European Journal of Biophysics

| Peer-Reviewed |

Scaling of Total Metabolic, Gravitational and Heat Energy of Living Organisms, Earth and Sun

Received: 15 February 2015    Accepted: 12 March 2015    Published: 14 July 2015
Views:       Downloads:

Share This Article

Abstract

The gravitational energy, total metabolic energy and heat energy of living organisms, Earth and Sun are scaled. Statistical analyses have shown that nearly a linear relationship between the total metabolic energy per lifespan of Poikilothermic organisms (Pls, kJ), total heat energy (THEE, kJ) of the Earth and the body mass (M, kg) of Poikilotherms and Earth (ME, kg) in log-log plots holds: Pls= 1.696×105 M0.949 with R2= 0.996. A similar relationship between the total metabolic energy of Homoitherms Mammals and Aves (Pls, kJ), the total heat energy of Sun (emitted over Earth surface per Earth’s lifespan) (THES, kJ), and body mass (M, kg) of Mammals, Aves and Earth (ME, kg) holds: Pls = 10.2×105 M1.023 with R2= 0.996. The metabolic potential of living organisms, gravitational and heat potential of Earth and Sun are scaled too. The gravitational and ‘heat’ potential of Earth are emerging as a lower limit of lifespan metabolic potentials of unicellular organisms, while the gravitational and ‘heat’ potential of Sun are emerging as an upper limit of lifespan metabolic potentials of multicellular organisms (Poikilotherms, Mammals and Aves). The relationships between mass-energy characteristics of living organisms, Earth and Sun show that gravitational and heat energy of Earth and Sun determine maximum and minimum total metabolic energy (per lifespan) of living organisms, while the gravitational and ‘heat’ potentials of Earth and Sun determine their maximum and minimum lifespan metabolic potentials.

DOI 10.11648/j.ejb.s.2015030301.11
Published in European Journal of Biophysics (Volume 3, Issue 3-1, June 2015)

This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Perspectives in Biophysics

Page(s) 1-10
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Total Metabolic, Gravitational, Heat, Energy, Earth, Sun

References
[1] N. Fujiwara, “The scaling rule for environmental organizing systems in a gravitational field,” BioSystems, vol. 73, pp. 111-116, 2004.
[2] G. Clément, “Introduction to space biology,” The Space Technology Library, vol. 18, pp. 1-50, 2006.
[3] R.J. Blakely, Potential theory in gravity and magnetic applications. Cambridge University Press, UK, 1996.
[4] B.K. McNab, “On the utility of uniformity in the definition of basal rate of metabolism,” Phys. Zoology, vol.70, pp.718-720, 1997.
[5] A.T. Atanasov, “The linear allometric relationship between total metabolic energy per life span and body mass of Poikilothermic animals,” Biosystems, vol. 82, pp. 137-142, 2005.
[6] A.T. Atanasov, “Linear allometric relationship between total metabolic energy per lifespan and body mass of terrestrial mammals in captivity,” BJVM, vol. 9, pp. 159-174, 2006.
[7] A.T. Atanasov, “The linear allometric relationship between total metabolic energy per life span and the body mass of mammals,” Biosystems, vol. 90, pp. 224-233, 2007.
[8] A.T. Atanasov, “The near to linear allometric relationship between total metabolic energy per life span and the body mass of Nonpasseriformes birds,” BJVM, vol. 10, pp. 235-245, 2007.
[9] N. Fujiwara, “Origin of the scaling rule for fundamental living organisms based on thermodynamics,” BioSystems, vol. 70, pp. 1-7, 2003.
[10] J.R. Hickey, B.M. Alton, H.L. Kyle and D. Hoyt, “Total solar irradiance measurements by ERB/NUMBUS 7. A review of nine years,” Space Sci. Rev., vol. 48, pp. 321-342, 1998.
[11] A.J. Colozza, Effect of data and location on maximum achievable altitude for a solar powered aircraft. NASA Contractor Report 202326. NYMA, Inc. Brook Park, Ohio, 1997.
[12] C. Gueymard , “The sun’s total and spectral irradiance for solar energy applications and solar radiation models,” Solar Energy, vol. 76, pp. 423-453, 2003.
[13] H.N. Pollack, S.J. Hurter and J.R. Johnson, “Heat flow from the Earth’s interior: analysis of the global data set,” Reviews of Geophysics, vol. 31(3), pp. 267-280, 1993.
[14] J.G. Sclater, C. Jaupart and D. Galson, “The heat flow through oceanic and continental crust and the heat loss of the Earth,” Reviews of Geophysics and Space Physics, vol. 18(1), pp. 269-311, 1980.
[15] G. F. Davies, “Thermal histories of convective Earth models and constrains on radiogenic heat production in the Earth,” J. Geophys. Res., vol. 85, pp.2517-2530, 1980.
[16] E. M. Galimov, “Redox evolution of the Earth caused by a multi-stage formation of its core,” EPSL, vol. 233, pp. 263-276, 2005.
[17] H-H. Ku and R. Sohal, “Comparison of mitochondrial pro-oxidant generation and anti-oxidant defences between rat and pigeon: possible basis of variation in longevity and metabolic potential,” Mech. Ageing. Dev., vol. 72, pp. 67-76, 1993.
[18] D. Volkmann and A. Sievers, “Research under reduced gravity. Part I: Bases of gravitational biology,” Die Naturwissenschaffen, vol. 79, pp. 68-74, 1992.
[19] M. Yamashita and S.A. Baba, “Biology of size and gravity,” Biol. Sci. Space, vol. 18, pp. 13-27, 2004.
[20] D. Valev, “Determination of total mechanical energy of the universe within the framework of Newtonian mechanics,” In “arXiv:0909.2726vl [physics.gen-ph] 15 Sep 2009”.
[21] P. Todd, “Gravity-depending phenomena at the scale of the single cell,” ASGSB Bull., vol. 2, pp. 95-113, 1989.
[22] P. Bouloc P and R. D’Ary, “Escherichia coli metabolism in space,” J. Gen. Microbiol., vol. 137, pp. 2839-2843, 1991.
[23] S. Deguchi, H. Shimoshige, M. Tsudome, S-A. Mukai, R.W. Corkery RW, S. and K. Horikoshi, “Microbial growth at hyperaccelerations up to 403 627×g,” PNAS, Early Ed., 2010 (www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1018027108).
[24] Y. Kato, Y. Mogami and S.A. Baba, “Responses to hypergravity in proliferation of Paramecium tetraurelia,” Zoology Science, vol. 20, pp.1373-1380, 2003.
[25] A.L. Demain and A. Fang, “Secondary metabolism in simulated microgravity,” Chem. Rec., vol. 1, pp. 333-346, 2001.
[26] C.A. Nickerson, C.M. Ott, J.W. Wilson, R. Ramamurthy and D.L. Pierson, “Microbial responses to microgravity and other low-shear environments,” Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., vol. 68, pp. 345-361, 2004.
[27] B. Purevdorj-Gage, K.B. Sheehan and L.E. Hyman, “Effects of low-shear modeled microgravity on cell function, gene expression and phenotype in Saccharomyces cerevisiae,” Appl. Environ. Microbiol., vol. 72, pp. 4569-4575, 2006.
[28] G. Horneck, D. Klaus and L. Mancinelli, “Space Microbiology,” Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., vol.74, pp. 121-156, 2010.
[29] V.A. Kotov, “Solar System, exoplanets and anthropic principle,” Bull. Crim. Astr. Obs., vol.105, pp. 119-128, 2009.
[30] R.A. Kerr, “Putting a Lid on Life on Europe,” Science, vol. 294, pp. 1258-1259, 2001.
[31] D. Schulze-Makuch and L.N. Irwin, “Energy Cycling and Hypothetical Organisms in Europa’s Ocean,” Astrobiology, vol.2, pp.105-121, 2002.
[32] D. Volkmann and F. Baluska, “Gravity: one of the driving forces for evolution,” Protoplasma, vol. 229, pp. 143-148, 2006.
[33] A.H. Brown, “From gravity and the organism to gravity and the cell,” ASGSB Bull., vol. 4, pp. 7-18, 1991.
[34] M.D. Ross, “The influence of gravity on structure and function of animals,” Adv. Space Res., vol. 4, pp. 305-314, 1984.
[35] J.R. Keefe, Final report of the NASA Mammalian Developmental Biology Working Group. In: NASA Developmental Biology Workshop (K.A. Souza and T.W. Halstead, eds.), pp.46-63. NASA TM-86756, Washington, D.C., 1985.
[36] D. J. Wolgemuth and A.K. Murashov, “Models and molecular approaches to assessing the effects of the microgravity environment on vertebrate development,” ASGSB Bull., vol. 8, pp. 63-71, 1995.
[37] K. Michaelian, “Thermodynamic stability of ecosystems,” J. Theoret. Biol., vol. 237, pp. 323-335, 2005.
[38] K. Michaelian, “Thermodynamic origin of life,” In “arXiv:0907.0042v3 [physics.gen-ph] 8 Sep 2010”.
[39] C. Sagan and G. Mullen, “Earth and Mars: Evolution of atmospheres and surface temperature,” Science (New Series), vol. 177, pp. 52-56, 1972.
[40] C.L. Van Dover, The Ecology of Deep-Sea Hydrothermal Vents. Copyright © 2000 by Princeton University Press, UK, 2000.
[41] J. D. Fix, ASTRONOMY: Journey to the cosmic frontiers. First Ed., University of Iowa, Mosby-Year Book, Inc., 1995.
Author Information
  • Department of Physics and Biophysics, Medical Faculty, Trakia University, Stara Zagora, Bulgaria

Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Atanas Todorov Atanasov. (2015). Scaling of Total Metabolic, Gravitational and Heat Energy of Living Organisms, Earth and Sun. European Journal of Biophysics, 3(3-1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ejb.s.2015030301.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Atanas Todorov Atanasov. Scaling of Total Metabolic, Gravitational and Heat Energy of Living Organisms, Earth and Sun. Eur. J. Biophys. 2015, 3(3-1), 1-10. doi: 10.11648/j.ejb.s.2015030301.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Atanas Todorov Atanasov. Scaling of Total Metabolic, Gravitational and Heat Energy of Living Organisms, Earth and Sun. Eur J Biophys. 2015;3(3-1):1-10. doi: 10.11648/j.ejb.s.2015030301.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ejb.s.2015030301.11,
      author = {Atanas Todorov Atanasov},
      title = {Scaling of Total Metabolic, Gravitational and Heat Energy of Living Organisms, Earth and Sun},
      journal = {European Journal of Biophysics},
      volume = {3},
      number = {3-1},
      pages = {1-10},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ejb.s.2015030301.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ejb.s.2015030301.11},
      eprint = {https://download.sciencepg.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ejb.s.2015030301.11},
      abstract = {The gravitational energy, total metabolic energy and heat energy of living organisms, Earth and Sun are scaled. Statistical analyses have shown that nearly a linear relationship between the total metabolic energy per lifespan of Poikilothermic organisms (Pls, kJ), total heat energy (THEE, kJ) of the Earth and the body mass (M, kg) of Poikilotherms and Earth (ME, kg) in log-log plots holds: Pls= 1.696×105 M0.949 with R2= 0.996. A similar relationship between the total metabolic energy of Homoitherms Mammals and Aves (Pls, kJ), the total heat energy of Sun (emitted over Earth surface per Earth’s lifespan) (THES, kJ), and body mass (M, kg) of Mammals, Aves and Earth (ME, kg) holds: Pls = 10.2×105 M1.023 with R2= 0.996. The metabolic potential of living organisms, gravitational and heat potential of Earth and Sun are scaled too. The gravitational and ‘heat’ potential of Earth are emerging as a lower limit of lifespan metabolic potentials of unicellular organisms, while the gravitational and ‘heat’ potential of Sun are emerging as an upper limit of lifespan metabolic potentials of multicellular organisms (Poikilotherms, Mammals and Aves). The relationships between mass-energy characteristics of living organisms, Earth and Sun show that gravitational and heat energy of Earth and Sun determine maximum and minimum total metabolic energy (per lifespan) of living organisms, while the gravitational and ‘heat’ potentials of Earth and Sun determine their maximum and minimum lifespan metabolic potentials.},
     year = {2015}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Scaling of Total Metabolic, Gravitational and Heat Energy of Living Organisms, Earth and Sun
    AU  - Atanas Todorov Atanasov
    Y1  - 2015/07/14
    PY  - 2015
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ejb.s.2015030301.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ejb.s.2015030301.11
    T2  - European Journal of Biophysics
    JF  - European Journal of Biophysics
    JO  - European Journal of Biophysics
    SP  - 1
    EP  - 10
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2329-1737
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ejb.s.2015030301.11
    AB  - The gravitational energy, total metabolic energy and heat energy of living organisms, Earth and Sun are scaled. Statistical analyses have shown that nearly a linear relationship between the total metabolic energy per lifespan of Poikilothermic organisms (Pls, kJ), total heat energy (THEE, kJ) of the Earth and the body mass (M, kg) of Poikilotherms and Earth (ME, kg) in log-log plots holds: Pls= 1.696×105 M0.949 with R2= 0.996. A similar relationship between the total metabolic energy of Homoitherms Mammals and Aves (Pls, kJ), the total heat energy of Sun (emitted over Earth surface per Earth’s lifespan) (THES, kJ), and body mass (M, kg) of Mammals, Aves and Earth (ME, kg) holds: Pls = 10.2×105 M1.023 with R2= 0.996. The metabolic potential of living organisms, gravitational and heat potential of Earth and Sun are scaled too. The gravitational and ‘heat’ potential of Earth are emerging as a lower limit of lifespan metabolic potentials of unicellular organisms, while the gravitational and ‘heat’ potential of Sun are emerging as an upper limit of lifespan metabolic potentials of multicellular organisms (Poikilotherms, Mammals and Aves). The relationships between mass-energy characteristics of living organisms, Earth and Sun show that gravitational and heat energy of Earth and Sun determine maximum and minimum total metabolic energy (per lifespan) of living organisms, while the gravitational and ‘heat’ potentials of Earth and Sun determine their maximum and minimum lifespan metabolic potentials.
    VL  - 3
    IS  - 3-1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

  • Sections