| Peer-Reviewed

Experimental Investigation on the Properties of Compressed Earth Blocks Stabilised with a Liquid Chemical

Received: 28 September 2017    Accepted: 10 October 2017    Published: 7 November 2017
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Soil blocks are usually stabilised with cementing materials, fibres or chemicals to improve their performance properties for construction purpose. This study investigates the properties of compressed earth blocks stabilised with a liquid chemical (Pidiproof LW+). Experiment was conducted using 0.5, 1 and 1.5% weight contents of Pidiproof LW+ to produce compressed earth blocks and cured at 7, 14, 21 and 28 days. The blocks were tested for density, absorption coefficient, compressive strength and splitting tensile strength. It was found that with the exception of density test, the chemical inclusion in the other tests significantly improved the performance properties of the compressed earth blocks. Furthermore, the higher chemical content (1.5%) inclusion in the compressed earth block provided better performance properties. The paper concludes that the inclusion of the liquid chemical in the compressed earth blocks generally improved the performance properties of the blocks. Recommendation is made to the use of other chemicals for applicability in earthen construction.

Published in Advances in Materials (Volume 6, Issue 6)
DOI 10.11648/j.am.20170606.13
Page(s) 122-128
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Compressed Earth Blocks, Density, Absorption Coefficient, Compressive Strength, Splitting Tensile Strength

References
[1] H. Danso, Use of agricultural waste fibres as enhancement of soil blocks for low-cost housing in Ghana [Ph.D. thesis], School of Civil Engineering and Surveying, University of Portsmouth, 2015, http://eprints.port.ac.uk/id/eprint/20762.
[2] H. Houben and H. Guillaud, Earth construction: a comprehensive guide. London: International Technology Publications, 1994.
[3] F. Parisi, D. Asprone, L. Fenu, and A. Prota, “Experimental characterization of Italian composite adobe bricks reinforced with straw fibers,” Composite Structures, vol. 122, pp. 300–307, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.11.060.
[4] W. Quagliarini and S. Lenci, “The influence of natural stabilisers and natural fibres on the mechanical properties of ancient Roman adobe bricks,” Journal of Cultural Heritage, vol. 11, pp. 309-314, 2010. doi:10.1016/j.culher.2009.11.012.
[5] Y. Millogo, J. E. Aubert, E. Hamard and J. C. Morel, “How Properties of Kenaf Fibers from Burkina Faso Contribute to the Reinforcement of Earth Blocks,” Materials, vol. 8, pp. 2332-2345, 2015, doi:10.3390/ma8052332.
[6] M. G. Sreekumar and D. G. Nair, “Stabilized lateritic blocks reinforced with fibrous coir wastes” International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and Technology, vol. 4, pp. 23-32, 2013.
[7] P. Donkor and E. Obonyo, “Compressed soil blocks: influence of fibers on flexural properties and failure mechanism,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 121, pp. 25–33, 2016.
[8] H. Danso, D. B. Martinson, M. Ali, and J. B. Williams, “Physical, mechanical and durability properties of soil building blocks reinforced with natural fibres,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 101, pp. 797–809, 2015.
[9] H. Danso, D. B. Martinson, M. Ali, and J. Williams, “Effect of fibre aspect ratio on mechanical properties of soil building blocks,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 83, pp. 314–319, 2015.
[10] H. Danso, D. B. Martinson, M. Ali, and J. Williams, “Effect of sugarcane bagasse fibre on the strength properties of soil blocks,” in Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Bio-Based Building Materials, Clermont-Ferrand, France, June 2015.
[11] B. V. Venkatarama Reddy, R. Lal and K. S. Nanjunda Rao, “Optimum Soil Grading for the Soil-Cement Blocks,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, vol. 19, pp. 139-148, 2007, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:2(139).
[12] A. S. Muntohar, “Engineering characteristics of the compressed-stabilized earth brick,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 25, pp. 4215–4220, 2011.
[13] R. Alavéz-Ramírez, P. Montes-Garcia, J. Martinez-Reyes, D. C. Altamirano-Juarez and Y. Gochi-Ponce, “The use of sugarcane bagasse ash and lime to improve the durability and mechanical properties of compacted soil blocks,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 34, pp. 296–305, 2012, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.02.072.
[14] P. Walker and T. Stace, “Properties of some cement stabilised compressed earth blocks and mortars,” Materials and Structures, vol. 30, no. 203, pp. 545–551, 1997.
[15] J. E. Oti, J. M. Kinuthia and J. Bai, “Unfired clay bricks: from laboratory to industrial production,” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Engineering Sustainability, vol. 162, pp. 229–237, 2009.
[16] A. Balila, M. Vahdati, T. Lees and S. Nortcliff, “Sustainable bio-inspired stabilisers to enhance the strength, durability and structural stability of adobe bricks used for the construction of houses in the outskirts of Khartoum,” Young Researchers’ Forum III, Innovation in Construction Materials, 12 April 2016.
[17] D. Bernardi, J. DeJong, B. M. Montoya and B. Martinez, “Bio-bricks: Biologically cemented sandstone bricks,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 55, pp. 462-9, 2014.
[18] Pidilite, “Liquid Integral Waterproofing Compound for Concrete and Plaster,” 2010, http://kannanpaints.weebly.com/uploads/3/7/3/7/3737630/pidiproof_lw.pdf.
[19] BS EN 771-1, Specification for masonry units, Clay Masonry Units, European Standard adopted by British Standards Institution: http://shop.bsigroup.com/ProductDetail/?pid=000000000030142472, 2003.
[20] BS EN 772-11, Methods of Test for Masonry Units, European Standards adopted by British Standards Institution: http://shop.bsigroup.com/ProductDetail/?pid=000000000030215381, 2011.
[21] BS EN 772-1, Methods of test for masonry units. Determination of Compressive Strength, European Standards adopted by British Standards Institution: http://shop.bsigroup.com/ProductDetail/?pid=000000000030215378, 2011.
[22] BS EN 12390-6, Testing hardened concrete, Tensile Splitting Strength of Test Specimens, European Standard adopted by British Standards Institution: https://www.document-center.com/standards/show/BS-EN-12390-6, 2009.
[23] Arumala, J. O. and Gondal, T. Compressed Earth Building Block for Affordable Housing, London, United Kingdom, RICS Publishers. 2007.
[24] H. Danso, B. Martinson, M. Ali, and C. Mant, “Performance characteristics of enhanced soil blocks: a quantitative review,” Building Research & Information, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 253–262, 2015.
[25] K. M. A. Hossain, M. Lachemi and S. Easa, “Stabilized soils for construction applications incorporating natural resources of Papua New Guinea,” Resources, Conservation and Recycling, vol. 51, pp. 711–731, 2007.
[26] C. M. Chan, “Effect of natural fibers inclusion in clay bricks: physico-mechanical properties,” International Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, vol. 3 (1), pp. 51–57, 2011.
[27] R. Bahar, M. Benazzoug and S. Kenai, “Performance of compacted cement-stabilised soil,” Cement & Concrete Composites, vol. 26, pp. 811–820, 2004.
[28] K. M. A. Hossain and L. Mol, “Some engineering properties of stabilized clayey soils incorporating natural pozzolans and industrial wastes,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 25, pp. 3495–3501, 2011. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.03.042.
[29] Y. Millogo and J. C. Morel, “Microstructural characterization and mechanical properties of cement stabilised adobes,” Materials and Structures, vol. 45, pp. 1311-1318, 2012, DOI 10.1617/s11527-012-9833-2.
[30] R. Medjo Eko, E. D. Offa, T. Y. Ngatcha and L. S. Minsili, “Potential of salvaged steel fibers for reinforcement of unfired earth blocks,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 35, pp. 340–346, 2012. doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.11.050.
[31] H. Danso, “Properties of Coconut, Oil Palm and Bagasse Fibres: As Potential Building Materials,” Procedia Engineering, vol. 200, pp. 1–9, 2017, doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.002.
[32] A. Laborel-Préneron, J.-E. Aubert, C. Magniont, P. Maillard and C. Poirier, “Effect of Plant Aggregates on Mechanical Properties of Earth Bricks,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, vol. 29, pp. 1-12, 2017, doi:10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002096.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Humphrey Danso. (2017). Experimental Investigation on the Properties of Compressed Earth Blocks Stabilised with a Liquid Chemical. Advances in Materials, 6(6), 122-128. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.am.20170606.13

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Humphrey Danso. Experimental Investigation on the Properties of Compressed Earth Blocks Stabilised with a Liquid Chemical. Adv. Mater. 2017, 6(6), 122-128. doi: 10.11648/j.am.20170606.13

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Humphrey Danso. Experimental Investigation on the Properties of Compressed Earth Blocks Stabilised with a Liquid Chemical. Adv Mater. 2017;6(6):122-128. doi: 10.11648/j.am.20170606.13

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.am.20170606.13,
      author = {Humphrey Danso},
      title = {Experimental Investigation on the Properties of Compressed Earth Blocks Stabilised with a Liquid Chemical},
      journal = {Advances in Materials},
      volume = {6},
      number = {6},
      pages = {122-128},
      doi = {10.11648/j.am.20170606.13},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.am.20170606.13},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.am.20170606.13},
      abstract = {Soil blocks are usually stabilised with cementing materials, fibres or chemicals to improve their performance properties for construction purpose. This study investigates the properties of compressed earth blocks stabilised with a liquid chemical (Pidiproof LW+). Experiment was conducted using 0.5, 1 and 1.5% weight contents of Pidiproof LW+ to produce compressed earth blocks and cured at 7, 14, 21 and 28 days. The blocks were tested for density, absorption coefficient, compressive strength and splitting tensile strength. It was found that with the exception of density test, the chemical inclusion in the other tests significantly improved the performance properties of the compressed earth blocks. Furthermore, the higher chemical content (1.5%) inclusion in the compressed earth block provided better performance properties. The paper concludes that the inclusion of the liquid chemical in the compressed earth blocks generally improved the performance properties of the blocks. Recommendation is made to the use of other chemicals for applicability in earthen construction.},
     year = {2017}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Experimental Investigation on the Properties of Compressed Earth Blocks Stabilised with a Liquid Chemical
    AU  - Humphrey Danso
    Y1  - 2017/11/07
    PY  - 2017
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.am.20170606.13
    DO  - 10.11648/j.am.20170606.13
    T2  - Advances in Materials
    JF  - Advances in Materials
    JO  - Advances in Materials
    SP  - 122
    EP  - 128
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2327-252X
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.am.20170606.13
    AB  - Soil blocks are usually stabilised with cementing materials, fibres or chemicals to improve their performance properties for construction purpose. This study investigates the properties of compressed earth blocks stabilised with a liquid chemical (Pidiproof LW+). Experiment was conducted using 0.5, 1 and 1.5% weight contents of Pidiproof LW+ to produce compressed earth blocks and cured at 7, 14, 21 and 28 days. The blocks were tested for density, absorption coefficient, compressive strength and splitting tensile strength. It was found that with the exception of density test, the chemical inclusion in the other tests significantly improved the performance properties of the compressed earth blocks. Furthermore, the higher chemical content (1.5%) inclusion in the compressed earth block provided better performance properties. The paper concludes that the inclusion of the liquid chemical in the compressed earth blocks generally improved the performance properties of the blocks. Recommendation is made to the use of other chemicals for applicability in earthen construction.
    VL  - 6
    IS  - 6
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Construction & Wood Technology, University of Education, Winneba, Ghana

  • Sections