| Peer-Reviewed

Study of Phosphorus Adsorption and Its Relationship with Soil Properties, Analyzed with Langmuir and Freundlich Models

Received: 6 January 2014    Accepted:     Published: 20 February 2014
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Phosphorus (P) adsorption capacity and its relationship with some properties of five different soil types (Fluvisols, Cambisols, Vertisols, Arenosols and Nitosols) of Tigray Region, northern Ethiopia were studied during the main cropping season in 2012. Besides, fractionation of the total soil P in to Ca-P, Fe-P and Al-P was carried out and their relationships with P adsorption characteristics of the soil type under study were also studied. Adsorption data for the different soil types were obtained by equilibrating the respective soil samples for 24 hours at room temperature with 25 ml of 0.01 M CaCl2, containing 0, 60, 120, 180, 240, 300, 360, 420, 480 and 540 mg kg-1 of applied external P as KH2PO4. The results of this study showed that Ca-P was highest followed by Fe-P in all the soils except in the Arenosols. Testing the Langmuir and Freundlich adsorption isotherms both showed well fitted with the correlation coefficients (r) that ranged from 0.951 to 0.999 in all the soils. Comparing the two adsorption models, the Freundlich model was slightly better in Vertisols, Arenosols and Nitosols while the Langmuir model was better in the Fluvisols and Cambisols in predicting P adsorption. The adsorption maximum (b) obtained from the Langmuir isotherm ranged from 296.6 mg P kg-1 soil in Fluvisols to 820.4 mg P kg-1 soil in Vertisols. The constant related to bonding energy calculated from the Langmuir adsorption model varied from 0.0151 to 0.0447 L mg-1. The Freundlich adsorption parameters also ranged from 7.28 to 30.15 mg kg-1 for the Freundlich isotherm constant (Kf) and from 0.4874 to 1.012 for slope of the Freundlich isotherm (1/n). Among the soil properties (CaCO3, CEC, organic matter, EC, pH, and sand, silt, and clay contents), clay content, CEC and CaCO3 were positively correlated with the Langmuir adsorption maximum. The adsorption maximum significantly (P ≤ 0.05) correlated (r = -0.902 but decreased with increasing sand content. The constant (Kf) positively and significantly (P ≤ 0.05) correlated (r = 0.953) with EC of the soil. The remaining soil properties studied were not significantly correlated with the adsorption parameters.

Published in Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (Volume 3, Issue 1)
DOI 10.11648/j.aff.20140301.18
Page(s) 40-51
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Phosphorus Content, Isotherms, Freundlich Model, Langmuir Model, Soil Characterization, Ethiopian Soils

References
[1] G.M. Pierzynski, J.T. Sims and G.F., Vance. Soils and environmental quality. 3rd ed., Taylor and Francis, Boca Raton, USA. 2005.
[2] M.L. Leclerc M.C. Nolin, D. Cluis and R.R. Simard. Grouping soils of the Montreal lowlands (Quebec) according to fertility and P sorption and desorption characteristics. Can. J. Soil Sci., 81: 71-83. 2001.
[3] K. Daly, D. Jeffrey and H. Tunney. The effect of soil type on phosphorus sorption capacity and desorption dynamics in Irish grassland soils. Soil Use Manage, 17: 12-20. 2001.
[4] N.J. Barrow. Modeling the effects of pH on phosphate sorption by soils. J. Soil Sci., 35: 283-297. 1984.
[5] I. Bertrand, R.E. Holloway, R.D. Armstrong and M.J. Mclaughlin. Chemical characteristics of phosphorus in alkaline soils from Southern Australia. Aust. J. Soil Res., 41: 61-76. 2003.
[6] O.A Amelidris and H. S. Ahmed. Phosphorus sorption capacity as a guide for phosphorus availability of selected Sudanese soil series. African Crop Science Journal, 20-65. 2012.
[7] H. Moazed Y. Hoseini, A. Naseri and F. Abbasi. Determining phosphorus adsorption isotherm in soil and its relation to soil characteristics. International Journal of Soil Science, 5 (3): 131-139. 2010.
[8] Z.A. Mohammad, S. Hoque and K.T. Osman. A comparison of the Langmuir, Freundlich and Temkin equations to describe phosphate sorption characteristics of some representative soils of Bangladesh. International Journal of Soil Science, 7: 91-99. 2012.
[9] L. Pulschen. Soils and Plant Nutrition Section, Terminal report for the period May 1983-April 1987. Agricultural Research Center, Debre Zeit, Ethiopia. 1987.
[10] Desta B. Diagnosis of phosphorus deficiency in Ethiopian soils. 18p. Soil Science Bulletin, No: 3. Institute of Agricultural Research, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. 1952.
[11] Tekalign M. and I. Haque. Phosphorus status of some Ethiopian soils. I. Sorption characteristics. Plant and Soil, 102: 261-266. 1987.
[12] Fassil, K. and C. Yamoah. Soil fertility status and Numass fertilizer recommendation of Typic Hapluusterts in the nrthern highlands of Ethiopia. World Applied Sciences Journal, 6(11): 1473-1480. 2009.
[13] C. Behn, M. Janssen, G.A. Yalemsew and B. Lennartz. Phosphorus contents and phosphorous sorption in soils of the Gilgel Gibe catchment, SW Ethiopia. The Smithsonian/NASA Astrophysics Data System, Geophysical Research, Abstracts. 2013.
[14] Birru Y., Heluf G.. and V.P. Gupta. Phosphorus sorption characteristics of some soils of the north-western highlands of Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Natural Resources (EJNR). 5(1): 1-16. 2003
[15] D. Miressa and W.P. Robarge. Soil characteristics and management effects on phosphorus sorption by highland plateau soils of Ethiopia. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 63(5): 1455-1462. 1999
[16] HTSL (Hunting Technical Service Limited). Tigray rural development study, Annex 4. Land and water resources consultants in association with Sir M. Macdonald and Partners, London, UK. 1976.
[17] G.W. Meijerin. Alternative cropping practices in Ethiopia: A literature review, PIMEA Working Paper 2002-2005, Wageningen University, the Netherlands. 2002.
[18] P.R. Day. Particle fractionation and particle-size analysis. pp. 545-567. In: Black, CA, D.D. Evans, J.L. Ensminger and F.E. Clark (eds). Methods of soil analysis. Part I. ASA, WI, Madison, USA. 1965.
[19] D.L. Rowell. Soil science: Method and applications. Longman Scientific and Technical, Longman Group UK Limited Addison, Wesley, England. 350p. 1994.
[20] M. Peech. Hydrogen-ion activity. pp. 914-926. In: CA, Black, D.D. Evans, J.L. Ensminger and F.E. Clark (eds). Methods of soil analysis. Part II.ASA, WI, Madison, USA. 1965.
[21] H.D. Chapman. Cation exchange capacity. pp. 891-901. In: CA, Black, D.D. Evans, J.L. Ensminger and F.E. Clark (eds). Methods of soil analysis. Part II. ASA, WI, Madison, USA. 1965.
[22] P.R. Hesse. A text book of soil chemical analysis. Murray Publishers Limited, London, UK. 1971.
[23] FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization). The Euphrates Pilot Irrigation Project Methods of Soil analysis. Gadeb Soil laboratory (A laboratory Manual), Rome, Italy. 1974
[24] S.R. Olsen, C.V. Cole, L. Watanabe and A. Dean. Estimation of available P in soils by extraction with NaHCO3. USDA Cir. 939, US Government Printing Office, Washington D. C., USA. 1954.
[25] F.S. Watanabe and S.R. Olsen. Test of an ascorbic acid method for determining phosphorus in water and NaHCO3, extracts from soil. Soil Science Society of America Proceeding, 29:677-678. 1965.
[26] A. Walkley and C.A. Black. An examination of the method for determining soils organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science, 37: 29-38. 1934.
[27] S.C. Chang and M. L. Jackson. Fractionation of soil phosphorus. Soil Science, 84: 133-144. 1957.
[28] G.W. Peterson and R.B. Corey. A modified Chang and Jackson procedure for routine fractionation of inorganic soil phosphates. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings, 30: 563-565. 1966.
[29] J. Murphy, and J.P. Riley. A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Analytica Chimica Acta, 27: 31-36. 1962.
[30] R.L. Fox. and E.J. Kamprath. Phosphate sorption isotherms for evaluating the phosphorous requirements of soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc., 34: 902-907. 1970M. Ayaz, A. Saleem and M. Memon. Phosphorus adsorption parameters in relation to soil characteristics. Journal Chemical Society of Pakistan, 32 :129-139. 2010
[31] Charman P.E. and M.M. Roper. Soil organic matter. In: Charman P.E., Murphy B.W., eds. Soils-their properties and management, 3rd edition. Melbourne, Australia: Oxford University Press, pp. 276-285. 2007.
[32] R.J. Shaw. Soil salinity-electrical conductivity and chloride In: Peverill K.I., Sparrow L.A., and Reuter D.J., eds. Soil Analysis: An Interpretation Manual. pp. 129-145. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Australia. 1999.
[33] A.J. Metson. Methods of chemical analysis for soil survey samples. Newzealand Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, Soil Bureau Bulletin. pp. 168-175. In: Hazelton, P.A, Murphy, B.W., eds. Interpreting soil test results: what do all the, numbers mean?. 2nd Edition. Government Printer,Wellington, New Zealand, New South Wales (NSW) Department of Natural Resources, CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Australia. 1961.
[34] F. Nachtergaele, H.V. Velthuizen, and L. Verelst. Harmonized world soil database. (version 1.1). FAO, Rome, Italy and Laxenburg, Austria.2009.
[35] J. Landon. Booker tropical soil manual: Handbook for soil survey and agricultural land evaluation in the tropics and subtropics. A John Wiley and Sons, New York. 1991.
[36] E.U. Onweremadu. Predicting phosphorus sorption characteristics in highly weathered soils of South-Eastern Nigeria. Research Journal of Environmental Sciences, 1: 47-55.2007.
[37] B. Singh and R.J. Gilkes. Phosphorus sorption in relation to soil properties for the major soil types of south-west Australia. Aust. J. Soil Res., 29: 602-618. 1991.
[38] Y. Hoseini and R. D. Taleshmikaiel 2013. Comparison of phosphorus adsorption isotherms in soil and its relation to soil properties. International Journal of Agriculture, 3 (1): 163-171. 2013.
[39] M. Ayaz, A. Saleem and M. Memon. Phosphorus adsorption parameters in relation to soil characteristics. Journal Chemical Society of Pakistan, 32 :129-139. 2010
[40] L. Zhuan-xi, Z. Bo, T. Jia-liang, and W. Tao. Ecological Engineering. pp 35-57. 2009.
[41] M. Arshed Rahmatulla M. Salim and M, Yousaf. Soil properties related to phosphorus sorption as described by modified Freundlich equations in some soils. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 4: 290-292. 2000.
[42] R. Burt., M.D. Mays, E.C. Benham and M.A. Wilson. Phosphorus characterization and correlation with properties of selected bench mark soil of the United States. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal., 33: 117-142. 2002.
[43] S.K. Sanyal and S.K. De Datta. Chemistry of phosphorus transformations in soil. Adv. Soil Sci., 16: 1-120. 1991.
[44] ICRISAT (International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics).. Farming Systems. Pp.255-259. In ICRISAT Annual Report 1984. ICRISAT, Patancheru, India. 1985.
[45] H. Amjad G.. Abdul and M. Ghulam. Use of models for phosphorus adsorption on some sodic soils of Punjab. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 2: 241-248. 2006.
[46] N.A. Polyzopoulos, V.Z. Keramidas and H. Kiosse. Phosphate sorption by some Alfisols of Greece as described by commonly used isotherms. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 49: 81-4. 1985.
[47] M. Del Bubba, C.A. Arias and H. Brix. Phosphorus adsorption maximum of sands for use as media in subsurface flow constructed reed beds as measured by the Langmuir isotherm. Water Res., 37: 390-400. 2003.
[48] M.S. Bakheit, and A. Pakermanjie. Phosphate adsorption and desorption by calcareous soils of Syria. Commun. Soil Sci. Pl. Anal., 24: 197-210. 1993.
[49] T. Gregory, L. K. Chelsey and K. D. Shimizu. A critical examination of the use of the Freundlich isotherm in characterizing molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPS). Analytica Chemica Acta., 528: 107-113. 2005.
[50] R.G. McLaren and K.C. Cameron.. Soil Science: An introduction to the properties and management of New Zealand soils. Oxford University Press, Auckland- New Zealand. 1990.
[51] S. Shai laja. Phosphate adsorption-desorption in selected Vertisols. An MSc Thesis Presented to Andhra Pradesh Agricultural University. 1989.
[52] S. Kuo, and E.G., Lotse. Kinetics of phosphate adsorption and desorption by lake sediments. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc., 38: 50-54. 1974.
[53] M. Zhou and Y. Li. Phosphorus–sorption characteristics of calcareous soils and limestone from the southern Everglades and adjacent farmlands. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 65: 1404-12. 2001.
[54] G..S. Bahl and G.S. Toor. Influence of poultry manure on phosphate availability and the standard phosphate requirement of crop estimated from quantity–intensity relationships in different soils. Bioresource Tech., 85: 317-322. 2002.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Fisseha Hadgu, Heluf Gebrekidan, Kibebew Kibret, Birru Yitaferu. (2014). Study of Phosphorus Adsorption and Its Relationship with Soil Properties, Analyzed with Langmuir and Freundlich Models. Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, 3(1), 40-51. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aff.20140301.18

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Fisseha Hadgu; Heluf Gebrekidan; Kibebew Kibret; Birru Yitaferu. Study of Phosphorus Adsorption and Its Relationship with Soil Properties, Analyzed with Langmuir and Freundlich Models. Agric. For. Fish. 2014, 3(1), 40-51. doi: 10.11648/j.aff.20140301.18

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Fisseha Hadgu, Heluf Gebrekidan, Kibebew Kibret, Birru Yitaferu. Study of Phosphorus Adsorption and Its Relationship with Soil Properties, Analyzed with Langmuir and Freundlich Models. Agric For Fish. 2014;3(1):40-51. doi: 10.11648/j.aff.20140301.18

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.aff.20140301.18,
      author = {Fisseha Hadgu and Heluf Gebrekidan and Kibebew Kibret and Birru Yitaferu},
      title = {Study of Phosphorus Adsorption and Its Relationship with Soil Properties, Analyzed with Langmuir and Freundlich Models},
      journal = {Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries},
      volume = {3},
      number = {1},
      pages = {40-51},
      doi = {10.11648/j.aff.20140301.18},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aff.20140301.18},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.aff.20140301.18},
      abstract = {Phosphorus (P) adsorption capacity and its relationship with some properties of five different soil types (Fluvisols, Cambisols, Vertisols, Arenosols and Nitosols) of Tigray Region, northern Ethiopia were studied during the main cropping season in 2012. Besides, fractionation of the total soil P in to Ca-P, Fe-P and Al-P was carried out and their relationships with P adsorption characteristics of the soil type under study were also studied. Adsorption data for the different soil types were obtained by equilibrating the respective soil samples for 24 hours at room temperature with 25 ml of 0.01 M CaCl2, containing 0, 60, 120, 180, 240, 300, 360, 420, 480 and 540 mg kg-1 of applied external P as KH2PO4. The results of this study showed that Ca-P was highest followed by Fe-P in all the soils except in the Arenosols. Testing the Langmuir and Freundlich adsorption isotherms both showed well fitted with the correlation coefficients (r) that ranged from 0.951 to 0.999 in all the soils. Comparing the two adsorption models, the Freundlich model was slightly better in Vertisols, Arenosols and Nitosols while the Langmuir model was better in the Fluvisols and Cambisols in predicting P adsorption. The adsorption maximum (b) obtained from the Langmuir isotherm ranged from 296.6 mg P kg-1 soil in Fluvisols to 820.4 mg P kg-1 soil in Vertisols. The constant related to bonding energy calculated from the Langmuir adsorption model varied from 0.0151 to 0.0447 L mg-1. The Freundlich adsorption parameters also ranged from 7.28 to 30.15 mg kg-1 for the Freundlich isotherm constant (Kf) and from 0.4874 to 1.012 for slope of the Freundlich isotherm (1/n). Among the soil properties (CaCO3, CEC, organic matter, EC, pH, and sand, silt, and clay contents), clay content, CEC and CaCO3 were positively correlated with the Langmuir adsorption maximum. The adsorption maximum significantly (P ≤ 0.05) correlated (r = -0.902 but decreased with increasing sand content. The constant (Kf) positively and significantly (P ≤ 0.05) correlated (r = 0.953) with EC of the soil. The remaining soil properties studied were not significantly correlated with the adsorption parameters.},
     year = {2014}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Study of Phosphorus Adsorption and Its Relationship with Soil Properties, Analyzed with Langmuir and Freundlich Models
    AU  - Fisseha Hadgu
    AU  - Heluf Gebrekidan
    AU  - Kibebew Kibret
    AU  - Birru Yitaferu
    Y1  - 2014/02/20
    PY  - 2014
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aff.20140301.18
    DO  - 10.11648/j.aff.20140301.18
    T2  - Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries
    JF  - Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries
    JO  - Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries
    SP  - 40
    EP  - 51
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2328-5648
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aff.20140301.18
    AB  - Phosphorus (P) adsorption capacity and its relationship with some properties of five different soil types (Fluvisols, Cambisols, Vertisols, Arenosols and Nitosols) of Tigray Region, northern Ethiopia were studied during the main cropping season in 2012. Besides, fractionation of the total soil P in to Ca-P, Fe-P and Al-P was carried out and their relationships with P adsorption characteristics of the soil type under study were also studied. Adsorption data for the different soil types were obtained by equilibrating the respective soil samples for 24 hours at room temperature with 25 ml of 0.01 M CaCl2, containing 0, 60, 120, 180, 240, 300, 360, 420, 480 and 540 mg kg-1 of applied external P as KH2PO4. The results of this study showed that Ca-P was highest followed by Fe-P in all the soils except in the Arenosols. Testing the Langmuir and Freundlich adsorption isotherms both showed well fitted with the correlation coefficients (r) that ranged from 0.951 to 0.999 in all the soils. Comparing the two adsorption models, the Freundlich model was slightly better in Vertisols, Arenosols and Nitosols while the Langmuir model was better in the Fluvisols and Cambisols in predicting P adsorption. The adsorption maximum (b) obtained from the Langmuir isotherm ranged from 296.6 mg P kg-1 soil in Fluvisols to 820.4 mg P kg-1 soil in Vertisols. The constant related to bonding energy calculated from the Langmuir adsorption model varied from 0.0151 to 0.0447 L mg-1. The Freundlich adsorption parameters also ranged from 7.28 to 30.15 mg kg-1 for the Freundlich isotherm constant (Kf) and from 0.4874 to 1.012 for slope of the Freundlich isotherm (1/n). Among the soil properties (CaCO3, CEC, organic matter, EC, pH, and sand, silt, and clay contents), clay content, CEC and CaCO3 were positively correlated with the Langmuir adsorption maximum. The adsorption maximum significantly (P ≤ 0.05) correlated (r = -0.902 but decreased with increasing sand content. The constant (Kf) positively and significantly (P ≤ 0.05) correlated (r = 0.953) with EC of the soil. The remaining soil properties studied were not significantly correlated with the adsorption parameters.
    VL  - 3
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • School of Natural Resource Management and Environmental Science, Haramaya University, Haramaya, Ethiopia

  • School of Natural Resource Management and Environmental Science, Haramaya University, Haramaya, Ethiopia

  • School of Natural Resource Management and Environmental Science, Haramaya University, Haramaya, Ethiopia

  • Amhara Regional Agricultural Research Institute, Amhara National Regional State, Ethiopia

  • Sections