| Peer-Reviewed

Improving the Voltage Quality and Power Transfer Capability of Transmission System Using FACTS Controller

Received: 16 November 2020    Accepted: 12 March 2021    Published: 22 March 2021
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

One of the main challenges of the future in the utility sector is constructing the new transmission line corridor. This is due to the fact that land compensation cost associated with the expansion of a new transmission line corridor becomes very expensive and also power transmission efficency is very low. In addition to that, the high carbon emission, which is the major challenge of the world right now, related to the additional conventional energy-based power generation to meet dramatically increased electricity demand and the volatility nature of the existing transmission networks are some of the main drivers to implement FACTS controller in transmission network for flexible, reliable, efficient and stable power transmission. This study accounts modeling of static VAR compensator (SVC), static synchronous compensator (STATCOM), unified power flow controller (UPFC) in a 5-bus transmission system to enhance transmission efficency and the quality of power supplied to the costomer. FACTS devices for improving the transmission line capacity and voltage profile of the power system. The three FACTS controllers are modeled for the standard 5 bus IEEE system based on Newton Raphson algorithm using NEPLAN simulation software in order to investigate their impacts on transmission line capacity and voltage profile improvement. Based on the simulation result, the voltage profile as well as the capacity of the IEEE 5 bus system is improved well by using each of the FACTS controller. From the simulation result we can conclude that the STATCOM and SVC are very efficent in voltge profile improvement whereas the UPFC is well performed for the power transmission capability of the transmission network.

Published in International Journal of Energy and Power Engineering (Volume 10, Issue 1)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijepe.20211001.12
Page(s) 10-19
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

FACTS Controller, STATCOM, SVC, Transmission Line Capacity, UPFC, Voltage Profile

References
[1] N. G. Hingorani, L. Gyugyi, and M. El-Hawary, Understanding FACTS: Concepts and Technology of Flexible AC Transmission Systems, IEEE press, 2000.
[2] P. K. Vijay Varma1, “Load Flow Analysis in IEEE 14 Bus System Using,” Ijsart, vol. 3, no. 10, 2017.
[3] K. R. Padiyar, Facts Controllers in Power Transmission Distribution. 2007.
[4] B. F. Wollenberg, “Transmission system reactive power compensation,” Proc. IEEE Power Eng. Soc. Transm. Distrib. Conf., vol. 1, no. c, pp. 507–508, 2002.
[5] H. F. and S. T. A. Olwegard, K. Walve, G. Waglund, “Improvement of Transmission Capacity by Thyristor Controlled Reactive Power,” IEEE Trans. Power Appar. Syst., vol. PAS-1, no. 8, pp. 3930–3939, 1981.
[6] R. M. Mathur, Static compensators for reactive power control, Canadian Electrical Association. Winnipeg: Cantext Publ., 1986.
[7] K. R. PADIYAR and R. K. VARMA, “Concepts of Static Var System Control for Enhancing Power Transfer in Long Transmission Lines,” Electr. Mach. Power Syst., vol. 18, no. 4–5, pp. 337–358, Jul. 1990.
[8] M. O’Brien and G. Ledwich, “Static reactive-power compensator controls for improved system stability,” IEE Proc. C - Gener. Transm. Distrib., vol. 134, no. 1, pp. 38–42, 1987.
[9] A. E. Hammad, “Analysis of Power System Stability Enhancement by Static VAR Compensators,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 222–227, 1986.
[10] X.-P. Zhang, “Fast three phase load flow methods,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 1547–1554, 1996.
[11] M. S. S. and T. J. O. J. D. Glover, Power System: Analysis and Design, Fourth Ed, Thomson Learning, India. 2007.
[12] A. R. B. and V. Vittal, “Power Systems Analysis, Pearson Education.” 2004.
[13] J. J. Grainger and W. D. Stevenson, Power Systems Analysis. 2004.
[14] R. Idema and D. J. P. Lahaye, Computational Methods in Power System Analysis. 2014.
[15] S. Arabi and P. Kundur, “A versatile FACTS device model for powerflow and stability simulations,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 1944–1950, 1996.
[16] A. Nabavi-Niaki and M. R. Iravani, “Steady-state and dynamic models of unified power flow controller (UPFC) for power system studies,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 1937–1943, 1996.
[17] M. Noroozian, L. Angquist, M. Ghandhari, and G. Andersson, “Use of UPFC for optimal power flow control,” IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 1629–1634, 1997.
[18] H. Ambriz-Perez, E. Acha, C. R. Fuerte-Esquivel, and A. D. la Torre, “Incorporation of a UPFC model in an optimal power flow using Newton’s method,” IEE Proc. - Gener. Transm. Distrib., vol. 145, no. 3, pp. 336–344, 1998.
[19] T. T. Nguyen and V. L. Nguyen, “Representation of line optimisation control in unified power-flow controller model for power-flow analysis,” IET Gener. Transm. Distrib., vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 714–723, 2007.
[20] C. R. Fuerte-Esquivel, E. Acha, and H. Ambriz-Perez, “A comprehensive Newton-Raphson UPFC model for the quadratic power flow solution of practical power networks,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 102–109, 2000.
[21] X.-P. Zhang and K. R. Godfrey, “Advanced unified power flow controller model for power system steady state control,” in 2004 IEEE International Conference on Electric Utility Deregulation, Restructuring and Power Technologies. Proceedings, 2004, vol. 1, pp. 228-233 Vol. 1.
[22] U. Mhaskar, A. Mote, and A. Kulkarni, “A new formulation for load flow solution of power systems with series FACTS devices,” in IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, 2004., 2004, p. 1164 Vol. 1.
[23] K. M. Nor, H. Mokhlis, and T. A. Gani, “Reusability techniques in load-flow analysis computer program,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 1754–1762, 2004.
[24] D. M. Teferra, “Optimal Design and Dynamic Modelling of a Hybrid Distributed Generation System Containing Solar PV, Diesel and Wind Turbine with Storage,” Glob. Sci. J., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 3862–3874, 2020.
[25] S. Bhowmick, B. Das, and N. Kumar, “An Indirect UPFC Model to Enhance Reusability of Newton Power-Flow Codes,” IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 2079–2088, 2008.
[26] D. M. Teferra and P. D. L. Ngoo, “A Review Paper on the Role of FACTS and Resilient AC Distribution Systems in the Development of an Intelligent Power System,” vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 235–243, 2019.
[27] N. G. Hingorani, “Flexible AC transmission,” IEEE Spectr., vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 40–45, 1993.
[28] D. M. Teferra, “Potential and feasibility study of standalone solar PV/wind/biogas and biodiesel hybrid electric supply system in Ethiopia,” Int. J. Energy Technol. Policy, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 368–377, 2017.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Demsew Mitiku Teferra, Livingstone Ngoo. (2021). Improving the Voltage Quality and Power Transfer Capability of Transmission System Using FACTS Controller. International Journal of Energy and Power Engineering, 10(1), 10-19. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepe.20211001.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Demsew Mitiku Teferra; Livingstone Ngoo. Improving the Voltage Quality and Power Transfer Capability of Transmission System Using FACTS Controller. Int. J. Energy Power Eng. 2021, 10(1), 10-19. doi: 10.11648/j.ijepe.20211001.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Demsew Mitiku Teferra, Livingstone Ngoo. Improving the Voltage Quality and Power Transfer Capability of Transmission System Using FACTS Controller. Int J Energy Power Eng. 2021;10(1):10-19. doi: 10.11648/j.ijepe.20211001.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijepe.20211001.12,
      author = {Demsew Mitiku Teferra and Livingstone Ngoo},
      title = {Improving the Voltage Quality and Power Transfer Capability of Transmission System Using FACTS Controller},
      journal = {International Journal of Energy and Power Engineering},
      volume = {10},
      number = {1},
      pages = {10-19},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijepe.20211001.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepe.20211001.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijepe.20211001.12},
      abstract = {One of the main challenges of the future in the utility sector is constructing the new transmission line corridor. This is due to the fact that land compensation cost associated with the expansion of a new transmission line corridor becomes very expensive and also power transmission efficency is very low. In addition to that, the high carbon emission, which is the major challenge of the world right now, related to the additional conventional energy-based power generation to meet dramatically increased electricity demand and the volatility nature of the existing transmission networks are some of the main drivers to implement FACTS controller in transmission network for flexible, reliable, efficient and stable power transmission. This study accounts modeling of static VAR compensator (SVC), static synchronous compensator (STATCOM), unified power flow controller (UPFC) in a 5-bus transmission system to enhance transmission efficency and the quality of power supplied to the costomer. FACTS devices for improving the transmission line capacity and voltage profile of the power system. The three FACTS controllers are modeled for the standard 5 bus IEEE system based on Newton Raphson algorithm using NEPLAN simulation software in order to investigate their impacts on transmission line capacity and voltage profile improvement. Based on the simulation result, the voltage profile as well as the capacity of the IEEE 5 bus system is improved well by using each of the FACTS controller. From the simulation result we can conclude that the STATCOM and SVC are very efficent in voltge profile improvement whereas the UPFC is well performed for the power transmission capability of the transmission network.},
     year = {2021}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Improving the Voltage Quality and Power Transfer Capability of Transmission System Using FACTS Controller
    AU  - Demsew Mitiku Teferra
    AU  - Livingstone Ngoo
    Y1  - 2021/03/22
    PY  - 2021
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepe.20211001.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijepe.20211001.12
    T2  - International Journal of Energy and Power Engineering
    JF  - International Journal of Energy and Power Engineering
    JO  - International Journal of Energy and Power Engineering
    SP  - 10
    EP  - 19
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2326-960X
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepe.20211001.12
    AB  - One of the main challenges of the future in the utility sector is constructing the new transmission line corridor. This is due to the fact that land compensation cost associated with the expansion of a new transmission line corridor becomes very expensive and also power transmission efficency is very low. In addition to that, the high carbon emission, which is the major challenge of the world right now, related to the additional conventional energy-based power generation to meet dramatically increased electricity demand and the volatility nature of the existing transmission networks are some of the main drivers to implement FACTS controller in transmission network for flexible, reliable, efficient and stable power transmission. This study accounts modeling of static VAR compensator (SVC), static synchronous compensator (STATCOM), unified power flow controller (UPFC) in a 5-bus transmission system to enhance transmission efficency and the quality of power supplied to the costomer. FACTS devices for improving the transmission line capacity and voltage profile of the power system. The three FACTS controllers are modeled for the standard 5 bus IEEE system based on Newton Raphson algorithm using NEPLAN simulation software in order to investigate their impacts on transmission line capacity and voltage profile improvement. Based on the simulation result, the voltage profile as well as the capacity of the IEEE 5 bus system is improved well by using each of the FACTS controller. From the simulation result we can conclude that the STATCOM and SVC are very efficent in voltge profile improvement whereas the UPFC is well performed for the power transmission capability of the transmission network.
    VL  - 10
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Electrical Engineering, Addis Ababa Science and Technology University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

  • Department of Electrical & Communications Engineering, Multimedia University of Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya

  • Sections