Potential of Small Holder Farmers Agricultural Practices in Enhancing Soil Organic Carbon Stock and Other Selected Soil Physico Properties at Akaki District, Ethiopia
Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries
Volume 8, Issue 6, December 2019, Pages: 112-120
Received: Aug. 20, 2019; Accepted: Oct. 26, 2019; Published: Jan. 6, 2020
Views 29      Downloads 15
Authors
Addisu Wakayo, Oromia Department of Agriculture and Natural Resource, Bishoftu, Ethiopia
Tokuma Urgessa, Ethiopian Biodiversity Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Article Tools
Follow on us
Abstract
Land degradation and extensive use of agricultural lands have led to the decline in soil fertility. To reverse the nutrient deterioration of cultivated lands, farmers have started employing various conservation agriculture practices. This study was initiated to examine the potential of conservation agriculture (integrated practices such as inter cropping, crop rotation, residue retention and minimum tillage) by smallholder farmers to enhance soil organic carbon stock and other selected soil physicochemical properties in Akaki district Bilbilo micro watershed. A systematic sampling method was employed for data collection. Totally 96 composite soil samples (8 plots x 2 systems x 2 replication of site x 3 depth: 0-10cm, 10-20cm and 20-30cm) were collected for analysis. Results showed that soil bulk density (BD) was significantly (p<0.05) varied with practices and depth (p<0.001). It was lower in soil under conservation (0.78 g m-3) than under conventional practice (1.48 gm-3); and in the top layer 0-10 cm (1.21±0.05) than the rest depths. BD showed increasing trend with soil depth across the practices: lower on the top 0-10cm depth (0.78 ±0.03) compared with the rest. The pH was higher (7.28) in conservation than conventional (5.75). The CEC was higher (14.6Cmol (+)/kg) in conservation practice than in the conventional (10.3 cmol (+)/kg). Both pH and CEC had shown increase in the two practices and soil depth due to the leaching of base cation from upper to lower layers. The mean SOC stocks decrease with increasing soil depth about the significant variations with treatments and depth. The SOC stock was higher (110.6t c /h) in conservation practice than in conventional practice (50.22 t/ha). Similarly, total N stocks was also higher (19.5 t c/ha) in conservation practice than in conventional practice (17.4 t c/ha). SOC and total N in both practices had decreased with soil depth due to lower accumulation of organic residue in the lower layer. Likewise, C: N ratios had increases with depth due to similar reason the decrease the amount of soil organic carbon and TN pool (e.g. root biomass) with depth. However, the C: N ratio has higher value in conservation practice (6.51) than in conventional practice (6.05). Most of the measured soil properties were improved in CA aided followed by soil depth compared with conventional agriculture and at soil depth layers ones. The interaction of farming practice types and soil depth also significantly affected all parameters.
Keywords
Nutrient Management, Residue Retention, Crop Rotation, Crop Land Use, Step-wise Integration, Soil Bulk Density
To cite this article
Addisu Wakayo, Tokuma Urgessa, Potential of Small Holder Farmers Agricultural Practices in Enhancing Soil Organic Carbon Stock and Other Selected Soil Physico Properties at Akaki District, Ethiopia, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. Vol. 8, No. 6, 2019, pp. 112-120. doi: 10.11648/j.aff.20190806.12
Copyright
Copyright © 2019 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
References
[1]
Ahmad, N. 1986. Soil and agronomic factors influencing fodder production in the Ethiopian highlands of East Africa. PSD Working paper no. B4. International Livestock Centre for Africa (ILCA), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Pp. 58.
[2]
Baruah, R., Medhi, B. K., Patgiri, D. K., Bhattacharyya, D. and Deka, C. R., 2017. Soil organic carbon stock in agricultural land of Jorhat district of Assam. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 16 (1), pp. 25-31.
[3]
Blake, G. R., and Hartge, K. H. 1986. Bulk density in methods of Soil Analysis, Part I: Physical and Mineralogical Methods (Klute, A. eds.); Soil Science Society of America: Madison, Wisconsin, pp. 363-375.
[4]
Brady, N. C. and Weil, R. R. 2002. The Nature and Properties of Soils, 13th Ed. Prentice- Hall Inc., New Jersey, USA. 960: pp. 16-27.
[5]
Beretta, A. N., Silbermann, A. V., Paladino, L., Torres, D., Bassahun, D., Musselli, R. and García-Lamohte, A., 2014. Soil te×ture analyses using a hydrometer: modification of the Bouyoucos method. Ciencia e investigación agraria, 41 (2), pp. 263-271.
[6]
Chaudhari, P. R., Ahire, D. V., Ahire, V. D., Chkravarty, M. and Maity, S. 2013. Soil bulk density as related to soil te×ture, organic matter content and available total nutrients of Coimbatore soil. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications. 3 (2): pp. 1-8.
[7]
Chernet, T. Hart, WK. Aronson, JL. and Walter, RC. 1998. New age constraints on the Timing of volcanism and tectonism in the northern Ethiopian Main Rift-Southern Afar transition zone. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res., 80: pp. 267-280.
[8]
Dudal, R., 1965. Dark clay soils of tropical and sub-tropical regions. Agricultural Development Report 83. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization), Rome. pp. 16.
[9]
Eggleston, S., Buendia, L., and Miwa, K. 2006. IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories (recursoelectrónico): waste. Kanagawa, JP: Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, cultivated soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 50: pp. 627–633.
[10]
Foth, H. D. and B. G. Ellis., 1997. Soil fertility, 2nd Ed. Lewis CRC Press LLC., USA.
[11]
Gicheru, P., Gachene, C., Mbuvi, J. and Mare, E., 2004. Effects of soil management practices and tillage systems on surface soil water conservation and crust formation on a sandy loam in semi-arid Kenya. Soil and Tillage Research, 75 (2), pp. 173-184.
[12]
Gustafsson, J., Cederberg, C., Sonesson, U., and Emanuelsson, A. 2013. The methodology of the FAO study: Global Food Losses and Food Waste-e×tent, causes and prevention”-FAO, 2011. SIK Institutet förlivsmedelochbioteknik.
[13]
Govaerts, B., Fuentes, M., Sayre, K. D., Mezzalama, M., Nicol, J. M., Deckers, J., Etchevers, J., and Figueroa-Sandoval, B. 2007. Infiltration, soil moisture, root rot and nematode populations after 12 years of different tillage, residue and crop rotation managements. Soil Till. Res. 94: 209–219.
[14]
Gwenzi, W., Gotosa, J., Chakanetsa, S. and Mutema, Z., 2009. Effects of tillage systems on soil organic carbon dynamics, structural stability and crop yields in irrigated wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) –cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) rotation in semi-arid Zimbabwe. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 83 (3), p. 211.
[15]
Havlin, J. L., Beaton, J. D., Tisdale, S. L., and Nelson, W. L. 2005. Soil fertility and fertilizers: An introduction to nutrient management. 7th Edition. Pearson Prentice Hall Publishers, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA.
[16]
Jat, R. K., Sapkota, T. B., Singh, R. G., Jat, M. L. L., Kumar, M. & Gupta, R. K. 2014. Seven years of conservation agriculture in a rice–wheat rotation of Eastern Gangetic Plains of South Asia: yield trends and economic profitability. Field Crops Research, 164, 199–210
[17]
Jones, J. B. 2003. Agronomic handbook: management of crops, soils, and their fertility. CRC press LLC, N. W. Corporate Blvd., Boca Ratio, Florida.
[18]
Karppinen, K., Zoratti, L., Nguyenquynh, N., Häggman, H. and Jaakola, L., 2016. On the developmental and environmental regulation of secondary metabolism in Vaccinium spp. berries. Frontiers in plant science, 7, pp. 655.
[19]
Kumar, A., Somasundaram, J., Biswas, A. K., Sinha, N. K., Mishra, V. N., Chaudhary, R. S., Mohanty, M., Hati, K. M., Saha, R. and Patra, A. K., 2017. Short-term effect of conservation agriculture practices on soil quality of a vertisol in central India. Applied Biological Research, 19 (1), pp. 26-34.
[20]
Leifeld. J, S. Bassin, and J. Fuhrer, 2005. Carbon stocks in Swiss agricultural soils predicted by land-use, soil characteristics, and altitude, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ., 105, pp. 255–266.
[21]
Mann, W., Henderson, B., Branca, G., Lipper, L., Gerber, P., Tennigkeit, T., Neves, B. and Wilkes, A., 2011. Climate change mitigation finance for smallholder agriculture: a guide book to harvesting soil carbon sequestration benefits.
[22]
Mengistu C, Kibebew K, Tarekegn F. 2017. Influence of Different Land Use Types and Soil Depths on Selected Soil Properties Related to Soil Fertility in Warandhab Area, Horo Guduru Wallaga Zone, Oromiya, Ethiopia. Int J Environ Sci Nat Res., 4 (2): 555634.
[23]
McGarry, D., Bridge, B. J. and Radford, B. J. 2000. Contrasting soil physical properties after zero and traditional tillage of an alluvial soil in the semi-arid subtropical. Soil Tillage Research 53 (2), pp 105-115.
[24]
Morisada, K., Ono, K., and Kanomata, H. 2004. Organic carbon stock in forest soils in Japan. Geoderma, 119 (1-2), pp. 21-32.
[25]
Muche M, Kokeb A, Molla E, 2005. Assessing the Physicochemical Properties of Soil under Different Land Use Types. J Environ Anal To×icol.; 5: 309
[26]
Murphy, B. 2014. Soil organic matter and soil function–Review of the literature and underlying data. Department of the environment, canberra, Australia. pp. 155.
[27]
Negassa, W., Abera, T., Friesen, D. K., Deressa, A. and Dinsa, B., 2001, February. Evaluation of compost for maize production under farmers' conditions. In Seventh Eastern and Southern Africa Regional Maize Conference (pp. 382-386).
[28]
Rice, C. and Scholes, B., 2008. Greenhouse gas mitigation in agriculture. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 363 (1492), pp. 789-813
[29]
Smith, P., Martino, D., Cai, Z., Gwary, D., Janzen, H., Kumar, P., McCarl, B., Ogle, S., O'Mara, F., Rice, C. and Scholes, B., 2007. Greenhouse gas mitigation in agriculture. Philosophical transactions of the royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 363 (1492), pp. 789-813.
ADDRESS
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
U.S.A.
Tel: (001)347-983-5186