This work aims to study the performance of standard fixed photovoltaic (PV) solar systems and compare it to single axis tracking photovoltaic solar system. The study has two parts: experimental part and simulation part. In the experimental analysis, two identical mounting grid connected PV systems 125kWp with same PV modules and inverters are installed under Jordan climate condition for ten months start from April to January. The PV panels are installed using either fixed mount with tilt angle 25 degree and single axis manual tracking (North - South tracking system). The measured data for these different mounting cases of PV system are analyzed and compared together. The data has been collected using data loggers every fifteen minutes, recorded then analyzed. The experimental result showed that the output power injected into grid increased in total by approximately 9.69% as compared with the fixed system of 25̊ tilted angle. Both Fixed and tracking PV systems are applied into PVSYS simulation tool to investigate the performance using solar radiation data for Amman, Jordan. the simulation tool showed that the power gained from single axis tracking system increased by 12.83%. The simulation results are compared with measured data which is approximately close to the result from experimental study. The percentage of difference between experimental output power and simulation result is very small, it doesn't exceed 0.440% using single axis tracking system. While the difference in fixed system is bigger, it is approximately 4.00%.
| Published in | American Journal of Energy Engineering (Volume 10, Issue 3) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ajee.20221003.13 |
| Page(s) | 75-84 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Photovoltaic System (PV), Solar Tracker, Tilted Sun Tracker, Manual Single-Axis Sun Tracker
| [1] | Zerlaut G. A and Heiskell R. F (1977), Solar tracking device, US Patent, 4031385A, https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/0a/9d/0e/9a4a95efb72fb4/US4031385.pdf |
| [2] | Richard C. Neville (1978), Solar energy collector orientation and tracking mode, Solar Energy, 20, 7-11, https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-092X(78)90134-2 |
| [3] | Rizk J. and Chaiko Y. (2008), Solar tracking system: More efficient use of solar panels, World acid. OfSci. And Techno, 2 (5), 784-786, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1075038 |
| [4] | Musyafa, Ali & Soeprijanto, Adi & Abadi, Imam. (2014). Design of single axis solar tracking system at photovoltaic panel using fuzzy logic controller, engineering and technology, 2.04 (6.). 10.1049/cp.2014.1086, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/300489864 |
| [5] | A. Z. Hafez, J. H. Shazly, M. B. Eteiba (2015), Comparative evaluation of optimal energy efficiency designs for solar tracking systems, Proc. Of the third intl.cnf. on advances in applied science and environmental engineering, 134-141, https://www.academia.edu/12011004 |
| [6] | Battu Deepa, M. Hemalatha, Solar Energy tracking system using At89s52 microcontroller and L293d motor driver circuit, IJSCE, 5, 2231-2307, https://www.ijsce.org/portfolio-item/C2673075315/ |
| [7] | Murat Kacira, Mehmet Simsekb, Yunus Baburc, Sedat Demirkolc (2004), Determing optimum tilt angle and orientations of photovoltaic panels in Sanliurfa, Turkey, Renewable Energy, 29, 1265-1275, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2003.12.014 |
| [8] | Salah Abdallah and Salem Nihimeh (2004), Two axes sun tracking system with PLC control, Energy Conversion and Management, 45, 1931-1939, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2003.10.007 |
| [9] | Cemil Sunger (2009), Multi-axes sun-tracking system with PLC control for photovoltaic panels in Turkey, Renewable Energy, 34, 1119- 1125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2008.06.020 |
| [10] | Zhimin Li, Xinyue Liu, Runsheng Tan, (2010), Optical performance of inclined south-north single-axis tracked solar panels, Energy, 35, 2511- 2516, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.02.050 |
| [11] | William David Lubitz (2011), Effect of manual tilt adjustments on incident irradiance on fixed and tracking solar panels, Applied Energy, 88, 1710-1719, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.11.008 |
| [12] | Rustu Eke and Ali Senturk (2012), Performance comparison of a double-axis sun tracking versus fixed PV system, Solar Energy, 86, 2665-2672, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2012.06.006 |
| [13] | John Kaldellis and Dimitrios zafirakis (2012), Experimental investigation of the optimum photovoltaic panels’ tilt angle during the summer period unit of photovoltaic systems, Energy, 38, 305- 314, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.11.058 |
| [14] | George Cristian Lazaroiu, Michela Longo, Mariacristina Roscia, Mario Pagano (2014), Comparative analysis of fixed and sun tracking low power PV systems considering energy consumption, Energy Conversion and Management, 92, 143-148, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.12.046 |
| [15] | Saban Yilmaz, Hasan Riza Ozcalik, Osman Dogmus, Furkan Dincer, Muharrem Karaaslad (2015), Design of two axses sun tracking controller with analytically solar radiation calculations, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 43, 997- 1005, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.11.090 |
| [16] | Naseer Ahmad, Anwar K. Sheikh, P. Gandhidasan, Moustafa Elshafie (2015), Modeling, simulation and performance evaluation of a community scale PVRO water desalination system operated by fixed and tracking PV panels: A case study for Dhahran city, Saudi Arabia, Renewable Energy, 75, 433- 447, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.10.023 |
| [17] | Guillermo Quesada, Laura Guillon, Daniel R. Rousse, Mosafa Mehrtash, Yvan Duti, Pierre-Luc Paradis (2015), Tracking strategy for photovoltaic solar systems in high latitudes, Energy Conversion and Management, 103, 147- 156, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2015.06.041 |
| [18] | Hassan Fathabadi (2016), Novel high accurate sensorless dual-axis solar tracking system controlled by maximum power point tracking unit of photovoltaic systems, Applied Energy, 173, 448- 459, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.03.109 |
| [19] | www.Solidsolar.com. |
| [20] | www.SMAsunnyportsl.com. |
| [21] | www.Suntech.com. |
| [22] | www.Renac.com. |
| [23] | www.aeicable.co.uk. |
APA Style
Layali Mohammad Abu Hussein, Mohammad Fathi Musa. (2022). Performance Comparison of Manual Single Axis Sun-Tracking Photovoltaic (PV) with Fixed System PV Panels in Jordan. American Journal of Energy Engineering, 10(3), 75-84. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajee.20221003.13
ACS Style
Layali Mohammad Abu Hussein; Mohammad Fathi Musa. Performance Comparison of Manual Single Axis Sun-Tracking Photovoltaic (PV) with Fixed System PV Panels in Jordan. Am. J. Energy Eng. 2022, 10(3), 75-84. doi: 10.11648/j.ajee.20221003.13
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ajee.20221003.13,
author = {Layali Mohammad Abu Hussein and Mohammad Fathi Musa},
title = {Performance Comparison of Manual Single Axis Sun-Tracking Photovoltaic (PV) with Fixed System PV Panels in Jordan},
journal = {American Journal of Energy Engineering},
volume = {10},
number = {3},
pages = {75-84},
doi = {10.11648/j.ajee.20221003.13},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajee.20221003.13},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajee.20221003.13},
abstract = {This work aims to study the performance of standard fixed photovoltaic (PV) solar systems and compare it to single axis tracking photovoltaic solar system. The study has two parts: experimental part and simulation part. In the experimental analysis, two identical mounting grid connected PV systems 125kWp with same PV modules and inverters are installed under Jordan climate condition for ten months start from April to January. The PV panels are installed using either fixed mount with tilt angle 25 degree and single axis manual tracking (North - South tracking system). The measured data for these different mounting cases of PV system are analyzed and compared together. The data has been collected using data loggers every fifteen minutes, recorded then analyzed. The experimental result showed that the output power injected into grid increased in total by approximately 9.69% as compared with the fixed system of 25̊ tilted angle. Both Fixed and tracking PV systems are applied into PVSYS simulation tool to investigate the performance using solar radiation data for Amman, Jordan. the simulation tool showed that the power gained from single axis tracking system increased by 12.83%. The simulation results are compared with measured data which is approximately close to the result from experimental study. The percentage of difference between experimental output power and simulation result is very small, it doesn't exceed 0.440% using single axis tracking system. While the difference in fixed system is bigger, it is approximately 4.00%.},
year = {2022}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Performance Comparison of Manual Single Axis Sun-Tracking Photovoltaic (PV) with Fixed System PV Panels in Jordan AU - Layali Mohammad Abu Hussein AU - Mohammad Fathi Musa Y1 - 2022/09/21 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajee.20221003.13 DO - 10.11648/j.ajee.20221003.13 T2 - American Journal of Energy Engineering JF - American Journal of Energy Engineering JO - American Journal of Energy Engineering SP - 75 EP - 84 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2329-163X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajee.20221003.13 AB - This work aims to study the performance of standard fixed photovoltaic (PV) solar systems and compare it to single axis tracking photovoltaic solar system. The study has two parts: experimental part and simulation part. In the experimental analysis, two identical mounting grid connected PV systems 125kWp with same PV modules and inverters are installed under Jordan climate condition for ten months start from April to January. The PV panels are installed using either fixed mount with tilt angle 25 degree and single axis manual tracking (North - South tracking system). The measured data for these different mounting cases of PV system are analyzed and compared together. The data has been collected using data loggers every fifteen minutes, recorded then analyzed. The experimental result showed that the output power injected into grid increased in total by approximately 9.69% as compared with the fixed system of 25̊ tilted angle. Both Fixed and tracking PV systems are applied into PVSYS simulation tool to investigate the performance using solar radiation data for Amman, Jordan. the simulation tool showed that the power gained from single axis tracking system increased by 12.83%. The simulation results are compared with measured data which is approximately close to the result from experimental study. The percentage of difference between experimental output power and simulation result is very small, it doesn't exceed 0.440% using single axis tracking system. While the difference in fixed system is bigger, it is approximately 4.00%. VL - 10 IS - 3 ER -
Information
Email: