| Peer-Reviewed

Personalized Communication Strategies: Towards a New Debtor Typology Framework

Received: 28 October 2021    Accepted: 27 November 2021    Published: 24 December 2021
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

The debt collection industry collected 6 billion euros in Germany in 2020, which roughly amounted to 0.2% of the country’s GDP. As a result, the performance of debt collection agencies is critical for the stability of vast parts of the economy. Yet, a systematic understanding of debtors’ personalities and the most successful way to approach them is still lacking. The aim of the present study is twofold: First, based on debt collection agency (PAIR Finance) data, we established a novel debtor typology framework that extends previous research by including 4 behavioral dimensions. Second, we investigated how the success of communication strategies differs depending on a debtor’s typology. Typology scores were generated based on 72 features. Outbound communication strategies varied in the way they were phrased (tonality) and the time of day when they were sent out (timing). Our results show that debtors’ typologies can be identified based on 4 dimensions: Willingness to pay, ability to pay, financial organization, and rational behavior. Using these dimensions, debtors could be classified into 16 different typologies. We identified 5 main typologies, which account for 63% of the debtors in our data set. Further, we observed that each debtor typology reacted differently to the content and timing of reminder messages, allowing us to define an optimal debt collection strategy for each typology. For example, sending a reciprocity message at 8 p.m. in the evening is the most successful strategy to observe a reaction from a debtor who is willing to pay their debt, able to pay their debt, chaotic in terms of their financial organization, and emotional when communicating and handling their finances. In sum, our findings suggest that each debtor type should be approached in a personalized way using different tonalities and timing schedules.

Published in Psychology and Behavioral Sciences (Volume 10, Issue 6)
DOI 10.11648/j.pbs.20211006.20
Page(s) 256-268
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Debt Collection, Financial Decision-making, Typology, Nudging, Payment

References
[1] Bridges, W. (1992). The character of organizations: Using Jungian type in organizational development. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
[2] Bundesverband Deutscher Inkasso-Unternehmen e.V. (2020, November 27). Umsatzeinbuβen von bis zu einem Drittel: Inkassowirtschaft sieht existenzielle Bedrohung f¨ ur zahlreiche Unternehmen [Press release]. https://www.inkasso.de/presse/pressemitteilungen/ umsatzeinbu%C3%9Fen-von-bis-zu-einem-drittel- inkassowirtschaft-sieht
[3] Correa, A., Ruiz-Herrera, N., Ruz, M., Tonetti, L., Martoni, M., Fabbri, M., & Natale, V. (2017). Economic decision-making in morning/evening-type people as a function of time of day. Chronobiology international, 34 (2), 139-147.
[4] Danziger, S., Levav, J., & Avnaim-Pesso, L. (2011). Extraneous factors in judicial decisions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108 (17), 6889-6892.
[5] Demarque, C., Charalambides, L., Hilton, D. J., & Waroquier, L. (2015). Nudging sustainable consumption: The use of descriptive norms to promote a minority behavior in a realistic online shopping environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43, 166-174.
[6] Doerrenberg P. & Peichl A. (2017). Tax morale and the role of social norms and reciprocity: evidence from a randomized survey experiment. ZEW Discussion Papers No. 17-045, 1-35.
[7] Dominy, N., & Kempson, E. (2003). Can’t Pay Or Won’t Pay?: A Review of Creditor and Debtor Approaches to the Non-payment of Bills. London: Lord Chancellor’s Department.
[8] Dur, R., Fleming, D., van Garderen, M., & van Lent, M. (2021). A social norm nudge to save more: A field experiment at a retail bank. CESifo Working Paper, No. 8894, Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute (CESifo), Munich.
[9] Fehr, E., & G¨ achter, S. (2000). Fairness and retaliation: The economics of reciprocity. Journal of economic perspectives, 14 (3), 159-181.
[10] Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human relations, 7 (2), 117-140.
[11] Gerardi, K., Herkenhoff, K. F., Ohanian, L. E., & Willen, P. S. (2018). Can’t pay or won’t pay? unemployment, negative equity, and strategic default. The Review of Financial Studies, 31 (3), 1098-1131.
[12] Gillitzer, C., & Sinning, M. (2020). Nudging businesses to pay their taxes: Does timing matter? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 169, 284-300.
[13] Gullo, K., Berger, J., Etkin, J., & Bollinger, B. (2019). Does time of day affect variety-seeking? Journal of Consumer Research, 46 (1), 20-35.
[14] Hallsworth, M., Chadborn, T., Sallis, A., Sanders, M., Berry, D., Greaves, F.,... & Davies, S. C. (2016). Provision of social norm feedback to high prescribers of antibiotics in general practice: a pragmatic national randomised controlled trial. The Lancet, 387 (10029), 1743-1752.
[15] Horne, J. A., & Oestberg, O. (1976). A self-assessment questionnaire to determine morningness-eveningness in human circadian rhythms. International Journal of Chronobiology, 4, 97-110.
[16] John, P., & Blume, T. (2018). How best to nudge taxpayers? The impact of message simplification and descriptive social norms on payment rates in a central London local authority. Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, 1 (1), 1-11.
[17] Lea, S. E., Webley, P., & Walker, C. M. (1995). Psychological factors in consumer debt: Money management, economic socialization, and credit use. Journal of economic psychology, 16 (4), 681-701.
[18] Linder, J. A., Doctor, J. N., Friedberg, M. W., Nieva, H. R., Birks, C., Meeker, D., & Fox, C. R. (2014). Time of day and the decision to prescribe antibiotics. JAMA internal medicine, 174 (12), 2029-2031.
[19] Livingstone, S. M., & Lunt, P. K. (1992). Predicting personal debt and debt repayment: Psychological, social and economic determinants. Journal of economic psychology, 13 (1), 111-134.
[20] McCaulley, M. H. (1990). The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: A measure for individuals and groups. Measurement and evaluation in counseling and development, 22 (4), 181-195.
[21] McCaulley, M. H. (2000). Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: A bridge between counseling and consulting. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 52 (2), 117- 132.
[22] Myers, I. (1962). The Myers-Briggs type indicator. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press
[23] Ortega, D., & Sanguinetti, P. (2013). Deterrence and reciprocity effects on tax compliance: experimental evidence from Venezuela. CAF Working paper No 2013/08, 1-30.
[24] Pittenger, D. J. (2005). Cautionary comments regarding the Myers-Briggs type indicator. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 57 (3), 210-221.
[25] Provost, J., & Anchors, S. (1987). Applications of the Myers-Briggs type indicator in higher education. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
[26] Schneider, S. M., & Schupp, J. (2014). Individual differences in social comparison and its consequences for life satisfaction: introducing a short scale of the Iowa- Netherlands Comparison Orientation Measure. Social Indicators Research, 115 (2), 767-789.
[27] Shang, J., & Croson, R. (2009). A field experiment in charitable contribution: The impact of social information on the voluntary provision of public goods. The economic journal, 119 (540), 1422-1439.
[28] Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Penguin.
[29] Trivers, R. L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. The Quarterly review of biology, 46 (1), 35-57.
[30] Watson, J. J., & Barnao, J. (2009). Debt repayment: A typology. International Business & Economics Research Journal (IBER), 8 (1), 59-68.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Minou Ghaffari, Maxime Kaniewicz, Stephan Stricker. (2021). Personalized Communication Strategies: Towards a New Debtor Typology Framework. Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 10(6), 256-268. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20211006.20

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Minou Ghaffari; Maxime Kaniewicz; Stephan Stricker. Personalized Communication Strategies: Towards a New Debtor Typology Framework. Psychol. Behav. Sci. 2021, 10(6), 256-268. doi: 10.11648/j.pbs.20211006.20

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Minou Ghaffari, Maxime Kaniewicz, Stephan Stricker. Personalized Communication Strategies: Towards a New Debtor Typology Framework. Psychol Behav Sci. 2021;10(6):256-268. doi: 10.11648/j.pbs.20211006.20

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.pbs.20211006.20,
      author = {Minou Ghaffari and Maxime Kaniewicz and Stephan Stricker},
      title = {Personalized Communication Strategies: Towards a New Debtor Typology Framework},
      journal = {Psychology and Behavioral Sciences},
      volume = {10},
      number = {6},
      pages = {256-268},
      doi = {10.11648/j.pbs.20211006.20},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20211006.20},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.pbs.20211006.20},
      abstract = {The debt collection industry collected 6 billion euros in Germany in 2020, which roughly amounted to 0.2% of the country’s GDP. As a result, the performance of debt collection agencies is critical for the stability of vast parts of the economy. Yet, a systematic understanding of debtors’ personalities and the most successful way to approach them is still lacking. The aim of the present study is twofold: First, based on debt collection agency (PAIR Finance) data, we established a novel debtor typology framework that extends previous research by including 4 behavioral dimensions. Second, we investigated how the success of communication strategies differs depending on a debtor’s typology. Typology scores were generated based on 72 features. Outbound communication strategies varied in the way they were phrased (tonality) and the time of day when they were sent out (timing). Our results show that debtors’ typologies can be identified based on 4 dimensions: Willingness to pay, ability to pay, financial organization, and rational behavior. Using these dimensions, debtors could be classified into 16 different typologies. We identified 5 main typologies, which account for 63% of the debtors in our data set. Further, we observed that each debtor typology reacted differently to the content and timing of reminder messages, allowing us to define an optimal debt collection strategy for each typology. For example, sending a reciprocity message at 8 p.m. in the evening is the most successful strategy to observe a reaction from a debtor who is willing to pay their debt, able to pay their debt, chaotic in terms of their financial organization, and emotional when communicating and handling their finances. In sum, our findings suggest that each debtor type should be approached in a personalized way using different tonalities and timing schedules.},
     year = {2021}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Personalized Communication Strategies: Towards a New Debtor Typology Framework
    AU  - Minou Ghaffari
    AU  - Maxime Kaniewicz
    AU  - Stephan Stricker
    Y1  - 2021/12/24
    PY  - 2021
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20211006.20
    DO  - 10.11648/j.pbs.20211006.20
    T2  - Psychology and Behavioral Sciences
    JF  - Psychology and Behavioral Sciences
    JO  - Psychology and Behavioral Sciences
    SP  - 256
    EP  - 268
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2328-7845
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20211006.20
    AB  - The debt collection industry collected 6 billion euros in Germany in 2020, which roughly amounted to 0.2% of the country’s GDP. As a result, the performance of debt collection agencies is critical for the stability of vast parts of the economy. Yet, a systematic understanding of debtors’ personalities and the most successful way to approach them is still lacking. The aim of the present study is twofold: First, based on debt collection agency (PAIR Finance) data, we established a novel debtor typology framework that extends previous research by including 4 behavioral dimensions. Second, we investigated how the success of communication strategies differs depending on a debtor’s typology. Typology scores were generated based on 72 features. Outbound communication strategies varied in the way they were phrased (tonality) and the time of day when they were sent out (timing). Our results show that debtors’ typologies can be identified based on 4 dimensions: Willingness to pay, ability to pay, financial organization, and rational behavior. Using these dimensions, debtors could be classified into 16 different typologies. We identified 5 main typologies, which account for 63% of the debtors in our data set. Further, we observed that each debtor typology reacted differently to the content and timing of reminder messages, allowing us to define an optimal debt collection strategy for each typology. For example, sending a reciprocity message at 8 p.m. in the evening is the most successful strategy to observe a reaction from a debtor who is willing to pay their debt, able to pay their debt, chaotic in terms of their financial organization, and emotional when communicating and handling their finances. In sum, our findings suggest that each debtor type should be approached in a personalized way using different tonalities and timing schedules.
    VL  - 10
    IS  - 6
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Psychology School, Fresenius University of Applied Sciences, Hamburg, Germany

  • PAIR Finance GmbH, Berlin, Germany

  • PAIR Finance GmbH, Berlin, Germany

  • Sections