| Peer-Reviewed

Impact of Ozone Pollution on Human Health and Economic Loss Assessment

Received: 9 March 2021    Accepted: 2 April 2021    Published: 15 October 2021
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

The problem of ozone (O3) pollution in the air has become increasingly prominent in recent years, and the health effects of O3 pollution on people have attracted more attention. O3 is the primary pollutant with the highest over-limit rate in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Pearl River Delta. Based on the data of O3 concentration, exposed pollution, baseline mortality, and hospitalization rate monitored by the Pearl River Delta Regional Air Quality Monitoring Network (PRD-RAQMN) in Shenzhen. This study evaluates the impact of O3 pollution on human health and economic loss in Shenzhen from 2006 to 2018 by using the relative risk model, benefit conversion method, and disease cost method. The annual mean value of daily 8 h maximum concentration of O3 in Shenzhen shows an overall significant upward trend from 2006 to2018, with an average annual value range of 70 to 190.92 μg/m3 and an average value of 112.89 μg/m3. The number of death and hospitalization caused by O3 pollution increases significantly, and the incidence of respiratory system diseases is higher than that of circulatory system diseases. However, the mortality caused by circulatory system diseases was higher than that caused by respiratory system diseases. The economic loss of health caused by O3 pollution increased yearly, with an annual average economic loss of82.46 million RMB, reached 658.31 million RMB in 2018, accounted for 0.0272% of Shenzhen’s GDP in 2018.

Published in International Journal of Accounting, Finance and Risk Management (Volume 6, Issue 4)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijafrm.20210604.11
Page(s) 94-101
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Ozone, Health Effects, Economic Loss, Shenzhen

References
[1] Seager J, Bechtel J, Bock S, Dankelman I. Global gender and environment outlook: Nairobi, Kenya: United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP); 2016.
[2] Forouzanfar MH, Afshin A, Alexander LT, Anderson HR, Bhutta ZA, Biryukov S, et al. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. The Lancet. 2016; 388 (10053): 1659-724.
[3] Gakidou E, Afshin A, Abajobir AA, Abate KH, Abbafati C, Abbas KM, et al. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. The Lancet. 2017; 390 (10100): 1345-422.
[4] Srebot V, Gianicolo EA, Rainaldi G, Trivella MG, Sicari R. Ozone and cardiovascular injury. Cardiovascular ultrasound. 2009; 7 (1): 30.
[5] Jerrett M, Burnett RT, Pope III CA, Ito K, Thurston G, Krewski D, et al. Long-term ozone exposure and mortality. New England Journal of Medicine. 2009; 360 (11): 1085-95.
[6] Zanobetti A, Schwartz J. Ozone and survival in four cohorts with potentially predisposing diseases. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine. 2011; 184 (7): 836-41.
[7] Anderson H, Spix C, Medina S, Schouten J, Castellsague J, Rossi G, et al. Air pollution and daily admissions for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in 6 European cities: results from the APHEA project. European respiratory journal. 1997; 10 (5): 1064-71.
[8] Zhang JiaYao. Acute health effects of ozone on population [D]: Nanjing medical university, 2019.
[9] Nuvolone D, Balzi D, Pepe P, Chini M, Scala D, Giovannini F, et al. Ozone short-term exposure and acute coronary events: a multicities study in Tuscany (Italy). Environmental research. 2013; 126: 17-23.
[10] Naties V. System of Environmental-Economic Accounting 2012. Central Framework. New York, NY; 2014.
[11] National Environmental Protection Administration, World Bank. China's Environmental and Economic Accounting Technical Guide-"Establishment of China's Green National Economic Accounting System," Sub-Report No. 4. Beijing; 2006: 2.
[12] WS/T666—2019. National health commission of the People's Republic of China [S].
[13] Zmirou D, Deloraine A, Balducci F, Boudet C, Dechenaux J. Health effects costs of particulate air pollution. Journal of occupational and environmental medicine. 1999; 41 (10): 847-56.
[14] Patankar A, Trivedi P. Monetary burden of health impacts of air pollution in Mumbai, India: implications for public health policy. Public health. 2011; 125 (3): 157-64.
[15] Zhang M, Song Y, Cai X, Zhou J. Economic assessment of the health effects related to particulate matter pollution in 111 Chinese cities by using economic burden of disease analysis. Journal of Environmental Management. 2008; 88 (4): 947-54.
[16] Wei GuoRu, Shi XingMin. Xi 'an PM_ (2.5) health damage value assessment [J]. Environmental science. 2018; 39 (07): 3014-21.
[17] Liao Zhiheng, Fan Shaojia. Effects of O3 pollution on human health in the Pearl River Delta from 2006 to 2012 [J]. China Environmental Science, 2015, 35 (03): 897-905.
[18] Meng Xiaoyan, Wang Ruibing, Du Li, et al. Characteristics analysis of O3 concentration in pilot cities [J]. China Environmental Monitoring, 013, 29 (1): 64-70.
[19] Zeng Xiangang, Ruan Fangfang, Jiang Yijing, et al. Spatial distribution and health effects of ozone pollution in China [J]. China Environmental Science, 2019, 39 (09): 4025-4032.
[20] Fan Fengyan, Wang Hongfei, Fan Lijun, et al. Health damage and economic loss assessment of air pollution in Jing-Jin-Ji region [J]. Ecological Economy, 2019, 35 (09): 157-163.
[21] Wong TW, Lau TS, Yu TS, Neller A, Wong SL, Tam W, et al. Air pollution and hospital admissions for respiratory and cardiovascular diseases in Hong Kong. Occupational and environmental medicine. 1999; 56 (10): 679-83.
[22] Chen Renjie, Chen Bingheng, Kan Haidong, et al. Health impact assessment of near-surface ozone pollution in Shanghai [J]. China Environmental Science, 2010, 30 (05): 603-608.
[23] Organization WH. WHO Air quality guidelines for particulate matter, ozone, nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide: global update 2005: summary of risk assessment. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2006.
[24] Chen Sumei. Health loss assessment of haze pollution in Beijing: historical changes and current situation [J]. Urban and Environmental Research, 2018 (2): 84-96.
[25] Guangdong provincial department of ecological environment. Report of regional air monitoring network in the pearl river delta of guangdong, Hong Kong and Macao. http://search.gd.gov.cn/Search/ local_msg/160?keywords2019.
[26] Shenzhen Health Committee. Summary of health statistics in Shenzhen. http://wjw.sz.gov.cn/. 2019.
[27] Shenzhen Municipal Bureau of Statistics. Shenzhen statistical yearbook. http://tjj.sz.gov.cn/. 2019.
[28] Guangdong Provincial Bureau of Statistics. Guangdong Statistical Yearbook. http://stats.gd.gov.cn/. 2019.
[29] China National Bureau of Statistics. China Statistical Yearbook. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/. 2019.
[30] Bell ML, Dominici F, Samet JM. A meta-analysis of time-series studies of ozone and mortality with comparison to the national morbidity, mortality, and air pollution study. Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass). 2005; 16 (4): 436.
[31] WS/T 666-2019, Technical specification for health risk assessment of air pollution population [S].
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Liu Qian. (2021). Impact of Ozone Pollution on Human Health and Economic Loss Assessment. International Journal of Accounting, Finance and Risk Management, 6(4), 94-101. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijafrm.20210604.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Liu Qian. Impact of Ozone Pollution on Human Health and Economic Loss Assessment. Int. J. Account. Finance Risk Manag. 2021, 6(4), 94-101. doi: 10.11648/j.ijafrm.20210604.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Liu Qian. Impact of Ozone Pollution on Human Health and Economic Loss Assessment. Int J Account Finance Risk Manag. 2021;6(4):94-101. doi: 10.11648/j.ijafrm.20210604.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijafrm.20210604.11,
      author = {Liu Qian},
      title = {Impact of Ozone Pollution on Human Health and Economic Loss Assessment},
      journal = {International Journal of Accounting, Finance and Risk Management},
      volume = {6},
      number = {4},
      pages = {94-101},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijafrm.20210604.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijafrm.20210604.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijafrm.20210604.11},
      abstract = {The problem of ozone (O3) pollution in the air has become increasingly prominent in recent years, and the health effects of O3 pollution on people have attracted more attention. O3 is the primary pollutant with the highest over-limit rate in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Pearl River Delta. Based on the data of O3 concentration, exposed pollution, baseline mortality, and hospitalization rate monitored by the Pearl River Delta Regional Air Quality Monitoring Network (PRD-RAQMN) in Shenzhen. This study evaluates the impact of O3 pollution on human health and economic loss in Shenzhen from 2006 to 2018 by using the relative risk model, benefit conversion method, and disease cost method. The annual mean value of daily 8 h maximum concentration of O3 in Shenzhen shows an overall significant upward trend from 2006 to2018, with an average annual value range of 70 to 190.92 μg/m3 and an average value of 112.89 μg/m3. The number of death and hospitalization caused by O3 pollution increases significantly, and the incidence of respiratory system diseases is higher than that of circulatory system diseases. However, the mortality caused by circulatory system diseases was higher than that caused by respiratory system diseases. The economic loss of health caused by O3 pollution increased yearly, with an annual average economic loss of82.46 million RMB, reached 658.31 million RMB in 2018, accounted for 0.0272% of Shenzhen’s GDP in 2018.},
     year = {2021}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Impact of Ozone Pollution on Human Health and Economic Loss Assessment
    AU  - Liu Qian
    Y1  - 2021/10/15
    PY  - 2021
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijafrm.20210604.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijafrm.20210604.11
    T2  - International Journal of Accounting, Finance and Risk Management
    JF  - International Journal of Accounting, Finance and Risk Management
    JO  - International Journal of Accounting, Finance and Risk Management
    SP  - 94
    EP  - 101
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2578-9376
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijafrm.20210604.11
    AB  - The problem of ozone (O3) pollution in the air has become increasingly prominent in recent years, and the health effects of O3 pollution on people have attracted more attention. O3 is the primary pollutant with the highest over-limit rate in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Pearl River Delta. Based on the data of O3 concentration, exposed pollution, baseline mortality, and hospitalization rate monitored by the Pearl River Delta Regional Air Quality Monitoring Network (PRD-RAQMN) in Shenzhen. This study evaluates the impact of O3 pollution on human health and economic loss in Shenzhen from 2006 to 2018 by using the relative risk model, benefit conversion method, and disease cost method. The annual mean value of daily 8 h maximum concentration of O3 in Shenzhen shows an overall significant upward trend from 2006 to2018, with an average annual value range of 70 to 190.92 μg/m3 and an average value of 112.89 μg/m3. The number of death and hospitalization caused by O3 pollution increases significantly, and the incidence of respiratory system diseases is higher than that of circulatory system diseases. However, the mortality caused by circulatory system diseases was higher than that caused by respiratory system diseases. The economic loss of health caused by O3 pollution increased yearly, with an annual average economic loss of82.46 million RMB, reached 658.31 million RMB in 2018, accounted for 0.0272% of Shenzhen’s GDP in 2018.
    VL  - 6
    IS  - 4
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Southern China Institute of Fortune Management Research, Guangzhou, China

  • Sections