Weed competition is one of the most important production constraints causing up to 91.6% reduction in potential yield of cowpea. Therefore, an experiment was conducted at Sirinka and at Jari, northern Ethiopia, during the 2014 main cropping season: to evaluate the effect of planting pattern and frequency of weeding on weeds, yield components and yield of cowpea. There were 18 treatments comprising combination of three planting patterns (S1: 60 cm x 10 cm, S2: 45 cm x 15 cm, S3: 45 cm x 10 cm) and six weeding frequencies viz. one hand weeding and hoeing at 2 weeks after crop emergence (WAE), one hand weeding and hoeing at 3 WAE, one hand weeding and hoeing at 4 WAE, two hand weeding and hoeing at 2 and 5 WAE, weed free check, and weedy check. The treatments were arranged in factorial combination in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Results showed significantly lower total weed dry weight at Sirinka than at Jari. The highest weed control efficacy was recorded in two hand weeding and hoeing at 2 and 5 WAE of cowpea at Sirinka. The plants in weedy check plots at Jari attained maximum height which was significantly higher than all the other treatments. Significantly highest number of pods per plant was recorded in weed free check under 60 cm x 10 cm spacing at Jari. Number of seeds per pod was highest in weed free check at 45 cm x 10 cm spacing at Sirinka. The interaction of weeding frequency and location had significant effect on cowpea dry biomass yield. The highest total dry biomass (12413 kg ha-1) was obtained in one hand weeding and hoeing at 4 WAE at Jari while the highest grain yield (4508 kg ha-1) was recorded from complete weed free under 60 cm x 10 cm spacing at Sirinka. The harvest index ranged from 18.2% in weedy check at Jari to 39.1% in weed free check at Sirinka. The results indicated that the use of 60 cm x 10 cm planting pattern in combination with hand weeding and hoeing at 3 WAE at Sirinka and hand weeding and hoeing at 4 WAE at Jari proved to be the most feasible practice.
| Published in | Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (Volume 6, Issue 4) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.aff.20170604.12 |
| Page(s) | 111-122 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Broadleaved, Grain Yield, Weed Control Efficiency, Weed Density, Weed Dry Weight
| [1] | Timko, M. P. and Singh, B. B. 2008. Cowpea, a multifunctional legume, pp. 227-257. In: Moore, P. H., Ming, R. (Eds.), Genomics of tropical crop plants. Springer, New York. |
| [2] | Kitch, L. W., Bottenburg, H., Wolfson, J. L. 1998. Indigenous knowledge and cowpea pest management in Sub-Saharan Africa. pp. 292–302. In: Singh, B. B., Mohan, R. D. R., Dashiell, K. E., Jackai, L. E. N. (Eds.), Advances in cowpea Research. Co-publication of International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) and Japan International Center for Agricultural Sciences (JIRCAS), Ibadan, Nigeria. |
| [3] | Muimui, K. K. 2010. Beans Stakeholder Consultative Workshop. Common Wealth Youth Programme Africa. Lusaka. |
| [4] | Shiringani, R. P., Shimeles, H. A. 2011. Yield response and stability among cowpea genotypes at three planting dates and test environments. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 6 (4): 3259- 3263. |
| [5] | Sankie, L., Addo-Bediako, K. O. and Ayodele, V. 2012. Susceptibility of seven cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp] cultivars to cowpea beetle (Callosbruchus maculatres). Agricultural Science Research Journal, 2 (2): 65-69. |
| [6] | Muoneke, C. O., Ndukwe, O. M., Umana, P. E., Okpara, D. A., Asawalam, D. O. 2012. Productivity of vegetables cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp] and maize (Zea mays L.) intercropping system as influenced by component density in a tropical zone of southeastern Nigeria. International Journal of Agricultural Research Development, 15: 835-847. |
| [7] | Williams, M. M. 2006. Planting date influences critical period of weed control in sweet corn. Weed Science, 54: 928-933. |
| [8] | Kavalinuskaite, D. and Bobinas, C. 2006. Determination of weed composition critical period in red bat. Agronomic Research, 4: 217-220. |
| [9] | Anwar, S., Shah, W. A., Bakht, J. and Jabeen, U. 2004. Comparison of sorghum extracts, chemical and hand weeding management in wheat crop. Journal of Agronomy, 3 (1): 59-67. |
| [10] | Amador-Ramirez, M. D., Wilson, R. G. and Martin, A. R. 2001. Weed control and dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) response to in-row cultivation, rotary hoeing and herbicides. Weed Technology, 15: 429-436. |
| [11] | Chikoye, D., Udensi, E. U. and Lum, A. F. 2005. Evaluation of a new formulation of atrazine and metolachlor mixture for weed control in maize in Nigeria. Crop Protection, 24: 1016-1020. |
| [12] | IAR (Institute of Agricultural Research). 1987. Development of Synthetic Varieties of Maize. Department of Field Crops Maize Progress Report for the Period 1984/1985. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. |
| [13] | Matthews P. W., Armstrong, E. L., Lisle, C. J., Menz, I. D., Shephard P. L. and Armstrong, B. C. 2008. The effect of faba bean plant population on yield, seed quality and plant architecture under irrigation in southern NSW. Crop Agronomy Journal of Australia, 49: 999-1008. |
| [14] | Cheema, Z. A., Hussain, S. and Khaliq, A. 2003. Efficacy of sorgaab in combination with allelopathic water extracts and reduced rate of pendimethalin for weed control in mung bean. Journal of Plant Science, 2: 21-25. |
| [15] | Payne, R. W., Murray, D. A., Harding, S. A., Baird, D. B. and Soutar, D. M. 2009. GenStat for windows (12nd edn.) Introduction. VSN International, Hemel, Hempstead. |
| [16] | Gomez, K. A. and Gomez, A. A. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. pp. 680. 2nd Edition. John Willey and Sons, Inc. |
| [17] | Acosta, M. 1991. Determination of the critical period of competition of weeds in cowpea bean [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp] in Alanje. Scientific Journal of Philippines, 5: 43-48. |
| [18] | Muhammad, N. and Ahmad, S. 1999. Critical period of weed competition with the growth of mungbean. Pakistan Journal of Biological Science, 2 (4): 1600-1610. |
| [19] | Weiner, J., Griepentrog, H. W. and Kristensen, L. 2001. Suppression of weeds by spring wheat Triticum aestivum increases with crop density and spatial uniformity. Journal of Applied Ecology, 38: 784–790. |
| [20] | Naeem, M., Saeed, A. and Hakoomat, A. 2000. Efficacy of faluazifop butyl (Fusillade 25 EC) and fenoxaprop-P- ethyl (Pumas 69 EW) for weed control in mung bean. Pakistan Journal Agricultural Science, 37: 1-2. |
| [21] | Kelechukwu, N. E, Adewale, M. O. and Ezekiel, A. A. 2007. Aluminum Influence on Performance of some Cowpea cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp] Varieties on a Nigerian Alfisol. Word Journal of Agricultural Science, 3 (4): 512-522. |
| [22] | Mohamed, L. Z. 2002. The effect of intra-row spacing and starter nitrogen fertilizer on growth and yield of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp]. M.Sc thesis, University of Khartoum, Sudan. |
| [23] | Yayeh Bitew, Fekremariam Asargew, Oumer Beshir. 2014. Effect of Plant Spacing on the Yield and Yield Component of Field Pea (Pisum Sativum L.) at Adet, North Western Ethiopia. Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, 3 (5): 368-373. |
| [24] | Turk, M. A. and Tawaha, A. R. M. 2002. Impact of seeding rate, sedding date, rate and method of phosphorus application in faba bean (Vicia faba L. Minpr) in the absence of moisture stress. Biotechnology and Agronomy Society of Environment, 6 (3): 171-178. |
| [25] | Khalil, S. K., Wahab, A., Rehman, A., Muhammad, F., Wahab, S., Khan, A. Z., Zubair, M., Shah, M. K., Khalil, I. H. and Amin, R. 2010. Density and planting date influence on phenological development assimilate partitioning and dry matter production of faba bean. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 42 (6): 3831- 3838. |
| [26] | Thalji, T. 2010. Effect of plant density on seed yield and agronomic characters of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) under greenhouse conditions. Biosciences Research, 7 (1): 22-25. |
| [27] | Derya, O. Y. 2013. Impact of plant density on yield and yield components of pea (Pisum sativum ssp. sativum L.) cultivars. Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science, 2 (8): 169-174. |
| [28] | Yousaf, A., Ahsanui, M., Tahir, G. and Ahmed, N. 1999. Effect of Inter and Intra row Spacing on Yield and Yield components of Chickpea. Pakistan Journal of Biological Science, 2 (2): 305-307. |
| [29] | Hodgson, G. L. and Blackman, G. E. 2005. An Analysis of the Influence of Plant Density on the Growth of Vicia faba. Journal of Experimental Botany, 48: 147-165. |
| [30] | Ayaz, S., McNeil, D. L., McKenzie, B. A. and Hill, G. D. 2001. Density and sowing depth effects on yield components of grain legumes. Proceeding of Agronomy Society, New Zealand, 29: 9-15. |
| [31] | Rashid, A., Khan, R., Marwat, S. 2009. Importance of weed control in chickpea under rain fed condition. American-Eurasian Journal of Agriculture and Environment Science, 5 (4): 456-459. |
| [32] | Fathi, A. O. E., Khalaf, A. S. and Salim, N. M. 2011. Influence of tillage and weed management methods on chickpea yield and yield components, Pakistan Journal of Weed Science, 16 (2): 189-198. |
| [33] | Tepe, I., Erman, M., Yergin, R. and Bukun, B. 2011. Critical period of weed control in chickpea under non-irrigated conditions. Turk Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 35: 525-534. |
| [34] | Khan, F. S., Zammurad, I. A., Muhammad, A. and Hussain, S. 2008. Response of mungbean genotypes to rhizobium inoculum and varying levels of nitrogen fertilizer. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Research, 21: 1-4. |
| [35] | Biswan, D. K., Haque, M. M., Hamid, A., Ahmed, J. U. and Rahman, M. A. 2002. Influence of plant population density on growth and yield of two black gram varieties. Pakistan Journal of Agronomy, 3: 83-85. |
| [36] | Tunio, S. D., Rajput, M. J., Rajput, M. A. and Rajput, F. K. 1980. Effect of different row and plant spacings on growth and yield in soybean (Glycine max L. Merril). Egyptian Journal of Agronomy, 5 (1): 57-65. |
| [37] | Paul, T. and Joshi, M. C. 1977. Note on response of soybean variety 'Bragg' to plant population and planting geometry in Kumaon hills. Pantnagar Journal of Research, 2 (2): 225-226. |
| [38] | Lehman, W. F. and Lambert, J. W. 1960. Effects of spacing of soybean plants between and within rows on yield and its components. Agronomy Journal, 52 (1): 210-237. |
| [39] | Tessema, T. and Tanner, D. G. 1997. Grass weed competition and calculated economic threshold densities in bread wheat in Ethiopia. African Crop Science Journal, 5: 371-384. |
| [40] | Raklia, D. 1999. Efficacy of Sorghum allelopathy as weed control strategy. Kasetsart Journal of Natural Science, 40: 195-200. |
| [41] | Borras, L., Slafer, G. A. and Otegui, M. E. 2004. Seed dry weight response to source-sink manipulations in wheat, maize and soybean: a quantitative reappraisal. Field Crops Research, 86: 131-146. |
| [42] | Tenaw Workayehu, Beyenesh Zemicchael and Waga Mazengia. 1997. Effect of variety, seed rate and weeding frequencies on weed infestation and grain yield of haricot bean. 61pp. In: Proceeding of the 2th and 3th Annual Conference of the Ethiopian Weed Science Society, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. |
| [43] | Sharma G. D., Sharma, J. J. and Sood, S. 2004. Evaluation of alachlor, metolachlor and pendimethalin for weed control in rajmash (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in cold desert of North Western Himalayas. Indian Journal of Weed Science, 36: 287-289. |
| [44] | Shahidullah, M. and Hossain, M. M. 1987. Influence of inter-and intra-row spacing of soybean on yield and its components. Bangladesh Journal of Science, 22: 1-7. |
| [45] | Ihsanullah, F., Hayat, T., Habib, A., Abdul, B. and Noor, U. 2002. Effect of Row Spacing on Agronomic Traits and Yield of Mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]. Asian Journal of Plant Science, 1: 328-329. |
| [46] | Turk, M. A., Tawaha, A. M. and El-Shatnawi, M. K. J. 2003. Response of lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) to plant density, sowing date, phosphorus fertilization and ethephon application in the absence of moisture stress. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 189: 1-6. |
| [47] | Vrataric, M., Krizmanic, M. and Madjar, S. 1976. Effects of plant spacing and sowing on yield characteristics in new selections or genotypes of soybean. Field Crop Abstracts, 31 (11): 721 -723. |
| [48] | Green, D. S., Burlamagui, P. F. and Shible, R. 1977. Performance of randomly selected soybean lines with semi determinate and indeterminate growth habits. Journal of Crop Science, 17 (2): 335-339. |
| [49] | Cheema, M. and Akther, S. 2005. Efficacy of different post emergence herbicides and their application methods in controlling weeds in wheat. Pakistan Journal of Weed Science Research, 11: 23-30. |
| [50] | Al-Thahabi, S. A., Yasin, J. Z., Abu-Irmaileh, B. E., Haddad, N. I. and Saxena, M. C. 1994. Effect of weed removal on productivity of chickpea and lentil in a Mediterranean environment. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 5: 333-341. |
| [51] | Nuland, D. S. 1989. A visual description of the common bean plant four major growth periods. Bean Improvement Cooperative, 32; 16-17. |
| [52] | Goulden, D. S. 1976. Effect of plant population and row spacing on yield and components of yield in navy bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). New Zeland Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 4: 177-180. |
| [53] | Grafton, K. F., Schneiter, A. A. and Nagle, B. J. 1988. Row spacing, plant population and genotype x row spacing interaction effects on yield and yield components of dry bean. Agronomy Journal, 80: 631-634. |
| [54] | Ball, R. A., McNew, R. W., Vories, E. D., Keisling, T. C. and Purcell, L. C. 2001. Path analyses of population density effects on short season soybean yield. Agronomy Journal, 93 (1): 187-195. |
| [55] | Hamad, M. S. 2010. Effect of Plant density and Cultivar on Growth and Yield of Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp]. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Science, 4 (8): 3148-3153. |
| [56] | Joseph, A., Osipitan, A. O., Segun, T. L., Raphael, O. A. and Stephen, O. A. 2014. Growth and Yield Performance of Cowpea cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp] as influenced by Row Spacing and Period of Weed interference in South West Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural Science, 4: 16 – 37. |
| [57] | Askew, S. D., Wilcut, J. W. and Cranmer, J. R. 2002. Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) and weed response to flumioxazin applied pre plant and post emergence directed. Weed Technology, 16: 184-190. |
| [58] | Vesterager, J. M., Nielsen, N. E and Hogh-Jensen, H. 2006. Variation in phosphorus uptake and use efficiencies between pigeon pea genotypes and cowpea. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 29: 1869–1888. |
| [59] | Al-Rifaee, M., Turk, M. A. and Tawaha, A. R. M. 2004. Effect of seed size and plant population density on yield and yield components of faba bean (Vicia faba L.). International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 2: 294-299. |
| [60] | Thalji, T. 2006. Impact of row spacing on faba bean growth under Mediterranean rainfed conditions. Journal of Agronomy, 5 (3): 527-532. |
| [61] | Khalil, S. K., Amanullah, A. W. and Khan, A. Z. 2011. Variation in leaf traits, yield and yield components of faba bean in response to planting dates and densities. Egypt Academic Journal of Biological Science, 2 (1): 35-43. |
| [62] | Dahmardeh, M., Ramroodi, M. and Valizadeh, J. 2010. Effect of plant density and cultivars on growth, yield and yield components of faba bean (Vicia faba L.). African Journal of Biotechnology, 9 (50): 8643-8647. |
| [63] | Mizan, A., Sharma, J. J. and Gebremedhin, W. 2009. Estimation of Critical Period of Weed-Crop Competition and yield Loss in Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.). Ethiopian Journal of Weed Management, 3 (1): 39-53. |
| [64] | Weber, C. R., Shibles, R. M. and Byth, D. E. 1966. Effect of plant population and row spacing on Soybean development and production. American Society of Agronomy Journal, 58: 99-102. |
| [65] | Li, R., Guidong, Z., Yumei, Z. and Zhanzhi, X. 2004. Damage loss and control technology of weeds in cow pea field. Weed Science, 2: 25–36. |
APA Style
Getachew Mekonnen, J. J. Sharma, Lisanework Negatu, Tamado Tana. (2017). Effect of Planting Pattern and Weeding Frequency on Weed Infestation, Yield Components and Yield of Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) WALP.] in Wollo, Northern Ethiopia. Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, 6(4), 111-122. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aff.20170604.12
ACS Style
Getachew Mekonnen; J. J. Sharma; Lisanework Negatu; Tamado Tana. Effect of Planting Pattern and Weeding Frequency on Weed Infestation, Yield Components and Yield of Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) WALP.] in Wollo, Northern Ethiopia. Agric. For. Fish. 2017, 6(4), 111-122. doi: 10.11648/j.aff.20170604.12
AMA Style
Getachew Mekonnen, J. J. Sharma, Lisanework Negatu, Tamado Tana. Effect of Planting Pattern and Weeding Frequency on Weed Infestation, Yield Components and Yield of Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) WALP.] in Wollo, Northern Ethiopia. Agric For Fish. 2017;6(4):111-122. doi: 10.11648/j.aff.20170604.12
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.aff.20170604.12,
author = {Getachew Mekonnen and J. J. Sharma and Lisanework Negatu and Tamado Tana},
title = {Effect of Planting Pattern and Weeding Frequency on Weed Infestation, Yield Components and Yield of Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) WALP.] in Wollo, Northern Ethiopia},
journal = {Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries},
volume = {6},
number = {4},
pages = {111-122},
doi = {10.11648/j.aff.20170604.12},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aff.20170604.12},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.aff.20170604.12},
abstract = {Weed competition is one of the most important production constraints causing up to 91.6% reduction in potential yield of cowpea. Therefore, an experiment was conducted at Sirinka and at Jari, northern Ethiopia, during the 2014 main cropping season: to evaluate the effect of planting pattern and frequency of weeding on weeds, yield components and yield of cowpea. There were 18 treatments comprising combination of three planting patterns (S1: 60 cm x 10 cm, S2: 45 cm x 15 cm, S3: 45 cm x 10 cm) and six weeding frequencies viz. one hand weeding and hoeing at 2 weeks after crop emergence (WAE), one hand weeding and hoeing at 3 WAE, one hand weeding and hoeing at 4 WAE, two hand weeding and hoeing at 2 and 5 WAE, weed free check, and weedy check. The treatments were arranged in factorial combination in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Results showed significantly lower total weed dry weight at Sirinka than at Jari. The highest weed control efficacy was recorded in two hand weeding and hoeing at 2 and 5 WAE of cowpea at Sirinka. The plants in weedy check plots at Jari attained maximum height which was significantly higher than all the other treatments. Significantly highest number of pods per plant was recorded in weed free check under 60 cm x 10 cm spacing at Jari. Number of seeds per pod was highest in weed free check at 45 cm x 10 cm spacing at Sirinka. The interaction of weeding frequency and location had significant effect on cowpea dry biomass yield. The highest total dry biomass (12413 kg ha-1) was obtained in one hand weeding and hoeing at 4 WAE at Jari while the highest grain yield (4508 kg ha-1) was recorded from complete weed free under 60 cm x 10 cm spacing at Sirinka. The harvest index ranged from 18.2% in weedy check at Jari to 39.1% in weed free check at Sirinka. The results indicated that the use of 60 cm x 10 cm planting pattern in combination with hand weeding and hoeing at 3 WAE at Sirinka and hand weeding and hoeing at 4 WAE at Jari proved to be the most feasible practice.},
year = {2017}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Effect of Planting Pattern and Weeding Frequency on Weed Infestation, Yield Components and Yield of Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) WALP.] in Wollo, Northern Ethiopia AU - Getachew Mekonnen AU - J. J. Sharma AU - Lisanework Negatu AU - Tamado Tana Y1 - 2017/07/10 PY - 2017 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aff.20170604.12 DO - 10.11648/j.aff.20170604.12 T2 - Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries JF - Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries JO - Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries SP - 111 EP - 122 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-5648 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aff.20170604.12 AB - Weed competition is one of the most important production constraints causing up to 91.6% reduction in potential yield of cowpea. Therefore, an experiment was conducted at Sirinka and at Jari, northern Ethiopia, during the 2014 main cropping season: to evaluate the effect of planting pattern and frequency of weeding on weeds, yield components and yield of cowpea. There were 18 treatments comprising combination of three planting patterns (S1: 60 cm x 10 cm, S2: 45 cm x 15 cm, S3: 45 cm x 10 cm) and six weeding frequencies viz. one hand weeding and hoeing at 2 weeks after crop emergence (WAE), one hand weeding and hoeing at 3 WAE, one hand weeding and hoeing at 4 WAE, two hand weeding and hoeing at 2 and 5 WAE, weed free check, and weedy check. The treatments were arranged in factorial combination in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Results showed significantly lower total weed dry weight at Sirinka than at Jari. The highest weed control efficacy was recorded in two hand weeding and hoeing at 2 and 5 WAE of cowpea at Sirinka. The plants in weedy check plots at Jari attained maximum height which was significantly higher than all the other treatments. Significantly highest number of pods per plant was recorded in weed free check under 60 cm x 10 cm spacing at Jari. Number of seeds per pod was highest in weed free check at 45 cm x 10 cm spacing at Sirinka. The interaction of weeding frequency and location had significant effect on cowpea dry biomass yield. The highest total dry biomass (12413 kg ha-1) was obtained in one hand weeding and hoeing at 4 WAE at Jari while the highest grain yield (4508 kg ha-1) was recorded from complete weed free under 60 cm x 10 cm spacing at Sirinka. The harvest index ranged from 18.2% in weedy check at Jari to 39.1% in weed free check at Sirinka. The results indicated that the use of 60 cm x 10 cm planting pattern in combination with hand weeding and hoeing at 3 WAE at Sirinka and hand weeding and hoeing at 4 WAE at Jari proved to be the most feasible practice. VL - 6 IS - 4 ER -
Information
Email: