Extensive Practice Improves Adaptation to Predictable Perturbations in a Sequential Coincidente Timing Task
American Journal of Life Sciences
Volume 2, Issue 2, April 2014, Pages: 90-95
Received: Mar. 14, 2014;
Accepted: Apr. 9, 2014;
Published: Apr. 10, 2014
Views 3180 Downloads 126
Herbert Ugrinowitsch, Sports Department, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
Rodolfo Novellino Benda, Physical Education Department, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
Umberto Cesar Corrêa, Pedagogy Department, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Go Tani, Pedagogy Department, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
The levels of learning in motor tasks have been investigated by means of extensive practice (i.e., practice that is continued beyond the achievement of performance stabilization), which shows better performance than practice until performance stabilization when facing situations that require adaptation. However, the better performance of extensive practice has been tested with unpredictable perturbation, in which changes are necessary after the movement onset, but not with predictable perturbation, which allows planning a new organization of the action before the movement onset. The present study investigated adaptation to predictable perturbation, comparing no performance stabilization at all, practice until performance stabilization and practice beyond performance stabilization, i.e., extensive practice, in a coincident timing task. This task required the performance of a sequence of movements in accordance with a visual stimulus. Forty-five self-reported right-handed volunteers participated in this study, and they were randomly divided into three groups during the first phase of the study: Pre-Stabilization (PG), Stabilization (SG) and Extensive Practice (EG), which were operationally defined as 10 trials, three trials in a row with absolute error (AE) < 30 msec and six blocks of three trials in a row with AE < 30 msec, respectively. In the second phase, the velocity of the visual stimulus changed, causing a perceptual perturbation. The results showed that adaptation is easier after performance stabilization and that the variability observed after performance stabilization could be a source of adaptability. In general, these results indicate that the process of motor learning continues beyond performance stabilization
Rodolfo Novellino Benda,
Umberto Cesar Corrêa,
Extensive Practice Improves Adaptation to Predictable Perturbations in a Sequential Coincidente Timing Task, American Journal of Life Sciences.
Vol. 2, No. 2,
2014, pp. 90-95.
R.A. Scheidt, J.B. Dingwell, F.A. Mussa-Ivaldi, Learning to move amid uncertainty, J. Neurophys. vol. 86, pp. 971-985, 2001.
F.S. Fonseca, R.N. Benda, V.L.S. Profeta, H. Ugrinowitsch, Extensive Practice Improves Adaptation to Unpredictable Perturbations in a Sequential Coincident Timing Task. Neurosci. Lett. vol. 517, pp. 123-127, 2012.
H. Ugrinowitsch, S.P. Santos-Naves, M.V. Carbinatto, R.N. Benda, G. Tani, Motor skill adaptation depends on the level of learning, Inter. J. Hum. Soc. Scie. vol. 6, pp. 177-181, 2011.
Tani, G.; Corrêa, U. C.; Basso, L.; Benda, R.N.; Ugrinowitsch, H.; Choshi, K. An Adaptive Process Model of Motor Learning: Insights for the Teaching of Motor Skills. Nonlin. Dynam. Psych. Life Sci., vol. 18, pp. 47-66, 2014.
P.M. Fitts, M.I. Posner, Human Performance. Belmont: Brooks-Cole, 1967, 162 pp.
R.W. Pew, Acquisition of hierarchical control over the temporal organization of skill, J. Exp. Psych. vol. 71, pp. 764-761, 1966.
U.C. Corrêa, H. Ugrinowitsch, R.N. Benda, G. Tani, Effects of practice schedule on the adaptive process of motor learning. Rev. Port. Cien. Desp. vol. 10, pp. 158-171, 2010.
S. Richter, J. Konczak, M. Maschke, T. Kalenscher, D. Timmann, A.R. Illenberger, A.R.I.K.T. Kalveram, Adaptive motor behavior of cerebellar patients during exposure to unfamiliar external forces. J. Mot. Behav. vol. 36, pp. 28-38, 2004a.
S. Richter, P. Jansen-Osmann, J. Konczak, K. Kalveram, Motor adaptation to different dynamic environments is facilitated by indicative context stimuli, Psych. Res. vol. 68 pp. 245-251, 2004b.
F.A. Kagerer, J.L. Contreras-Vidal, G.E. Stelmach, Adaptation to gradual as compared with sudden visou-motor distortions, Exp. Brain Res. vol. 115, pp. 557-561, 1997.
D. Sternard, M.O. Abe, Variability, noise, and sensitivity to error in motor learning a motor task, in: F. Danion, M.L. Latash, (Eds.), Motor Control: Theories, Experiments, and Applications, Oxford, University Press, 2011, pp. 267-294.
P.W. Dorfman, Timing and anticipation: a developmental perspective. J. Mot. Behav. vol. 9, pp. 67-79, 1977.
L.R.T. Willians, J.M. Jasiewicz, R.W. Simmons, Coincidence timing of finger, arm, and whole body movements. Percep. and Mot. Skills, vol. 92, pp. 535-547, 2000.
N. Bernstein, The Co-ordination and Regulation of Human Movements. Oxford, Pergamon, 1967, 196 pp.
K.M. Newell, Change in movement and skill: learning, retention and transfer, in: M. Latash, M. Turvey (Eds.), Dexterity and Movement, Lawrence Erlbaum, New Jersey, 1996, pp. 393-430.
R.A. Schmidt, A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psych. Rev. vol. 82, pp. 225-260, 1975.
L. Li, J.M. Haddad, J. Hamil, Stability and variability may respond differently to changes in walking speed. Hum. Mov. Sci. vol. 24, pp. 257-267, 2005.
E. Burdet, K.P. Tee, I. Mareels, T.E. Milner, C.M. Chew, D.W. Franklin, R. Osu, M. Kawato, Stability and motor adaptation in human arm movements. Biol. Cyber. vol. 94, pp. 20-32, 2006.
K.M. Newell, D.M. Corcos, Variability and Motor Control. Champaign, Illions, Human Kinetics, 1993, 510 p.
M.A. Riley, M.T. Turvey, Variability and determinism in motor behavior. J. Mot. Behav. vol. 34, pp. 94-125, 2002.
K. Torre, R. Balasubramaniam, Disentangling stability, variability and adaptability in human performance: Focus on the interplay between local variance and serial correlation. J. Exp. Psych.: Hum. Perc. Perf. vol. 37, pp. 539-550, 2011.
R.E. van Emmerik, E.E.H. van Wegen, On the functional aspects of variability in postural control. Exerc. Sport Sci. Rev. vol. 30, pp. 177-193, 2002.
G. Tani, Processo adaptativo em aprendizagem motora: o papel da Variabilidade. [Adaptive process and motor learning: the role of variability]. Revista Paulista de Educação Física, [Paulista J. Phys. Educ.] vol. 14, pp. 55-61, 2000.
M.L. Latash, F. Danion, J.F. Scholz, V.M. Zatiorsky, G. Schöner, Approaches to analysis of handwriting as a task of coordinating a redundant motor system. Hum. Mov. Sci. vol. 22, pp. 153-171, 2003.
J.P. Scholz, G. Schöner, The uncontrolled manifold concept: Identifying control variables for a functional task. Exp. Brain Res. vol. 126, pp. 289-306, 1999.
H. Heuer, Invariant relative timing in motor-program theory. In: J. Fagard, P.H. Wolff, (Eds.) The development of timing control and temporal organization in coordinated-actions. North-Holland, Amsterdan, 1991, pp. 37-68.
E.J. Manoel, L. Basso, U.C. Correa, G. Tani, Modularity and hierarchical organization of action programs in human acquisition of graphic skills, Neurosci. Lett. vol. 335, pp. 83-86, 2002.
J.A.S. Kelso, Dynamic Patterns, the Self-Organization of Brain and Behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995, 334 p.
A.B. Slifkin, K.M. Newell, Noise, information transmission, and force variability. J. Exp. Psych.: Hum. Perc. Perf. vol. 25, pp. 837-851, 1999.
E.J. Manoel, K.J. Connolly, Variability and the development of skill actions, Intern. J. Psychophys. vol. 19, pp. 129-147, 1995.
A.M. Gentile, A working model of skill acquisition with application to teaching. Quest, vol. 17, pp. 3-23, 1972.
P.G. Zanone, J.A.S. Kelso, Learning and transfer as dynamical paradigms for behavioral change. In: G.E. Stelmach, J. Requin (Eds.) Tutorials in Motor Behavior II. Amsterdam, Elsevier Science, 1992, pp.563-582.