Effects of Varieties and Intra Row Spacing on Yield of Maize (Zea mays L) Under Supplementary Irrigation in an Arid Region of Western Ethiopia
Advances in Applied Sciences
Volume 4, Issue 2, April 2019, Pages: 52-58
Received: Mar. 16, 2019; Accepted: May 6, 2019; Published: May 31, 2019
Views 205      Downloads 27
Author
Tasisa Temesgen, School of Natural Resource Management and Environmental Sciences, Haramaya University, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia
Article Tools
Follow on us
Abstract
Determination of optimum plant population and the use of improved varieties in combination with appropriate agronomic practices are important components of maize production package for maximizing productivity. The study was conducted 2017- 2018 under supplementary irrigation at 9o 10' 00'' N' latitude and 35o22' 00′′ E longitude, Western Ethiopia, to determining the effects of variety and intra-row spacing on yield of maize (Zea mays L.), the same application of irrigation water. The experiment was conducted in factorial arrangement of four intra-row spacing (20, 25, 30 and 35cm) with three maize varieties (BH546, Shone and BHQPY-545) in RCBD. The interaction of variety and intra-row spacing was highly significant (P<0.01) on yield components and yield of maize. The highest (1.75) average number of ears per plant was recorded from varieties BH546 and BHQPY-545 at 35cm intra-row spacing. The highest (35cm) ear length was recorded from BH546 at 35cm intra-row spacing. Generally, leaf area, stand count, ears per plant, ear length, and ear diameter showed a decreasing trend with decreasing intra-row spacing. Based on these results, it can be tentatively concluded that the variety BH546 could be used at plant density of 53,333 plants ha-1 and (25cm) intra-row spacing is best to get the highest green cob yield of maize under supplemental irrigation during the off-season in the study area.
Keywords
Intra-row Spacing, Supplementary Irrigation, Plant Density and Crop Variety
To cite this article
Tasisa Temesgen, Effects of Varieties and Intra Row Spacing on Yield of Maize (Zea mays L) Under Supplementary Irrigation in an Arid Region of Western Ethiopia, Advances in Applied Sciences. Vol. 4, No. 2, 2019, pp. 52-58. doi: 10.11648/j.aas.20190402.13
Copyright
Copyright © 2019 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
References
[1]
FAO, 2015, The State of Food and Agriculture Social protection and agriculture: breaking the cycle of rural poverty.
[2]
Muhammad, A., Muhammad, A., M., and Cengiz, R. 2015. Drought stress in maize (Zea mays L.) effects, resistance mechanisms, global achievements and biological strategies for improvement (pp. 1–79).
[3]
Beyenesh Zemichael and Nigussie Dechassa. 2017. Performance of bread wheat (TriticumaestivumL.) in response tosupplemental irrigation and rate of nitrogen application inEnderta, Tigray, Northern Ethiopia. Int. J. of Life Sciences, 2017, Vol. 5 (3): 345-361.
[4]
Mupangwa, M. and Dagne Wegary. 2018. Closing the gap between the potential yield and obtained results of improved maize varieties: Case for Ethiopia. African Seed Association (AFSTA) Congress, at Cairo, Egypt (CIMMYT).
[5]
Malaku Adimasu. 2014. Hybrid maize seed production manual. Ethiopia Seed Association. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[6]
Kahiu Ngugi, Jerono Cheserek, Cecilia Muchira and George Chemining’wa. 2013. Anthesis to Silking Interval Usefulness in Developing Drought Tolerant Maize. Dept of Plant Sciences and Crop Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, College of Agriculture and Veterinary Sciences, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
[7]
Tokatlis, I. S. & Koutroubas, S. D. 2004. A review of maize hybrids dependence on high plant populations and its implications for crop yield stability. Field Crops Research, 49:119-126.
[8]
Raouf, S. S., Sedghi, M. and Gholipouri, A., 2009. Effect of Population Density on Yield and Yield attribute of maize hybrids. Research journal of Biology sciences 4 (4): 375-379.
[9]
Abuzar, M. R., Sodazai, G. U., Bolach, M. S., Bolach, A. A, Shah, I. H, avaid, T. J. and Hussa, N. 2011. Effect of Plant Population Densities on Yield of Maize. The journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 21(4):692-695.
[10]
Adeniyan, O. N. and Ojeniyi, S. O. 2005. Effect of poultry manure, NPK 15-15-15 fertilizer and combination on of their reduced levels on maize growth and soil chemical properties. Nigerian J. Soil Sci. 15: 34-41.
[11]
Eskandarnejada, S., Khorasani, S., Bakhtiaric, A. Heidarian, R. 2013. Effect of row spacing and plant density on yield and yield components of sweet corn (Zea mays L.). Journal of Crop Science, l3 (1): 81-8.
[12]
Sangoi, L., M. Ender, A. Guidolin, M. L. de Almeida and P. C. Heberle, 2001. Influence of row spacing reduction on maize grain yield and yield components. Agronomy Journal, 36 (6) 861-869.
[13]
Zamir, M. S. I., Ahmad, A. H., Javeed, H. M. R. and Latif, T. 2011. Growth and yield behavior of two maize hybrids (zea mays L.) towards different plant spacing. Cercetări Agronomiceîn Moldova Vol. XLIV, No. 2 (146).
[14]
Kunoskan, O. 2000. Effect of plant density on yield and yield related characters on of some maize hybrids grown in hatey condition as second crop. M. SC. Thesis, Science Institute. M. K. U. 8(3): 71-75.
[15]
Lakew Getaneh, Ketema Belete and Tamado Tana .2016 Growth and Productivity of Maize (Zea mays L.) as Influenced by Inter and Intra-Row Spacing in Kombolcha, Eastern Ethiopia. MSc, Thesis, Haramaya University, Haramaya, Ethiopia.
[16]
Sabo, M. U, Wailare, M. A., Aliyu, M. J. and Sanusi, M. H. 2016. Effect of variety and spacing on growth and yield of maize (Zea mays L.) in Bauchi State, Nigeria. Int. Plant and Soil Sci. 2016; 9 (6):1-6.
ADDRESS
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
U.S.A.
Tel: (001)347-983-5186