| Peer-Reviewed

A Contraction Based Solution for the Improvement of Fish Ladder Attraction Flow

Received: 22 April 2021    Accepted: 24 May 2021    Published: 4 June 2021
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

A new, potentially cost efficient, concept for improving the attraction flow to a fish ladder has been investigated in a case study. For the upstream migrating Atlantic salmon to reach the fish ladder and by-pass the case study hydropower plant, it must be able to localize the attraction flow where it enters the main flow from the tailrace of the hydropower plant in the so-called confluence area. Here the comparatively small and limited attraction flow from the old river channel must be improved in order to be able compete with the substantially larger main flow. The objective of the present study is to investigate the feasibility of a new concept for further improvement of the attraction flow using guiding walls forming a contraction channel. Field measurements were performed tracing tagged fish in the confluence area downstream of the case study hydropower plant in order to understand the movement pattern of the fish. Based on the results, and results from bathymetry measurements in the same area, a physical scale model was constructed where it was experimentally demonstrated that it is hydraulically feasible to construct guiding walls, forming a contraction, which accelerate the attraction flow and generate a concentrated turbulent jet with a higher velocity, while keeping the flow rate unchanged. The attraction flow penetrates about half-way (70 m) into the main flow and reaches the position where most fish are positioned according to fish position measurements and therefore potentially has a good ability to attract upstream migrating fish. There is no negative impact on the water level in the confluence area and thereby not on electricity production. It was shown that the results can be scaled up to prototype conditions and the strategy can presumably be generalized to similar flow situations, existing at other hydropower plants, allowing for improved upstream fish migration in coexistence with a sound hydropower production.

Published in American Journal of Water Science and Engineering (Volume 7, Issue 2)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajwse.20210702.14
Page(s) 57-71
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Attraction Flow, Salmon, Fish Migration, Acoustic Telemetry, Physical Scale Model Test, Hydropower

References
[1] Andersson, A. G., Leonardsson, K., Lindberg, D. E., Lundström, T., Hellström, J. G. I., & Lundqvist, H. 2016. Describing fish passage in a river confluence with telemetry and CFD. In 11th International Symposium on Eco-hydraulics, Melbourne, Australia.
[2] Angele, K., Andersson, A. Validation of a HEC-RAS model of the Stornorrfors fish migration old river channel against new field data, 2018. 12th ISE 2018, Tokyo, Japan.
[3] Angele, K., Billstein, M. Fish ladder effectivization: Reconstruction of the Stornorrfors B-spillway, 2018. 12th ISE 2018, Tokyo, Japan.
[4] Angele, K., Odemark, Y., Cehlin, M. Hemström, B., Högström, C. M., Henriksson, M., Tinoco, H., Lindqvist, H., 2011. Flow mixing inside a control-rod guide tube – Experimental tests and CFD simulations. Nuclear Engineering and Design 241 (2011) 4803–4812.
[5] Armstrong, G. S., M. W. Aprahamian, G. A. Fewings, P. J. Gough, N. A. Reader & P. V. Varallo, 2010, Environment Agency Fish Pass Manual: Guidance Notes On The Legislation, Selection and Approval of Fish Passes In England and Wales, Document – GEHO 0910 BTBP-E-E, Environment Agency, Bristol, U.K.
[6] Baktoft, H., K. O. Gjelland, F. Okland, and U. H. Thygesen. 2017. Positioning of aquatic animals based on time-of-arrival and random walk models using YAPS (Yet Another Positioning Solver). Scientific Reports 7.
[7] Balk, H., and Lindem, T., 2004. Sonar4 and Sonar 5-Pro, Post processing system, Operator Manual v5.9.3. Lindem Data Acquisition, Norway.
[8] Beach, M. H., 1984. Fish pass design - criteria for the design and approval of fish passes and other structures to facilitate the passage of migratory fish in rivers. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Lowestoft, Fish. Res. Tech. Rep. 78, 45 p.
[9] Braillard, O., Howard, R., Angele, K. Shams, A., Edh, N. Thermal mixing in a T-junction: Novel CFD-grade measurements of the fluctuating temperature in the solid wall. Nuclear Engineering and Design 330 (2018) 377–390.
[10] Burman, A. J., Andersson, A. G., Hellström, J. G. I., and Angele, K.. Case Study of Transient Dynamics in a Bypass Reach. Water 2020, 12, 1585; doi: 10.3390/w12061585.
[11] Calles, O., E. Degerman, H. Wickström, J. Christiansson, S. Gustafsson & I. Näslund, 2013, Anordningar för upp- och nedströmspassage av fisk vid vattenanläggningar - Underlag till vägledning om lämpliga försiktighetsmått och bästa möjliga teknik för vattenkraft, Rapport 2013: 14, Havs- och vattenmyndigheten.
[12] Calles, E. O. & L. A. Greenberg, 2009. Connectivity is a two-way street: the need for a holistic approach to fish passage problems in regulated rivers. Rivers research and application 25: 1268–1286.
[13] Carling, P. A., 1983. Threshold of coarse sediment transport in broad and narrow natural streams. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, Volume 8, Issue 1.
[14] Castro-Santos T., 2005. Optimal swim speeds for traversing velocity barriers: an analysis of volitional high-speed swimming behavior of migratory fishes. The Journal of Experimental Biology 208, 421-432.
[15] Donaldson, M. R., Hinch, S. G., Suski, C. D., Fisk, A., Heupel, M. R., Cooke, S. J., 2014. Making connections in aquatic ecosystems with acoustic telemetry monitoring. Front. Ecol. Environ. 12, 565–573.
[16] DWA, 2014, Fischaufstiegsanlagen und fischpassierbare Bauwerke - Gestaltung, Bemessung, Qualitätssicherung, DWA Regelwerk, Merkblatt DWA-M 509, Hennef, Germany.
[17] DVWK, 2002, Fish passes – Design, dimensions and monitoring, Deutscher Verband für Wasserwirtschaft und Kulturbaue. V. (DVWK): translated by Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), FAO, Rome.
[18] Edlund, L. E., 1996. Norrländsk uppslagsbok: ett uppslagsverk på vetenskaplig grund om den norrländska regionen. [Region-Övre]. "Band 4". Tore Frängsmyr. Umeå: Norrlands universitetsförlag. sid. 309f. Libris länk. ISBN 91-972484-2-8.
[19] Forssén, Å., 2020, Stornorrfors hatchery, Vattenfall (private communication).
[20] Guideline Upstream Fishways on German Federal Waterways (AH FAA), Bundesanstalt für Wasserbau (BAW) und Bundesanstalt für Gewässerkunde (BfG), Version 2.0, 26/06/2015.
[21] Hemström, B. 2010, Fiskvandring förbi Stornorrfors kraftverk, 3D-beräkning av lockvattenströmning i älvfåra med ledarm 2010. U10: 13, 1-61.
[22] Heneka, P.; Zinkhahn, M.; Schütz, C.; Weichert, R. B. A Parametric Approach for Determining Fishway Attraction Flow at Hydropower Dams. Water 2021, 13, 743. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13050743.
[23] Katopidis, C. & R. Gervais, 2016. Fish swimming performance database and analysis, Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat (CSAS), Research document 2016/002, Central and Artic Region, Fisheries and Oceans Canada.
[24] Lantmäteriet, 2020. https://www.lantmateriet.se/sv/Kartor-och-geografisk-information/Kartor/.
[25] Larinier, M. (1992) Guide pour la conception de dispositifs de franchissement de barrages ou d’obstacles pour les poissons migrateurs. Bulletin Français de la Pêche et de la Pisciculture, 326/327, 1–206.
[26] Larinier, M. (2002). Chapter 3 Biological Factors To Be Taken Into Account in the Design of Fishways, Bull. Fr. Pêche Piscic., 364 suppl. (L), 28–38. https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2002105.
[27] Liedtke, T., Rub, M., 2012. Techniques for telemetry transmitter attachment and evaluation of transmitter effects on fish performance. In: Telemetry Techniques: A User Guide for Fisheries Research., pp. 45–87.
[28] Lilja, J., Marjomäki, T. J., Riikonen, R., and Jurvelius, J., 2000. Simulation and experimental measurement of side-aspect target strength of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) at high frequency. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 61, 2227–2236.
[29] Lindberg, D. E., Leonardsson, K., Andersson, A. G., Lundström, T. S., Lundqvist, H., 2013. Methods for locating the proper position of a planned fishway entrance near a hydropower tailrace. Limnologica 43 (2013) 339–347.
[30] Lundqvist, H., Rivinoja, P., Leonardsson, K. and McKinnell, S., 2008, Upstream passage problems for wild Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) in a flow controlled river and its effect on the population, Hydrobiologia Vol. 602, 111-127.
[31] Pavlov, D. S., 1989, Structures assisting the migrations of non-salmonid fish: USSR, translated by Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, FAO Fisheries Technical Paper, No. 308, Rome.
[32] Peakall, J., Warburton, J., 1996. Surface tension in small hydraulic river models - the significance of the Weber number. Journal of Hydrology (New Zealand). Vol. 35, No. 2, THEME ISSUE: Hydraulic Modelling of braided Gravel-bed Rivers, pp. 199-212.
[33] Peake, S. & R. S. McKinley, 1998, The re-examination of swimming performance relative to downstream migration of juvenile salmonids. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 55: 682–687.
[34] Pincock, D. G., Johnston, S. V., 2012. Acoustic telemetry overview. Telemetry techniques: a user guide for fisheries research, pp. 305–337.
[35] Sektionen för Geoteknik. Erosionsskydd i vatten vid väg- och brobyggnad, 1978, Vägverket, 1987: 18, 1-30.
[36] Smith, B. L., Mahaffy, J. H., Angele, K., A CFD benchmarking exercise based on flow mixing in a T-junction. Nuclear Engineering and Design 264 (2013) 80–88.
[37] Sveen, J. K., An introduction to MatPIV v. 1.6.1, eprint series, Dept. of Math. University of Oslo, "Mechanics and Applied Mathematics", NO. 2 ISSN 0809-4403, August 2004.
[38] Thorstad, E. B., Fiske, P., Aarestrup, K., Hvidsten, N. A., Hårsaker, K., Heggberget, T. G. and Økland, F. Upstream migration of Atlantic salmon in three regulated rivers. Aquatic telemetry: Advances and applications. Proceedings of the Fifth Conference on Fish Telemetry held in Europe. Ustica, Italy, 9-13 June 2003. Rome, FAO/COISPA. 2005. 295p.
[39] USFWS (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). 2019. Fish Passage Engineering Design Criteria. USFWS, Northeast Region R5, Hadley, Massachusetts.
[40] Widén, Å., R. Jansson, M. Johansson, M. Lindström, L. Sandin & D. Wisaeus, 2016, Maximal Ekologisk Potential i Umeälven, www.umealven.se.
[41] Wolfram Research, Inc. 2019. Mathematica, Version 12.0, Champaign, IL.
[42] Wolter, C., Schomaker, C. Fish passes design discharge requirements for successful operation. River Res Applic. 2019; 1–5.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Kristian Angele, Patrik Andreasson, Ake Forssen, David Aldven, Gustav Hellstrom, et al. (2021). A Contraction Based Solution for the Improvement of Fish Ladder Attraction Flow. American Journal of Water Science and Engineering, 7(2), 57-71. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajwse.20210702.14

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Kristian Angele; Patrik Andreasson; Ake Forssen; David Aldven; Gustav Hellstrom, et al. A Contraction Based Solution for the Improvement of Fish Ladder Attraction Flow. Am. J. Water Sci. Eng. 2021, 7(2), 57-71. doi: 10.11648/j.ajwse.20210702.14

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Kristian Angele, Patrik Andreasson, Ake Forssen, David Aldven, Gustav Hellstrom, et al. A Contraction Based Solution for the Improvement of Fish Ladder Attraction Flow. Am J Water Sci Eng. 2021;7(2):57-71. doi: 10.11648/j.ajwse.20210702.14

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajwse.20210702.14,
      author = {Kristian Angele and Patrik Andreasson and Ake Forssen and David Aldven and Gustav Hellstrom and Kjell Leonardsson},
      title = {A Contraction Based Solution for the Improvement of Fish Ladder Attraction Flow},
      journal = {American Journal of Water Science and Engineering},
      volume = {7},
      number = {2},
      pages = {57-71},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajwse.20210702.14},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajwse.20210702.14},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajwse.20210702.14},
      abstract = {A new, potentially cost efficient, concept for improving the attraction flow to a fish ladder has been investigated in a case study. For the upstream migrating Atlantic salmon to reach the fish ladder and by-pass the case study hydropower plant, it must be able to localize the attraction flow where it enters the main flow from the tailrace of the hydropower plant in the so-called confluence area. Here the comparatively small and limited attraction flow from the old river channel must be improved in order to be able compete with the substantially larger main flow. The objective of the present study is to investigate the feasibility of a new concept for further improvement of the attraction flow using guiding walls forming a contraction channel. Field measurements were performed tracing tagged fish in the confluence area downstream of the case study hydropower plant in order to understand the movement pattern of the fish. Based on the results, and results from bathymetry measurements in the same area, a physical scale model was constructed where it was experimentally demonstrated that it is hydraulically feasible to construct guiding walls, forming a contraction, which accelerate the attraction flow and generate a concentrated turbulent jet with a higher velocity, while keeping the flow rate unchanged. The attraction flow penetrates about half-way (70 m) into the main flow and reaches the position where most fish are positioned according to fish position measurements and therefore potentially has a good ability to attract upstream migrating fish. There is no negative impact on the water level in the confluence area and thereby not on electricity production. It was shown that the results can be scaled up to prototype conditions and the strategy can presumably be generalized to similar flow situations, existing at other hydropower plants, allowing for improved upstream fish migration in coexistence with a sound hydropower production.},
     year = {2021}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - A Contraction Based Solution for the Improvement of Fish Ladder Attraction Flow
    AU  - Kristian Angele
    AU  - Patrik Andreasson
    AU  - Ake Forssen
    AU  - David Aldven
    AU  - Gustav Hellstrom
    AU  - Kjell Leonardsson
    Y1  - 2021/06/04
    PY  - 2021
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajwse.20210702.14
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajwse.20210702.14
    T2  - American Journal of Water Science and Engineering
    JF  - American Journal of Water Science and Engineering
    JO  - American Journal of Water Science and Engineering
    SP  - 57
    EP  - 71
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2575-1875
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajwse.20210702.14
    AB  - A new, potentially cost efficient, concept for improving the attraction flow to a fish ladder has been investigated in a case study. For the upstream migrating Atlantic salmon to reach the fish ladder and by-pass the case study hydropower plant, it must be able to localize the attraction flow where it enters the main flow from the tailrace of the hydropower plant in the so-called confluence area. Here the comparatively small and limited attraction flow from the old river channel must be improved in order to be able compete with the substantially larger main flow. The objective of the present study is to investigate the feasibility of a new concept for further improvement of the attraction flow using guiding walls forming a contraction channel. Field measurements were performed tracing tagged fish in the confluence area downstream of the case study hydropower plant in order to understand the movement pattern of the fish. Based on the results, and results from bathymetry measurements in the same area, a physical scale model was constructed where it was experimentally demonstrated that it is hydraulically feasible to construct guiding walls, forming a contraction, which accelerate the attraction flow and generate a concentrated turbulent jet with a higher velocity, while keeping the flow rate unchanged. The attraction flow penetrates about half-way (70 m) into the main flow and reaches the position where most fish are positioned according to fish position measurements and therefore potentially has a good ability to attract upstream migrating fish. There is no negative impact on the water level in the confluence area and thereby not on electricity production. It was shown that the results can be scaled up to prototype conditions and the strategy can presumably be generalized to similar flow situations, existing at other hydropower plants, allowing for improved upstream fish migration in coexistence with a sound hydropower production.
    VL  - 7
    IS  - 2
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Vattenfall AB, Research and Development, Laboratories, ?lvkarleby, Sweden

  • Vattenfall AB, Research and Development, Laboratories, ?lvkarleby, Sweden

  • Vattenfall AB, Research and Development, Laboratories, ?lvkarleby, Sweden

  • Vattenfall AB, Research and Development, Laboratories, ?lvkarleby, Sweden

  • Department of Wildlife, Fish and Environmental Studies, Umea, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden

  • Department of Wildlife, Fish and Environmental Studies, Umea, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden

  • Sections