| Peer-Reviewed

Gas Hydrate Treatments in Pipeline Using Locally Sourced Material as Green Inhibitor

Received: 21 March 2023    Accepted: 14 April 2023    Published: 10 June 2023
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Hydrates had been a lengthy-standing issue in the oil and gas sector, causing significant flow assurance problem. It may form obstructions due to the decline in pressure and low temperature in oil and gas pipelines. Its impact can be felt in drilling risers, chokes, killing lines, and preventing blowouts. Hydrate plugging of the pipeline would cost approximately more than $1 million per day. In this work, the development of a local inhibitor for the treatment of hydrate formation in oil and gas pipeline under different conditions were studied using a mini hydrate flow loop. A biodegradable and water-soluble inhibitor (Caricaceae Plant Extract Kinetic Inhibitor, CPEKI) was developed from plant extract of caricaceae plant family that was sourced locally. This was done in order to reduce the cost of importing conventional inhibitors like that of Mono Ethylene Glycol (MEG) and Methanol (MEOH). The experiments were carried out with an initial loop pressure of 150 psi and temperature of 29ºC. Different weight concentration of CPEKI, MEG and MEOH were tested under varying conditions of temperature and pressure. The induction time for hydrate formation and inhibition at different conditions were also recorded. From the results analysis, it was observed that the CPEKI shows a very good inhibitory performance throughout the processes with an optimum concentration of 0.05wt% against MEG and MEOH inhibitors. Similarly, the relationship between pressure and temperature as a function of time also indicates that CPEKI performed very well compared to MEG and MEOH. Consequently, it is confirmed that CPEKI is eco-friendly and cheap and therefore suggested for field trials.

Published in American Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology (Volume 8, Issue 2)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajset.20230802.15
Page(s) 110-118
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Hydrate, Inhibitor, MEG, Flow, Gas, Material

References
[1] Amir H. Mohammadi, Dominique Richon, (2010). ‘‘Gas Hydrate phase Equilibrium in the presence of Ethylene Glycol or methanol aqueous solution Industrial & Engineering chemistry Research. Vol. 49, No. 18, pp. 8865-8869.
[2] A. Mohammadi, Manteghian (2014). ‘‘The induction time of Hydrate Formation from a carbon dioxide-Methane Gas Mixture; Petroleum Science and Technology. Vol. 32. No 24. Pp. 3029-3035.
[3] Bai, Y., Bai, Q., (2005) Subsea Pipelines and Risers, Second ed. Elsevier Science Ltd.
[4] Boyun Guo, Shanghon song, Jacob Chacko, Ali Ghalambor, (2005). Flow Assurance, Offshore pipelines, pp. 169-214.
[5] Bei Liu, Weixin Pang, BaoziPeng, Changyy Sun, GuangjinChe (2011). ‘‘Heat Transfer Related to Gas Hydrate Formation/Dissociation’’ Developments in Transfer.
[6] Camargo, R. and Palermo, T. (2002). Rheological Properties of Hydrate Suspensions in an Asphaltenic Crude Oil. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Gas Hydrates, May 19-23, 2002. Yokohama Symposia, Yokohama, Japan.
[7] Carroll, J. J (2009). Natural gas hydrates: a guide for engineers. Amsterdam, Elsevier XVII 276s.
[8] Chaudhari, P. N (2015), Department of Hydrate risk quantification in oil and gas production, Ph.D Dissertation, Colorado School of Mines.
[9] Deaton, W. M. and Frost, E. M. Gas Hydrates and their Relation to the Operation of Natural Gas Pipelines, U.S. Bureau of Mines Monograph, 1946, 8, 101.
[10] Dyke, V. K (1997). ‘‘Fundamentals of petroleum, Petroleum Extension Service, Austin, Texas.
[11] E. M Reyma, S. R. Stewart (2001),” Case History of the Reward of a Hydrate plug formed during deepwater Testing”. SPE/ADC Conference.
[12] Edmonds B., R. A. S. Moorwood& R. Szczepanski (2001); “Controlling, Remediation of Fluid Hydrates in Deepwater Drilling Operations”, Ultradeep Engineering Supplement to Offshore Magazine, March 2001, pp. 7-10.
[13] Elechi, V. U., Ikiensikimama, S. S., Ajienka, J. A., Akaranta, O., Onyekonwu, M. O., Odutola, T. O. and Okon, O. E. (2018): Gas Hydrate Inhibition in a Simulated Offshore Environment using Local Inhibitor. SPE Paper 193439 presented at Nigeria Annual International Conference and Exhibition, held in Lagos Nigeria.
[14] Freer, F. M and Sloan E. D (2000) Ann N. Y Acsd. Sci 912, pp 651-657.
[15] Fulong Ning, Ling Zhang, YunzhongTu, Guosheng Jiang, Maoyong Shi (20100. ‘‘Gas Hydrate Formation, agglomeration and inhibition in oil-based drilling fluids for deep-water drilling. Journal of Natural Gas Chemistry, vol. 19, No. 3. Pp. 234-240.
[16] Giavirini, C and Hester, K (2011). Gas Hydrate: Immense Energy Potential and Environmental Challenges, London: Springer London.
[17] Kelland, M. A. (2006): History of the Development of Low Dosage Hydrate inhibitors. Energy fuels, 20 (3), 825-847.
[18] Khan, M. S., Parloon, C. B., Lal, B., Mellon, N. B. (2017): “Influence of Tetramethylammonium Hydroxide on Methane and Carbon Dioxide Hydrate.” Phase Equilibrium Conditions. Fluid Phase Equilibra. Vol. 440, pp 1-8.
[19] Lederhos, J. P., Long J. P., Sum, A., Christiansen, R, and Solan Jr., E. D. (1996): “Effective Kinetic Hydrate Inhibitors for Natural Gas Hydrates”, Chemicla engineering science, Vol. 51, No. 8, pp. 1221-1229.
[20] Mogbolu, P. O. and Madu, J., 2014, August. Prediction of Onset of Gas Hydrate Formation in Offshore Operations. In SPE Nigeria Annual International Conference and Exhibition. Society of petroleum Engineers.
[21] Mujis, H. M, Beers, N. C, Van Om N. M, Kind, C. E and Anselme, M. J (1990): Pat. 2036, 084.
[22] Nwigbo, S. C., Okafor, V. N. and Okewale, A. O. (2012): “Comparative Study of ElaeisGuiniensis Exudates (Palm wine) as a Corrosion Inhibitor for Mild Steel in Acidic and Basic Solutions.” Research Journal of Applied Science, Engineering and Technology. Vol 4, No 9 pp 1035-1039. ISSN: 2040-7647.
[23] Nasheed, O., Sabil, K. M., Lal, B., Ismail, L and Jafaar, A. J. (2014): “Study of 1- (2-hydroxyethyl) 3-methy-limidazolium halide as Thermodynamic Inhibitors.” Applied Mechanics and Materials, Vol. 625, pp 337-340.
[24] Odutola, T. O., Ajienka, J. A., Onyekonwu, M. O. and Ikiensikimama, S. S. (2017): “Design, Fabrication and Validation of a Laboratory Flow Loop for Hydrate Studies.” American Journal of Chemical Engineering. Vol 5, No. 3-12, pp 28-41. doi: 10.11648/j.ajche.s.2017050301.14.
[25] O. Urdahl, A. Lund, P. Mark, T. N Nilsen (1995). Chemical Engineering Science. Vol. 50, pp 863-870.
[26] Peng B-Z, Sum C-Y, Liu P, Liu Y-T, Chen J. Chen G. J. (2009). Interfacial properties of methane (aqueous VC-713 Solution under hydrate formation condition. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 336 (2): 738-42.
[27] Reijnhout, M. J, Kind. C. E, Klomp, U. C (1993): Eur. Pat. 526,929. Sami. N. A, Sangwai, J. S & Balasubramanian. N. (2013). Gas hydrate applications and problems in oil and gas industry. International Journal of scientific & Engineering Research. 4, pp. 1-4.
[28] Sloan, E. D and Koh C. A., (2008). ‘‘Clathrate Hydrates of Natural Gases, Tgird edition CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group. Boca Raton, Florida, USA pp. 319-341.
[29] Singh, P., Venkatesan, R., Folger, H. S and Nagarajan, N., (2000). Formation and aging incipient thin film Wax- oil Gels AIChE Journal. 46 (5), pp 1059-1074.
[30] Sum, A. K., (2013) October. Prevention management, and remediation approaches for gas hydrates in the flow assurance of oil/gas flowlines. In OTC Brasil. Offshore Technology Conference.
[31] Talaghat, M. R. Enhancement of the Performance of Modified Starch as a Kinetic Hydrate Inhibitor in the Presence of Polyoxides for Simple Gas Hydrate Formation in a Flow Mini-Loop Apparatus. J. Nat. Sci. and Eng., 2014, 18, 7-12.
[32] Turner, D. J., Mahadevan, G., Lachance, J., (2015) Hydrate stable start-up and restart of oil and gas production systems, article presented at the 25th International.
[33] Urdahl O; Lund, A; Mork. P and Nilsen, T. N (1995): Inhibition of Gas Hydrate Formation by Means of Chemical Additives. Development of an experimental set-up for Characterization of Gas Hydrate Inhibitor Efficiency with Respect with Respect to Flow Properties and Deposition. Chem Eng Sci. 50 (5), 863-870.
[34] Wu, M. Wang S, Liu H. (2007). A study on inhibitors for the prevention of Hydrate Formation in Gas Transmission pipeline. Journal of Natural Gas Chemistry. 16 (1): 81-85.
[35] Xiaoyong FU, Chou-Hong Tann, T. K, Thiruvengadam, Jurning Lee, Cesar colon (2001). “A regioselective PCL5 Mediated dehydration for preparing 9, 11 corticosteroids” Tetrahedrum Letters, Vol 42, No. 14, pp2639-2642.
[36] Lee, W.; Kim, K.-S.; Kang, S.-P.; Kim, J.-N. Synergetic Performance of the Mixture of Poly(N-vinylcaprolactam) and a Pyrrolidinium-Based Ionic Liquid for Kinetic Hydrate Inhibition in the Presence of the Mineral Oil Phase. Energy Fuels 2018, 32, 4932–4941.
[37] Zheng, Z (2010) “Molecular Dynamics Simulations on Inhibition of Methane Hydrates” Master of Science. IOWA State University.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Ikeh Lesor, Onyeso Jackson Alozie. (2023). Gas Hydrate Treatments in Pipeline Using Locally Sourced Material as Green Inhibitor. American Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology, 8(2), 110-118. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajset.20230802.15

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Ikeh Lesor; Onyeso Jackson Alozie. Gas Hydrate Treatments in Pipeline Using Locally Sourced Material as Green Inhibitor. Am. J. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2023, 8(2), 110-118. doi: 10.11648/j.ajset.20230802.15

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Ikeh Lesor, Onyeso Jackson Alozie. Gas Hydrate Treatments in Pipeline Using Locally Sourced Material as Green Inhibitor. Am J Sci Eng Technol. 2023;8(2):110-118. doi: 10.11648/j.ajset.20230802.15

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajset.20230802.15,
      author = {Ikeh Lesor and Onyeso Jackson Alozie},
      title = {Gas Hydrate Treatments in Pipeline Using Locally Sourced Material as Green Inhibitor},
      journal = {American Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology},
      volume = {8},
      number = {2},
      pages = {110-118},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajset.20230802.15},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajset.20230802.15},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajset.20230802.15},
      abstract = {Hydrates had been a lengthy-standing issue in the oil and gas sector, causing significant flow assurance problem. It may form obstructions due to the decline in pressure and low temperature in oil and gas pipelines. Its impact can be felt in drilling risers, chokes, killing lines, and preventing blowouts. Hydrate plugging of the pipeline would cost approximately more than $1 million per day. In this work, the development of a local inhibitor for the treatment of hydrate formation in oil and gas pipeline under different conditions were studied using a mini hydrate flow loop. A biodegradable and water-soluble inhibitor (Caricaceae Plant Extract Kinetic Inhibitor, CPEKI) was developed from plant extract of caricaceae plant family that was sourced locally. This was done in order to reduce the cost of importing conventional inhibitors like that of Mono Ethylene Glycol (MEG) and Methanol (MEOH). The experiments were carried out with an initial loop pressure of 150 psi and temperature of 29ºC. Different weight concentration of CPEKI, MEG and MEOH were tested under varying conditions of temperature and pressure. The induction time for hydrate formation and inhibition at different conditions were also recorded. From the results analysis, it was observed that the CPEKI shows a very good inhibitory performance throughout the processes with an optimum concentration of 0.05wt% against MEG and MEOH inhibitors. Similarly, the relationship between pressure and temperature as a function of time also indicates that CPEKI performed very well compared to MEG and MEOH. Consequently, it is confirmed that CPEKI is eco-friendly and cheap and therefore suggested for field trials.},
     year = {2023}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Gas Hydrate Treatments in Pipeline Using Locally Sourced Material as Green Inhibitor
    AU  - Ikeh Lesor
    AU  - Onyeso Jackson Alozie
    Y1  - 2023/06/10
    PY  - 2023
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajset.20230802.15
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajset.20230802.15
    T2  - American Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology
    JF  - American Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology
    JO  - American Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology
    SP  - 110
    EP  - 118
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2578-8353
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajset.20230802.15
    AB  - Hydrates had been a lengthy-standing issue in the oil and gas sector, causing significant flow assurance problem. It may form obstructions due to the decline in pressure and low temperature in oil and gas pipelines. Its impact can be felt in drilling risers, chokes, killing lines, and preventing blowouts. Hydrate plugging of the pipeline would cost approximately more than $1 million per day. In this work, the development of a local inhibitor for the treatment of hydrate formation in oil and gas pipeline under different conditions were studied using a mini hydrate flow loop. A biodegradable and water-soluble inhibitor (Caricaceae Plant Extract Kinetic Inhibitor, CPEKI) was developed from plant extract of caricaceae plant family that was sourced locally. This was done in order to reduce the cost of importing conventional inhibitors like that of Mono Ethylene Glycol (MEG) and Methanol (MEOH). The experiments were carried out with an initial loop pressure of 150 psi and temperature of 29ºC. Different weight concentration of CPEKI, MEG and MEOH were tested under varying conditions of temperature and pressure. The induction time for hydrate formation and inhibition at different conditions were also recorded. From the results analysis, it was observed that the CPEKI shows a very good inhibitory performance throughout the processes with an optimum concentration of 0.05wt% against MEG and MEOH inhibitors. Similarly, the relationship between pressure and temperature as a function of time also indicates that CPEKI performed very well compared to MEG and MEOH. Consequently, it is confirmed that CPEKI is eco-friendly and cheap and therefore suggested for field trials.
    VL  - 8
    IS  - 2
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Petroleum and Gas Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Port Harcourt, Port Harcourt, Nigeria

  • Department of Petroleum and Gas Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Port Harcourt, Port Harcourt, Nigeria

  • Sections