Please enter verification code
Confirm
Influence of Glass and Air on Our Perception of DNA
European Journal of Biophysics
Volume 8, Issue 1, June 2020, Pages: 10-15
Received: Aug. 10, 2020; Accepted: Aug. 21, 2020; Published: Aug. 27, 2020
Views 145      Downloads 38
Author
Yuri Pivovarenko, Research and Training Centre ‘Physical and Chemical Materials Science’, Under Kyiv Taras Shevchenko University and NAS of Ukraine, Kiev, Ukraine
Article Tools
Follow on us
Abstract
The chemical and physical properties of glass do not allow it to be considered as an inert material. Therefore, it is necessary to discuss the ability of laboratory glassware to influence the state and properties of aqueous solutions, including DNA solutions. As a demonstration of this ability, it is shown here how contact with glass affects the state of salts in aqueous solutions. In terms of the topic under discussion, it is especially important that sodium salts are very sensitive to these contacts. Thus, it is shown here that contact with glass can affect the formation of fibers from sodium salts of DNA, which were mainly used in X-ray studies aimed at determining the molecular structure and parameters of DNA molecules. Special attention is paid to the fact that laboratory glassware is also sensitive to contact with aqueous solutions, including DNA solutions. That such sensitivity may be important to biologists is also shown here. In particular, it was shown how ignoring the sensitivity of silica glass, from which the photometric cells are made, to electrization gave rise to misconceptions about the spectral properties of aqueous solutions, including DNA solutions. The effect of air dissolved in aqueous DNA solutions on the spectral properties of both these solutions and the photometric cells containing them is also shown. In particular, it was shown that UV absorption of aqueous DNA solutions, which does not contain air, is completely insensitive to heating, and UV absorption of aqueous DNA solutions, which are saturated with air, is supersensitive to heating. In other words, it is shown here that our understanding of the thermal denaturation of DNA, which is reflected in the UV absorption of its aqueous solutions, was formed due to these two types of sensitivity. In the end, a conclusion is proposed here about the significant contribution of glass and air to the creation of traditional ideas about the structure and properties of DNA.
Keywords
DNA, Structure, Fibers, UV Absorption, Spectra, Melting, Phenazines
To cite this article
Yuri Pivovarenko, Influence of Glass and Air on Our Perception of DNA, European Journal of Biophysics. Vol. 8, No. 1, 2020, pp. 10-15. doi: 10.11648/j.ejb.20200801.12
Copyright
Copyright © 2020 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
References
[1]
Semenoff N. (1936) Chemical Kinetics and Chain Reactions. Nature, 137, 127-128.
[2]
Vallance C. (2017) An Introduction to Chemical Kinetics. San Rafael, USA: Morgan & Claypool Publishers.
[3]
Nekrasov B. V. (1974) Bases of General Chemistry 1, Moscow: Chemistry. In Russian.
[4]
Pivovarenko Y. (2018) Legends of DNA morphology. Morphologia, 12 (2), 77-83.
[5]
Saenger W. (1984) Principles of Nucleic Acid Structure. New York: Springer Verlag.
[6]
Pivovarenko Y. V. (2015) UV Absorbance of Aqueous DNA. European Journal of Biophysics, 3 (3), 19-22.
[7]
Pivovarenko Y. (2018) ±Water: Demonstration of water properties, depending on its electrical potential. World Journal of Applied Physics, 3 (1), 13-18.
[8]
Moore R. D., and Morrill G. A. (1976) A possible mechanism for concentrating sodium and potassium in the cell nucleus. Biophysical Journal, 16, 527-533.
[9]
Shabarova Z. A., and Bogdanov A. A. (1978) Chemistry of Nucleic Acids and their Components, Moscow: Chemistry. In Russian.
[10]
Pivovarenko Y. (2015) Nucleic Acids in Atypical Conditions. European Journal of Biophysics, 3 (1), 5-9.
[11]
Nagai K., and Hecht S. M. (1991) Site-specific Cleavage by Antisense Oligonucleotides Covalently Linked to Phenazine Di-N-oxide. J. B. C, 266 (35), 23994-24002.
[12]
Pivovarenko Y., Shablykin O., and Vasiliev A. (2012) The nature of interactions between cationic phenazine N-oxides and DNA, 3, 20-24. In Ukrainian.
[13]
Hooper G., and Dick D. A. T. (1976) Nonuniform Distribution of Sodium in the Rat Hepatocyte. J. of General Physiology, 67, 469-474.
[14]
Oberleihtner H., Wunsch S., and Schneider S. (1992) Patchy accumulation of apical Na+ transporters allows cross talk between extracellular space and cell nucleus. PNAS USA, 89, 241-245.
[15]
Watson J. D., and Crick F. H. C. (1953) A structure of deoxyribose nucleic acid. Nature, 171, 737-738.
[16]
Rodley G. A., Bates R. H. T., and Arnott S. (1980) Is DNA really double helix? Trends Biochem. Sci., 5, 231-234.
[17]
Gorski F. (1980) A comparison of the Watson-Crick DNA structural model with the new “side by side” model. Folia Biol. (Krakow), 28, 211-224.
[18]
Doshi R., Day P. J. R., and Tirelli N. (2009) Dissolved oxygen alteration of the spectrophotometric analysis and quantification of nucleic acid solutions. Biochem. Soc. Transactions, 37, 466-470.
[19]
Doshi R., Day P. J. R., Carampin P. at all. (2010) Spectrophotometric analysis of nucleic acids: oxygenation-dependant hyperchromism of DNA. Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 396, 2331-2339.
[20]
Mergny J.-L., Li J., Lacroix L., Amrane, S., and Chaires, J. B. (2005) Thermal difference spectra: a specific signature for nucleic acid structures. Nucleic Acids Res., 33 (16), 1-6.
[21]
Vladimirov Yu. A. (2004) Reactive oxygen and nitrogen species: importance for diagnosis, prevention and therapy. Biochemistry, 69 (1), 5-7.
[22]
Ozawa T. (1997) Oxidative Damage and Fragmentation of Mitochondrial DNA in Cellular Apoptosis. Bioscience Reports., 17, 237-250.
[23]
Cadenas E., and Davics K. J. A. (2000) Mitochondrial free radical generation, oxidative stress and aging. Free Radic. Biol. Med., 29, 222-230.
[24]
Frenkel K. (1992) Carcinogen-mediated oxidant formation and oxidative DNA damage. Pharmacol. Ther., 53, 127-166.
[25]
Malins D. C. (1995) Precancerous diagnostics for breast cancer by studying free-radical damage to DNA. Optical Engineering Reports, 135, 1-3.
[26]
Poli G., and Parola M. (1997) Oxidative damage and fibrogenesis. Free Radic. Biol. Med., 22, 287-305.
[27]
Poulsen H. E., Prieme H., and Loft S. (1998) Role of oxidative DNA damage in cancer initiation and promotion. Eur. J. Cancer Prev., 7, 9-16.
[28]
Khan F., and Ali R. (2005) Enhanced recognition of hydroxyl radical modified plasmid DNA by circulating cancer antibodies. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res., 24, 289-296.
[29]
Y. Pivovarenko (2018) The value of gaseous hydrogen generated by the intestinal microflora of human. Chapter 7 in: Top 10 Contributions on Biomedical Sciences, 2-15. Hyderabad, India: Avid Science.
ADDRESS
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
U.S.A.
Tel: (001)347-983-5186