| Peer-Reviewed

An Investigation into Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK): Teachers’ Views on Knowledge

Received: 2 April 2021    Accepted: 23 April 2021    Published: 8 May 2021
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) has been given a lot of attention in the academic field in recent years, inparticular in the field of teacher cognition and teacher knowledge. This research aimed to investigate the views on language (regarded as one aspect of PCK) shown in the practices of six Chinese in-service teachers teaching College English at two universities in the south of China by using a qualitative multiple case study approach. The existing literature guided the current research, which investigated teachers’ views on knowledge to guide language teacher education and development in mainland China. The results of the data analysis in this study revealed that the participant teachers were generally experienced in their use of declarative knowledge, but possibly unskilled in their use of strategic knowledge. To summarize, views on knowledge encompasses teachers’ creative ways of thinking and their personal understanding of the discipline of teaching. It is the teachers’ ability to endow declarative knowledge with personal significance. Views on knowledge include teachers’ personal wisdom that transforms procedural knowledge into strategic knowledge (the ability to solve problems in classroom teaching practice). It entails teachers’ constant updating and development of their personal pedagogical knowledge in the teaching practice of particular subject matter.

Published in Teacher Education and Curriculum Studies (Volume 6, Issue 2)
DOI 10.11648/j.tecs.20210602.11
Page(s) 41-50
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

PCK, Teachers’ Views on Knowledge, Teacher Education and Development, Teacher Knowledge

References
[1] Adams, J. E. (2000). Taking charge of curriculum. Columbia University Press.
[2] Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.
[3] Bao, Y. & Tang, Z. (2014). The conceptual criticism and development of Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Education Science, 30(6), 39–44.
[4] Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage.
[5] Danuse, N. (2011). Researching science teacher pedagogical content knowledge. Problems of Education in the 21st Century. 35, 104–118.
[6] Duff, P. (2008). Case study research in applied linguistics. Erlbaum.
[7] Elbaz, F. (1983). Teacher thinking: A study of practical knowledge. Nichols.
[8] Fernandez, L. M. (2013). Beyond La Nina, La Pinta, and La Santa Maria: The invention and mental mapping of the New World. Social Education, 77, 7–13.
[9] Fernandez, A. N. (2014, December 9). Crossing the border to kindergarten. Education Week.
[10] Freeman, D. & Richards, J. C. (1996). Teacher learning in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
[11] Grossman, P. L. (1989). A study in contrast: Sources of PCK for secondary English. Journal of Teacher Education, 40 (5), 24–31.
[12] Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. Teachers College Press.
[13] Han, G. (2011). Constructing PCK in EFL teachers. Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
[14] Li, W. (2012). The core connotation analysis of Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Journal of Southwest University: Philosophy and Social Science, 38 (1), 26–31.
[15] Liu, S. (2013). A general overview of Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Data of Culture and Education, 34, 155–156.
[16] Liu, X. (2010). A general overview of Pedagogical Content Knowledge in China and the enlightenment of teacher training. Journal of Junior Mathematics: Junior Middle School Edition, 12, 10–13.
[17] Louis, C., Lawrence, M. & Keith, M. (Eds.). (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). Routledge.
[18] M. C. Clark, & P. Peterson. (1993). Teachers' thought processes. Teacher's thought processes. Yamazaki Laboratory of educational psychology, Hokkaido University of education, Hakodate.
[19] Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Jossey-Bass.
[20] Merriam, S. B. (2001). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Jossey-Bass.
[21] Merriam, S. B. (2002). Introduction to qualitative research. In S. B. Merriam & Associates (Eds.), Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. Jossey-Bass.
[22] Pi, L. S. (2000). Teaching design. Higher Education Press.
[23] Richards, J. C. (1998). Beyond training. Cambridge University Press.
[24] Roberts, D. A. (2000). Achieving scientific literacy: from purposes to practices. Science Education, 84(1), 123–127.
[25] Russell, T. L. & Munby, H. (1991). Reframing: The role of experience in developing teachers’ professional knowledge. In D. A Schön (Ed.), The reflective turn (pp. 164–187). Teachers College Press.
[26] Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Temple.
[27] Seliger, H. W. & Shohamy, E. (1989). Second language research methods. Oxford University Press.
[28] Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15 (2), 4–14.
[29] Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching. Harvard Educational Review, 57.
[30] Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage.
[31] Sun, T. (2014). Constructing research based on comprehensible Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Teaching Monthly (Middle School Edition) Teaching Reference, 8, 45–48.
[32] Talanquer, V. (2004). Formación docente: qué conocimiento distingue a los buenos maestros de química? educación química.
[33] Tsui, A. B. M. (2003). Understanding expertise in teaching: Case studies of ESL teachers. Cambridge University Press.
[34] Wallace, M. J. (1991). Training foreign language teachers. Cambridge University Press.
[35] Walsh, S. (2006). Investigating classroom discourse. Routledge.
[36] Woods, D. (1996). Teacher cognition in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
[37] Wu, Y. A. (2005). Study the qualities of excellent FL teachers. Foreign language teaching and research (3).
[38] Xia, J. (2007). The challenges for teachers of college English: Teacher development issues and strategies. Foreign Languages in China, 4 (2), 4–6.
[39] Xie, S. & Ma, Y. (2013). The development of study in Pedagogical Content Knowledge: On the enlightenment to teacher education study in China. Modern Education Management, 6, 56–61.
[40] Ye, H. (2007). Developing of a knowledge base for the teaching profession. CELEA Journal (Bimonthly). 30 (4), 85–98.
[41] Zhou, Y. (2013). “Professional Development through Learning Communities in the Early Years of ELT Practice in China,” presentation delivered at the fifth National Academic Conference of Foreign Language Teachers’ Education and Development at Guangdong University of Foreign Studies in Guangzhou.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Rui Feng Lyu. (2021). An Investigation into Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK): Teachers’ Views on Knowledge. Teacher Education and Curriculum Studies, 6(2), 41-50. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.tecs.20210602.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Rui Feng Lyu. An Investigation into Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK): Teachers’ Views on Knowledge. Teach. Educ. Curric. Stud. 2021, 6(2), 41-50. doi: 10.11648/j.tecs.20210602.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Rui Feng Lyu. An Investigation into Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK): Teachers’ Views on Knowledge. Teach Educ Curric Stud. 2021;6(2):41-50. doi: 10.11648/j.tecs.20210602.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.tecs.20210602.11,
      author = {Rui Feng Lyu},
      title = {An Investigation into Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK): Teachers’ Views on Knowledge},
      journal = {Teacher Education and Curriculum Studies},
      volume = {6},
      number = {2},
      pages = {41-50},
      doi = {10.11648/j.tecs.20210602.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.tecs.20210602.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.tecs.20210602.11},
      abstract = {Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) has been given a lot of attention in the academic field in recent years, inparticular in the field of teacher cognition and teacher knowledge. This research aimed to investigate the views on language (regarded as one aspect of PCK) shown in the practices of six Chinese in-service teachers teaching College English at two universities in the south of China by using a qualitative multiple case study approach. The existing literature guided the current research, which investigated teachers’ views on knowledge to guide language teacher education and development in mainland China. The results of the data analysis in this study revealed that the participant teachers were generally experienced in their use of declarative knowledge, but possibly unskilled in their use of strategic knowledge. To summarize, views on knowledge encompasses teachers’ creative ways of thinking and their personal understanding of the discipline of teaching. It is the teachers’ ability to endow declarative knowledge with personal significance. Views on knowledge include teachers’ personal wisdom that transforms procedural knowledge into strategic knowledge (the ability to solve problems in classroom teaching practice). It entails teachers’ constant updating and development of their personal pedagogical knowledge in the teaching practice of particular subject matter.},
     year = {2021}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - An Investigation into Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK): Teachers’ Views on Knowledge
    AU  - Rui Feng Lyu
    Y1  - 2021/05/08
    PY  - 2021
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.tecs.20210602.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.tecs.20210602.11
    T2  - Teacher Education and Curriculum Studies
    JF  - Teacher Education and Curriculum Studies
    JO  - Teacher Education and Curriculum Studies
    SP  - 41
    EP  - 50
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2575-4971
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.tecs.20210602.11
    AB  - Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) has been given a lot of attention in the academic field in recent years, inparticular in the field of teacher cognition and teacher knowledge. This research aimed to investigate the views on language (regarded as one aspect of PCK) shown in the practices of six Chinese in-service teachers teaching College English at two universities in the south of China by using a qualitative multiple case study approach. The existing literature guided the current research, which investigated teachers’ views on knowledge to guide language teacher education and development in mainland China. The results of the data analysis in this study revealed that the participant teachers were generally experienced in their use of declarative knowledge, but possibly unskilled in their use of strategic knowledge. To summarize, views on knowledge encompasses teachers’ creative ways of thinking and their personal understanding of the discipline of teaching. It is the teachers’ ability to endow declarative knowledge with personal significance. Views on knowledge include teachers’ personal wisdom that transforms procedural knowledge into strategic knowledge (the ability to solve problems in classroom teaching practice). It entails teachers’ constant updating and development of their personal pedagogical knowledge in the teaching practice of particular subject matter.
    VL  - 6
    IS  - 2
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • School of Foreign Studies, Guangdong University of Finance and Economics, Haizhu, Guangzhou, PR China

  • Sections