, Land-use change at cadastral parcel level in Albania, in Modelling Land-Use Change. 2007, Springer. p. 25-44.
[12] Kikula, I., Charnley, S., Yanda, P., Ecological changes in the Usangu Plains and their implications on the downstream flow of the Great Ruaha river in Tanzania. Research Report No.99. 1996, Institute of Resource Assessment: Dar es Salaam.
[13] Kashaigili, J.J., et al., Dynamics of Usangu plains wetlands: Use of remote sensing and GIS as management decision tools. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 2006. 31(15): p. 967-975.
[14] Kashaigili, J.J., Impacts of land-use and land-cover changes on flow regimes of the Usangu wetland and the Great Ruaha River, Tanzania. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 2008. 33(8–13): p. 640-647.
[15] Behera, D., et al., Modelling and analyzing the watershed dynamics using Cellular Automata (CA)–Markov model–A geo-information based approach. Journal of earth system science, 2012. 121(4): p. 1011-1024.
[16] Weng, Q., Land use change analysis in the Zhujiang Delta of China using satellite remote sensing, GIS and stochastic modelling. Journal of environmental management, 2002. 64(3): p. 273-284.
[17] Shu, Y. and K.G. Villholth, Analysis of Flow and Baseflow Trends in the Usangu Catchment, Tanzania. IWMI, International Water Management Institute, Pretoria, South Africa. http://www.ru.ac.za/static/institutes/iwr/SANCIAHS/2012/documents/047_Shu.pdf 2012.
[18] SMUWC, Final Report, Water Resources. Supporting report 7, Directorate of Water Resources, Dar es salaam, Tanzania. 2001a. p. 81.
[19] Kadigi, R.M., et al., Water for irrigation or hydropower generation?—Complex questions regarding water allocation in Tanzania. Agricultural water management, 2008. 95(8): p. 984-992.
[20] Geosystems, L., ERDAS imagine. 2011: Atlanta,Georgia.
[21] ESRI, ArcGIS Desktop 10.1. 2011, Environmental Systems Research Institute: Redlands, CA.
[22] Anderson, J.R., et al., A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data: US Geological Survey Professional Paper 964,28.Washington,1976.
[23] Kiptala, J., et al., Land use and land cover classification using phenological variability from MODIS vegetation in the Upper Pangani River Basin, Eastern Africa. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 2013. 66: p. 112-122.
[24] Lillesand, T.M. and R.W. Kiefer, Remote sensing and image interpretation. 1994, Wiley, New York.
[25] Jensen, J.R., Introductory Digital Image Processing: A Remote Sensing Perspective. 2007: Prentice Hall.
[26] Naidoo, R. and K. Hill, Emergence of indigenous vegetation classifications through integration of traditional ecological knowledge and remote sensing analyses. Environmental Management, 2006. 38(3): p. 377-387.
[27] Molnár, Z., et al., Distribution of the (semi-) natural habitats in Hungary I. Marshes and grasslands. Acta Botanica Hungarica, 2008. 50: p. 59-105.
[28] Labs, C., IDRISI Selva v17. GIS and Image Processing Software 2012.
[29] Abdel-Kader, F.H., Digital soil mapping at pilot sites in the northwest coast of Egypt: A multinomial logistic regression approach. The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, 2011. 14(1): p. 29-40.
[30] Tabachnick, B. and L. Fidell, Multivariate analysis of variance and covariance. Using multivariate statistics, 2007. 3: p. 402-407.
[31] Westergren, A., et al., Eating difficulties, need for assisted eating, nutritional status and pressure ulcers in patients admitted for stroke rehabilitation. Journal of clinical nursing, 2001. 10(2): p. 257-269.
[32] Hu, Z. and C. Lo, Modeling urban growth in Atlanta using logistic regression. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 2007. 31(6): p. 667-688.
[33] Kashaigili, J.J., et al. Integrated hydrological modelling of wetlands for environmental management: the case of the Usangu wetlands in the Great Ruaha catchment. in RIPARWIN Seminar Presentation, Sokoine Univ. of Agric. Morogoro, Tanzania. 2005.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Canute Hyandye, Christina Geoffrey Mandara, John Safari. (2015). GIS and Logit Regression Model Applications in Land Use/Land Cover Change and Distribution in Usangu Catchment. American Journal of Remote Sensing, 3(1), 6-16. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajrs.20150301.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Canute Hyandye; Christina Geoffrey Mandara; John Safari. GIS and Logit Regression Model Applications in Land Use/Land Cover Change and Distribution in Usangu Catchment. Am. J. Remote Sens. 2015, 3(1), 6-16. doi: 10.11648/j.ajrs.20150301.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Canute Hyandye, Christina Geoffrey Mandara, John Safari. GIS and Logit Regression Model Applications in Land Use/Land Cover Change and Distribution in Usangu Catchment. Am J Remote Sens. 2015;3(1):6-16. doi: 10.11648/j.ajrs.20150301.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajrs.20150301.12,
      author = {Canute Hyandye and Christina Geoffrey Mandara and John Safari},
      title = {GIS and Logit Regression Model Applications in Land Use/Land Cover Change and Distribution in Usangu Catchment},
      journal = {American Journal of Remote Sensing},
      volume = {3},
      number = {1},
      pages = {6-16},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajrs.20150301.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajrs.20150301.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajrs.20150301.12},
      abstract = {This study applied time series analysis to examine land use/land cover (LULC) change and distribution in Usangu watershed and multinomial logistic regression in the GIS environment to model the influence of the related driving factors. Historical land use/cover data of the watershed were extracted from the 2000, 2006 and 2013 Landsat images using GIS and remote sensing data processing and analysis techniques. Data was analyzed using ArcMap 10.1, ERDAS Imagine, SPSS and IDRISI Selva software. Eight factors likely to influence LULC change and LULC distribution were assessed. These include elevation, slope, distance from roads, distance from rivers networks, population density, Normalized Vegetation Index (NDVI), annual rainfall and soil types. Results show that LULC changes are mainly influenced by variations in annual rainfall, population density and distance from road networks. LULC distribution is determined mainly by terrain and edaphic factors namely elevation, slope and soil types. NDVI does not influence LULC change nor determine the LULC distribution, but can be used to show concentration of LULC types on a landscape. Combination of GIS, remote sensing and statistical analysis capabilities are powerful tools for assessing and model processes of land use change and their underlying causes in terms of time and space. It is concluded that ingeniously integration of remote sensing, GIS application combined with multi-source spatial data analysis give great possibility of quantifying and explaining the temporal and spatial LULC changes and distribution in a given watershed.},
     year = {2015}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - GIS and Logit Regression Model Applications in Land Use/Land Cover Change and Distribution in Usangu Catchment
    AU  - Canute Hyandye
    AU  - Christina Geoffrey Mandara
    AU  - John Safari
    Y1  - 2015/04/09
    PY  - 2015
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajrs.20150301.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajrs.20150301.12
    T2  - American Journal of Remote Sensing
    JF  - American Journal of Remote Sensing
    JO  - American Journal of Remote Sensing
    SP  - 6
    EP  - 16
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2328-580X
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajrs.20150301.12
    AB  - This study applied time series analysis to examine land use/land cover (LULC) change and distribution in Usangu watershed and multinomial logistic regression in the GIS environment to model the influence of the related driving factors. Historical land use/cover data of the watershed were extracted from the 2000, 2006 and 2013 Landsat images using GIS and remote sensing data processing and analysis techniques. Data was analyzed using ArcMap 10.1, ERDAS Imagine, SPSS and IDRISI Selva software. Eight factors likely to influence LULC change and LULC distribution were assessed. These include elevation, slope, distance from roads, distance from rivers networks, population density, Normalized Vegetation Index (NDVI), annual rainfall and soil types. Results show that LULC changes are mainly influenced by variations in annual rainfall, population density and distance from road networks. LULC distribution is determined mainly by terrain and edaphic factors namely elevation, slope and soil types. NDVI does not influence LULC change nor determine the LULC distribution, but can be used to show concentration of LULC types on a landscape. Combination of GIS, remote sensing and statistical analysis capabilities are powerful tools for assessing and model processes of land use change and their underlying causes in terms of time and space. It is concluded that ingeniously integration of remote sensing, GIS application combined with multi-source spatial data analysis give great possibility of quantifying and explaining the temporal and spatial LULC changes and distribution in a given watershed.
    VL  - 3
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Institute of Rural Development Planning (IRDP), Dodoma, Tanzania

  • Institute of Rural Development Planning (IRDP), Dodoma, Tanzania

  • Institute of Rural Development Planning (IRDP), Dodoma, Tanzania

  • Sections