Rejection sensitivity online was prevalent among adolescents that was potential risk factor for affect. The purpose of the study was to examine the relationship between rejection sensitivity on networking sites and sentimental responses through self-assesion and self-esteem respectively and the sequential mediated effect both of them, the research also tested the moderated role of gender. There were 823 adolescents included in this research. They completed a questionnaire packages consisting of 4 scales. The findings indicated that adolescents’ emotional responses to rejection sensitivity on networking sites was significant, the mediating model was remarkable through self-assesion and significant sequential mediated effect both of self-assesion and self-esteem for affect among girls but not boys, however, rejection sensitivity on social networking sites was directly related to negative affect among boys, gender played a moderating role in the relationship between rejection sensitivity on social networking sites and positive affect/negative affect respectively, boys were sensitive to negative affect but girls were sensitive to both of positive and negative affect and boys responsed to stimulus slightly than girls. The findings provided a new insight to the prevention and intervention for the negative affect and improvement for positive affect among adolescents. The implication of the conclusions for understanding and counteracting rejection sensitivity on networking sites were discussed.
| Published in | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences (Volume 10, Issue 5) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.pbs.20211005.14 |
| Page(s) | 183-191 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Rejection Sensitivity on Social Networking, Self-Assesion, Self-Esteem, Positive and Negative Affect
| [1] | Williams, K. D. (2007). Ostracism. Psychology, 58 (1), 425. |
| [2] | Dickerson, S. S. & Zoccola, P. M. (2013). Cortisol responses to social exclusion. In DeWall, C. N. (Ed): Oxford Handbook of Social Exclusion. |
| [3] | Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Attachment. New York: Basic Books. |
| [4] | Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117 (3), 497–529. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497 |
| [5] | Kimberly, J. B., & Diane, M. Q. (2016). Weight-based rejection sensitivity: Scale development and implications for well-being. Body Image, 16, 79–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2015.11.005 |
| [6] | Charlotte, R., & Babette, R. (2014). Rejection sensitivity as a mediator of the relationship between experienced rejection and borderline characteristics. Personality and Individual Differences 69, 176–181. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.05.032 |
| [7] | Melanie, J. Z. (2015). Emotional sensitivity before and after coping with rejection: A longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 41, 28–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2015.05.001 |
| [8] | Julie, L. P., Tracy, D., Alex, B., Beth, G., & Janelle, S. (2019). Partner self-esteem and interpersonal risk: Rejection from a low self-esteem partner constrains connection and increases depletion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 80, 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.09.006 |
| [9] | Morganne, A. K., Lucas J. A., & Tony, T. W. (2018). Rejection sensitivity, interpersonal rejection, and attention for emotional facial expressions. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 59, 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2017.11.004 |
| [10] | Sarah, L. B., Sean, M. M., Jared, F. R., Nikki L. L., & Kelly, C. C. (2019). Rejection sensitivity and suicide ideation among psychiatric inpatients: An integration of two theoretical models. Psychiatry Research, 272, 54–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2018.12.009 |
| [11] | Rebecca, N., Rebecca, T., & Pamela, Q. (2018). Influence of loneliness and rejection sensitivity on threat sensitivity in romantic relationships in young and middle-aged adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 131 (1), 185–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.04.047 |
| [12] | Nagila, K., Donna, A. M., Marry, S., & Marcel, A. G. (2018). How borderline personality characteristics affect adolescents’ life satisfaction: The role of rejection sensitivity and social relations. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 15 (5), 594-607. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2017.1321983 |
| [13] | Gao, S., Assink, M., Cipriani, A., & Lin, K. (2017). Associations between rejection sensitivity and mental health outcomes: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 57, 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2017.08.007 |
| [14] | Angel, F., Anu, A., Cassidy, G., Courtney, C., Sabine, W., Stefan, G. & Hofmann.(2011). Rejection sensitivity mediates the relationship between social anxiety and body dysmorphic concerns. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 25, 946–949. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2011.06.001. |
| [15] | John, W., Dtrew, & Nesdale. (2012). Rejection Sensitivity, Social Withdrawal, and Loneliness in Young Adults. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42 (8), 1984–2005. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00927.x. |
| [16] | Chopik, W. J., & Giasson, H. L. (2017). Age differences in explicit and implicit age attitudes across the life span. The Gerontologist, 57 (2), 169–177. https://academic.oup.com/gerontologist/article-abstract/57/suppl_2/S169/3913364 |
| [17] | Thompson, I., Hong, J. S., Lee, J. M., Prys, N. A., Morgan, J. T., & Udo-Inyang, I. (2020). A review of the empirical research on weight-based bullying and peer victimisation published between 2006 and 2016. Educational Review, 72 (1), 82-110. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2018.1483894 |
| [18] | Ford, R., King, T., Priest, N., & Kavanagh, A. (2017). Bullying and mental health and suicidal behaviour among 14-to 15-year-olds in a representative sample of Australian children. Australian New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. 51 (9), 897–908. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004867417700275 |
| [19] | Schaan, V. K., Schulz, A., Bernstein, M., Schachinger, H., & Vogele, C. (2020). Effects of rejection intensity and rejection sensitivity on social approach behavior in women. PLoS ONE, 15 (1): e0227799. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227799 |
| [20] | Bernstein, M. J., & Claypool, H. M. (2012). Social Exclusion and Pain Sensitivity: Why Exclusion Sometimes Hurts and Sometimes Numbs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38 (2), 185–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0146167211422449 PMID: 21885860 |
| [21] | Anna, M. M., & Gemma, R. (2018). Rejection Sensitivity, Jealousy, and the Relationship to Interpersonal Aggression. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33 (13), 2118–2129. doi: 10.1177/0886260515622572. |
| [22] | Wright, B. A. (1960). Physical disability: A psychological approach. New York: Harper & Row. |
| [23] | Crocker, J., & Park, L. E. (2004). The costly pursuit of self-esteem. Psychological Bulletin, 130 (4), 392–414. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.3.392 |
| [24] | Hong, C., Chen, Z., & Li, C. (2017). “Liking” and being “liked”: How are personality traits and demographics associated with giving and receiving “likes” on Facebook? Computers in Human Behavior, 68: 292–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.048 |
| [25] | Porch, T. (2015). Society, Culture, and the Selfie: Analysis of the Impact of the Selfie Practice on Women’s Body Image. Atlanta, GA: Emory University. |
| [26] | Tylka, T. L., & Wood-Barcalow, N. L. (2015a). The Body Appreciation Scale-2: Item refinement and psychometric evaluation. Body Image, 12, 53–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2014.09.006 |
| [27] | Vogt Yuan, A. S. (2010). Body perceptions, weight control behavior, and changes in adolescents’ psychological well-being over time: a longitudinal examination of gender. Youth Adolescents, 39, 927–939. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10964-009-9428-6 |
| [28] | Hyde, J. S., Mezulis, A. H., & Abramson, L. Y. (2008). The ABCs of depression: integrating affective, biological, and cognitive models to explain the emergence of the gender difference in depression. Psychology Review. 115, 291–313. doi: 10.1037/ 0033-295X.115.2.291. |
| [29] | Schmidt, J., & Martin, A. (2019). Appearance Teasing and Mental Health: Gender Differences and Mediation Effects of Appearance-Based Rejection Sensitivity and Dysmorphic Concerns. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 579. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00579. |
| [30] | Abdul, K., Muhammad, K. U., Kazi, N. H., Md, N. S., & Anjuman, S. (2019). Perceived Parental Acceptance–Rejection in Childhood Predict Psychological Adjustment and Rejection Sensitivity in Adulthood. Psychology Study 64 (4), 447–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-019-00508-z |
| [31] | Webb, H. J., Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., Waters, A. M., Farrell, L. J., Nesdale, D., & Downey, G. (2017). Pretty Pressure From Peers, Parents, and the Media: A Longitudinal Study of Appearance-Based Rejection Sensitivity. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 27 (4), 718-735. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12310 |
| [32] | Shuling, G., Mark, K., Andrea, C., & Kangguang, L. (2017). Associations between rejection sensitivity and mental health outcomes: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 57, 59-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2017.08.007 |
| [33] | Downey, G., & Feldman, S. I. (1996). Implications of rejection sensitivity for intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70 (6), 1327–1343. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.6.1327 |
| [34] | Rosenberg, F. (1995). Global self-esteem and specific self-esteem: Different concepts, Different outcomes. American Sociological Review, 60 (1), 141-156. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2096350 |
| [35] | Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of Positive and Negative Affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54 (6), 1063–1070. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063. |
| [36] | Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press. |
| [37] | Muthén, B., & Kaplan, D. (1992). A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non-normal Likert variables: A note on the size of the model. The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 45, 19–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1992.tb00975.x. |
| [38] | Stubbs-Richardson, M., Sinclair, H. C., Goldberg, R. M., Ellithorpe, C. N., & Amadi, S. C. (2018). Reaching out versus lashing out: examining gender differences in experiences with and responses to bullying in high school. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 43, 39–66. doi: 10.1007/s12103-017- 9408-4. |
| [39] | Yue, L., Xing, Q., & Yanmei, Z. (2018). Modulation of Brain Response to Peer Rejection by Rejection Sensitivity: An Exploratory Study, Neuropsychologia, 117, 389-397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.07.003 |
| [40] | Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., Nesdale, D., Webb, H. J., Khatibi, M., & Downey, G. (2016). A longitudinal rejection sensitivity model of depression and aggression: unique roles of anxiety, anger, blame, withdrawal, and retribution. Abnormal Children Psychology, 4, 1291–1307. doi: 10.1007/s10802-016-0127-y. |
| [41] | Salk, R. H., Petersen, J. L., Abramson, L. Y., & Hyde, J. S. (2016). The contemporary face of gender differences and similarities in depression throughout adolescence: development and chronicity. Journal of Affective Disorders, 205, 28–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2016.03.071 |
| [42] | Malti, T., Buchmann, M. (2010). Socialization and individual antecedents of adolescents’ and young adults’ moral motivation. Journal of Youth Adolescents. 39, 138–149. doi: 10.1007/s10964-009-9400-5. |
| [43] | Chua, T. H. H., & Chang, L. (2016). Follow me and like my beautiful selfies: Singapore teenage girls’ engagement in self-presentation and peer comparison on social media. Computers in Human Behavior, 55 (A), 190–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.011 |
| [44] | Bazarova, N. N. & Choi, Y. H. (2014). Self-disclosure in social media: Extending the functional approach to disclosure motivations and characteristics on social network sites. Journal of Communication, 64 (4), 635–657. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12106 |
| [45] | Bleidorn, W., Arslan, R. C., Denissen, J. J., Rentfrow, P. J., Gebauer, J. E., Potter, J., et al. (2016). Age and gender differences in self-esteem-A cross-cultural window. Journal of Personality Social Psychology, 111 (3), 396–410. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000078 |
| [46] | Von Soest, T., Wichstrøm, L., & Kvalem, I. L. (2016). The development of global and domain-specific self-esteem from age 13 to 31. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110 (4), 592–608. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000060 |
| [47] | Teo, A. R., Choi, H., & Valenstein, M. (2013). Social relationships and depression: ten-year follow-up from a nationally representative study. PLOS ONE, 8 (4), e62396. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062396. |
| [48] | Jon, D. E., Dmitri, R., Liu, T., & Yang, H. B. (2020). Fear of missing out predicts repeated measurements of greater negative affect using experience sampling methodology. Journal of Affective Disorders, 262 (1), 298-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2019.11.026 |
| [49] | Williams, J. A., Vernon, J., Williams, M. C., & Malecha, K. (1987). Sex Role Socialization in picture books: an update. Sociology Department, Faculty Publications, 68. (1), 148-156, https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/sociologyfacpub/8 |
| [50] | Symons, K., Vanw, E. I., Walrave, M., Van, O. J., & Ponnet, K. (2019). Parents' concerns over internet use, their engagement in interaction restrictions, and adolescents' behavior on social networking sites. Youth and society, 52 (8), 1569-1581. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X19834769 |
| [51] | Ibrahim, T., Özgür, E. (2019). Motives Behind Cyberbullying Perpetration: A Test of Uses and Gratifications Theory. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 1-26. doi: 10.1177/0886260518819882. |
APA Style
Liqin Liu, Ping Ni, Beibei Yang. (2021). Rejection Sensitivity on Social Networking Sites: How It Differently Impacts Late Adolescents’ Positive and Negative Affect. Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 10(5), 183-191. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20211005.14
ACS Style
Liqin Liu; Ping Ni; Beibei Yang. Rejection Sensitivity on Social Networking Sites: How It Differently Impacts Late Adolescents’ Positive and Negative Affect. Psychol. Behav. Sci. 2021, 10(5), 183-191. doi: 10.11648/j.pbs.20211005.14
AMA Style
Liqin Liu, Ping Ni, Beibei Yang. Rejection Sensitivity on Social Networking Sites: How It Differently Impacts Late Adolescents’ Positive and Negative Affect. Psychol Behav Sci. 2021;10(5):183-191. doi: 10.11648/j.pbs.20211005.14
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.pbs.20211005.14,
author = {Liqin Liu and Ping Ni and Beibei Yang},
title = {Rejection Sensitivity on Social Networking Sites: How It Differently Impacts Late Adolescents’ Positive and Negative Affect},
journal = {Psychology and Behavioral Sciences},
volume = {10},
number = {5},
pages = {183-191},
doi = {10.11648/j.pbs.20211005.14},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20211005.14},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.pbs.20211005.14},
abstract = {Rejection sensitivity online was prevalent among adolescents that was potential risk factor for affect. The purpose of the study was to examine the relationship between rejection sensitivity on networking sites and sentimental responses through self-assesion and self-esteem respectively and the sequential mediated effect both of them, the research also tested the moderated role of gender. There were 823 adolescents included in this research. They completed a questionnaire packages consisting of 4 scales. The findings indicated that adolescents’ emotional responses to rejection sensitivity on networking sites was significant, the mediating model was remarkable through self-assesion and significant sequential mediated effect both of self-assesion and self-esteem for affect among girls but not boys, however, rejection sensitivity on social networking sites was directly related to negative affect among boys, gender played a moderating role in the relationship between rejection sensitivity on social networking sites and positive affect/negative affect respectively, boys were sensitive to negative affect but girls were sensitive to both of positive and negative affect and boys responsed to stimulus slightly than girls. The findings provided a new insight to the prevention and intervention for the negative affect and improvement for positive affect among adolescents. The implication of the conclusions for understanding and counteracting rejection sensitivity on networking sites were discussed.},
year = {2021}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Rejection Sensitivity on Social Networking Sites: How It Differently Impacts Late Adolescents’ Positive and Negative Affect AU - Liqin Liu AU - Ping Ni AU - Beibei Yang Y1 - 2021/10/30 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20211005.14 DO - 10.11648/j.pbs.20211005.14 T2 - Psychology and Behavioral Sciences JF - Psychology and Behavioral Sciences JO - Psychology and Behavioral Sciences SP - 183 EP - 191 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-7845 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20211005.14 AB - Rejection sensitivity online was prevalent among adolescents that was potential risk factor for affect. The purpose of the study was to examine the relationship between rejection sensitivity on networking sites and sentimental responses through self-assesion and self-esteem respectively and the sequential mediated effect both of them, the research also tested the moderated role of gender. There were 823 adolescents included in this research. They completed a questionnaire packages consisting of 4 scales. The findings indicated that adolescents’ emotional responses to rejection sensitivity on networking sites was significant, the mediating model was remarkable through self-assesion and significant sequential mediated effect both of self-assesion and self-esteem for affect among girls but not boys, however, rejection sensitivity on social networking sites was directly related to negative affect among boys, gender played a moderating role in the relationship between rejection sensitivity on social networking sites and positive affect/negative affect respectively, boys were sensitive to negative affect but girls were sensitive to both of positive and negative affect and boys responsed to stimulus slightly than girls. The findings provided a new insight to the prevention and intervention for the negative affect and improvement for positive affect among adolescents. The implication of the conclusions for understanding and counteracting rejection sensitivity on networking sites were discussed. VL - 10 IS - 5 ER -
Information
Email: