| Peer-Reviewed

The Impact of a Blended Course on Yemeni University Students’ Perceptions and Collaborative Knowledge Construction Performances

Published in Innovation (Volume 3, Issue 2)
Received: 21 May 2022    Accepted: 7 June 2022    Published: 30 June 2022
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

This descriptive study surveyed the perceptions and the attitudes of a group of Yemeni student teachers towards technology use in a blended course (BC). It also aims at finding out whether the student teachers differ in their perceptions and attitudes towards blended learning based on their gender. The sample of the study consisted of (128) Yemeni EFL student teachers of the third level who are studying Morphology and Syntax at the Department of English in the College of Education in Sana’a University. The study attempted to answer research questions regarding (a) their perceptions about technology use in a blended classroom, and (b) if the participants’ perception about technology use differ based on their gender. The researchers collected the data via a questionnaire whose results showed positive perceptions about the face-to-face classroom and a negative attitude towards the Web course. The results of the current study showed that the highest mean average among the six domains of the attitudes towards technology use was the domain of Web course (M = 3.85), followed by the domain of Engaging (M = 3.16) and the domain of effectiveness(M = 3.05). In the fourth place came Motivation (M = 3.01) The last two domains with the lowest means were the domain of proficiency (M = 2.91) and the domain of performance (M = 2.48). Moreover, the differences between the attitudes of the male and female students were not statistically significant. The findings of the current study present some pedagogical implications and suggestions for future research studies.

Published in Innovation (Volume 3, Issue 2)
DOI 10.11648/j.innov.20220302.15
Page(s) 64-71
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Blended Classroom, Perceptions, Attitudes, Academic Achievement, Gender

References
[1] Adas, Dana and Abu Shmais, Wafa. (2011). Students' Perceptions Towards Blended Learning Environment Using the OCC. An - Najah University Journal, 25 (6), 1681- 1710.
[2] Al-Mekhlafi, A. A. (2014). The Effect of Using EFL Online Program on the Oral Skills of Level One Students, Department of English, Faculty of Education, Sana’a University, Unpublished M. A. Thesis: Sana’a University, Yemen.
[3] Bergmann, J. & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your Classroom. Reach every Student in every Class every Day. Washington, DC: International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE).
[4] Bock, Anna; Kniha, K.; Goloborodko, E.; Lemos, M.; Rittich, A.; Möhlhenrich, S.; Rafai, N.; Hölzle, F and Modabber, A. (2021). Effectiveness of Face-to-Face, Blended and e-Learning in Teaching the Application of Local Anaesthesia: A Randomized Study, BMC Medical Education. Retrieved on 10th May, 2021 from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02569-z
[5] Bordoloi, R.; Das, P. and Das, K. (2021). Perceptions towards Online/Blended Learning at the Time of Covid-19 Pandemic: An Academic Analytics in the Indian Context, Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, Retrieved on 10th May, 2021 from: https://www.emerald.com/insight/2414-6994.htm
[6] Chen-Hsieh, J. S., Wu, W.-C. V., & Marek, M. W. (2017). Using the Flipped Classroom to Enhance EFL Learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30, (1–2), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2015.1111910.
[7] Dream Box Learning (2013). Five Benefits of Blended Learning. Retrieved on April, 26th, 2021. https://www.dreambox.com/blog/five-benefits-of-blended-learning#sthash.GFzwZkKu.dpuf
[8] Elmer, S. J., Carter, K. R., Armga, A. J. & Carter, J. R. (2016). Blended Learning within an Undergraduate Exercise Physiology Laboratory. Advances in Physiology Education, 40(1), 64-69.
[9] Enfield, J. (2013). Looking at the Impact of the Flipped Classroom Model of Instruction on Undergraduate Multimedia Students at CSUN. Tech Trends, 57(6), 14-27.
[10] Frankel, J.R. & Wallen, N.E. (2006).How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. (6thed.). The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
[11] Friesen, Norm. (2012). Report: Defining Blended Learning. Retrieved on 26/4/2021 from: https://www.normfriesen.info/papers/Defining_Blended_Learning_NF.pdf
[12] Gambari, A.; Shittu, A.; Ogunlade, O. and Osunlade, O. (2017). Effectiveness of Blended Learning and E-Learning Modes of Instruction on the Performance of Undergraduates in Kwara State, Nigeria. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 5 (1), 25-36.
[13] Glazer, Francine S. (2012). Blended Learning across the Discipline, across the Academy Stylus, Publishing LLC.
[14] Grazian, Kevin J. and Hall, John D. (2017). Flipped Instruction with English Language Learners at a Newcomer High School, Journal of Online Learning Research, 3 (2), 175- 196.
[15] Hashemyolia, Shayeshteh and Ayub, Ahmed. (2014). The Effects of Utilizing English Language Courseware on Secondary School Students’ Performance in Iran. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 4 (3).
[16] Hunt, Veronica. (2016). Pros and Cons of Blended Learning at College, eLearning Industry. Retrieved on April 28th, 2021 from: https://elearningindustry.com/pros-cons-blended-learning-at-college
[17] Jaster, Robert. (2017). Student and Instructor Perceptions of a Flipped College Algebra Classroom. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education,29 (1), 1-16.
[18] Mahmoud, A. N., Ahmed, A. and Mirna, N. (2012). Evaluating Student Satisfaction with Blended Learning in a Gender-segregated. Environment Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, (11), 193.
[19] Njoroge, Joyce; Andrew, Norman; Diana, Reed, and Inchul, Suh. (2012). Identifying Facets of Technology Satisfaction: Measure Development and Application, Journal of Learning in Higher Education, 8 (2), 7-17.
[20] Oweis, T. I. (2018). Effects of Using a Blended Learning Method on Students’ Achievement and Motivation to Learn English in Jordan: A Pilot Case Study. Hindawi Education Research International Journal. 1-7. Retrieved on 10th May, 2021 from: https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7425924
[21] Shabani, M.; Parseh, F. and Gerdabi, A. (2014). The Impact of Chat on the Vocabulary Retention of Iranian EFL Learners. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World. 5(3).
[22] Ughade, P. and Badre, S. (2020). Blended Learning- A Study on Students’ Perceptions about suitability of the Framework for Higher Education. The Online Journal of Distance Education and e-Learning, 8 (2), 72-79.
[23] Zengin, Y. (2017). Investigating the Use of the Khan Academy and Mathematics Software with a Flipped Classroom Approach in Mathematics Teaching. Educational Technology & Society, 20 (2), 89–100.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Mohammad Abdu Ahmed Al-Mekhlafi, Eman Abdulghani Al-Sharjabi, Abdulraheem Ali Al-Shothabi. (2022). The Impact of a Blended Course on Yemeni University Students’ Perceptions and Collaborative Knowledge Construction Performances. Innovation, 3(2), 64-71. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.innov.20220302.15

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Mohammad Abdu Ahmed Al-Mekhlafi; Eman Abdulghani Al-Sharjabi; Abdulraheem Ali Al-Shothabi. The Impact of a Blended Course on Yemeni University Students’ Perceptions and Collaborative Knowledge Construction Performances. Innovation. 2022, 3(2), 64-71. doi: 10.11648/j.innov.20220302.15

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Mohammad Abdu Ahmed Al-Mekhlafi, Eman Abdulghani Al-Sharjabi, Abdulraheem Ali Al-Shothabi. The Impact of a Blended Course on Yemeni University Students’ Perceptions and Collaborative Knowledge Construction Performances. Innovation. 2022;3(2):64-71. doi: 10.11648/j.innov.20220302.15

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.innov.20220302.15,
      author = {Mohammad Abdu Ahmed Al-Mekhlafi and Eman Abdulghani Al-Sharjabi and Abdulraheem Ali Al-Shothabi},
      title = {The Impact of a Blended Course on Yemeni University Students’ Perceptions and Collaborative Knowledge Construction Performances},
      journal = {Innovation},
      volume = {3},
      number = {2},
      pages = {64-71},
      doi = {10.11648/j.innov.20220302.15},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.innov.20220302.15},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.innov.20220302.15},
      abstract = {This descriptive study surveyed the perceptions and the attitudes of a group of Yemeni student teachers towards technology use in a blended course (BC). It also aims at finding out whether the student teachers differ in their perceptions and attitudes towards blended learning based on their gender. The sample of the study consisted of (128) Yemeni EFL student teachers of the third level who are studying Morphology and Syntax at the Department of English in the College of Education in Sana’a University. The study attempted to answer research questions regarding (a) their perceptions about technology use in a blended classroom, and (b) if the participants’ perception about technology use differ based on their gender. The researchers collected the data via a questionnaire whose results showed positive perceptions about the face-to-face classroom and a negative attitude towards the Web course. The results of the current study showed that the highest mean average among the six domains of the attitudes towards technology use was the domain of Web course (M = 3.85), followed by the domain of Engaging (M = 3.16) and the domain of effectiveness(M = 3.05). In the fourth place came Motivation (M = 3.01) The last two domains with the lowest means were the domain of proficiency (M = 2.91) and the domain of performance (M = 2.48). Moreover, the differences between the attitudes of the male and female students were not statistically significant. The findings of the current study present some pedagogical implications and suggestions for future research studies.},
     year = {2022}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - The Impact of a Blended Course on Yemeni University Students’ Perceptions and Collaborative Knowledge Construction Performances
    AU  - Mohammad Abdu Ahmed Al-Mekhlafi
    AU  - Eman Abdulghani Al-Sharjabi
    AU  - Abdulraheem Ali Al-Shothabi
    Y1  - 2022/06/30
    PY  - 2022
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.innov.20220302.15
    DO  - 10.11648/j.innov.20220302.15
    T2  - Innovation
    JF  - Innovation
    JO  - Innovation
    SP  - 64
    EP  - 71
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2994-7138
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.innov.20220302.15
    AB  - This descriptive study surveyed the perceptions and the attitudes of a group of Yemeni student teachers towards technology use in a blended course (BC). It also aims at finding out whether the student teachers differ in their perceptions and attitudes towards blended learning based on their gender. The sample of the study consisted of (128) Yemeni EFL student teachers of the third level who are studying Morphology and Syntax at the Department of English in the College of Education in Sana’a University. The study attempted to answer research questions regarding (a) their perceptions about technology use in a blended classroom, and (b) if the participants’ perception about technology use differ based on their gender. The researchers collected the data via a questionnaire whose results showed positive perceptions about the face-to-face classroom and a negative attitude towards the Web course. The results of the current study showed that the highest mean average among the six domains of the attitudes towards technology use was the domain of Web course (M = 3.85), followed by the domain of Engaging (M = 3.16) and the domain of effectiveness(M = 3.05). In the fourth place came Motivation (M = 3.01) The last two domains with the lowest means were the domain of proficiency (M = 2.91) and the domain of performance (M = 2.48). Moreover, the differences between the attitudes of the male and female students were not statistically significant. The findings of the current study present some pedagogical implications and suggestions for future research studies.
    VL  - 3
    IS  - 2
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of English, Al-Hikma University, Sana’a, Yemen

  • Department of English, University of Science and Technology, Sana’a, Yemen

  • Department of English, Faculty of Education, Sana’a University, Sana’a, Yemen

  • Sections