Local Government and Self-government in the CIS and Kazakhstan

Yuvitsa Nikolay Vladimirovich

doi:doi:10.11648/j.jppa.20210503.13

| Peer-Reviewed

Local Government and Self-government in the CIS and Kazakhstan

Yuvitsa Nikolay Vladimirovich

Published in Journal of Public Policy and Administration (Volume 5, Issue 3)

Received: 5 July 2021 Accepted: 12 August 2021 Published: 23 August 2021

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

The theoretical, methodological and practical aspects of management and self-government at the local level in the post-Soviet states are reflected. The Introduction outlined the objectivity of the transition to models of governance at the local level based on the principles of classical liberalism and democracy. In Western countries, they were formed in a specific historical form, taking into account the peculiarities of social development and national specifics. In post-Soviet countries, the replacement of social structures of the former state system was not always confirmed by the adequacy of the principles of the rule of law and the experience of full-fledged statehood. The main part notes the differences in methods, models and content of civil society institutions. In theoretical terms, there is a lack of identity of the concepts that form the system of governance at the local level, including civil society institutions, as well as differences in their powers at the levels of hierarchy. The diversity of subjects of influence poorly takes into account the differences in approaches, methods, management technologies and tools for influencing the control object. In the course of the evolution of the liberal model, the centralized functions of public administration in the previous model were only monopolized within the national framework. In the course of this modernization, it is necessary to better take into account the challenges of a global nature; common previous experience; national traditions, as well as strategic goals for the development of new national entities. Positive processes of democratization of public administration do not exclude the need to develop all institutions of civil society. Kazakhstan needs to pay attention to the processes of democratization of civil society as a whole; assistance to structures for coordinating local self-government institutions at the national and regional levels; creating public councils representing the interests of the population, and provide them with material and financial resources; various forms of interregional cooperation, taking into account foreign experience. The Conclusion reflects measures to enhance the role of civil society institutions in modern conditions, taking into account their importance for the CIS countries, including future studies of this problem.

Published in	Journal of Public Policy and Administration (Volume 5, Issue 3)
DOI	10.11648/j.jppa.20210503.13
Page(s)	84-89
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Civil Society, Public Administration, Civil Society Institutions, Local Government, Local Self-government of Territories, Municipal Government

References

[1]	A. Balgimbaev Kazakhstan model of democracy: formation and specificity. Kazakhstanskaya Pravda, February 24, 2012. - P. 6.
[2]	See eg: Vasyutin Y., Emelyanov N. Local government in foreign countries: Tula, publishing house "TSPU", 2001; Constitutions of foreign states. - M, Legal Literature, 2002; Kurmanbaeva S. K. Structure, functions and methods of work of local self-government in the Republic of Kazakhstan // Municipal management: textbook, Almaty, 2010; Local authorities: foreign experience. - M.: AON at the Central Committee of the CPSU-220 p.; Scientific basis of public administration in the USSR. – USSR Academy of Sciences: Institute of state and law. – Publishing house "Science": M.: 1968 – 440 p.; Sagindikov E. N. Aktobe breakthrough: step by step. - Based on articles, interviews, speeches, reports / E. N. Sagidikov, Aktobe, "A-Polygraphy", 2010. -332 p.; Cherkasov A. I. Local self-government in the USA: organization and development trends: monograph, 2017.; Uvarov Yu. M. Local self-government in Russia: M.: Norma, 2005. et al.
[3]	N. V. Yuvica Forum of border regions of Russia and Kazakhstan and its main participants Economy: strategy and practice. scientific edition - Almaty, 2008., №3. S. 40-45; N. V. Yuvitsa Problems and prospects of development of Aktobe as a million-plus city. - Izdenis-Search, No. 2 (2) 2010. P. 31-40; Yuvitsa Nikolay Globale trends in modernenstaatlichen managementJornalL'Association1901 "SEPIKE", Ausgabe 4 Ostgofen Deutschland Poitiers Franse (registered in scientific base Deutsche Nationalbibliothek), 30.04.2014, - С. 114-120; N. V. Yuvitsa Modernization of local government in Kazakhstan and the CIS: theory and practiceEconomics. Law. State. "Economy. Right. State "- No. 1 (1), September 2018.-. P. 43-52; N. V. Yuvitsa Local government in the Republic of Kazakhstan: an attempt to create a national model. (Print) Management. 2019; 7 (1): 26-34 https://doi.org/10.26425/2309-3633-2019-1-26-34 May 2019 and others.
[4]	N. V. Yuvitsa Local state government and self-government, Textbook, Almaty: TechnoErudit ", 2018. -172s. (rec-but by the Academic Council of L. N. Gumilyov ENU, pr. 4, from 24.10.18).
[5]	R. S. Tseitlin, S. A. Sergeev History of public administration and municipal self-government in Russia: textbook / R. S. Zeitlin, S. A. Sergeev. 2nd ed., Rev. and add. - M. Omega 2 -L, 2006. - 125 p.
[6]	N. V. Yuvitsa Theory and practice of local government: Textbook, Astana: LLP "LantarTrade, 2018. - 189 p.; - p. 71.
[7]	Actual problems of economic development of the regions of the Republic of Kazakhstan // ENU named after L. N. Gumilyov. Economic series. BULLETIN, No. 3, 2014. - p. 68-75.
[8]	A. Vlasova Civil society: reboot. –Kazakhstanskaya Pravda, October 5, 2018. - P. 6.
[9]	M. Esimkhanov Nobody measures the contribution of public organizations to the development of society. –Cursive, no. 19, 21 May 201 5. - P. 9.
[10]	E. Aimagambetov Green light was given to the Civil Initiative. –Kazakhstanskaya Pravda, March 25, 2016. - p. 14.
[11]	E. Tashkimbaev Towards developed self-government. –Kazakhstanskaya Pravda, No. 228, November 26, 2016. - P. 8.
[12]	D. Nurgaliev Productive partnership. –Kazakhstanskaya Pravda, No. 111, June 11, 2016. - P. 2.
[13]	Feedback on the Report of the Public Fund "International Fund" Global Success of people ", 2019, FINAL PROGRAM REPORT... https://cisc.kz›wp-content› uploads›2020/08 PDF N. Parmanov, N. Yuvitsa (Appendix 13 - summaries of lecturers). In the rest... / videos / 1033995813456039 / Nikolai Vladimirovich Yuvitsa on the formation.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Yuvitsa Nikolay Vladimirovich. (2021). Local Government and Self-government in the CIS and Kazakhstan. Journal of Public Policy and Administration, 5(3), 84-89. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20210503.13

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Yuvitsa Nikolay Vladimirovich. Local Government and Self-government in the CIS and Kazakhstan. J. Public Policy Adm. 2021, 5(3), 84-89. doi: 10.11648/j.jppa.20210503.13

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Yuvitsa Nikolay Vladimirovich. Local Government and Self-government in the CIS and Kazakhstan. J Public Policy Adm. 2021;5(3):84-89. doi: 10.11648/j.jppa.20210503.13

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.jppa.20210503.13,
  author = {Yuvitsa Nikolay Vladimirovich},
  title = {Local Government and Self-government in the CIS and Kazakhstan},
  journal = {Journal of Public Policy and Administration},
  volume = {5},
  number = {3},
  pages = {84-89},
  doi = {10.11648/j.jppa.20210503.13},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20210503.13},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jppa.20210503.13},
  abstract = {The theoretical, methodological and practical aspects of management and self-government at the local level in the post-Soviet states are reflected. The Introduction outlined the objectivity of the transition to models of governance at the local level based on the principles of classical liberalism and democracy. In Western countries, they were formed in a specific historical form, taking into account the peculiarities of social development and national specifics. In post-Soviet countries, the replacement of social structures of the former state system was not always confirmed by the adequacy of the principles of the rule of law and the experience of full-fledged statehood. The main part notes the differences in methods, models and content of civil society institutions. In theoretical terms, there is a lack of identity of the concepts that form the system of governance at the local level, including civil society institutions, as well as differences in their powers at the levels of hierarchy. The diversity of subjects of influence poorly takes into account the differences in approaches, methods, management technologies and tools for influencing the control object. In the course of the evolution of the liberal model, the centralized functions of public administration in the previous model were only monopolized within the national framework. In the course of this modernization, it is necessary to better take into account the challenges of a global nature; common previous experience; national traditions, as well as strategic goals for the development of new national entities. Positive processes of democratization of public administration do not exclude the need to develop all institutions of civil society. Kazakhstan needs to pay attention to the processes of democratization of civil society as a whole; assistance to structures for coordinating local self-government institutions at the national and regional levels; creating public councils representing the interests of the population, and provide them with material and financial resources; various forms of interregional cooperation, taking into account foreign experience. The Conclusion reflects measures to enhance the role of civil society institutions in modern conditions, taking into account their importance for the CIS countries, including future studies of this problem.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Local Government and Self-government in the CIS and Kazakhstan
AU  - Yuvitsa Nikolay Vladimirovich
Y1  - 2021/08/23
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20210503.13
DO  - 10.11648/j.jppa.20210503.13
T2  - Journal of Public Policy and Administration
JF  - Journal of Public Policy and Administration
JO  - Journal of Public Policy and Administration
SP  - 84
EP  - 89
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2640-2696
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20210503.13
AB  - The theoretical, methodological and practical aspects of management and self-government at the local level in the post-Soviet states are reflected. The Introduction outlined the objectivity of the transition to models of governance at the local level based on the principles of classical liberalism and democracy. In Western countries, they were formed in a specific historical form, taking into account the peculiarities of social development and national specifics. In post-Soviet countries, the replacement of social structures of the former state system was not always confirmed by the adequacy of the principles of the rule of law and the experience of full-fledged statehood. The main part notes the differences in methods, models and content of civil society institutions. In theoretical terms, there is a lack of identity of the concepts that form the system of governance at the local level, including civil society institutions, as well as differences in their powers at the levels of hierarchy. The diversity of subjects of influence poorly takes into account the differences in approaches, methods, management technologies and tools for influencing the control object. In the course of the evolution of the liberal model, the centralized functions of public administration in the previous model were only monopolized within the national framework. In the course of this modernization, it is necessary to better take into account the challenges of a global nature; common previous experience; national traditions, as well as strategic goals for the development of new national entities. Positive processes of democratization of public administration do not exclude the need to develop all institutions of civil society. Kazakhstan needs to pay attention to the processes of democratization of civil society as a whole; assistance to structures for coordinating local self-government institutions at the national and regional levels; creating public councils representing the interests of the population, and provide them with material and financial resources; various forms of interregional cooperation, taking into account foreign experience. The Conclusion reflects measures to enhance the role of civil society institutions in modern conditions, taking into account their importance for the CIS countries, including future studies of this problem.
VL  - 5
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Yuvitsa Nikolay Vladimirovich

Economics, Department of Economics and Entrepreneurship, Institute of Economics and Business, Ulyanovsk State University, Simbirsk, Russian

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Yuvitsa Nikolay Vladimirovich. (2021). Local Government and Self-government in the CIS and Kazakhstan. Journal of Public Policy and Administration, 5(3), 84-89. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20210503.13

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Yuvitsa Nikolay Vladimirovich. Local Government and Self-government in the CIS and Kazakhstan. J. Public Policy Adm. 2021, 5(3), 84-89. doi: 10.11648/j.jppa.20210503.13

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Yuvitsa Nikolay Vladimirovich. Local Government and Self-government in the CIS and Kazakhstan. J Public Policy Adm. 2021;5(3):84-89. doi: 10.11648/j.jppa.20210503.13

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.jppa.20210503.13,
  author = {Yuvitsa Nikolay Vladimirovich},
  title = {Local Government and Self-government in the CIS and Kazakhstan},
  journal = {Journal of Public Policy and Administration},
  volume = {5},
  number = {3},
  pages = {84-89},
  doi = {10.11648/j.jppa.20210503.13},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20210503.13},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jppa.20210503.13},
  abstract = {The theoretical, methodological and practical aspects of management and self-government at the local level in the post-Soviet states are reflected. The Introduction outlined the objectivity of the transition to models of governance at the local level based on the principles of classical liberalism and democracy. In Western countries, they were formed in a specific historical form, taking into account the peculiarities of social development and national specifics. In post-Soviet countries, the replacement of social structures of the former state system was not always confirmed by the adequacy of the principles of the rule of law and the experience of full-fledged statehood. The main part notes the differences in methods, models and content of civil society institutions. In theoretical terms, there is a lack of identity of the concepts that form the system of governance at the local level, including civil society institutions, as well as differences in their powers at the levels of hierarchy. The diversity of subjects of influence poorly takes into account the differences in approaches, methods, management technologies and tools for influencing the control object. In the course of the evolution of the liberal model, the centralized functions of public administration in the previous model were only monopolized within the national framework. In the course of this modernization, it is necessary to better take into account the challenges of a global nature; common previous experience; national traditions, as well as strategic goals for the development of new national entities. Positive processes of democratization of public administration do not exclude the need to develop all institutions of civil society. Kazakhstan needs to pay attention to the processes of democratization of civil society as a whole; assistance to structures for coordinating local self-government institutions at the national and regional levels; creating public councils representing the interests of the population, and provide them with material and financial resources; various forms of interregional cooperation, taking into account foreign experience. The Conclusion reflects measures to enhance the role of civil society institutions in modern conditions, taking into account their importance for the CIS countries, including future studies of this problem.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Local Government and Self-government in the CIS and Kazakhstan
AU  - Yuvitsa Nikolay Vladimirovich
Y1  - 2021/08/23
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20210503.13
DO  - 10.11648/j.jppa.20210503.13
T2  - Journal of Public Policy and Administration
JF  - Journal of Public Policy and Administration
JO  - Journal of Public Policy and Administration
SP  - 84
EP  - 89
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2640-2696
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20210503.13
AB  - The theoretical, methodological and practical aspects of management and self-government at the local level in the post-Soviet states are reflected. The Introduction outlined the objectivity of the transition to models of governance at the local level based on the principles of classical liberalism and democracy. In Western countries, they were formed in a specific historical form, taking into account the peculiarities of social development and national specifics. In post-Soviet countries, the replacement of social structures of the former state system was not always confirmed by the adequacy of the principles of the rule of law and the experience of full-fledged statehood. The main part notes the differences in methods, models and content of civil society institutions. In theoretical terms, there is a lack of identity of the concepts that form the system of governance at the local level, including civil society institutions, as well as differences in their powers at the levels of hierarchy. The diversity of subjects of influence poorly takes into account the differences in approaches, methods, management technologies and tools for influencing the control object. In the course of the evolution of the liberal model, the centralized functions of public administration in the previous model were only monopolized within the national framework. In the course of this modernization, it is necessary to better take into account the challenges of a global nature; common previous experience; national traditions, as well as strategic goals for the development of new national entities. Positive processes of democratization of public administration do not exclude the need to develop all institutions of civil society. Kazakhstan needs to pay attention to the processes of democratization of civil society as a whole; assistance to structures for coordinating local self-government institutions at the national and regional levels; creating public councils representing the interests of the population, and provide them with material and financial resources; various forms of interregional cooperation, taking into account foreign experience. The Conclusion reflects measures to enhance the role of civil society institutions in modern conditions, taking into account their importance for the CIS countries, including future studies of this problem.
VL  - 5
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download