Relevant Stages, Actors, and Instruments in the Portuguese Judicial System Modernization Process

Ana Melro; Filipe Teles; Lídia Oliveira

doi:doi:10.11648/j.jppa.20220601.16

| Peer-Reviewed

Relevant Stages, Actors, and Instruments in the Portuguese Judicial System Modernization Process

Ana Melro, Filipe Teles, Lídia Oliveira

Published in Journal of Public Policy and Administration (Volume 6, Issue 1)

Received: 24 January 2022 Accepted: 8 February 2022 Published: 24 February 2022

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Modernization processes occur by following some type of previously defined stages or phases, which intend to have as a result the efficiency, efficacy, transparency and closeness to the citizen, namely, if one is referring to the modernization of public policies. The paper presents the results achieved with three research analysis performed: the first one applied to official Portuguese Governmental documents (specifically, legislature programs, since 1975), following Martinelli’ guidelines; the second considering the interviews’ content analysis conducted to key actors positioned at the level of public policies’ definition, specifically, to what the Portuguese judicial system is concerned; and the third one which was the NVivo analysis applied to those same interviews. To the modernization processes that have been happening in the last 10 years, interviewees highlighted the challenges faced, various key moments linked to specific projects and the relevance of Information and Communication Technologies. The main research goal was to understand how the Portuguese judicial system modernization processes happen, considering the different dimensions of the judicial system and of the modernization process. It was possible to conclude that several external events, such as economic and public health crises, have a major influence on judicial system modernization processes. All the actors involved are relevant for the reforms, whether at an upstream or downstream level. With the European Union having a relevant role. Instruments such as laws, platforms, work management tools also assume an important role. However, the highlight of the judicial system modernization processes’ instruments goes to the Information and Communication Technologies and the infocommunicational competences.

Published in	Journal of Public Policy and Administration (Volume 6, Issue 1)
DOI	10.11648/j.jppa.20220601.16
Page(s)	38-48
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Modernization, Reform, Portuguese Judicial System, NVivo Analysis, Qualitative Methods

References

[1]	F. Teles, “Public Administration in Portugal,” in European Perspectives for Public Administration: the Way Forward, G. Bouckaert and W. Jann, Eds. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2020, pp. 439–454.
[2]	I. Corte-Real, “The Modernization of Public Administration in Portugal, 1950s-1970s,” Mem. y Civilización, vol. 21, Jun. 2018.
[3]	C. Pollitt and G. Bouckaert, Public Management Reform. A Comparative Analysis - Into the Age of Austerity, 4^th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.
[4]	R. Ippoliti and G. Tria, “Efficiency of judicial systems: model definition and output estimation.,” J. Appl. Econ., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 385–408, 2020.
[5]	OCDE, “Justice Transformation in Portugal: Building on Successes and Challenges,” OECD Publishing, Paris, 2020.
[6]	A. Hondeghem, X. Rousseaux, and F. Schoenaers, “Modernisation of the Criminal Justice Chain and the Judicial System: New Insights on Trust, Cooperation and Human Capital,” vol. 00050. 2016.
[7]	A. Dashwood and A. C. Johnston, “The Future of the Judicial System of the European Union.” 2001.
[8]	J. P. Dias and C. Gomes, “Judicial Reforms ‘Under Pressure’: The New Map/Organisation of the Portuguese Judicial System,” Utr. Law Rev., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 174–186, Jul. 2018.
[9]	A. V Malko, S. F. Afanasiev, and V. A. Terekhin, “Judicial reform as a tool for increase efficiency of legal protection of individuals,” Pravoprimenenie, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 16–32, 2021.
[10]	M. Ruxanda, “EU’s Influence on Romania’s Judicial System: A Step Towards Democratic Consolidation?,” Sfera Polit., vol. XX, no. 167 (1), pp. 135–147, 2012.
[11]	G. Vecchi, “Systemic Or Incremental Path Of Reform? The Modernization Of The Judicial System In Italy,” Int. J. Court Adm., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 64–87, 2013.
[12]	S. P. Santos and C. A. F. Amado, “On the need for reform of the Portuguese judicial system - Does Data Envelopment Analysis assessment support it?” Omega (United Kingdom), vol. 47, pp. 1–16, 2014.
[13]	C. Cusatelli and M. Giacalone, “Evaluation Indices of the Judicial System and ICT Developments in Civil Procedure,” Procedia Econ. Financ., vol. 17, pp. 113–120, 2014.
[14]	R. Wang, “Legal technology in contemporary USA and China,” Comput. Law Secur. Rev. Int. J. Technol. Law Pract., vol. 39, 2020.
[15]	A. Martinelli, Global Modernization. Rethinking the project of modernity. London: SAGE Publications, 2005.
[16]	R. H. Sampieri, C. F. Collado, and P. B. Lucio, Metodología de la Investigación, 4^th ed. Iztapalapa, Mexico: McGraw-Hill Interamericana, 2006.
[17]	A. Bryman, Social Research Methods, 4^th ed. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.
[18]	F. Souza, A. Costa, and A. Moreira, “WebQDA: Análise de Dados Qualitativos Suportada pelo Software WebQDA,” VII Conferência Internacional de Tecnologia de Informação e Comunicação na Educação – Challenges 2011. Universidade do Minho, Braga, 2010.
[19]	L. Bardin, L. Reto, and A. Pinheiro, Análise de Conteúdo. Lisboa: Edições 70, 1977.
[20]	J. P. Dias, “The transition to a democratic Portuguese judicial system: (delaying) changes in the legal culture.,” Int. J. Law Context, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 24–41, 2016.
[21]	J. P. Dias, P. Casaleiro, T. M. Lima, and C. Gomes, “Judicial Responses to COVID-19 Attack: Impacts on the Working Conditions of Portuguese Courts.,” Int. J. Court Adm., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 1–14, 2021.
[22]	V. Gorodovenko, O. Bondar, and L. Udovyka, “Justice in the COVID-19 era through the Prism of Judicial Power,” Ius Humani, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 51–72, 2021.
[23]	G. Falavigna and R. Ippoliti, “Reform policy to increase the judicial efficiency in Italy: The opportunity offered by EU post-COVID funds,” J. Policy Model., vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 923–943, 2021.
[24]	M. Plachta, “Crime, Law Enforcement and Judicial System at Times of COVID-19 Pandemic.,” International Enforcement Law Reporter, vol. 36, no. 7. pp. 252–255, 2020.
[25]	C. Gomes, Os Atrasos da Justiça. Lisboa: Fundação Francisco Manuel dos Santos, 2011.
[26]	F. Fonseca and C. Carapeto, Governação, Inovação e Tecnologias - O Estado rede e a Administração Pública do Futuro, 1^a. Lisboa: Edições Sílabo, Lda., 2009.
[27]	Ministério da Justiça, “Justiça + Próxima 2016-2019,” Lisboa, 2019.
[28]	A. Melro, “Sistema Judicial Português como Política Pública: Motivos e Fundamentações,” Espaço Público, vol. 6, pp. 1–10, 2021.
[29]	F. Piedade, N. Ribeiro, M. Loff, T. Neves, and I. Menezes, “Learning about the European Union in Times of Crisis: Portuguese Textbooks’ Normative Visions of European Citizenship,” J. Soc. Sci. Educ., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 31–40, 2018.
[30]	European Union, “2019-2023 Action Plan European e-Justice,” Bruxelas, 2019.
[31]	C. Madureira, “Public administration characteristics and performance in EU28: Portugal,” Bruxelas, 2018.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Ana Melro, Filipe Teles, Lídia Oliveira. (2022). Relevant Stages, Actors, and Instruments in the Portuguese Judicial System Modernization Process. Journal of Public Policy and Administration, 6(1), 38-48. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20220601.16

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Ana Melro; Filipe Teles; Lídia Oliveira. Relevant Stages, Actors, and Instruments in the Portuguese Judicial System Modernization Process. J. Public Policy Adm. 2022, 6(1), 38-48. doi: 10.11648/j.jppa.20220601.16

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Ana Melro, Filipe Teles, Lídia Oliveira. Relevant Stages, Actors, and Instruments in the Portuguese Judicial System Modernization Process. J Public Policy Adm. 2022;6(1):38-48. doi: 10.11648/j.jppa.20220601.16

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.jppa.20220601.16,
  author = {Ana Melro and Filipe Teles and Lídia Oliveira},
  title = {Relevant Stages, Actors, and Instruments in the Portuguese Judicial System Modernization Process},
  journal = {Journal of Public Policy and Administration},
  volume = {6},
  number = {1},
  pages = {38-48},
  doi = {10.11648/j.jppa.20220601.16},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20220601.16},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jppa.20220601.16},
  abstract = {Modernization processes occur by following some type of previously defined stages or phases, which intend to have as a result the efficiency, efficacy, transparency and closeness to the citizen, namely, if one is referring to the modernization of public policies. The paper presents the results achieved with three research analysis performed: the first one applied to official Portuguese Governmental documents (specifically, legislature programs, since 1975), following Martinelli’ guidelines; the second considering the interviews’ content analysis conducted to key actors positioned at the level of public policies’ definition, specifically, to what the Portuguese judicial system is concerned; and the third one which was the NVivo analysis applied to those same interviews. To the modernization processes that have been happening in the last 10 years, interviewees highlighted the challenges faced, various key moments linked to specific projects and the relevance of Information and Communication Technologies. The main research goal was to understand how the Portuguese judicial system modernization processes happen, considering the different dimensions of the judicial system and of the modernization process. It was possible to conclude that several external events, such as economic and public health crises, have a major influence on judicial system modernization processes. All the actors involved are relevant for the reforms, whether at an upstream or downstream level. With the European Union having a relevant role. Instruments such as laws, platforms, work management tools also assume an important role. However, the highlight of the judicial system modernization processes’ instruments goes to the Information and Communication Technologies and the infocommunicational competences.},
 year = {2022}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Relevant Stages, Actors, and Instruments in the Portuguese Judicial System Modernization Process
AU  - Ana Melro
AU  - Filipe Teles
AU  - Lídia Oliveira
Y1  - 2022/02/24
PY  - 2022
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20220601.16
DO  - 10.11648/j.jppa.20220601.16
T2  - Journal of Public Policy and Administration
JF  - Journal of Public Policy and Administration
JO  - Journal of Public Policy and Administration
SP  - 38
EP  - 48
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2640-2696
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20220601.16
AB  - Modernization processes occur by following some type of previously defined stages or phases, which intend to have as a result the efficiency, efficacy, transparency and closeness to the citizen, namely, if one is referring to the modernization of public policies. The paper presents the results achieved with three research analysis performed: the first one applied to official Portuguese Governmental documents (specifically, legislature programs, since 1975), following Martinelli’ guidelines; the second considering the interviews’ content analysis conducted to key actors positioned at the level of public policies’ definition, specifically, to what the Portuguese judicial system is concerned; and the third one which was the NVivo analysis applied to those same interviews. To the modernization processes that have been happening in the last 10 years, interviewees highlighted the challenges faced, various key moments linked to specific projects and the relevance of Information and Communication Technologies. The main research goal was to understand how the Portuguese judicial system modernization processes happen, considering the different dimensions of the judicial system and of the modernization process. It was possible to conclude that several external events, such as economic and public health crises, have a major influence on judicial system modernization processes. All the actors involved are relevant for the reforms, whether at an upstream or downstream level. With the European Union having a relevant role. Instruments such as laws, platforms, work management tools also assume an important role. However, the highlight of the judicial system modernization processes’ instruments goes to the Information and Communication Technologies and the infocommunicational competences.
VL  - 6
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Ana Melro

Research Unit on Governance, Competitiveness and Public Policies (GOVCOPP) & Digital Media and Interaction Research Center (DigiMedia), University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal
Filipe Teles

Research Unit on Governance, Competitiveness and Public Policies (GOVCOPP), University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal
Lídia Oliveira

Digital Media and Interaction Research Center (DigiMedia), University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Ana Melro, Filipe Teles, Lídia Oliveira. (2022). Relevant Stages, Actors, and Instruments in the Portuguese Judicial System Modernization Process. Journal of Public Policy and Administration, 6(1), 38-48. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20220601.16

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Ana Melro; Filipe Teles; Lídia Oliveira. Relevant Stages, Actors, and Instruments in the Portuguese Judicial System Modernization Process. J. Public Policy Adm. 2022, 6(1), 38-48. doi: 10.11648/j.jppa.20220601.16

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Ana Melro, Filipe Teles, Lídia Oliveira. Relevant Stages, Actors, and Instruments in the Portuguese Judicial System Modernization Process. J Public Policy Adm. 2022;6(1):38-48. doi: 10.11648/j.jppa.20220601.16

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.jppa.20220601.16,
  author = {Ana Melro and Filipe Teles and Lídia Oliveira},
  title = {Relevant Stages, Actors, and Instruments in the Portuguese Judicial System Modernization Process},
  journal = {Journal of Public Policy and Administration},
  volume = {6},
  number = {1},
  pages = {38-48},
  doi = {10.11648/j.jppa.20220601.16},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20220601.16},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jppa.20220601.16},
  abstract = {Modernization processes occur by following some type of previously defined stages or phases, which intend to have as a result the efficiency, efficacy, transparency and closeness to the citizen, namely, if one is referring to the modernization of public policies. The paper presents the results achieved with three research analysis performed: the first one applied to official Portuguese Governmental documents (specifically, legislature programs, since 1975), following Martinelli’ guidelines; the second considering the interviews’ content analysis conducted to key actors positioned at the level of public policies’ definition, specifically, to what the Portuguese judicial system is concerned; and the third one which was the NVivo analysis applied to those same interviews. To the modernization processes that have been happening in the last 10 years, interviewees highlighted the challenges faced, various key moments linked to specific projects and the relevance of Information and Communication Technologies. The main research goal was to understand how the Portuguese judicial system modernization processes happen, considering the different dimensions of the judicial system and of the modernization process. It was possible to conclude that several external events, such as economic and public health crises, have a major influence on judicial system modernization processes. All the actors involved are relevant for the reforms, whether at an upstream or downstream level. With the European Union having a relevant role. Instruments such as laws, platforms, work management tools also assume an important role. However, the highlight of the judicial system modernization processes’ instruments goes to the Information and Communication Technologies and the infocommunicational competences.},
 year = {2022}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Relevant Stages, Actors, and Instruments in the Portuguese Judicial System Modernization Process
AU  - Ana Melro
AU  - Filipe Teles
AU  - Lídia Oliveira
Y1  - 2022/02/24
PY  - 2022
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20220601.16
DO  - 10.11648/j.jppa.20220601.16
T2  - Journal of Public Policy and Administration
JF  - Journal of Public Policy and Administration
JO  - Journal of Public Policy and Administration
SP  - 38
EP  - 48
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2640-2696
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20220601.16
AB  - Modernization processes occur by following some type of previously defined stages or phases, which intend to have as a result the efficiency, efficacy, transparency and closeness to the citizen, namely, if one is referring to the modernization of public policies. The paper presents the results achieved with three research analysis performed: the first one applied to official Portuguese Governmental documents (specifically, legislature programs, since 1975), following Martinelli’ guidelines; the second considering the interviews’ content analysis conducted to key actors positioned at the level of public policies’ definition, specifically, to what the Portuguese judicial system is concerned; and the third one which was the NVivo analysis applied to those same interviews. To the modernization processes that have been happening in the last 10 years, interviewees highlighted the challenges faced, various key moments linked to specific projects and the relevance of Information and Communication Technologies. The main research goal was to understand how the Portuguese judicial system modernization processes happen, considering the different dimensions of the judicial system and of the modernization process. It was possible to conclude that several external events, such as economic and public health crises, have a major influence on judicial system modernization processes. All the actors involved are relevant for the reforms, whether at an upstream or downstream level. With the European Union having a relevant role. Instruments such as laws, platforms, work management tools also assume an important role. However, the highlight of the judicial system modernization processes’ instruments goes to the Information and Communication Technologies and the infocommunicational competences.
VL  - 6
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download