| Peer-Reviewed

Analysis of Learning Habits of China’s Undergraduates from the Perspective of Compulsory Courses

Received: 9 November 2021    Accepted: 6 December 2021    Published: 24 December 2021
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

In the context of economic globalization, higher education pays more and more attention to the cultivation of interdisciplinary talents. Changing the inappropriate part of traditional teaching methods has become a challenge that China’s higher education must handle to maintain its competitiveness in the new era. Covid-19 makes the combination of online and offline teaching become the norm, which will also raise higher requirements for undergraduates’ learning self-discipline. This paper analyses the learning habits of undergraduates in China’s higher education institutions. Compulsory courses account for a large proportion of the curriculum, and they are the learning tasks that must be completed during undergraduate stage, and their credits directly corresponding to the classroom learning time, which can indicate some learning situations of undergraduate. The statistical data were collected from a comprehensive university, and its training disciplines were divided into five cases. The average weekly fixed class workload of undergraduates was obtained through the credits of compulsory courses in each case for many grades. The reasons for the formation of undergraduates learning status and the influence of learning quality were interpreted by the combination of the survey data with the corresponding teachers’ comments. The weakness of active learning consciousness of China’s undergraduates is mainly related to the learning habits formed under long-term exam-oriented education. In addition, teachers’ sense of responsibility plays a core role in the learning outcomes of undergraduates. At present, the concern of China’s higher education is gradually shifting from teaching to learning, focusing on the cultivation of undergraduates’ interest in their majors and independent learning ability after class.

Published in Higher Education Research (Volume 6, Issue 6)
DOI 10.11648/j.her.20210606.18
Page(s) 195-206
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Compulsory Courses, Class Contact Hours, Workload, Independent Learning

References
[1] Alarcón, F., Beneitone, P., Armas, R. D., Kieling, S., Suñé, L. & Veneros, D. (2013). Student Workload and Degree Profiles: the Experience of CLAR Credits in Latin America. Tuning Journal for Higher Education 1 (1): 165-186.
[2] Arocena, R. & Sutz, J. (2001). Changing Knowledge Production and Latin American Universities. Research Policy 30 (8): 1221-1234.
[3] Bowyer, K. (2012). A Model of Student Workload. Journal of Higher Education Policy 34 (3): 239-258.
[4] Campbell, M. & Fox, L. ed. (2014). Learning Technology Effectiveness. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Education Technology.
[5] CCED (Compilation Committee of Education Dictionary). (1991). Volume 3 in Education Dictionary, Edited by M. Gu, 19-20. Shanghai: Shanghai Education Press.
[6] Chambers, E. (1992). Work-load and the Quality of Student Learning. Studies in Higher Education 17 (2): 141-153.
[7] Chambers, E. (1994). Assessing Learner Workload. Materials Production in Open and Distance Learning, 141-153, Edited by F. Lockwood. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
[8] Chen, D. Y. (2002). The Amalgamation of Chinese Higher Education Institutions. Education Policy Analysis Archives 10 (20).
[9] Chen, X.-F. (2011). Ideal-Oriented Policymaking: An Analysis of the 985 Project Policy Process. Chinese Education & Society 44 (5): 8-18.
[10] Chiang, I.-C. N. (2014). Extra-curricular Reading in Taiwan. The Asian EFL Journal Professional Teaching Articles 80: 4-33.
[11] Crawford, J., Butler-Henderson, K., Rudolph, J. Malkawi, B., Glowatz, M., Burton, R. Magni, P. A. & Lam, S. (2020). COVID-19: 20 Countries’ Higher Education Intra-period Digital Pedagogy Responses. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching 3 (1): 9-27.
[12] Dahlgren, L.-O. (1998). Outcomes of Learning. Scottish Academic Press.
[13] Darmody, M., Smyth, E. & Unger, M. (2008). Field of Study and Students’ Workload in Higher Education: Ireland and Austria in Comparative Perspective. International Journal of Comparative Sociology 49 (4-5): 329-346.
[14] Entwistle, N. & Ramsden, P. (2015). Understanding Student Learning (Routledge Revivals, 1st Ed.). London: Routledge Press.
[15] Fadelelmoula, T. (2018). The Impact of Class Attendance on Student Performance. International Research Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences 6 (2): 47-49.
[16] Ghonim, M. & Eweda, N. (2018). Investigating Elective Courses in Architectural Education. Frontiers of Architectural Research 7 (2): 235-256.
[17] Goe, L. & Leslie, S. (2008). Teacher Quality and Student Achievement: Making the Most of Resent Research. TQ Research & Policy Brief.
[18] Gu, H.-B. & Xue, S.-S. (2009). The Proportion of Elective Courses should be Improved in China. [woguo gaoxiao xuanxiuke bizhong jidai tigao (in Chinese).] China Higher Education Research 10: 85-87.
[19] Harman, G. (2005). Australian Social Scientists and Transition to a More Commercial University Environment. Higher Education Research & Development 24 (1): 79-94.
[20] Hemer, S. R. (2014). Finding Time for Quality Teaching: An Ethnographic Study of Academic Workloads in the Social Sciences and Their Impact on Teaching Practices. Higher Education Research & Development 33 (3): 483-495.
[21] HETSC (Higher Education Teaching Steering Committee, Ministry of Education) (2018). National Standards for Undergraduate Majors Teaching Quality of Higher Education. [putong gaodeng xuexiao benke zhuanyelei jiaoxue zhiliang guojia biaozhun (in Chinese)]. Higher Education Press.
[22] Jagersma, J. & Parsons, J. (2011). Empowering Students as Active Participants in Curriculum Design and Implementation. New Zealand Journal of Teachers’ Work 8 (2): 114-121.
[23] Karjalainen, A., Alha, K. & Jutila, S. (2008). Give Me Time to Think: Determining Student Workload in Higher Education. Oulu: Oulu University Press.
[24] Kember, D. & Leung, D. Y. P. (1998). Influences upon Students’ Perceptions of Workload. Educational Psychology 18 (3): 293-307.
[25] Kember, D. & Leung, D. Y. P. (2006). Characterising a Teaching and Learning Environment Conductive to Making Demands on Students while not Making Their Workload Excessive. Studies in Higher Education 32 (2): 185-198.
[26] Kyndt, E., Dochy, F., Struyven, K. & Cascallar, E. (2011). The Direct and Indirect Effect of Motivation for Learning on Student’s Approaches to Learning through the Perceptions of Workload and Task Complexity. Higher Education Research & Development 30 (2): 135-150.
[27] Kyndt, E., Berghmans, I., Dochy, F. & Bulckens, L. (2014). Time is not enough, Workload in Higher Education: A Student Perspective. Higher Education Research & Development 33 (4): 684-698.
[28] Leisyte, L., Enders, J. & de Boer, H. (2009). The Balance between Teaching and Research in Dutch and English Universities in the Context of University Governance Reforms. Higher Education 58 (5): 619-635.
[29] Lemass, B. & Stace, R. (2010). Towards Teaching and Research Parity: A Teaching Quality and Reward Framework. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 14 (1): 21-27.
[30] Lockwood, F. (1999). Estimating Student Workload: Implications for Quality Learning. Staff and Educational Development International 3 (3): 281-289.
[31] Liu, S.-Y. & Rosa, M. J. (2008). Quality Assessment of Undergraduate Education in China: A Policy Analysis. Higher Education Management and Policy 20 (3): 79-96.
[32] Liu, S.-Y. (2015). Higher Education Quality Assessment in China: An Impact Study. Higher Education Policy 28 (2): 175-195.
[33] Ma, G.-L. (2011). On the Problems and Countermeasures of Chinese Elementary Education. Journal of Jinhua Polytechnic 11 (1): 35-38.
[34] Ma, S., Li, Y.-R. & Zhang, P.-P. (2021). Analysis of Undergraduates’ Courses in China’s Comprehensive Universities – A Case Study. Higher Education Studies 11 (1): 42-54.
[35] Marton, F. & Wenestam, C. (1978). Qualitative Differences in the Understanding and Retention of the Main Point in Some Texts Based on the Principle – Example Structure. Academic Press 32: 633-643.
[36] Money, J., Nixon, S., Tracy, F., Hennessy, C., Ball, E., & Dinning, T. (2017). Undergraduate Student Expectations of University in the United Kingdom: What Really Matters to Them? Cogent Education 4 (1), 1301855.
[37] Neshkovska, S. (2018). Contemporary Challenges of Higher Education Teachers. Quality of University Learning and Teaching Conference Proceedings: 32-42, Brdo pri Kranju, 6. April 2016.
[38] Ng, K. C. (2007). Replacing Face-to-Face Tutorials by Synchronous Online Technologies: Challenges and pedagogical implications. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 8 (1): 1-15.
[39] Nyamupangedengu, E. (2017). Investigating Factors that Impact the Success of Studies in a Higher Education Classroom: A Case Study. Journal of Education 68: 113-130.
[40] QAA (the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education) (2013). Explaining student workload – Guidance about Providing Information for Students. © The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education 2013.
[41] Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning from the Student’s Perspective. Learning to Teach in Higher Education (2nd Ed.), Chapter 5, London & New York: Taylor & Francis Group.
[42] Sun, A., & Sun, Y.-Z. (2019). A Study of the Teaching-Evaluating Behavior of College Students: Based on Game Theory. Journal of Guangdong Polytechnic Normal University 5: 44-50.
[43] Sun, K. (2015). Analysis on the Cross Shaped Curriculum System of the World’s High-Level Universities. [shijie gaoshuiping daxue kecheng tixide shizixing tezheng tanxi (in Chinese)]. Education Exploration 1: 151-156.
[44] Weaver, R. & Qi, J. (2005). Classroom Organization and Participation: College Students’ Perceptions. The Journal of Higher Education 76 (5): 570-601.
[45] Whitelock, D., Thorpe, M. & Galley, R. (2015). Student Workload: A Case Study of Its Significance, Evaluation and Management at the Open University. Distance Education 36 (2): 161-176.
[46] Williams, K. C. & Williams, C. C. (2011). Five Key Ingredients for Improving Student Motivation. Research in Higher Education Journal 11.
[47] Wu, D. (1980). A Few Tentative Ideas of Implementing Credit System – Discuss Teaching Plan Concurrently. [shixing xuefenzhi de jidian shexiang – jianlun jiaoxue jihua (in Chinese)]. Peoples Education 4: 16-17+21.
[48] Yansyah & Nadia, H. (2019). Sharing Practice: Using Flipped Classroom for Developing Students’ English Skills and Learning Autonomy. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on English Language Teaching, Linguistics and Literature: 231-235.
[49] Yin C.-C. & Tam, W.-M. (1997). Multi-models of Quality in Education. Quality Assurance in Education 5 (1): 22-31.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Sai Ma, Xing Zeng, Zigen Li, Yanrong Li. (2021). Analysis of Learning Habits of China’s Undergraduates from the Perspective of Compulsory Courses. Higher Education Research, 6(6), 195-206. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.her.20210606.18

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Sai Ma; Xing Zeng; Zigen Li; Yanrong Li. Analysis of Learning Habits of China’s Undergraduates from the Perspective of Compulsory Courses. High. Educ. Res. 2021, 6(6), 195-206. doi: 10.11648/j.her.20210606.18

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Sai Ma, Xing Zeng, Zigen Li, Yanrong Li. Analysis of Learning Habits of China’s Undergraduates from the Perspective of Compulsory Courses. High Educ Res. 2021;6(6):195-206. doi: 10.11648/j.her.20210606.18

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.her.20210606.18,
      author = {Sai Ma and Xing Zeng and Zigen Li and Yanrong Li},
      title = {Analysis of Learning Habits of China’s Undergraduates from the Perspective of Compulsory Courses},
      journal = {Higher Education Research},
      volume = {6},
      number = {6},
      pages = {195-206},
      doi = {10.11648/j.her.20210606.18},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.her.20210606.18},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.her.20210606.18},
      abstract = {In the context of economic globalization, higher education pays more and more attention to the cultivation of interdisciplinary talents. Changing the inappropriate part of traditional teaching methods has become a challenge that China’s higher education must handle to maintain its competitiveness in the new era. Covid-19 makes the combination of online and offline teaching become the norm, which will also raise higher requirements for undergraduates’ learning self-discipline. This paper analyses the learning habits of undergraduates in China’s higher education institutions. Compulsory courses account for a large proportion of the curriculum, and they are the learning tasks that must be completed during undergraduate stage, and their credits directly corresponding to the classroom learning time, which can indicate some learning situations of undergraduate. The statistical data were collected from a comprehensive university, and its training disciplines were divided into five cases. The average weekly fixed class workload of undergraduates was obtained through the credits of compulsory courses in each case for many grades. The reasons for the formation of undergraduates learning status and the influence of learning quality were interpreted by the combination of the survey data with the corresponding teachers’ comments. The weakness of active learning consciousness of China’s undergraduates is mainly related to the learning habits formed under long-term exam-oriented education. In addition, teachers’ sense of responsibility plays a core role in the learning outcomes of undergraduates. At present, the concern of China’s higher education is gradually shifting from teaching to learning, focusing on the cultivation of undergraduates’ interest in their majors and independent learning ability after class.},
     year = {2021}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Analysis of Learning Habits of China’s Undergraduates from the Perspective of Compulsory Courses
    AU  - Sai Ma
    AU  - Xing Zeng
    AU  - Zigen Li
    AU  - Yanrong Li
    Y1  - 2021/12/24
    PY  - 2021
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.her.20210606.18
    DO  - 10.11648/j.her.20210606.18
    T2  - Higher Education Research
    JF  - Higher Education Research
    JO  - Higher Education Research
    SP  - 195
    EP  - 206
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2578-935X
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.her.20210606.18
    AB  - In the context of economic globalization, higher education pays more and more attention to the cultivation of interdisciplinary talents. Changing the inappropriate part of traditional teaching methods has become a challenge that China’s higher education must handle to maintain its competitiveness in the new era. Covid-19 makes the combination of online and offline teaching become the norm, which will also raise higher requirements for undergraduates’ learning self-discipline. This paper analyses the learning habits of undergraduates in China’s higher education institutions. Compulsory courses account for a large proportion of the curriculum, and they are the learning tasks that must be completed during undergraduate stage, and their credits directly corresponding to the classroom learning time, which can indicate some learning situations of undergraduate. The statistical data were collected from a comprehensive university, and its training disciplines were divided into five cases. The average weekly fixed class workload of undergraduates was obtained through the credits of compulsory courses in each case for many grades. The reasons for the formation of undergraduates learning status and the influence of learning quality were interpreted by the combination of the survey data with the corresponding teachers’ comments. The weakness of active learning consciousness of China’s undergraduates is mainly related to the learning habits formed under long-term exam-oriented education. In addition, teachers’ sense of responsibility plays a core role in the learning outcomes of undergraduates. At present, the concern of China’s higher education is gradually shifting from teaching to learning, focusing on the cultivation of undergraduates’ interest in their majors and independent learning ability after class.
    VL  - 6
    IS  - 6
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Office of Education Quality Evaluation & Supervision, Communication University of China, Beijing, China

  • School of Journalism, Communication University of China, Beijing, China

  • Beijing Dublin International College, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, China

  • Department of Laboratory & Equipment Management, Communication University of China, Beijing, China

  • Sections