| Peer-Reviewed

Gender, but Not CYP2C19 Genotypes and CYP3A Phenotypes, is a Major Determinant of Ilaprazole Pharmacokinetic

Received: 16 September 2014    Accepted: 24 November 2014    Published: 27 January 2015
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

The purpose of the study was to assess the impact of CYP2C19 genotypes, CYP3A phenotypes and gender-related difference on the pharmacokinetics of new proton pump inhibitor ilaprazole. Twenty-four healthy Chinese volunteers (age 24.0  1.9 years) were enrolled in an open-label study stratified for gender (12 males and 12 females) and their CYP2C19 genotype (12 of CYP2C19*1/*1 and 12 of CYP2C19*1/*2 or *1/*3). After a single 10-mg dose of ilaprazole was administrated, blood samples were collected at time 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 36h from all subjects. Ilaprazole and its metabolite sulfone-ilaprazole plasma concentrations were measured using the well-validated HPLC/MS/MS method. CYP3A phenotype was determined by the classic CYP3A probe drug midazolam one week after the clinical trial. The kinetics characteristics of ilaprazole and sulfone-ilaprazole were significantly influenced by gender. The clearance/systemic bioavailability (CL/F) of ilaprazole was much lower in female than in male (2.5  1.0 versus 3.7  1.6 h-1, P = 0.029), difference became more significant even after corrected by body weight (P = 0.008). However, the differences on half-life, AUC0-36 and AUC0→∞ of ilaprazole between genders were not significantly after normalized by body weight. As for sulfone ilaprazole, larger AUC0→36 and AUC0→∞ were detected in female when compared with male (406.8  126.3 vs. 246.7  70.0 ng • h/ml, P = 0.007, and 606.7  224.5 vs. 332.0  117.1 ng • h/ml, P = 0.001), discrepancies were still significant after corrected by total body weight, P value were 0.017 and 0.010 respectively. The pharmacokinetics parameters of ilaprazole and ilaprazole sulfone were neither different across CYP2C19 genotype groups nor related to CYP3A phenotype. CL/F of ilaprazole were much smaller in women than in men even after adjusted by body weight, indicating great effect of gender on the pharmacokinetics of ilaprazole. CYP2C19 genotypes and CYP3A phenotypes did not affect the pharmacokinetics of ilaprazole or sulfone-ilaprazole.

Published in American Journal of Life Sciences (Volume 3, Issue 1-4)

This article belongs to the Special Issue Pharmacogenomics & Personalized Medicine

DOI 10.11648/j.ajls.s.2015030104.13
Page(s) 14-20
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

CYP2C19, CYP3A Phenotype, Ilaprazole, Pharmacokinetics, Gender Difference

References
[1] Miner, P., Jr., et al., Gastric acid control with esomeprazole, lansoprazole, omeprazole, pantoprazole, and rabeprazole: a five-way crossover study. Am J Gastroenterol, 2003. 98(12): p. 2616-20.
[2] Horn, J., The proton-pump inhibitors: similarities and differences. Clin Ther, 2000. 22(3): p. 266-80; discussion 265.
[3] Robinson, M. and J. Horn, Clinical pharmacology of proton pump inhibitors: what the practising physician needs to know. Drugs, 2003. 63(24): p. 2739-54.
[4] Wang, L., et al., A new PPI, ilaprazole compared with omeprazole in the treatment of duodenal ulcer: a randomized double-blind multicenter trial. J Clin Gastroenterol, 2011. 45(4): p. 322-9.
[5] Ando, T., et al., A comparative study on endoscopic ulcer healing of omeprazole versus rabeprazole with respect to CYP2C19 genotypic differences. Dig Dis Sci, 2005. 50(9): p. 1625-31.
[6] Tanigawara, Y., et al., CYP2C19 genotype-related efficacy of omeprazole for the treatment of infection caused by Helicobacter pylori. Clin Pharmacol Ther, 1999. 66(5): p. 528-34.
[7] Andersson, T., et al., Identification of human liver cytochrome P450 isoforms mediating secondary omeprazole metabolism. Br J Clin Pharmacol, 1994. 37(6): p. 597-604.
[8] Pichard, L., et al., Oxidative metabolism of lansoprazole by human liver cytochromes P450. Mol Pharmacol, 1995. 47(2): p. 410-8.
[9] VandenBranden, M., et al., Interaction of human liver cytochromes P450 in vitro with LY307640, a gastric proton pump inhibitor. Pharmacogenetics, 1996. 6(1): p. 81-91.
[10] Zhou, G., et al., Identification of ilaprazole metabolites in human urine by HPLC-ESI-MS/MS and HPLC-NMR experiments. Biomed Chromatogr, 2010. 24(10): p. 1130-5.
[11] Cho, H., et al., Effect of CYP2C19 Genetic Polymorphism on Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of a New Proton Pump Inhibitor, Ilaprazole. J Clin Pharmacol, 2011.
[12] Li, Y., et al., Pharmacokinetics of the new proton pump inhibitor ilaprazole in Chinese healthy subjects in relation to CYP3A5 and CYP2C19 genotypes. Clin Chim Acta, 2008. 391(1-2): p. 60-7.
[13] Gibbs, M.A., et al., Inhibition of cytochrome P-450 3A (CYP3A) in human intestinal and liver microsomes: comparison of Ki values and impact of CYP3A5 expression. Drug Metab Dispos, 1999. 27(2): p. 180-7.
[14] Lin, Y.S., et al., In-vivo phenotyping for CYP3A by a single-point determination of midazolam plasma concentration. Pharmacogenetics, 2001. 11(9): p. 781-91.
[15] Beierle, I., B. Meibohm, and H. Derendorf, Gender differences in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther, 1999. 37(11): p. 529-47.
[16] Konieczna, L., A. Chmielewska, and H. Lamparczyk, Influence of sex on the pharmacokinetics of ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin. Chemotherapy, 2006. 52(3): p. 111-21.
[17] Thummel, K.E., et al., Use of midazolam as a human cytochrome P450 3A probe: I. In vitro-in vivo correlations in liver transplant patients. J Pharmacol Exp Ther, 1994. 271(1): p. 549-56.
[18] Thummel, K.E., et al., Use of midazolam as a human cytochrome P450 3A probe: II. Characterization of inter- and intraindividual hepatic CYP3A variability after liver transplantation. J Pharmacol Exp Ther, 1994. 271(1): p. 557-66.
[19] Qiao, H.L., et al., Pharmacokinetics of three proton pump inhibitors in Chinese subjects in relation to the CYP2C19 genotype. Eur J Clin Pharmacol, 2006. 62(2): p. 107-12.
[20] Chang, M., et al., Interphenotype differences in disposition and effect on gastrin levels of omeprazole--suitability of omeprazole as a probe for CYP2C19. Br J Clin Pharmacol, 1995. 39(5): p. 511-8.
[21] Kim, K.A., et al., Enantioselective disposition of lansoprazole in extensive and poor metabolizers of CYP2C19. Clin Pharmacol Ther, 2002. 72(1): p. 90-9.
[22] Eap, C.B., et al., Oral administration of a low dose of midazolam (75 microg) as an in vivo probe for CYP3A activity. Eur J Clin Pharmacol, 2004. 60(4): p. 237-46.
[23] Link, B., et al., Pharmacokinetics of intravenous and oral midazolam in plasma and saliva in humans: usefulness of saliva as matrix for CYP3A phenotyping. Br J Clin Pharmacol, 2008. 66(4): p. 473-84.
[24] Shimada, T., et al., Interindividual variations in human liver cytochrome P-450 enzymes involved in the oxidation of drugs, carcinogens and toxic chemicals: studies with liver microsomes of 30 Japanese and 30 Caucasians. J Pharmacol Exp Ther, 1994. 270(1): p. 414-23.
[25] Tanaka, E., Gender-related differences in pharmacokinetics and their clinical significance. J Clin Pharm Ther, 1999. 24(5): p. 339-46.
[26] Schroeder, T.J., et al., Comparison of two cyclosporine formulations in healthy volunteers: bioequivalence of the new Sang-35 formulation and Neoral. J Clin Pharmacol, 1998. 38(9): p. 807-14.
[27] Greenblatt, D.J., et al., Age and gender effects on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of triazolam, a cytochrome P450 3A substrate. Clin Pharmacol Ther, 2004. 76(5): p. 467-79.
[28] Lew, K.H., et al., Gender-based effects on methylprednisolone pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Clin Pharmacol Ther, 1993. 54(4): p. 402-14.
[29] Yee, G.C., et al., Age-dependent cyclosporine: pharmacokinetics in marrow transplant recipients. Clin Pharmacol Ther, 1986. 40(4): p. 438-43.
[30] Chen, M., et al., Sex differences in CYP3A activity using intravenous and oral midazolam. Clin Pharmacol Ther, 2006. 80(5): p. 531-8.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Shan Cao, Gan Zhou, Yao Chen, Dong Guo, Zhi-rong Tan, et al. (2015). Gender, but Not CYP2C19 Genotypes and CYP3A Phenotypes, is a Major Determinant of Ilaprazole Pharmacokinetic. American Journal of Life Sciences, 3(1-4), 14-20. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajls.s.2015030104.13

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Shan Cao; Gan Zhou; Yao Chen; Dong Guo; Zhi-rong Tan, et al. Gender, but Not CYP2C19 Genotypes and CYP3A Phenotypes, is a Major Determinant of Ilaprazole Pharmacokinetic. Am. J. Life Sci. 2015, 3(1-4), 14-20. doi: 10.11648/j.ajls.s.2015030104.13

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Shan Cao, Gan Zhou, Yao Chen, Dong Guo, Zhi-rong Tan, et al. Gender, but Not CYP2C19 Genotypes and CYP3A Phenotypes, is a Major Determinant of Ilaprazole Pharmacokinetic. Am J Life Sci. 2015;3(1-4):14-20. doi: 10.11648/j.ajls.s.2015030104.13

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajls.s.2015030104.13,
      author = {Shan Cao and Gan Zhou and Yao Chen and Dong Guo and Zhi-rong Tan and Lan Fan and Hai-tang Hu and Xiang-hong Qin and Hong-hao Zhou and Dong-sheng Ouyang and Wei Zhang},
      title = {Gender, but Not CYP2C19 Genotypes and CYP3A Phenotypes, is a Major Determinant of Ilaprazole Pharmacokinetic},
      journal = {American Journal of Life Sciences},
      volume = {3},
      number = {1-4},
      pages = {14-20},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajls.s.2015030104.13},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajls.s.2015030104.13},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajls.s.2015030104.13},
      abstract = {The purpose of the study was to assess the impact of CYP2C19 genotypes, CYP3A phenotypes and gender-related difference on the pharmacokinetics of new proton pump inhibitor ilaprazole. Twenty-four healthy Chinese volunteers (age 24.0  1.9 years) were enrolled in an open-label study stratified for gender (12 males and 12 females) and their CYP2C19 genotype (12 of CYP2C19*1/*1 and 12 of CYP2C19*1/*2 or *1/*3). After a single 10-mg dose of ilaprazole was administrated, blood samples were collected at time 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 36h from all subjects. Ilaprazole and its metabolite sulfone-ilaprazole plasma concentrations were measured using the well-validated HPLC/MS/MS method. CYP3A phenotype was determined by the classic CYP3A probe drug midazolam one week after the clinical trial. The kinetics characteristics of ilaprazole and sulfone-ilaprazole were significantly influenced by gender. The clearance/systemic bioavailability (CL/F) of ilaprazole was much lower in female than in male (2.5  1.0 versus 3.7  1.6 h-1, P = 0.029), difference became more significant even after corrected by body weight (P = 0.008). However, the differences on half-life, AUC0-36 and AUC0→∞ of ilaprazole between genders were not significantly after normalized by body weight. As for sulfone ilaprazole, larger AUC0→36 and AUC0→∞ were detected in female when compared with male (406.8  126.3 vs. 246.7  70.0 ng • h/ml, P = 0.007, and 606.7  224.5 vs. 332.0  117.1 ng • h/ml, P = 0.001), discrepancies were still significant after corrected by total body weight, P value were 0.017 and 0.010 respectively. The pharmacokinetics parameters of ilaprazole and ilaprazole sulfone were neither different across CYP2C19 genotype groups nor related to CYP3A phenotype. CL/F of ilaprazole were much smaller in women than in men even after adjusted by body weight, indicating great effect of gender on the pharmacokinetics of ilaprazole. CYP2C19 genotypes and CYP3A phenotypes did not affect the pharmacokinetics of ilaprazole or sulfone-ilaprazole.},
     year = {2015}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Gender, but Not CYP2C19 Genotypes and CYP3A Phenotypes, is a Major Determinant of Ilaprazole Pharmacokinetic
    AU  - Shan Cao
    AU  - Gan Zhou
    AU  - Yao Chen
    AU  - Dong Guo
    AU  - Zhi-rong Tan
    AU  - Lan Fan
    AU  - Hai-tang Hu
    AU  - Xiang-hong Qin
    AU  - Hong-hao Zhou
    AU  - Dong-sheng Ouyang
    AU  - Wei Zhang
    Y1  - 2015/01/27
    PY  - 2015
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajls.s.2015030104.13
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajls.s.2015030104.13
    T2  - American Journal of Life Sciences
    JF  - American Journal of Life Sciences
    JO  - American Journal of Life Sciences
    SP  - 14
    EP  - 20
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2328-5737
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajls.s.2015030104.13
    AB  - The purpose of the study was to assess the impact of CYP2C19 genotypes, CYP3A phenotypes and gender-related difference on the pharmacokinetics of new proton pump inhibitor ilaprazole. Twenty-four healthy Chinese volunteers (age 24.0  1.9 years) were enrolled in an open-label study stratified for gender (12 males and 12 females) and their CYP2C19 genotype (12 of CYP2C19*1/*1 and 12 of CYP2C19*1/*2 or *1/*3). After a single 10-mg dose of ilaprazole was administrated, blood samples were collected at time 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 36h from all subjects. Ilaprazole and its metabolite sulfone-ilaprazole plasma concentrations were measured using the well-validated HPLC/MS/MS method. CYP3A phenotype was determined by the classic CYP3A probe drug midazolam one week after the clinical trial. The kinetics characteristics of ilaprazole and sulfone-ilaprazole were significantly influenced by gender. The clearance/systemic bioavailability (CL/F) of ilaprazole was much lower in female than in male (2.5  1.0 versus 3.7  1.6 h-1, P = 0.029), difference became more significant even after corrected by body weight (P = 0.008). However, the differences on half-life, AUC0-36 and AUC0→∞ of ilaprazole between genders were not significantly after normalized by body weight. As for sulfone ilaprazole, larger AUC0→36 and AUC0→∞ were detected in female when compared with male (406.8  126.3 vs. 246.7  70.0 ng • h/ml, P = 0.007, and 606.7  224.5 vs. 332.0  117.1 ng • h/ml, P = 0.001), discrepancies were still significant after corrected by total body weight, P value were 0.017 and 0.010 respectively. The pharmacokinetics parameters of ilaprazole and ilaprazole sulfone were neither different across CYP2C19 genotype groups nor related to CYP3A phenotype. CL/F of ilaprazole were much smaller in women than in men even after adjusted by body weight, indicating great effect of gender on the pharmacokinetics of ilaprazole. CYP2C19 genotypes and CYP3A phenotypes did not affect the pharmacokinetics of ilaprazole or sulfone-ilaprazole.
    VL  - 3
    IS  - 1-4
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Xingya Hospital, Central South University, Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Hunan Key Laboratory of Pharmacogenetics, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China

  • Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Xingya Hospital, Central South University, Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Hunan Key Laboratory of Pharmacogenetics, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China

  • Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Xingya Hospital, Central South University, Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Hunan Key Laboratory of Pharmacogenetics, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China

  • Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Xingya Hospital, Central South University, Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Hunan Key Laboratory of Pharmacogenetics, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China

  • Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Xingya Hospital, Central South University, Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Hunan Key Laboratory of Pharmacogenetics, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China

  • Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Xingya Hospital, Central South University, Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Hunan Key Laboratory of Pharmacogenetics, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China

  • Liyzon Pharmaceutical Group Inc., Guihua Road North, Zhuhai, China

  • Liyzon Pharmaceutical Group Inc., Guihua Road North, Zhuhai, China

  • Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Xingya Hospital, Central South University, Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Hunan Key Laboratory of Pharmacogenetics, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China

  • Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Xingya Hospital, Central South University, Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Hunan Key Laboratory of Pharmacogenetics, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China

  • Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Xingya Hospital, Central South University, Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Hunan Key Laboratory of Pharmacogenetics, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China

  • Sections