| Peer-Reviewed

Pressure and Choking in Darts of College Athletes: The Interplay of Self-Enhancement

Received: 12 June 2023    Accepted: 27 June 2023    Published: 6 July 2023
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

The problem of diminished performance under stress, often referred to as 'choking under pressure,' is a significant issue in the realm of sports psychology, especially during high-stakes competitions. Researchers have thoroughly explored various factors contributing to this issue, yet the role of self-enhancement in sporting competition scenarios hasn't received the same level of scrutiny. Characterized by an individual's inclination to emphasize positive outcomes for self-esteem protection and setting lofty personal standards, self-enhancement is increasingly becoming a focal point in the study of choking. Our research draws from the self-focus theory and related studies, probing the mediating influence of self-enhancement on the relationship between high-pressure environments and choking tendencies. In our study, we used an experimental design based on dart-throwing as a representative model for sports performance under stress, aiming to elucidate the role of self-enhancement as a mediating variable in such settings. Involving fifty collegiate athletes, the study required participants to first complete a self-enhancement personality measure. They then engaged in dart-throwing tasks under two different conditions: one with low pressure and another with high pressure. Using statistical analysis tools SPSS 27.0 and Process 4.2, we discovered a link between high levels of self-enhancement, increased self-perceived cognitive pressure (β=.43, p<.01), and a higher chance of choking (β=.39, p<.01). The findings reveal that self-enhancement partially mediates the relationship between perceived pressure and performance, accounting for a variance of 30% in sports settings. It suggests that self-enhancement serves as a connecting factor between pressure perception and choking. These insights into self-enhancement tendencies provide valuable perspectives for designing future interventions to help mitigate choking. Such efforts could, in turn, potentially boost the competitiveness and longevity of collegiate athletes' performances.

Published in American Journal of Sports Science (Volume 11, Issue 3)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajss.20231103.11
Page(s) 59-67
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Pressure, Self-Enhancement, Choking, Mediating Effect

References
[1] Barger, B., Nabi, R., & Hong, L. Y. (2010). Standard back-translation procedures may not capture proper emotion concepts: A case study of Chinese disgust terms. Emotion, 10 (5), 703-711. doi: 10.1037/a0021453.
[2] Baumeister, R. F. (1984). Choking under pressure: self-consciousness and paradoxical effects of incentives on skillful performance. Journal of personality and social psychology, 46 (3), 610-620. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.46.3.610.
[3] Beer, J. S., Chester, D. S., & Hughes, B. L. (2013). Social threat and cognitive load magnify self-enhancement and attenuate self-deprecation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49 (4), 706-711. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp. 2013.02.017.
[4] Beilock, S. L., & Carr, T. H. (2001). On the fragility of skilled performance: what governs choking under pressure? Journal of experimental psychology. General, 130 (4), 701-725. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.130.4.701.
[5] Blanch, A., & Aluja, A. (2016). Text mining a self-report back-translation. Psychological Assessment, 28 (6), 750-764. doi: 10.1037/pas0000213.
[6] Case, F. M., Ford, J. B., Markowski, E., & Honeycutt, E. D. (2013). An Experimental Examination of Equivalence Failures in Multicultural Comparative Research. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 21 (1), 71-90. doi: 10.2753/MTP1069-6679210105.
[7] Colvin, C. R., Block, J., & Funder, D. C. (1995). Overly positive self-evaluations and personality: Negative implications for mental health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68 (6), 1152-1162. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.68.6.1152.
[8] Daou, M., Hutchison, Z., Bacelar, M., Rhoads, J. A., Lohse, K. R.,... Miller, M. W. (2019). Learning a skill with the expectation of teaching it impairs the skill’s execution under psychological pressure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 25 (2), 219-229. doi: 10.1037/xap0000191.
[9] Essl, A., & Jaussi, S. (2017). Choking under time pressure: The influence of deadline-dependent bonus and malus incentive schemes on performance. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 133, 127-137. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2016.11.001.
[10] Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39 (2), 175-191. doi: 10.3758/BF03193146.
[11] Gebauer, J. E., Sedikides, C., & Schrade, A. (2017). Christian self-enhancement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113 (5), 786-809. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000140.
[12] Gucciardi, D. F., Longbottom, J., Jackson, B., & Dimmock, J. A. (2010). Experienced Golfers' Perspectives on Choking Under Pressure. [Journal Article]. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 32 (1), 61-83. doi: 10.1123/jsep.32.1.61.
[13] Hart, W., Tortoriello, G. K., Richardson, K., & Breeden, C. J. (2020). Substantive vs. superficial self-enhancement: Differentiating narcissism constructs from self-esteem following failure. Personality and Individual Differences, 152, 109560. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2019.109560.
[14] Hayes, A. F. (2015). An Index and Test of Linear Moderated Mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50 (1), 1-22. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2014.962683.
[15] Hayes, A. F., & Rockwood, N. J. (2017). Regression-based statistical mediation and moderation analysis in clinical research: Observations, recommendations, and implementation. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 98, 39-57. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2016.11.001.
[16] Heck, P. R., & Krueger, J. I. (2016). Social Perception of Self-Enhancement Bias and Error. Social Psychology, 47 (6), 327-339. doi: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000287.
[17] Hepper, E. G., Gramzow, R. H., & Sedikides, C. (2010). Individual Differences in Self-Enhancement and Self-Protection Strategies: An Integrative Analysis. Journal of Personality, 78 (2), 781-814. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00633.x..
[18] Hepper, E. G., Sedikides, C., & Cai, H. (2012). Self-Enhancement and Self-Protection Strategies in China: Cultural Expressions of a Fundamental Human Motive. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44 (1), 5-23. doi: 10.1177/0022022111428515.
[19] Hill, D. M., Carvell, S., Matthews, N., Weston, N. J. V., & Thelwell, R. R. C. (2017). Exploring choking experiences in elite sport: The role of self-presentation. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 33, 141-149. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2017.09.001.
[20] Hill, D. M., Hanton, S., Matthews, N., & Fleming, S. (2010). Choking in sport: a review. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 3 (1), 24-39. doi: 10.1080/17509840903301199.
[21] Iwatsuki, T., Raalte, J. L. V., Brewer, B. W., Petitpas, A., & Takahashi, M. (2018). Relations Among Reinvestment, Self-Regulation, and Perception of Choking Under Pressure. Journal of Human Kinetics, 65 (1), 281-290. doi: 10.2478/hukin-2018-0042.
[22] Jin, W., Zhi, Q., Jinhua, L., Junmei, Z., Mengjie, W.,... Yi, S. (2018). Pressure and “Choking” Phenomenon: A Systematic Analysis Based on the Choking Process Theory. China Sport Science, 38 (12), 19-34. doi: 10.16469/j.css.201812003.
[23] Jinhua, L., Zhi, Q., Jin, W., Junmei, Z., Yi, S.,... Xiaoyu, M. (2021). Intermediary Effect Validation of Self-criticism Based on the Choking Experimental Paradigm. China Sport Science and Technology, 57 (03), 10-18. doi: 10.16470/j.csst.2020111.
[24] Lohse, K. R., Sherwood, D. E., & Healy, A. F. (2010). How changing the focus of attention affects performance, kinematics, and electromyography in dart throwing. Human Movement Science, 29 (4), 542-555. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2010.05.001.
[25] Lönnqvist, J., Paunonen, S., Nissinen, V., Ortju, K., & Verkasalo, M. (2011). Self-Enhancement in Military Leaders: Its Relevance to Officer Selection and Performance. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 60 (4), 670-695. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2011.00452.x.
[26] Masters, R. S. W. (1992). Knowledge, knerves and know-how: The role of explicit versus implicit knowledge in the breakdown of a complex motor skill under pressure. British Journal of Psychology, 83 (3), 343-358. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1992.tb02446.x.
[27] Merced, M. (2019). The psychodynamics of “choking” under performance pressure. Practice Innovations, 4 (1), 28-41. doi: 10.1037/pri0000080.
[28] Mesagno, C., Beckmann, J., Wergin, V. V., & Gröpel, P. (2019). Primed to perform: Comparing different pre-performance routine interventions to improve accuracy in closed, self-paced motor tasks. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 43, 73-81. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2019.01.001.
[29] Mesagno, C., Garvey, J., Tibbert, S. J., & Gropel, P. (2019). An Investigation Into Handedness and Choking Under Pressure in Sport. [Journal Article]. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 1-10. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2019.1588935.
[30] Mesagno, C., Harvey, J. T., & Janelle, C. M. (2012). Choking under Pressure and the Role of Fear of Negative Evaluation. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 13 (1), 60-68. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2011.07.007.
[31] Pulfrey, C., & Butera, F. (2013). Why Neoliberal Values of Self-Enhancement Lead to Cheating in Higher Education. Psychological Science, 24 (11), 2153-2162. doi: 10.1177/0956797613487221.
[32] Roberts, L. J., Jackson, M. S., & Grundy, I. H. (2019). Choking under pressure: Illuminating the role of distraction and self-focus. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 12 (1), 49-69. doi: 10.1080/1750984X.2017.1374432.
[33] Roberts, R., Cooke, A., Woodman, T., Hupfeld, H., Barwood, C.,... Manley, H. (2019). When the going gets tough, who gets going? An examination of the relationship between narcissism, effort, and performance. Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology, 8 (1), 93-105. doi: 10.1037/spy0000124.
[34] Sedikides, C., & Gregg, A. P. (2008). Self-Enhancement Food for Thought. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3 (2), 102-116. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00068.x.
[35] Takehiro, I., Raalte, J. L. V., Brewer, B. W., Petitpas, A., & Takahashi, M. (2018). Relations Among Reinvestment, Self-Regulation, and Perception of Choking Under Pressure. Journal of Human Kinetics, 65 (1), 281-290. doi: 10.2478/hukin-2018-0042.
[36] Teeselink, B. K., van Loon, R. J. D. P., van den Assem, M. J., & van Dolder, D. (2020). Incentives, performance and choking in darts. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 169, 38-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2019.10.026.
[37] Van Der Kam, N. A., Janssen, O., van der Vegt, G. S., & Stoker, J. I. (2014). The role of vertical conflict in the relationship between leader self-enhancement and leader performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 25 (2), 267-281. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.08.007.
[38] Wallace, H. M., & Baumeister, R. F. (2002). The performance of narcissists rises and falls with perceived opportunity for glory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82 (5), 819-834. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.82.5.819.
[39] Wang, J., Marchant, D., Morris, T., & Gibbs, P. (2004). Self-consciousness and trait anxiety as predictors of choking in sport. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 7 (2), 174-185. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1440-2440(04)80007-0
[40] Wang, J., Marchant, D., & Morris, T. (2004). Coping style and susceptibility to choking. Journal of sport behavior, 27 (1), 75. doi: https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/coping-style-susceptibility-choking/docview/215879328/se-2?accountid=15198
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Jinhua Liu, Zhicai Gao, Ya Zhou, Zhi Qiao, Sumaira Kayani. (2023). Pressure and Choking in Darts of College Athletes: The Interplay of Self-Enhancement. American Journal of Sports Science, 11(3), 59-67. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajss.20231103.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Jinhua Liu; Zhicai Gao; Ya Zhou; Zhi Qiao; Sumaira Kayani. Pressure and Choking in Darts of College Athletes: The Interplay of Self-Enhancement. Am. J. Sports Sci. 2023, 11(3), 59-67. doi: 10.11648/j.ajss.20231103.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Jinhua Liu, Zhicai Gao, Ya Zhou, Zhi Qiao, Sumaira Kayani. Pressure and Choking in Darts of College Athletes: The Interplay of Self-Enhancement. Am J Sports Sci. 2023;11(3):59-67. doi: 10.11648/j.ajss.20231103.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajss.20231103.11,
      author = {Jinhua Liu and Zhicai Gao and Ya Zhou and Zhi Qiao and Sumaira Kayani},
      title = {Pressure and Choking in Darts of College Athletes: The Interplay of Self-Enhancement},
      journal = {American Journal of Sports Science},
      volume = {11},
      number = {3},
      pages = {59-67},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajss.20231103.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajss.20231103.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajss.20231103.11},
      abstract = {The problem of diminished performance under stress, often referred to as 'choking under pressure,' is a significant issue in the realm of sports psychology, especially during high-stakes competitions. Researchers have thoroughly explored various factors contributing to this issue, yet the role of self-enhancement in sporting competition scenarios hasn't received the same level of scrutiny. Characterized by an individual's inclination to emphasize positive outcomes for self-esteem protection and setting lofty personal standards, self-enhancement is increasingly becoming a focal point in the study of choking. Our research draws from the self-focus theory and related studies, probing the mediating influence of self-enhancement on the relationship between high-pressure environments and choking tendencies. In our study, we used an experimental design based on dart-throwing as a representative model for sports performance under stress, aiming to elucidate the role of self-enhancement as a mediating variable in such settings. Involving fifty collegiate athletes, the study required participants to first complete a self-enhancement personality measure. They then engaged in dart-throwing tasks under two different conditions: one with low pressure and another with high pressure. Using statistical analysis tools SPSS 27.0 and Process 4.2, we discovered a link between high levels of self-enhancement, increased self-perceived cognitive pressure (β=.43, p<.01), and a higher chance of choking (β=.39, p<.01). The findings reveal that self-enhancement partially mediates the relationship between perceived pressure and performance, accounting for a variance of 30% in sports settings. It suggests that self-enhancement serves as a connecting factor between pressure perception and choking. These insights into self-enhancement tendencies provide valuable perspectives for designing future interventions to help mitigate choking. Such efforts could, in turn, potentially boost the competitiveness and longevity of collegiate athletes' performances.},
     year = {2023}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Pressure and Choking in Darts of College Athletes: The Interplay of Self-Enhancement
    AU  - Jinhua Liu
    AU  - Zhicai Gao
    AU  - Ya Zhou
    AU  - Zhi Qiao
    AU  - Sumaira Kayani
    Y1  - 2023/07/06
    PY  - 2023
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajss.20231103.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajss.20231103.11
    T2  - American Journal of Sports Science
    JF  - American Journal of Sports Science
    JO  - American Journal of Sports Science
    SP  - 59
    EP  - 67
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-8540
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajss.20231103.11
    AB  - The problem of diminished performance under stress, often referred to as 'choking under pressure,' is a significant issue in the realm of sports psychology, especially during high-stakes competitions. Researchers have thoroughly explored various factors contributing to this issue, yet the role of self-enhancement in sporting competition scenarios hasn't received the same level of scrutiny. Characterized by an individual's inclination to emphasize positive outcomes for self-esteem protection and setting lofty personal standards, self-enhancement is increasingly becoming a focal point in the study of choking. Our research draws from the self-focus theory and related studies, probing the mediating influence of self-enhancement on the relationship between high-pressure environments and choking tendencies. In our study, we used an experimental design based on dart-throwing as a representative model for sports performance under stress, aiming to elucidate the role of self-enhancement as a mediating variable in such settings. Involving fifty collegiate athletes, the study required participants to first complete a self-enhancement personality measure. They then engaged in dart-throwing tasks under two different conditions: one with low pressure and another with high pressure. Using statistical analysis tools SPSS 27.0 and Process 4.2, we discovered a link between high levels of self-enhancement, increased self-perceived cognitive pressure (β=.43, p<.01), and a higher chance of choking (β=.39, p<.01). The findings reveal that self-enhancement partially mediates the relationship between perceived pressure and performance, accounting for a variance of 30% in sports settings. It suggests that self-enhancement serves as a connecting factor between pressure perception and choking. These insights into self-enhancement tendencies provide valuable perspectives for designing future interventions to help mitigate choking. Such efforts could, in turn, potentially boost the competitiveness and longevity of collegiate athletes' performances.
    VL  - 11
    IS  - 3
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • School of Rehabilitation, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China

  • School of Electrical and Mechanical Engineering, Kunming Metallurgy College, Kunming, China

  • School of Rehabilitation, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China

  • School of Sports Science, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, China

  • Department of Education, Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi, Punjab, Pakistan

  • Sections