Background: Rapid fluid loading at diagnosis of sepsis is part of standard treatment. Predictive tools of fluid responsiveness are required to guide fluid resuscitation. The Passive Leg Raise [PLR] manoeuvre can predict fluid responsiveness in non-intubated patients with sepsis. The Inferior Vena Cava Collapsibility Index [IVCCI] can also be utilised but is not routinely performed. Aim: To investigate the correlation between Inferior Vena Cava Collapsibility Index [IVCCI] and a Passive Leg Raise [PLR] manoeuvre for the assessment of fluid responsiveness in non-intubated septic patients in a tertiary referral hospital in Sub-Saharan Africa. Methodology: A prospective observational study which recruited non-intubated septic patients who were hypotensive [mean arterial pressure less than 65 mm Hg], requiring fluid resuscitation. Focused Cardiac Ultrasound [FoCUS] was used to measure IVCCI followed immediately by a PLR manoeuvre for comparison. Patients were classified as fluid responders if they had an IVCCI ≥ 50% and/or an increase of 10% in pulse pressure following a PLR. The correlation between IVCCI and PLR on each patient in predicting fluid responsiveness was then assessed. Results: 38 patients satisfied the inclusion criteria. McNemar’s test yielded a p=0.039 indicating that PLR test and IVCCI are not equivalent in predicting fluid responsiveness in non-intubated septic patients. A Cohen’s Kappa of 0.283 signified only a “fair” correlation between the two. An IVCCI cut-off of 30% would have resulted in a near- perfect agreement as evidenced by a Cohen’s Kappa value of 0.93. A cut off between 30-40% would give a Cohen’ Kappa of 0.81 with a strong level of agreement. Conclusion: The PLR test and IVCCI test have a fair correlation and are not identical in predicting fluid responsiveness in non-intubated spontaneously breathing septic patients.
| Published in | International Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Medicine (Volume 11, Issue 2) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ijacm.20231102.17 |
| Page(s) | 88-97 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Fluid Responsiveness, Passive Leg Raise Manoeuvre, Inferior Vena Cava Collapsibility Index, Focused Cardiac Ultrasound, Sepsis
| [1] | Rhodes A, Evans LE, A lhazzani W, Levy MM, Antonelli, Ferrer R et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med. 2017; 43 [3]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-017-4683-6 |
| [2] | MaitlandK, Kiguli S, Opoka RO, Engoru C, Olupot-Olupot P, Aketch SO et al. Mortality after Fluid Bolus in African Children with Severe Infection. N Engl J Med. 2011; 364 [26]. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1101549 |
| [3] | Sakr Y, Rubatto Birri PN, Kotfis K, Nanchal R, Shah B, Kluge S, et al. Higher Fluid Balance Increases the Risk of Death from Sepsis: Results from a Large International Audit*. Crit Care Med. 2017; 45 [3] https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000002189 |
| [4] | Andrews B, Semler MW, Muchemwa L, Kelly P, Lakhi S, Heimburger DC, et al. Effect of an early resuscitation protocol on in-hospital mortality among adults with sepsis and hypotension: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA - J Am Med Assoc. 2017; 318 [13]. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.10913 |
| [5] | Self WH, Semler MW, Bellomo R, Brown SM, deBoisblanc BP, Exline MC, et al. Liberal Versus Restrictive Intravenous Fluid Therapy for Early Septic Shock: Rationale for a Randomized Trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2018; 72 [4]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.03.039 |
| [6] | Tigabu BM, Davari M, Kebriaeezadeh A, Mojtahedzadeh M. Fluid volume, fluid balance and patient outcome in severe sepsis and septic shock: A systematic review. Vol. 48, Journal of Critical Care. 2018 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.08.018 |
| [7] | Chaves RC de F, Corrêa TD, Neto AS, Bravim B de A, Cordioli RL, Moreira FT, et al. Assessment of fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients: A systematic review of literature. Vol. 8, Annals of Intensive Care. 2018 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-018-0365-y |
| [8] | Dong Z, Fang Q, Zheng X, Shi H. Passive leg raising as an indicator of fluid responsiveness in patients with severe sepsis. World J Emerg Med. 2012; 3 [3]. https://doi.org/10.5847/wjem.j.issn.1920-8642.2012.03.006 |
| [9] | Préau S, Dewavrin F, Soland V, Bortolotti P, Colling D, Chagnon JL, et al. Hemodynamic changes during a deep inspiration maneuver predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients. Cardiol Res Pract. 2012; 1 [1]. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/191807 |
| [10] | Corl KA, George NR, Romanoff J, Levinson AT, Chheng DB, Merchant RC, et al. Inferior vena cava collapsibility detects fluid responsiveness among spontaneously breathing critically ill patients. J Crit Care. 2017; 41 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.05.008 |
| [11] | Muller L, Bobbia X, Toumi M, Louart G, Molinari N, Ragonnet B, et al. Respiratory variations of inferior vena cava diameter to predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients with acute circulatory failure: Need for a cautious use. Crit Care. 2012; 16 [5] https://doi.org/10.1186/cc11672 |
| [12] | Lanspa MJ, Grissom CK, Hirshberg EL, Jones JP, Brown SM. Applying dynamic parameters to predict hemodynamic response to volume expansion in spontaneously breathing patients with septic shock. Shock. 2013; 39 [2]. https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0b013e31827f1c6a |
| [13] | Duus N, Shogilev DJ, Skibsted S, Zijlstra HW, Fish E, Oren-Grinberg A, et al. The reliability and validity of passive leg raise and fluid bolus to assess fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing emergency department patients. J Crit Care. 2015; 30 [1]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.07.031 |
| [14] | Maizel J, Airapetian N, Lorne E, Tribouilloy C, Massy Z, Slama M. Diagnosis of central hypovolemia by using passive leg raising. Intensive Care Med. 2007; 33 [7]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-007-0642-y |
| [15] | Préau S, Saulnier F, Dewavrin F, Durocher A, Chagnon JL. Passive leg raising is predictive of fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients with severe sepsis or acute pancreatitis. Crit Care Med. 2010; 38 [3]. https://doi.org10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181c8fe7a |
| [16] | Monnet X, Marik P, Teboul JL. Passive leg raising for predicting fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2016; 42 [12]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-015-4134-1 |
| [17] | Finnerty NM, Panchal AR, Boulger C, Vira A, Bischof JJ, Amick C, et al. Inferior vena cava measurement with ultrasound: What is the best view and best mode? Vol. 18, Western Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2017 https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2016.12.32489 |
| [18] | Caplan M, Durand A, Bortolotti P, Colling D, Goutay J, Duburcq T, et al. Measurement site of inferior vena cava diameter affects the accuracy with which fluid responsiveness can be predicted in spontaneously breathing patients: a post hoc analysis of two prospective cohorts. Ann Intensive Care. 2020; 10 [1] https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-020-00786-1 |
| [19] | Lamia B, Ochagavia A, Monnet X, Chemla D, Richard C, Teboul JL. Echocardiographic prediction of volume responsiveness in critically ill patients with spontaneously breathing activity. Intensive Care Med. 2007; 33 [7] https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-007-0646-7 |
| [20] | McGregor D, Sharma S, Gupta S, Ahmad S, Godec T, Harris T. Emergency department non-invasive cardiac output study [EDNICO]: A feasibility and repeatability study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2019; 27 [1] https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-019-0586-6 |
| [21] | Preau S, Bortolotti P, Colling D, Dewavrin F, Colas V, Voisin B, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of the Inferior Vena Cava Collapsibility to Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Spontaneously Breathing Patients with Sepsis and Acute Circulatory Failure. Crit Care Med. 2017; 45 [3] https://doi.org10.1097/CCM.0000000000002090 |
| [22] | Duchateau FX, Gauss T, Burnod A, Ricard-Hibon A, Juvin P, Mantz J. Feasibility of cardiac output estimation by ultrasonic cardiac output monitoring in the prehospital setting. Eur J Emerg Med. 2011; 18 [6] https://doi.org/10.1097/MEJ.0b013e32834777b6 |
| [23] | Zhang Z, Xu X, Ye S, Xu L. Ultrasonographic measurement of the respiratory variation in the inferior vena cava diameter is predictive of fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Vol. 40, Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. 2014 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2013.12.010 |
| [24] | Mandeville JC, Colebourn CL. Can transthoracic echocardiography be used to predict fluid responsiveness in the critically ill patient? A systematic review. Vol. 2012, Critical Care Research and Practice. 2012 https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/513480 |
| [25] | Airapetian N, Maizel J, Alyamani O, Mahjoub Y, Lorne E, Levrard M, et al. Does inferior vena cava respiratory variability predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients? Crit Care. 2015; 19 [1] https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-015-1100-9 |
| [26] | Kimura BJ, Dalugdugan R, Gilcrease GW, Phan JN, Showalter BK, Wolfson T. The effect of breathing manner on inferior vena caval diameter. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2011; 12 [2]. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejechocard/jeq157 |
| [27] | Lukoko LN, Kussin PS, Adam RD, Orwa J, Waweru-Siika W. Investigating SOFA, delta-SOFA and MPM-III for mortality prediction among critically ill patients at a private tertiary hospital ICU in Kenya: A retrospective cohort study. PLoS One. 2020; 15 [7] https://doi.org10.1371/journal.pone.0235809 |
| [28] | Peachey T, Tang A, Baker EC, Pott J, Freund Y, Harris T. The assessment of circulating volume using inferior vena cava collapse index and carotid Doppler velocity time integral in healthy volunteers: A pilot study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016; 24 [1] https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-016-0298-0 |
| [29] | Mayr FB, Yende S, Angus DC. Epidemiology of severe sepsis. Vol. 5, Virulence. 2014. https://doi.org/10.4161/viru.27372 |
| [30] | He HW, Liu DW. Passive leg raising in intensive care medicine. Chin Med J [Engl]. 2016; 129 [14]. https://doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.185866 |
APA Style
Anne-Marie Githaiga, Wangari Waweru-Siika, Mohamed Jeilan, Idris Chikophe, Vitalis Mung’ayi. (2023). Inferior Vena Cava Collapsibility Index Versus Passive Leg Raise To Assess Fluid Responsiveness in Non-Intubated Septic Patients - A Prospective Observational Study. International Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Medicine, 11(2), 88-97. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijacm.20231102.17
ACS Style
Anne-Marie Githaiga; Wangari Waweru-Siika; Mohamed Jeilan; Idris Chikophe; Vitalis Mung’ayi. Inferior Vena Cava Collapsibility Index Versus Passive Leg Raise To Assess Fluid Responsiveness in Non-Intubated Septic Patients - A Prospective Observational Study. Int. J. Anesth. Clin. Med. 2023, 11(2), 88-97. doi: 10.11648/j.ijacm.20231102.17
AMA Style
Anne-Marie Githaiga, Wangari Waweru-Siika, Mohamed Jeilan, Idris Chikophe, Vitalis Mung’ayi. Inferior Vena Cava Collapsibility Index Versus Passive Leg Raise To Assess Fluid Responsiveness in Non-Intubated Septic Patients - A Prospective Observational Study. Int J Anesth Clin Med. 2023;11(2):88-97. doi: 10.11648/j.ijacm.20231102.17
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ijacm.20231102.17,
author = {Anne-Marie Githaiga and Wangari Waweru-Siika and Mohamed Jeilan and Idris Chikophe and Vitalis Mung’ayi},
title = {Inferior Vena Cava Collapsibility Index Versus Passive Leg Raise To Assess Fluid Responsiveness in Non-Intubated Septic Patients - A Prospective Observational Study},
journal = {International Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Medicine},
volume = {11},
number = {2},
pages = {88-97},
doi = {10.11648/j.ijacm.20231102.17},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijacm.20231102.17},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijacm.20231102.17},
abstract = {Background: Rapid fluid loading at diagnosis of sepsis is part of standard treatment. Predictive tools of fluid responsiveness are required to guide fluid resuscitation. The Passive Leg Raise [PLR] manoeuvre can predict fluid responsiveness in non-intubated patients with sepsis. The Inferior Vena Cava Collapsibility Index [IVCCI] can also be utilised but is not routinely performed. Aim: To investigate the correlation between Inferior Vena Cava Collapsibility Index [IVCCI] and a Passive Leg Raise [PLR] manoeuvre for the assessment of fluid responsiveness in non-intubated septic patients in a tertiary referral hospital in Sub-Saharan Africa. Methodology: A prospective observational study which recruited non-intubated septic patients who were hypotensive [mean arterial pressure less than 65 mm Hg], requiring fluid resuscitation. Focused Cardiac Ultrasound [FoCUS] was used to measure IVCCI followed immediately by a PLR manoeuvre for comparison. Patients were classified as fluid responders if they had an IVCCI ≥ 50% and/or an increase of 10% in pulse pressure following a PLR. The correlation between IVCCI and PLR on each patient in predicting fluid responsiveness was then assessed. Results: 38 patients satisfied the inclusion criteria. McNemar’s test yielded a p=0.039 indicating that PLR test and IVCCI are not equivalent in predicting fluid responsiveness in non-intubated septic patients. A Cohen’s Kappa of 0.283 signified only a “fair” correlation between the two. An IVCCI cut-off of 30% would have resulted in a near- perfect agreement as evidenced by a Cohen’s Kappa value of 0.93. A cut off between 30-40% would give a Cohen’ Kappa of 0.81 with a strong level of agreement. Conclusion: The PLR test and IVCCI test have a fair correlation and are not identical in predicting fluid responsiveness in non-intubated spontaneously breathing septic patients.},
year = {2023}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Inferior Vena Cava Collapsibility Index Versus Passive Leg Raise To Assess Fluid Responsiveness in Non-Intubated Septic Patients - A Prospective Observational Study AU - Anne-Marie Githaiga AU - Wangari Waweru-Siika AU - Mohamed Jeilan AU - Idris Chikophe AU - Vitalis Mung’ayi Y1 - 2023/09/25 PY - 2023 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijacm.20231102.17 DO - 10.11648/j.ijacm.20231102.17 T2 - International Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Medicine JF - International Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Medicine JO - International Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Medicine SP - 88 EP - 97 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2997-2698 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijacm.20231102.17 AB - Background: Rapid fluid loading at diagnosis of sepsis is part of standard treatment. Predictive tools of fluid responsiveness are required to guide fluid resuscitation. The Passive Leg Raise [PLR] manoeuvre can predict fluid responsiveness in non-intubated patients with sepsis. The Inferior Vena Cava Collapsibility Index [IVCCI] can also be utilised but is not routinely performed. Aim: To investigate the correlation between Inferior Vena Cava Collapsibility Index [IVCCI] and a Passive Leg Raise [PLR] manoeuvre for the assessment of fluid responsiveness in non-intubated septic patients in a tertiary referral hospital in Sub-Saharan Africa. Methodology: A prospective observational study which recruited non-intubated septic patients who were hypotensive [mean arterial pressure less than 65 mm Hg], requiring fluid resuscitation. Focused Cardiac Ultrasound [FoCUS] was used to measure IVCCI followed immediately by a PLR manoeuvre for comparison. Patients were classified as fluid responders if they had an IVCCI ≥ 50% and/or an increase of 10% in pulse pressure following a PLR. The correlation between IVCCI and PLR on each patient in predicting fluid responsiveness was then assessed. Results: 38 patients satisfied the inclusion criteria. McNemar’s test yielded a p=0.039 indicating that PLR test and IVCCI are not equivalent in predicting fluid responsiveness in non-intubated septic patients. A Cohen’s Kappa of 0.283 signified only a “fair” correlation between the two. An IVCCI cut-off of 30% would have resulted in a near- perfect agreement as evidenced by a Cohen’s Kappa value of 0.93. A cut off between 30-40% would give a Cohen’ Kappa of 0.81 with a strong level of agreement. Conclusion: The PLR test and IVCCI test have a fair correlation and are not identical in predicting fluid responsiveness in non-intubated spontaneously breathing septic patients. VL - 11 IS - 2 ER -
Information
Email: