| Peer-Reviewed

A Geospatial Analysis of Bark Beetle-Induced Wildfire Risk Zones in the Okanogan Wenatchee National Forest

Received: 28 December 2016    Accepted: 21 January 2017    Published: 2 March 2017
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Over the past 30 years mountain pine beetle (MPB) outbreaks have become widespread throughout the western US and Canada. MPB attacks leave acres of dead trees that may predispose forest landscapes to large fires. With the use of field work and geospatial technology, these outbreaks can be better mapped and assessed to evaluate forest health. This study is designed to map and classify bark beetle infestation in Washington's Wenatchee National Forest. Field work on seventeen randomly selected sites was conducted using the point-centered quarter method. Recent MPB outbreak areas were classified using National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) imagery. A link between MPB attack and forest fires was then quantified using MODIS fire data. Lastly, a predictive infestation model was constructed using the following geophysical parameters: disturbance indices, Landsat TM5 classification of groundcover as well as vegetation stress using hyperspectral data. Selected imagery from the Hyperion sensor was used to run a minimum distance supervised classification in ENVI, in attempt to detect the early “green stage” of infestation. This study detected MPB spread and assessed the fire risk related to infestation.

Published in Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (Volume 6, Issue 1)
DOI 10.11648/j.aff.20170601.15
Page(s) 34-44
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

MODIS, Bark Beetle Infestation, GIS, Wildfire, Spectral Indices

References
[1] N. Axelson, “Influence of fire and mountain pine beetle on the dynamics of lodgepole pine stands in British Columbia, Canada. Forest Ecology and Management,” 257, pp. 1874–1882, 2009.
[2] F. J. Ahern, “The effects of bark beetle stress on the foliar spectral reflectance of lodgepole pine,” International Journal of Remote Sensing, vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 1451-1468, 1988.
[3] W. Barnes, X. Xiong, and V. Salomonson, “Status of Terra MODIS and Aqua MODIS,” Advances in Space Research, vol. 32, no. 11, pp. 2099–2106, 2003.
[4] G. Chander, and B. Markham, “Revised landsat-5 TM radiometric calibration procedures and post-calibration dynamic ranges,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 41, no. 11, pp. 2674–2677, 2003.
[5] T. Cheng, B. Rivard, G. A. Sanchez-Azofeifa, J. Feng, and M. Calvo-Polanco, “Continuous wavelet analysis for the detection of green attack damage due to mountain pine beetle infestation,” Remote Sensing of Environment, vol. 114, pp. 899–910, 2010.
[6] S. B. Coggins, N. C. Coops, M. Wulder, C. Bater, and S. M. Ortlepp, “Comparing the impacts of mitigation and non-mitigation on mountain pine beetle populations,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 92, pp. 112–120, 2011.
[7] G. Cottam, (1953). Some Sampling characteristics of a population of randomly dispersed individuals. Ecology, vol. 34, no. 4, Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1931337.
[8] E. P. Crist, and R. Kauth, “The tasseled cap de-mystified,” Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 81–86, 1986.
[9] E. Esin, and O. Uslu, “Assessment of the effects of agricultural practices on non-point source pollution for a coastal watershed: A case study Nif Watershed, Turkey,” Ocean & Coastal Management, vol. 51, pp. 601–611, 2008.
[10] M. Garrison-Johnston, J. Moore, S. Cook, and G. Niehoff, “Douglas-fir beetle infestations are associated with certain rock and stand types in the inland northwestern United States,” Community and Ecosystem Ecology, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 1354–1363, 2003.
[11] M. Hais, M. Jonasova, J. Langhammer, and T. Kucera, “Comparison of two types of forest disturbance using multitemporal landsat TM/ETM+ imagery and field vegetation data,” Remote Sensing of Environment, vol. 113, pp. 835–845, 2009.
[12] T. Han, M. Wulder, J. White, N. Coops, M. Alvarez, and C. Buston, “An Efficient protocol to process landsat images for change detection with tasselled cap transformation,” IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, vol. 4 no. 1, pp. 147–151, 2007.
[13] S. J. Hart, T. Schoenngal, T. Veblen, and T. B. Chapman, “Area burned in the western United States is unaffected by recent mountain pine beetle outbreaks,” PNAS, vol. 112 no. 14, pp. 4375–4380, 2015.
[14] T. J. Hawbaker, V. Radeloff, A. Syphard, Z. Zhu, and S. I. Stewart, “Detection rates of the MODIS active fire product in the United States,” Remote Sensing of Environment, vol. 112, pp. 2656–2664, 2008.
[15] S. Healey, W. B. Cohen, W. Zhiqiang, and O. N. Krankina, “Comparison of Tasseled Cap-based Landsat data structures for use in forest disturbance detection,” Remote Sensing of Environment, vol. 97, pp. 301–310, 2005.
[16] P. Hessburg, J. K. Agee, and J. F. Franklin, “Dry forests and wildland fires of the inland Northwest USA: Contrasting the landscape ecology of the pre-settlement and modern eras,” Forest Ecology and Management, vol. 211, pp. 117–139, 2005.
[17] A. J. Hicke, and C. J. Jenkins, “Mapping lodgepole pine stand structure susceptibility to mountain pine beetle attack across the western United States,” Forest Ecology and Management, vol. 255, pp. 1536–1547, 2008.
[18] C. Hsu, and L. Johnson, “Multi-criteria wetlands mapping using an integrated pixel-based and object-based classification approach,” Colorado Department of Transportation, CDOT, 2008.
[19] J. Jensen, 2007. Remote Sensing of the Environment an Earth Resource Perspective, edited by D. Kaveney, J. Howard, K. Schiaparelli, and E. Thomas. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
[20] S. Jin, and S. Sader, 2005. “Comparison of time series tasseled cap wetness and the mormalized difference moisture index in detecting forest disturbances,” Remote Sensing of Environment, vol. 94, pp. 364–372, 2005.
[21] M. Johnson, G. Kohler, D. Omdal, A. Ramsey-Kroll, B. Hostetler, R. Mathison, and A. Nelson, (2010). “Forest health highlights in Washington—2009,” USDA.
[22] M. W. Jolly, R. Parsons, A. Hadlow, G. Cohn, S. McAllister, J. B. Popp, R. Hubbard, and J. Negron, “Relationships between moisture, chemistry, and ignition of Pinus contorta needles during the early stages of mountain pine beetle attack,” Forest Ecology and Management, vol. 269, pp. 52–59, 2011.
[23] D. Kulakowski, and D. Jarvis, “The influence of mountain pine beetle outbreaks and drought on severe wildfires in northwestern Colorado and southern Wyoming: A look at the past century,” Forest Ecology and Management, vol. 262, pp. 1686–1696, 2011.
[24] D. Leatherman, I. Aguayo, and T. Mehall, (2007). Mountain pine beetle. Insect Series, vol. 5 (528), Colorado State University Press.
[25] H. J. Lynch, R. Renkin, R. Crabtree, and P. R. Moorcroft, “The Influence of Previous Mountain Pine Beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae) Activity on the 1988 Yellowstone Fires,” Ecosystems, vol. 9, pp. 1318–1327, 2006.
[26] G. W. Meigs, R. Kennedy, A. Gray, and A. J. Gregory, “Spatiotemporal dynamics of recent mountain pine beetle and western spruce budworm outbreaks across the Pacific Northwest Region,” vol. 339 no. 1, pp. 71–86, 2015.
[27] D. Mildrexler, M. Zhao, F. Heinsch, and S. Running, “A new satellite-based methodology for continental scale disturbance detection,” Ecological Applications, vol. 17 no. 1, pp. 235–250, 2007.
[28] J. D. Miller, S. Danzer, J. Watts, S. Stone, and S. Yool, “Cluster analysis of structural stage classes to map wildland fuels in a madrean ecosystem,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 68 no. 3, pp. 239–252, 2003.
[29] J. D. Miller, H. D. Safford, M. Crimmins, and A. E. Thode, “Quantitative Evidence for Increasing Forest Fire Severity in the Sierra Nevada and Southern Cascade Mountains, California and Nevada, USA,” Ecosystems, vol. 12, pp. 16–32, 2009.
[30] K. Mitchell, (2007). Quantitative analysis by the point-centered quarter method. Hobart and Williams Smith Colleges.
[31] J. Moore, P. Mika, J. Schwandt, and T. Shaw, “Nutrition and forest health,” Interior Cedar-Hemlock-White Pine Forests: Ecology and Management, 1993.
[32] K. Niemann, and F. Visintini, (2005). “Assessment of potential for remote sensing detection of bark beetle-infested areas during green attack: a literature review,” Natural Resources Canada, Mountain Pine Beetle Initiative Working Paper 2005–2.
[33] J. T. Parker, M. Clancy, and L. Mathiasen, “Interactions among fire, insects and pathogens in coniferous forests of the interior western United States and Canada,” Agriculture and Forest Entomology, vol. 8, pp. 167–189, 2006.
[34] L. Perez, and S. Dragicevic, “Modeling mountain pine beetle infestation with an agent-based approach at two spatial scales,” Environmental Modeling & Software, vol. 25 no. 2, pp. 223–236, 2009.
[35] J. Rouse, R. Haas, J. A. Schell, and. D. Deering, “Monitoring vegetation systems in the Great Plains with ERTS,” Proceedings of the Third Earth Resources Technology Satellite-1 Symposium, NASA, Greenbelt, MD, pp. 301–317, 1974.
[36] L. Sampedro, X. Moreira, P. Martins, and R. Zas, “Growth and nutritional response of Pinus pinaster after a large pine weevil (Hylobius abietis) attack,” Trees, vol. 23, 2009.
[37] State of the Climate drought, annual 2005. (2009). National Oceananic and Atmospheric Administration.
[38] S. Subramanian, N. Gat, M. Sheffield, J. Barhen, and N. Toomarian, “Methodology for hyperspectral image classification using novel neural network,” Algorithms for Multispectral and Hyperspectral Imagery III, SPIE, pp. 3071, 1997.
[39] United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2008. Soil Survey of Okanogan National Forest Area, Washington. Accessible online at: http://soils.usda.gov/survey/printed_surveys/.
[40] Washington State Department of Natural Resources, (Photographer). (2010). USGS 100k quad: twisp- a148120. [Web].
[41] J. White, N. Coops, T. Hilker, M. Wulder, and A. Carroll, “Detecting mountain pine beetle red attack damage with EO-1 Hyperion moisture incides,” International Journal of Remote Sensing, vol. 28 no. 10, pp. 2111–2121, 2007.
[42] M. J. Wingfield, E. Brockerhoff, B. D. Wingfield, and B. Slippers, “Planted forest health: The need for a global strategy,” Science, vol. 349, pp. 832–836.
[43] M. A. Wulder, J. White, N. Coops, T. Han, M. Alvarez, C. Butson, and X. Yuan, “A Procedure for mapping and monitoring mountain pine beetle red attack forest damage using landsat imagery,” Canadian Forest Service, BC-X-404, 2006.
[44] Q. Zhang, E. Middleton, Y. Cheng, K. Huemmrich, B. Cook, L. Corp, W. Kustas, A. Russ, J. Prueger and T. Yao, “Integrating chlorophyll fAPAR and nadir photochemical reflectance index from EO-1/Hyperion to predict cornfield daily gross primary production,” Remote Sensing of Environment, vol. 186, no. 1, pp. 311–321.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Marco Allain, Andrew Nguyen, Evan Johnson, Emily Williams, Stephanie Tsai, et al. (2017). A Geospatial Analysis of Bark Beetle-Induced Wildfire Risk Zones in the Okanogan Wenatchee National Forest. Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, 6(1), 34-44. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aff.20170601.15

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Marco Allain; Andrew Nguyen; Evan Johnson; Emily Williams; Stephanie Tsai, et al. A Geospatial Analysis of Bark Beetle-Induced Wildfire Risk Zones in the Okanogan Wenatchee National Forest. Agric. For. Fish. 2017, 6(1), 34-44. doi: 10.11648/j.aff.20170601.15

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Marco Allain, Andrew Nguyen, Evan Johnson, Emily Williams, Stephanie Tsai, et al. A Geospatial Analysis of Bark Beetle-Induced Wildfire Risk Zones in the Okanogan Wenatchee National Forest. Agric For Fish. 2017;6(1):34-44. doi: 10.11648/j.aff.20170601.15

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.aff.20170601.15,
      author = {Marco Allain and Andrew Nguyen and Evan Johnson and Emily Williams and Stephanie Tsai and Susan Prichard and J. W. Skiles},
      title = {A Geospatial Analysis of Bark Beetle-Induced Wildfire Risk Zones in the Okanogan Wenatchee National Forest},
      journal = {Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries},
      volume = {6},
      number = {1},
      pages = {34-44},
      doi = {10.11648/j.aff.20170601.15},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aff.20170601.15},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.aff.20170601.15},
      abstract = {Over the past 30 years mountain pine beetle (MPB) outbreaks have become widespread throughout the western US and Canada. MPB attacks leave acres of dead trees that may predispose forest landscapes to large fires. With the use of field work and geospatial technology, these outbreaks can be better mapped and assessed to evaluate forest health. This study is designed to map and classify bark beetle infestation in Washington's Wenatchee National Forest. Field work on seventeen randomly selected sites was conducted using the point-centered quarter method. Recent MPB outbreak areas were classified using National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) imagery. A link between MPB attack and forest fires was then quantified using MODIS fire data. Lastly, a predictive infestation model was constructed using the following geophysical parameters: disturbance indices, Landsat TM5 classification of groundcover as well as vegetation stress using hyperspectral data. Selected imagery from the Hyperion sensor was used to run a minimum distance supervised classification in ENVI, in attempt to detect the early “green stage” of infestation. This study detected MPB spread and assessed the fire risk related to infestation.},
     year = {2017}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - A Geospatial Analysis of Bark Beetle-Induced Wildfire Risk Zones in the Okanogan Wenatchee National Forest
    AU  - Marco Allain
    AU  - Andrew Nguyen
    AU  - Evan Johnson
    AU  - Emily Williams
    AU  - Stephanie Tsai
    AU  - Susan Prichard
    AU  - J. W. Skiles
    Y1  - 2017/03/02
    PY  - 2017
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aff.20170601.15
    DO  - 10.11648/j.aff.20170601.15
    T2  - Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries
    JF  - Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries
    JO  - Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries
    SP  - 34
    EP  - 44
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2328-5648
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aff.20170601.15
    AB  - Over the past 30 years mountain pine beetle (MPB) outbreaks have become widespread throughout the western US and Canada. MPB attacks leave acres of dead trees that may predispose forest landscapes to large fires. With the use of field work and geospatial technology, these outbreaks can be better mapped and assessed to evaluate forest health. This study is designed to map and classify bark beetle infestation in Washington's Wenatchee National Forest. Field work on seventeen randomly selected sites was conducted using the point-centered quarter method. Recent MPB outbreak areas were classified using National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) imagery. A link between MPB attack and forest fires was then quantified using MODIS fire data. Lastly, a predictive infestation model was constructed using the following geophysical parameters: disturbance indices, Landsat TM5 classification of groundcover as well as vegetation stress using hyperspectral data. Selected imagery from the Hyperion sensor was used to run a minimum distance supervised classification in ENVI, in attempt to detect the early “green stage” of infestation. This study detected MPB spread and assessed the fire risk related to infestation.
    VL  - 6
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Earth Science, Emporia State University, Emporia, USA

  • Department of Geography, San Jose State University, Fremont, USA

  • Department of Geography, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA

  • Department of Environmental Studies, University of California, Santa Barbara, USA

  • Department Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA

  • Pacific Wildland Fire Sciences Laboratory, USDA Forest Service, Seattle, USA

  • National Aeronautic Space Administration, NASA Ames Research Center, Mountain View, USA

  • Sections