Valuation of Environmental Services of Catchment Forests Within Baubau Wonco Watershed
Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries
Volume 4, Issue 6, December 2015, Pages: 275-283
Received: Oct. 20, 2015;
Accepted: Oct. 29, 2015;
Published: Nov. 17, 2015
Views 3512 Downloads 77
Safril Kasim, Spesifications Agroforestry, Department of Environmental Science, Faculty of Forestry and Environmental Science, Halu Oleo University, Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia
Aminuddin Mane Kandari, Spesifications Agroclimatology, Department of Environmental Science, Faculty of Forestry and Environmental Science, Halu Oleo University, Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia
La Ode Midi, Spesifications Agrohidrology, Department of Environmental Science, Faculty of Forestry and Environmental Science, Halu Oleo University, Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia
Anita Indriasari, Spesifications Agriculture of Economic and Social, Department of Environmental Science, Faculty of Forestry and Environmental Science, Halu Oleo University, Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia
Follow on us
Catchment forests cover a total of 2.750, 11 Ha. This is about 31,85% of the total area of Baubau Wonco watershed. This forested land provides both tangible and intangible benefits of which some are perceived as environmental services. However, it has encountered high rate of deforestation and forests degradation . A well managed catchment forests can bring about advantages to a wide range of stakeholders, normally far away from the forests in the form of water for domestic use, agriculture, industry, and preventing from flooding, erosion and landslide hazards. To this view, it is a logical assumption that these various stakeholders who are mostly living in the downstream area should provide costs for a good forest management as incentives to the local community who mostly occupy the upstream area. Therefore, the need of a model that regulates the upstream and downstream mechanism should be explored. The research is planned to be conducted for two years. The first year research has been carried out from July to October 2015. The study employed various methods of data analysis. Those are as follow: (i) Hedonic Price is used for estimating economic value of water for domestic and industrial use; (ii) Productivity approach used for analyzing economic value of water for agricultural use; (iii) Willingness to Pay (WTP) is used for analyzing economic value of catchment forests to preventing from erosion, flooding and landslide hazards. The results of the first year research show that the total volume of water domestic consumption reachs 6.163.488,50 m3 year-1, which is used by 18.950 households with the economic value obtains of Rp. 40.062.668.750 year-1, while the economic value of water for agricultural use achieves Rp. 30.199.167/ha year-1. This research will be continued to the second year study to (i) estimate the economic value of industrial water, (ii) to analyze the Total Economic Value of hydrological environmental services provided by catchment forests of the watershed area, and (iii) to develop a model that can facilitate downstream-upstream mechanism of a payment for the hydrological environmental services.
Hydrological-Environmental Services, Valuation, Domestic Use, Agricultural Use, Industrial Use, Erosion, Flood and Landslide Hazard Control
To cite this article
Aminuddin Mane Kandari,
La Ode Midi,
Valuation of Environmental Services of Catchment Forests Within Baubau Wonco Watershed, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries.
Vol. 4, No. 6,
2015, pp. 275-283.
Copyright © 2015 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Biro Pusat Statistik Kota Baubau, 2011. Baubau City in Numbers. BPS. Baubau.
Brand, D. 2002. Investing in the Environmental Services of Australian Forest. In: Pagiola, S., Landell-Mills, N. And Bishop, J (Eds). (2002) Selling Forest Environmental Sevices; Market-Based Mechanism for Conservation and Development, London. Pp234-245.
Isnin, M., Basri., H., and Romano, 2012. Economic Value of Water availability of Krueng Jreu Sub Watershed Aceh Besa Regency. Faculty of Agriculture, Syiahkuala University. Banda Aceh.
Januaris, 2004. The estimation of Economic Value of Irrigated Water to Support Agricultural Development in Kampar Watershed. IPB. Bogor.
Kasim, S., A.M..Kandari., Kahirun., 2007. Study on Characteristics of Baubau Wonco Watershed. Faculty of Agriculture, Halu Oleo University. Kendari.
Kasim, S., Midi. L., 2012. Impacts of Forested Land Use Changes on the Hydrological Functions of Baubau Wonco Watershed. Proceeding of International Seminar on CRISHU Forum October 17th 2013.
Kasim, S., Midi. L.,. 2013. Agroforestry System as Vegetative Conservation Method for Land Use Development in Baubau Wonco Watershed. Halu Oleo University. Kendari.
Kasim, S., Midi, L., and Sarlina, 2014. Valuation of Hydrological Environmental Services of Production Forest Area of Baini Village, Sampara Subdistrict, Konawe Regency. Faculty of Forestry and Environmental Science, Halu Oleo University. Kendari.
Kasim, S., Agustina, S., and Miduanto, 2014. Valuation of Hydrological Environmental Services of Watu Mate Protected Forest, Waworaha Village, Lasolo Subdistrict of South Konawe Regency. Faculty of Forestry and Environmental Science, Halu Oleo University, Kendari.
Merryna, A. 2009. Willingness To Pay Analysis of Local Community of Cirahab Sub Watershed. Economy and Environmental Department of ITB. Bandung.
Meteorology Station of Betoambari, 2013. Recent Climatic Report of Baubau City. Baubau.
Moore I.D. and J.P. Wilson. 1992. Length-slope factors for the revised universal soil loss equation: Simplified method of estimation. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. 47(5):423-428.
Panhalkar S, 2011. Land Capability Classification for Integrated Watershed Development by a Applying Remote Sensing and GIS techniques. Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science. VOL. 6, NO. 4, APRIL 2011, Pages 46-55. ISSN 1990-6145. Asian Research Publishing Network (ARPN).
Sumaryanto, 2006. An Increase of Irrigated Water Efficiency Through an Implemetation of Environmental Tax based on Economic Value of Irrigation. The Center of Social, Economy and Policy Analysis of Agriculture. Bogor.
Syaukat, Y., dan Siwi, N., A., A, 2009. An Estimation of Economic Value of Irrigated Water at Paddy Field Farm, Vab Der Wijce Irrigation Area of Sleman Regency, Yograkarta. Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian Indonesia. Yogyakarta.
Wilson J. P. and J. C. Gallant. 2000. Terrain Analysis: Principles and Applications. John Wiley and Sons, New York. pp. 87-131.
Winrock International, 2004. Financial Incentives to Communities for Stewardship of Environmental Resources; Feasibility Study. Winrock International, 621 North Kent Street, Suite 1200 Arlington, Virginia 22209 USA. www.winrock.org, 50 pp.
Zahabu, E., Malimbwi R.E., and Ngaga, Y.M. 2005. Payment for Environmental Services as Incentive Opportunities for Catchment Forest Reserves Manaement in Tanzania. Community Carbon Organization.